In reflecting on the dilemmas of globalization, Nicholas Burbules and Carlos Torres ask, “is globalization merely deleterious, or are there positive features associated with its practices and dynamics?” This is certainly a difficult question; globalization is very complex and complicated and there is little consensus on its contours, dimensions, and impact. Among educators, it is largely unexplored. Most of my students and colleagues have little idea about the meaning of globalization, and critical conversations about it are conspicuously absent in prevailing educational reform proposals. Similarly, while some educational philosophers have been writing about globalization, it has not significantly affected how we think about our larger purposes or our field of study. Yet globalization has many negative consequences that ought to trouble us, and even make us rethink our passions and priorities. For example, it is not hard to show that the unfettered expansion of freemarket capitalism, a defining feature of globalization, has made the suffering and social injustice in our world markedly worse. We see growing gaps between the wealthy and the poor, loss of job security, exploitation of workers, privatization of public goods and services, environmental destruction, diminishment of biodiversity, disruption of indigenous cultures, loss of community, increased global homogenization, and ultimately, the almost complete subordination of the developing world to the needs and desires of transnational corporations.