MLR, 10I.4, 2oo6 I079 La Femme chez Heinrich Heine et Charles Baudelaire: le langage moderne de l'amour. By SOPHIE BOYER. (Allemagne d'hier et d'aujourd'hui) Paris: L'Harmattan. 2004. xi+322pp. ?29. ISBN 2-7475-7822-4. Comparisons of Heine and Baudelaire are not entirely new terrain: the first to iden tify parallels between the two poets was Baudelaire himself, in an unfinished draft letter to Jules Janin in the I86os, defending Heine against the critic's denunciation and aligning himself with Heine's aesthetic, characterized in Baudelaire's eyes by sadness, irony, dissonance, pain, a longing for death, and a sense of decadence. Sub sequent commentators, including Walter Benjamin, Kurt Weinberg, Oliver Boeck, Gert Sautermeister, and Dolf Oehler, have also established comparisons between the two. Sophie Boyer acknowledges and evaluates these contributions, crediting Oehler in particular with revealing the political and historical underpinnings of the anti bourgeois aesthetic shared by Heine and Baudelaire among others. Boyer's study is, however, the first to compare in detail the representations of women, and in particular of the female body, in their poetry and other writings. Her main objective is not to establish or explore the influence of the German poet on his French counterpart, although she does suggest that Baudelaire's 'discours amoureux' originates inHeine; nor is it to reduce their representations of women to themisogyny undoubtedly pre sent in them. Rather, it is to analyse their perspectives to see what they can reveal about contemporary masculine attitudes in all their complexity. The extent towhich these texts can be deemed representative of contemporary attitudes is not made clear, if indeed it ever could be, but Boyer succeeds in identifying in both poets an ideal of beauty associated with melancholy and a discourse on love characteristic of the aesthetic of modernity, inwhich the subject's encounter with the other ismarked by a sense of dissonance rather than harmony. The author is persuasive when engaging directly with the texts and when confronting Heine and Baudelaire. Less well inte grated are the occasional unnecessarily lengthy discussions of thewritings of-among others-Octavio Paz, Sigmund Freud, Jean Baudrillard, and Benjamin, which tend to divert attention from the task at hand (perhaps most strikingly at the very beginning of the avant-propos, where a two-page discussion of Paz's The Double Flame precedes any clarification of its relevance to either Heine or Baudelaire). When eventually the author returns to the poets, the point of her excursions usually becomes clear, al though some readers might prefer concision and more signposting, especially in the case of the occasional sudden shift from, say, apsychoanalytical mode to socio-political questions. There are chapters on Baudelaire's comments on Heine; on the themes of melancholy and pain; on images of the prostitute and the metropolis; on the connec tions established between women, death, and illness; and on woman as sphinx and woman as statue. They lead to a final chapter inwhich the representation of women in relation to revolutionary politics isbrought to the fore. The author's description of this closing chapter as being 'en guise de conclusion' is symptomatic of what might be seen as a lack of overall coherence in the work: individually, Boyer's points are often illuminating, but they represent a varied series of insights into the complex ways in which the two poets represented women rather than elements of a sustained and cohe sive argument. Boyer's is a significant contribution to the comparative study of Heine and Baudelaire; however, there remains significant scope for further work, notably from the feminist critical perspectives sometimes rather summarily dismissed here. UNIVERSITYOFLEEDS PAULROWE ...