The author presents a criminological view of conspirology - the area of knowledge that analyzes phenomena connected with conspiracy, secret, undercover, hidden activities. From the criminological perspective, there are several dimensions to conspirology, each of which requires an independent analysis and methodological approach. The first one is traditional and relates to complicity or criminal conspiracy. The author shows the limited character of the Russian doctrine of participation in counteracting organized crime and objects against tabooing the topic of criminal conspiracy among the representatives of the legit bodies of power and governance. The second dimension describes the conspiracy of criminal activities, professional criminal management defined as the management of: 1) a criminal organization; 2) persons involved in criminal activities by criminal communities and their leaders; 3) convicted inmates. This leads to the concept of criminal bosses as persons involved in criminal management. The third dimension is connected with the interaction and cooperation between the representatives of official and criminal powers. The problem of corruption is especially relevant here. The fourth dimension relates to the criminalization of public relations of different types and levels, or the sliding of public governance into the quagmire of criminality, which, in its final form, leads to the emergence of a criminal state. The fifth dimension, most actively discussed at present, is the criminal plans of globalists, this deep subject of the world politics. Global conspirologists live in a surreal world of their own making, they signify negative social dynamics - backward movement to the past, to the «dark ages» of paganism. They are characterized by a criminal mentality. In the conditions when simulacra are piling up in the information space, each thinking individual is forced to decide whose side to pick: either that of the adepts of global conspiracy projects or of their opponents. The author suggests using the criminological criterion as one of the foundations for making this decision and determining how criminal the implemented projects are and how criminogenic are their consequences.
Read full abstract