Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation Research Articles

Cost Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation.

To compare costs of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation versus non-IVUS-guided TIPS creation, accounting for differences in procedure time and resource utilization. This single institution retrospective study estimated procedure time and resource utilization from 157 consecutive elective TIPS creation procedures, of which 91 were IVUS-guided and 66 were non-IVUS-guided. Differences in procedure costs were derived using time-driven activity-based costing. The difference in post-TIPS creation length of hospital stay was included in overall episode of care cost estimates. IVUS-guided TIPS creation was 45.5 minutes faster (p<0.001) and required 35.2 mL less contrast material (p<0.001) leading to savings of $325.34 on staffing, $58.21 on medications, and $76.59 on equipment usage. However, with $2,100 single-use disposable catheters, IVUS guidance was $1,484.96 more costly per procedure. Following TIPS creation mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days after IVUS-guided procedures versus 2.1 days after non-IVUS-guided procedures (p=0.001). With an estimated cost of $2,677 per hospital day, there was an overall savings of $656.64 with IVUS-guided TIPS creation. Improved procedural metrics during TIPS creation alone are unlikely to offset the costs of IVUS guidance. However, based on improvements in immediate post-TIPS creation clinical outcomes, which may translate into shorter hospitalization, IVUS guidance is likely to reduce overall costs for the episode of care related to TIPS creation.

Recurrent Portal Hypertension after Liver Transplant: Impact on Survival and the Role of TIPS Creation in Management.

Recurrent portal hypertension (PH) after liver transplant (LT) and its management are not well-studied. This study aims to evaluate the impact of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on outcomes of recurrent PH. From a cohort of 1846 LT recipients, 36 patients who underwent TIPS creation after LT were identified and considered as cases. To streamline comparison with the remaining LT patients without TIPS, a representative subset comprising more than 20% of the entire population (381/1810) was randomly selected. Diuretic refractory ascites, and endoscopic findings were reviewed to detect recurrent PH in patients without TIPS. Repeat transplantation, and graft and overall survival were compared between recurrent PH patients with and without TIPS. Survival analysis with multivariable Cox regression analysis was used for risk factors of survival. Out of 1846 patients, 36 (2%) underwent TIPS after LT. Among the control group, 24 (of 381, 6.3%) patients had recurrent PH. TIPS resulted in ascites resolution in 25 (of 36, 74%). Repeat transplant was more frequent in recurrent PH without TIPS, than recurrent PH with TIPS (33% vs. 11%, p=0.035). Median overall survival after TIPS was 2.4 years (95% CI: 0.6-3.2). Transplant-free survival after initial LT was not different between patients with or without TIPS (8.6 years vs. 7.6 years, p=0.360). Multivariable Cox regression showed that repeat transplant was associated with reduced mortality in recurrent PH (HR=0.15, p=0.016). Recurrent PH after LT is rare, but adversely impacts patient outcomes. However, TIPS in recurrent PH improves ascites without worsening survival.

Association between overt hepatic encephalopathy and liver pathology after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in cirrhotic patients

To investigate the association between overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and liver pathology after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in cirrhotic patients. From July 2015 to April 2024, 73 patients from 4 hospitals in China who received TIPS creation and liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Based on whether OHE occurred within 3 months after TIPS creation, the patients were categorized into OHE (n = 29) and non-OHE (n = 44) groups. The liver pathology was assessed by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), Sirius red staining, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. Liver pathology by H&E staining showed typical features of liver cirrhosis (including disordered structure and pseudolobule formation) in all the patients. No marked difference was observed in extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition between the OHE and non-OHE groups. However, the patients in the OHE group had a higher level of liver and systemic inflammation than in the non-OHE group. And there was a strong correction between intrahepatic macrophage infiltration and serum inflammatory indicators. Additionally, the OHE group had more liver neovascularization, which was consistent with liver inflammation. The emergence of OHE after TIPS creation is closely associated with liver pathology, especially in liver inflammation and angiogenesis, but not in ECM deposition.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Portal Vein Thrombosis

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Portal Vein Thrombosis

Percutaneous management of chronic total occlusion of the portal vein: a retrospective analysis of technical aspects and outcomes

BackgroundChronic total occlusion (CTO) of the portal vein is one of the main causes of portal hypertension, which may result in life-threatening complications often managed by interventional radiology (IR). The aim of this study is to report the innovative experience with percutaneous revascularization therapy in the management of portal vein CTO in paediatric and adult patients.Materials and methodsFrom January 2020 to December 2023 consecutive paediatric and adult patients with severe portal hypertension resulting from portal vein CTO who underwent attempts at percutaneous recanalization were retrospectively reviewed. Technical aspects including the percutaneous approach, portal vein stenting, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation, varices embolization and clinical outcomes including adverse events and control of portal hypertension were analyzed. Technical success was defined as at least partial restoration of the portal vein patency at the final angiogram. Clinical success was defined as the improvement of clinical-laboratory signs of portal hypertension and control for variceal bleeding.ResultsFifteen patients (median age = 21 years, range = 59 years; 10 males; 5 children) with portal vein CTO underwent a total of 25 percutaneous revascularization procedures. Nine patients (60%; 5 children, 4 adults) were liver transplant recipients. All patients except one had cavernous transformation of the extra-hepatic portal vein, involving the spleno-mesenteric confluence in 5 cases. Technical success was achieved in 13/15 (87%) patients of whom 8 had portal revascularization through the placement of an extra-hepatic stent; indeed, in six cases, a TIPS was performed to achieve sustained portal vein patency. Embolization of varices and/or cavernoma was performed in 12 patients. Adverse events occurred in 2/15 (splenic artery perforation and hemoperitoneum, one each) managed without sequelae. Technical success led to clinical success in all the 13/15 (87%) cases, with a median follow-up of 20 months (IQR 4–34 months).ConclusionCTO can be managed effectively by interventional radiology. Restored portal flow physiology alone is possible in most patients, while TIPS may be required in a small proportion of them, to prolong portal vein patency and control portal hypertension.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts.

Proposed in the early 1980s as a solution for managing complications of portal hypertension, the percutaneous creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has consistently gained a central role. Increasingly lower complication rates have been observed thanks to improvements in both technologies and the skills of interventional radiologists. This document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practice recommendations for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation, describing patient selection, intraprocedural management and follow-up, in addition to recommendations in paediatric settings. The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group consisting of seven European clinicians with recognised expertise in the creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. The writing group reviewed the existing literature performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to select relevant publications in the English language and involving human subjects, preferably published from 2009 to 2024. The final recommendations were developed by consensus. TIPS creation has an established role in the successful management of portal hypertension and its complications. This Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for patient selection, materials, its safe performance, and follow-up with complications management.

Sleep disturbance in patients with cirrhosis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BackgroundSleep disturbance (SD) is a common occurrence in individuals with cirrhosis and significantly impacts their quality of life. Datas regarding post transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) SD are scarce. This study aimed to explore the incidence and outcomes of post-TIPS SD.MethodsFrom August 2018 to November 2019, 73 patients who underwent TIPS were prospectively recruited for the study. Sleep quality was evaluated via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the presence of hepatic encephalopathy was evaluated according to the West Haven criteria before and after the TIPS procedure.ResultsNineteen patients (26%) experienced new-onset SD after TIPS, with a median latency of 67 (40–98) days from the procedure. The median time from TIPS creation to occurrence was 67 (40–98) days. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) post-TIPS emerged as an independent predictor of SD, with an odds ratio of 3 (95% CI: 1.04–8.78, P = 0.046). Notably, five of the six (83%) patients with SD experienced improvement after being administered eszopiclone. Ten of the thirteen (77%) patients with SD improved spontaneously without treatment. Furthermore, the prevalence of MHE was significantly greater among patients with SD than among those without SD (58% vs. 31%, P = 0.04).ConclusionsSD is prevalent in patients who undergo TIPS. MHE is an independent risk factor for the development of SD post-TIPS. Eszopiclone may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with SD after TIPS. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03685994, with a registration date of September 23, 2018.

Comparison of outcomes for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Viatorr versus Fluency versus a bare stent/Fluency stent combination

PurposeTo compare clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with the single covered-uncovered stent (Viatorr TIPS Endoprosthesis) versus covered stent (Fluency) versus a combination of covered and uncovered stent.Materials and methodsFrom May 2016 and July 2019, a total of 180 liver cirrhosis patients with recurrent variceal bleeding underwent TIPS creation with single covered-uncovered stent (n = 63) or covered stent (n = 41) or a covered and uncovered stent combination (n = 76). Shunt dysfunction, rebleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy and mortality was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.ResultsThe difference of baseline characteristics among these three groups were not significant. The included patients had a median age of 51 years (IQR 43–61), and 101 (56.1%) were men. The 1-year and 2-year shunt dysfunction rates were 1.6% and 3.2% in the single covered-uncovered stent group, 7.3% and 7.3% in the covered stent group and 5.3% and 6.6% in the combination group, respectively. There was no significant difference among groups [Hazard Ratio (HR) (95%CI): 1 vs 2.29 (0.38 − 13.72) vs 2.10 (0.41 − 10.83); P = 0.913]. No significant differences in the incidence of all-cause rebleeding were observed between the groups at 1 year (Viatorr vs Fluency vs combination: 11.1% vs 17.1% vs 10.5%) as well as 2 years (15.9% vs 17.1% vs 11.8%), with the HR (95%CI) being 1 vs 1.27 (0.5—3.21) vs 0.74 (0.30–1.82); P = 0.475). The 1-year and 2-year incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy were 30.2% and 30.2% in the single covered-uncovered stent group, 22.0% and 22.0% in the covered stent group and 25.0% and 25.0% in the combination group, respectively. However, there was no significant difference among these three groups (P = 0.402). In addition, there was no significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year mortality (6.3% and 7.9% vs. 4.9% and 9.8% vs. 6.6% and 9.2%, P = 0.606).ConclusionNo significant difference was observed among different stent groups. Fluency covered stent and the generic bare stent/Fluency covered stent was not an unreasonable alternative to the Viatorr stent for TIPS creation.

Transjugular antegrade transvenous obliteration, with and without portal decompression, for management of rectal variceal hemorrhage

PurposeTo report antegrade transvenous obliteration, with or without concurrent portosystemic shunt creation, for the treatment of hemorrhagic rectal varices.Materials and methodsEight patients, including five (62.5%) females and three (37.5%) males, with mean age of 55.8 ± 13.8 years (range: 30–70 years), underwent transjugular-approach antegrade transvenous obliteration of rectal varices, with or without portosystemic shunt creation. Demographic data, procedural details, technical success of variceal obliteration, clinical success, adverse events, and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively recorded. Clinical success was defined as resolution of rectal hemorrhage.ResultsPortal venous access was achieved via a transjugular intrahepatic approach in all patients. The inferior mesenteric vein was selected, and foamy sclerosant (1:2:3 mixture by volume of ethiodized oil: sodium tetradecyl sulfate: air) was injected into the rectal varices with antegrade balloon occlusion in seven (87.5%) and without balloon occlusion in one (12.5%). Five of eight (62.5%) patients underwent concomitant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation (mean diameter 8.4 ± 0.9-mm) immediately following transvenous obliteration. Technical success of variceal obliteration was achieved in all patients. There were no immediate post-procedural adverse events. There were no reported occurrences of rectal ischemia, perforation, or stricture following obliteration. Two (40%) of the patients who underwent concomitant TIPS creation developed hepatic encephalopathy within 30 days of the procedure, which was medically managed. Clinical resolution of hemorrhage was achieved in all patients with no recurrent rectal variceal hemorrhage during mean follow-up of 666 ± 396 days (range: 14 − 1,224 days).ConclusionTransvenous obliteration, with or without concurrent TIPS creation, is feasible with promising results for the management of rectal variceal hemorrhage.

Identifying the optimal measurement timing and hemodynamic targets of portal pressure gradient after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding

The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment for hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding. Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG was measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on clinical outcomes (portal hypertensive complications [PHCs], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models. The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p <0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHCs (early PPG≥ vs. <12mmHg: adjusted hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.55, p= 0.002) and OHE (0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, p= 0.030), while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging from 11 to 14mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE and effective prevention of PHC. PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long-term PPG and clinical outcomes, and a hemodynamic target PPG of 11-14mmHg is associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy. The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remain unclear. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events. Thus, PPG measurements taken at least 24 hours after TIPS should be used to guide decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting a post-TIPS PPG of 11-14mmHg or a 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline measured 24-72 hours after the procedure was associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy. Thus, these criteria could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.

Heart Failure after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

Heart Failure after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation

Comparison of specialized stent versus generic stent and bare stent combination for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation using the Viatorr stent remains relatively uncommon in underdeveloped and high-burden disease regions in Asia–Pacific, and there is a lack of comparative studies regarding its prognostic effects compared with the generic stent-graft/bare stent combination. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the prognostic endpoints of these two treatments in patients who underwent TIPS creation. Clinical data from 145 patients were collected, including 82 in the combination group and 63 in the Viatorr group. Differences in prognostic endpoints (shunt dysfunction, death, overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], rebleeding) between the two groups were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent risk factors for post-TIPS shunt dysfunction. The TIPS procedure was successful in all patients. After TIPS creation, both groups showed a significant decrease in porto-caval pressure gradient compared to that before TIPS creation. The stent patency rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were high in both the combination and Viatorr groups (93.7%, 88.5%, and 88.5% vs. 96.7%, 93.4%, and 93.4%, respectively). The stent patency rates was higher in the combination group than in the Viatorr group, although not statistically significant (HR = 2.105, 95% CI 0.640–6.922, Log-rank P = 0.259). There were no significant differences in other prognostic endpoints (death, OHE, rebleeding) between the two groups. The Cox model identified portal vein diameter (HR = 0.807, 95% CI 0.658–0.990, P = 0.040) and portal vein thrombosis (HR = 13.617, 95% CI 1.475–125.678, P = 0.021) as independent risk factors for post-TIPS shunt dysfunction. The shunt patency rates between the Viatorr stent and the generic stent-graft/bare stent combination showed no significant difference and the generic stent-graft/bare stent combination may be a viable alternative in areas where the Viatorr stent is not yet available.

Radiomics Analysis of Preprocedural CT Imaging for Outcome Prediction after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation.

To evaluate the role of radiomics in preoperative outcome prediction in cirrhotic patients who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using "controlled expansion covered stents". This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS with controlled expansion covered stent placement. From preoperative CT images, the whole liver was segmented into Volumes of Interest (VOIs) at the unenhanced and portal venous phase. Radiomics features were extracted, collected, and analyzed. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to assess which features could predict patients' outcomes. The endpoints studied were 6-month overall survival (OS), development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), grade II or higher HE according to West Haven Criteria, and clinical response, defined as the absence of rebleeding or ascites. A radiomic model for outcome prediction was then designed. A total of 76 consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS creation were enrolled. The highest performances in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were observed for the "clinical response" and "survival at 6 months" outcome with 0.755 and 0.767, at the unenhanced and portal venous phase, respectively. Specifically, on basal scans, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 66.42%, 63.93%, and 73.75%, respectively. At the portal venous phase, an accuracy of 65.34%, a specificity of 62.38%, and a sensitivity of 74.00% were demonstrated. A pre-interventional machine learning-based CT radiomics algorithm could be useful in predicting survival and clinical response after TIPS creation in cirrhotic patients.

Hepatobiliary Infection after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Patients with Prior Biliary Intervention: A Multi-Institution Retrospective Study

PurposeTo estimate the risk of hepatobiliary infection, including endoTIPSitis, liver abscesses, and cholangitis, after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in patients with prior biliary intervention. Materials and MethodsThis multi-institution, retrospective study identified 76 patients (n = 48 males; mean age, 54.9 years; mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease [MELD] score, 13.2; n = 45 for ascites and n = 23 for varices; n = 31 with prior liver transplantation) among 2,130 (3.6%) undergoing TIPS creation who had prior biliary intervention (n = 19 bilioenteric anastomoses, n = 35 sphincterotomies, n = 28 internal plastic stent placements, n = 4 internal metal stent placements, and n = 6 percutaneous biliary drain placements). The baseline risk of post–TIPS creation hepatobiliary infection was estimated from a control group of 1,202 TIPS creation procedures in patients without prior biliary intervention. ResultsEleven (14.5%) of 76 patients developed hepatobiliary infection after TIPS creation, including 7 with endoTIPSitis, 4 with hepatic abscesses, and 2 with cholangitis. The 30-day risk of infection was 10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5%–17.8%), significantly higher than the 0.4% risk (95% CI, 0.1%–0.8%) observed in patients without prior biliary intervention (hazard ratio [HR], 25.56; 95% CI, 8.36–78.13; P < .001). All types of biliary intervention were associated with increased risk of infection, with bilioenteric anastomoses conferring the highest risk. Paradoxically, among patients with prior biliary intervention, use of postprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with an increased infection risk (HR, 19.85; 95% CI, 2.44–161.50; P = .005). Microbial culture data showed high rates of Enterococcus, Klebsiella, and Candida species. ConclusionsPrior biliary intervention was associated with a 10.9% risk of hepatobiliary infection, including endoTIPSitis, liver abscess, and cholangitis, within 30 days after TIPS creation.

Trans-splenic Approach for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation in Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a trans-splenic approach for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in patients with portal vein thrombosis. (PVT). Material and Methods A retrospective review was performed on 36 consecutive patients with PVT who underwent TIPS using a trans-splenic approach from February 2018 to June 2021. Preprocedural data including demographic information and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were obtained. Outcomes measured included technical success, clinical success, complications, and survival. Results Technical success was achieved in 32 of 36 patients (89%). During the follow-up period, 16 of 32 (50%) required secondary TIPS interventions, most of which were planned as part of a staged procedure. 30/32 (94%) had stent patency on their most recent follow-up, with a median follow-up of 164 days. No patients had variceal bleeding following TIPS. 12 of 32 (38%) patients underwent successful transplant after TIPS. Anatomical portal vein end-to-end anastomosis was achieved in 11/12 (92%) patients. Conclusion The trans-splenic approach to TIPS is a reliable alternative to traditional TIPS in patients with PVT and provides high technical and clinical success rates. This technique can also be utilized to improve future liver transplant outcomes by facilitating anatomic portal vein end-to-end anastomoses.

Meta-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation with or without intravascular ultrasound guidance.

To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. MEDLINE and Embase databases were queried until July 2022 for comparative studies reporting procedure metrics for TIPS creation with or without IVUS guidance. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects modelling for total procedural time, time to portal venous access, fluoroscopy time, iodinated contrast volume use, air kerma, dose area product, and number of needle passes. Intraoperative procedure-related complications were also reviewed. Of 95 unique records initially identified, 6 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 194 and 240 patients underwent TIPS with and without IVUS guidance. Pooled analyses indicated that IVUS guidance was associated with reduced total procedure time (SMD -0.76 [95% CI -1.02, -0.50] P < .001), time to portal venous access (SMD -0.41 [95% CI -0.67, -0.15] P = .002), fluoroscopy time (SMD, -0.54 [95% CI -1.02, -0.07]; P = .002), contrast volume use (SMD, -0.89 [95% CI -1.16, -0.63]; P < .001), air kerma (SMD, -0.75 [95% CI -1.11, -0.38]; P < .001) and dose area product (SMD, -0.98 [95% CI -1.77, -0.20]; P = .013). A total of 4.2 and 7.8 needle passes were required in the IVUS and non-IVUS group, respectively (SMD, -0.60 [95% CI -1.42, 0.21]; P = .134). Pooled complication rates were 15.2% (12/79) and 21.4% (28/131), respectively. IVUS guidance during TIPS creation improves procedural metrics including procedural time, contrast usage, and radiation exposure. (1) The use of IVUS during TIPS is associated with shorter procedural time, lower contrast usage, and radiation exposure. (2)The use of IVUS is not associated with higher complication rates.

Paradoxical Cerebral Embolization during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation and Variceal Sclerotherapy.

Paradoxical Cerebral Embolization during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation and Variceal Sclerotherapy.

CBCT-based three-dimensional dual-phase vascular image fusion: anovel technique for interventional real-time TIPS guidance.

Due to the invisibility of the portal vein (PV), how to puncture the PV accurately and safely in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation remains achallenge of the procedure. We aimed to provide the first evaluation of the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based three-dimensional (3D) dual-phase vascular image fusion for interventional real-time guided PV puncture during TIPS procedures. From January 2021 to May 2021, 13patients undergoing TIPS were prospectively enrolled in this study. Images of the hepatic artery (HA) and PV in 3D were acquired and overlaid on interventional fluoroscopy images in adual-phase display mode for real-time PV puncture guidance. The number of PV puncture attempts, puncture time, overlaid image accuracy, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, and interventional complications were recorded. Portal vein puncture guided by CBCT-based 3D dual-phase vascular image fusion was successfully performed on 92.3% (12/13) patients. The mean number of PV puncture attempts was 1.8 ± 0.7 (1-3). The mean puncture time and fluoroscopy time was 3.5 ± 1.2 (2-6) min and 25.1 ± 9.4 (15-45) min, respectively. The mean dose area product was 39.49 ± 7.88 (28.81-52.87) mGym2. The error between the reference position of the fusion image and the interventional PV angiography image was less than 0.5 cm. No interventional complication was observed. Our results show that 3D dual-phase vascular image fusion might be asafe and feasible technique for interventional real-time guided PV puncture during TIPS. This novel technique might help to reduce the number of PV puncture attempts and the puncture time as well as lower the risks of interventional complications.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Extension for Transhepatic Mesocaval Shunt Creation: A Case Series for Treating Refractory Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is known to benefit patients with decompensated liver disease by alleviating portal pressure. However, TIPS creation is technically difficult and challenging to perform in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (4,5). Multiple endovascular techniques for portal vein recanalization with or without creating portosystemic shunt are available to decompress and alleviate portal hypertension in patients with PVT. In this case series, we represent TIPS extension to create an endovascular mesocaval shunt for the treatment of refractory upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Emergent TIPS for acute gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

To estimate the safety and effectiveness of emergent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data of thirty-three patients with AVB and HCC undergoing emergent TIPS creation from January 2016 to January 2022 were enrolled and were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were the safety of emergent TIPS creation, the bleeding control rate, and the rebleeding rate. The secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), liver function, overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and shunt dysfunction. Emergent TIPS creation was technically successful in 33 patients (100%) and one (3.0%) patient suffered a major procedure-related adverse event. The control rate of bleeding (within 5days) was 100%. During a median follow-up period of 26.3months, rebleeding occurred in 6 (18.2%) patients. The median OS was 20.0months. The 6-week and 1-year survival rates were 87% and 65%, respectively. Laboratory tests showed no significant impairment of liver function following TIPS creation. The incidences of overt HE and shunt dysfunction were 24.2% and 6.1%, respectively. Emergent TIPS creation is feasible and effective for treatment of AVB in cirrhotic patients with HCC.