STUDIES IN THE AGE OF CHAUCER Cindy L. Vitto and Marcia Smith Marzec, eds. New Perspectives on Criseyde. Asheville, N.C.: Pegasus Press, 2004. Pp. 336. $17.95, paper. The essays in this generally worthwhile collection make one thing clear: the poem that Chaucer refers to in his Retractions as ‘‘the book of Troilus ’’ has evolved, over its long critical history, into something more like ‘‘the book of Criseyde.’’ One has to wonder, in fact, whether a volume devoted to the comparatively static Troilus could ever invite the broad range of topics found here: everything from gendered reading practices, to manuscript studies, to exemplarity, to aesthetics, to codependency. It must be said, however, that the title of the collection, New Perspectives on Criseyde, is a bit misleading, or perhaps just overly optimistic. For whatever their other virtues, none of the perspectives adopted here strikes me as being particularly new. Some, indeed, are going on fifteen, twenty, or even thirty years old, and the wear, I am sorry to report, is starting to show. For this reason, New Perspectives on Criseyde will probably appeal more to those looking for a handy compilation of wellestablished critical positions than to anyone searching for the next leap forward in Chaucer studies. The anthology’s first section, ‘‘Historical Contexts for Understanding Criseyde,’’ starts off with an overview of twentieth-century interpretations of Criseyde by Lorraine Kochanske Stock, who deftly traces Criseyde ’s critical journey from a woman whose ‘‘slydynge . . . corage’’ must be either attacked or defended, to a symbol of idolatry, to a ‘‘charming enigma,’’ to a feminine subject shaped by, or struggling against, cultural and historical forces largely beyond her control. Stock’s account leaves little doubt that Criseyde is as much a product of criticism as of Chaucer’s text, and it does an excellent job of teasing out the genealogies from which most of these essays descend. Its comprehensiveness is rendered somewhat ironic, however, by the fact that two readings in particular, David Aers’s ‘‘Chaucer’s Criseyde: Woman in Society , Woman in Love’’ and Carolyn Dinshaw’s ‘‘Reading Like a Man: The Critics, the Narrator, Troilus, and Pandarus,’’ cast shadows across these pages so long and imposing that they threaten to blot out new growth. The two essays that round out this first section, Laura F. Hodges ’s ‘‘Criseyde’s ‘widewes habit large of samyt broun’ in Troilus and Criseyde’’ and Kathryn Jacobs’s ‘‘Mate or Mother: Positioning Criseyde Among Chaucer’s Widows,’’ are each as helpful and informative, in PAGE 340 340 ................. 16094$ CH17 11-01-10 14:05:26 PS REVIEWS their own way, as Stock’s. Neither one, though, does much to dispel the impression that this kind of historical ‘‘contextualizing’’ is but another means, to paraphrase Dinshaw, of containing the desire that Criseyde embodies. The three essays gathered together under the rubric ‘‘Concerns of Gender and Power’’ are linked by what the editors describe as a shared interest in ‘‘concepts of reading and/or writing, both internal and external to the text itself’’ (p. 5). Kara A. Doyle’s argument in ‘‘Criseyde Reading, Reading Criseyde,’’ for example, is that Chaucer tries to coerce even his female readers into identifying with Troilus and objectifying Criseyde. From as early as the sixteenth century, however, Chaucer’s female readers have been resisting his efforts. Indeed, as Doyle shows through the example of a letter written (presumably) by Margaret More Roper, the eldest daughter of Sir Thomas More, they have been identifying with Criseyde as a figure not of victimization or betrayal but of agency. Doyle’s essay is subtle and multifaceted, repeatedly calling our attention to the fact that readers have the power to make and unmake the meanings of texts and that a character like Criseyde can assume something like an independent existence. Missing, though, is any consideration of the Palinode, where the reader is enjoined to identify neither with Troilus nor Criseyde, but with Christ. Identification is likewise at stake in Martha Dana Rust’s ‘‘‘Le Vostre C’: Letters and Love in Bodleian Library Manuscript Arch. Selden. B.24,’’ only this time it is Criseyde’s forced identification with the material properties of one particular witness to Chaucer...
Read full abstract