The general objective of this work was: To determine if it is possible to commit the crime of kidnapping in the actions of the powers of the peasant patrols in Peru. For our research, the methods are: descriptive level; in which we have measured and described the characteristics of facts and phenomena; The result is that 63.7% (58) of judges and prosecutors state that sometimes the peasant patrols correctly apply the procedures in the resolution of legal conflicts. Likewise, 63.7% (58) state that the peasant patrols can almost always exercise jurisdictional functions within their territorial scope. Regarding the conclusions: it is shown that judges and prosecutors in 63.7% of 58 respondents sometimes express the peasant patrols correctly apply the procedures in the resolution of legal conflicts, 27.2% (24) almost always state and 9.1% (8) state that the peasant patrols almost never correctly apply the procedures in the resolution of legal conflicts. Other main conclusions are that 72.8% (66) of judges and prosecutors state that they almost always know the origin and powers of the peasant patrols, 18.1% (16) always know and 9.1% (8) almost never. They know the origin and powers of the peasant patrols.