ence on the stress required to deform the lithosphere at a given strain rate (equation (8), hereinafter called the strength of the lithosphere) of cooling the ductile portion of the lithosphere during extension. I concluded that for slow enough strain rates (< 10- ½ s-), cooling during extension, and the consequent increase in the strength of the lithosphere, could provide a limit to extension. In contrast, Sawyer [1985] contends that when brittle deformation of the lithosphere is considered, the correct conclusion should be that the rheological properties of the lithosphere cannot limit its extension under any circumstances. The purpose of this comment is to point out that Sawyer's conclusion is based on the results of calculations using a single, probably inappropriately cool, continental geotherm and that it is not justifiable to generalize these results to all reasonable continental geotherms. The earlier paper employed the slab model [Parsons and Sclater, 1977] for the initial thermal conditions of the continental lithosphere and assumed that the strength of lithosphere was dominated by the power law creep of olivine. Increase in the strength of the lithosphere then follows from temperature changes in the mantle due to thermal diffusion during extension; the magnitude of these changes is scaled by the temperature at the base of the lithosphere, but no significance is attached to absolute values of the temperature because of the simplicity of the model. This approach has the advantage of describing the system in terms of a few parameters, at the expense of neglecting factors such as brittle failure, high-stress plasticity of olivine [Goetze, 1978; Brace and Kohlstedt, 1980], the strength of the crust, and the influence of radioactivity on the continental geotherm. Sawyer [1985] advocates using a more realistic model and so incorporates the effect of brittle failure; however, he neglects the other simplifications, with misleading results: Because of the strong dependence of the strength of earth materials on temperature, any refinement to the simple model of England [1983] that attaches significance to absolute values of stress must also attach significance to absolute values of temperature. It is unfortunate, then, that Sawyer's paper deals exclusively with the development of a continental lithosphere having an oceanic geotherm. In addition, emphasis on the magnitude of the strength of the lithosphere ought to be matched by emphasis on the likely magnitudes of the stresses available to drive extension. It is hard to disagree with the conclusion that if the Moho were at a temperature of 340oC, then the upper mantle of a lithosphere straining at 2.5 X 10 -6 S - would probably be in the brittle field [Sawyer,
Read full abstract