Event Abstract Back to Event EEG alpha oscillations predict response criterion Katharina Limbach1, 2* and Paul M. Corballis1, 2 1 The University of Auckland, School of Psychology, New Zealand 2 Centre for Brain Research, New Zealand i. Background: Detection of near-threshold stimuli is highly variable. Several recent studies have linked variability in performance to fluctuations in the peristimulus alpha power (~ 10 Hz) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG). Typically, these studies rely on hit-rate as the dependent variable and claim that detection is more likely for stimuli presented during intervals of low posterior alpha-power. However, hit rates are determined by both sensitivity to the stimulus and response criterion. We investigated the relationships between fluctuations in alpha power and variability in these two parameters. ii.Methods: We recorded EEG during a backward-masking task requiring the detection of near-threshold stimuli in 19 participants. Single trials were sorted into high and low power bins, based on alpha power (8 – 12 Hz) in the 200ms before stimulus presentation. We compared hit rate, sensitivity and criterion between the bins. iii. Results: Our data confirm earlier reports of a relationship between alpha-power in the interval directly preceding stimulus presentation and hit rate. However, our results show that this relationship is most likely due to a shift in criterion. We found that alpha power preceding stimulus presentation is related to criterion placement but not to sensitivity. Higher power was related to more conservative criteria (i.e., a preponderance of “no” responses), and lower power related to more balanced criteria. Results of a follow-up experiment suggest that this relationship to response criteria relies on the immediate responses. When we tried to manipulate response criterion by asking people to rate the detectability of the stimulus on a 6-point scale, we no longer observed a relationship between alpha power and criterion placement. iv. Discussion: These findings hint at a more complex relationship between alpha power and detection performance than suggested by earlier reports. Alpha power is often understood as an index of cortical excitability. In the excited state indexed by low alpha power the visual system might accept stimuli as present more willingly than in less excited states. A stricter criterion for high-alpha states might be protective against false positives when the system is relatively disengaged from the world. Interestingly this relationship might only hold for immediate responses, suggesting that the role of alpha in visual processing is more about making the response than about sensitivity or cognitive processing. Acknowledgements Katharina Limbach is supported by a University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship Keywords: detection, Response Criterion, Alpha oscillations, EEG, cortical excitability Conference: ACNS-2013 Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society Conference, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia, 28 Nov - 1 Dec, 2013. Presentation Type: Poster Topic: Sensation and Perception Citation: Limbach K and Corballis PM (2013). EEG alpha oscillations predict response criterion. Conference Abstract: ACNS-2013 Australasian Cognitive Neuroscience Society Conference. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2013.212.00068 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 15 Oct 2013; Published Online: 25 Nov 2013. * Correspondence: Mrs. Katharina Limbach, The University of Auckland, School of Psychology, Auckland, New Zealand, klim366@aucklanduni.ac.nz Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Katharina Limbach Paul M Corballis Google Katharina Limbach Paul M Corballis Google Scholar Katharina Limbach Paul M Corballis PubMed Katharina Limbach Paul M Corballis Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract