This collection of five studies is intended to remember and present a step by step increase of scientific research approaches on contemporary topics related to Systems Theory and Cybernetics. The common line of these studies is related to an original construct: Interactive Modelling. Also, the common scientific pool that is presented is the International Consortium Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity.I the author, professor Nicolae Bulz, was dedicated the presentation of these five studies to my 40 years anniversary of scientifc research career – just into the Academic session of the Commission of Socio-Economic Cybernetics [ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ, Sectia de Stiinte Economice, Juridice si Sociologie], June 2, Tuesday, 2015 16:00-18:00.Interactive Modelling refers and re-proposes some long-term verified steps toward a dual praxis (researcherpractitioner):* The non-systemic structural possibility, and explicit verification, regarding our entities (technological, industrial, economic, social, ecological) from our deterministic, probabilistic and fuzzy perspective(s) in order to (re)apply or not the standard statistical modelling. So, to revise the entire statistical approach by iterative and interactive flows within the (all) systemic users as within a first stage (automatic) systemic knowledge (matricial space of states, input-output analysis), and then within a second stage modelling (neural networks, expert systems, decision support systems). * The operative contexts of our life and work support local techniques, inspired by our (presupposed, and natural) heuristics, and proper quasi-models. It means a new type of processing the (images of) our resources toward (the planned) objectives, according with (non)expressed criteria versus criteria upon criteria. All these draw a new hierarchical (a “zigzag” flow) becoming of our classical procedures: “top-down”, and “bottom up”. Interactive Modelling is a methodology which stands to cover and re-cover the too high complexity of our current systems. Sure that these systems would contain more and more constituted problems.The International Consortium Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity is the site of implementation (by original elaborated studies) for the two original constructs: “Creative_Partnership” and “Spirituality-Biodiversity” – all these by a collaborative publication policy – mainly by co-authorship of the Consortium members’ published studies.The International Consortium Generosity_Creativity_Solidarity tries to elicit a dynamic level of co-ordination (the best/dominant knowledge level - beyond the top or down of the co-ordination levels) / comprising the homogeneity level # heterogeneity level (hol#hel). The hol#hel model would be based on a triadic conceptual set of internalized constructs (C): C1: Natural-Artificial Dualism; C2: (A)symmetry; C3: Interactive Modelling. A possible aggregation of the C1, 2, 3 internalized constructs would elicit the compound construct: ‘Spirituality-Biodiversity / Creative Partnership’. A possible implementation of the C1, 2, 3 internalized constructs would elicit and evolve the frame and within the Generosity_ Creativity_Solidarity corpus. The above would support the world based on subtle indicators construct, resulting in an emulation inquiry, sparking and sparkling by a will_can_must_do quaternary elicitation within the Contemporary World Changes. This is to elicit a Charta - equally addressing the Generosity versus Creativity and Solidarity debate within the Contemporary World Changes paradigm. The Consortium members’' orientations as mutual direction /method of research, thesis integration, “cultural exchange” are expected to add/ to provide, at the initial interdisciplinary framework, a trans/co/cross-disciplinary guideline as regards the profile of the contents.
Read full abstract