To understand the creep behavior of a practical alloy that has a multiphase consisting of a matrix and several types of precipitate phases, the role of individual phases needs to be studied. However, it is difficult to elucidate the contribution of each phase to creep owing to their complex microstructural morphologies and very complex creep behavior. To understand the role of individual phases and the creep behavior, fundamental creep theories for ductile dual-phase (DDP) alloys must be established initially for specimens with simple microstructural morphologies. To apply these theories practically, they must also be experimentally verified. In this study, DDP alloys composed of 99.99 % Al (matrix phase) and an Al–Mg solid-solution alloy (reinforced phase) were fabricated as a fully continuous fiber state by accumulative roll bonding. Tensile and creep tests at elevated temperatures were performed on alloys composed of systematically varying volume fractions of the reinforced phase. Tensile data at 546 K indicated a linear relationship between the maximum stress and volume fraction of the reinforced phase; the lines were also connected to the data from single-phase materials of the matrix and reinforced phase. Thus, the amount of strain in the matrix and reinforced phases was the same as that during the tensile test, and the relationship between the maximum stress and volume fraction of a DDP alloy followed the classical linear law of mixtures (CLLM). The creep data for Al + Al–2Mg (DDP alloy) at 546 K were nearly equal to those calculated using the CLLM. Thus, the matrix and reinforced phases deformed at the same creep rate. Creep tests were also conducted for Al + Al-1M(5ARB), which had a fine-grained reinforced phase. The creep data for Al + Al-1M(5ARB) at 523 K were also a good approximation to the lines representing the data calculated using the CLLM. Hence, although the grain sizes of the two phases were very different, corresponding to different rate-controlling mechanisms, the creep data for a DDP alloy could be analyzed using the CLLM. Consequently, the creep behavior of the DDP alloys was a superposition of the creep behavior in both phases, and the interpretation of the creep data for DDP alloys using the creep theory of single-phase materials would lead to incorrect conclusions. These findings will contribute to a better understanding of the creep behaviors of practical alloys and will aid in the correct estimation of the creep lifetime.