E-government is now a major issue in information systems as witnessed in the ISJ special issue of January 2005 (Carter & Bélanger, 2005; Irani et al., 2005; Mahrer & Krimmer, 2005; Moon & Norris, 2005). The paper of Gary Pan, Shan Pan, Michael Newman and Donal Flynn in this first issue of 2006 adds to the debate. Yet it looks at an issue in this context that has bedevilled information systems projects for many years. It concerns the commitment of the actors when the project seems to be failing and changing direction to a more positive course. Using Lewin’s change theory, the authors look at a case study of electronic government in a local UK metropolitan borough council where the project was out of control originally but was turned around to be a successful project. The commitment transformation framework produced by the authors offers several important implications for researchers and practitioners. Lynette Kvasny and Mark Keil also address an important topic: the digital divide. Their paper examines efforts undertaken by two cities, and thus it is also relevant to the theme of e-government. It compares and contrasts two different publicly funded experiments aimed at enabling communities with low levels of internet access to increase access levels. The experiments were different but led to similar consequences. The research was designed to answer two questions: (1) How have the target populations and service providers reacted to the two initiatives? (2) Why have these initiatives been less successful than expected? It examines these questions using the theoretical lens of Bordieu. The paper provides some useful insights and certainly contradicts the pervasive hype that information technology will bring salvation to every one. The paper of David Arnott presents design science research to describe an investigation into the decision biases and debiasing strategies, and their importance for decision support systems (DSS) development. A taxonomy of 37 cognitive biases that codifies a complex area of psychological research is developed. The core of the project described in the paper involves the construction of a design artefact – an evolutionary DSS development methodology that uses cognitive bias theory as a focusing construct. The feasibility and effectiveness of the development methodology is evaluated in a participatory case study of a strategic DSS project where a managing director is supported in a decision about whether to close a division of a company. The findings indicate that the use of biases as a central theme in developing DSS has positive effects on delivering a system and decision outcomes, and provides positive value to clients. Our final paper, by Redouane El Amrani, Frantz Rowe and Bénédicte Geffroy-Maronnat, tests and analyses the impact of the number of modules, change type, existence of a vision statement and business process re-engineering on the organization’s perception of cross-functionality. The hypotheses were tested by surveying 100 French companies, 55 small and medium-sized enterprises, and 45 large companies, and then conducting a statistical analysis on both the quantitative and the qualitative data collected. The paper concludes that functional coverage (i.e. the scope of the enterprise resource planning modules implemented) and a managerial organizational vision are particularly significant in the emergence of a cross-functional perspective.
Read full abstract