CRB-65 Score Research Articles

Pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and pro-vasopressin for predicting short-term and long-term survival in community-acquired pneumonia: results from the German Competence Network CAPNETZ

BackgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most important clinical infection with a high long-term mortality rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of biomarkers for the prediction...

Primary care summary of the British Thoracic Society Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: 2009 update Endorsed by the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Primary Care Respiratory Society UK

The identification and management of adults presenting with pneumonia is a major challenge for primary care health professionals. This paper summarises the key recommendations of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) Guidelines for the management of Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) in adults. Systematic electronic database searches were conducted in order to identify potentially relevant studies that might inform guideline recommendations. Generic study appraisal checklists and an evidence grading from A+ to D were used to indicate the strength of the evidence upon which recommendations were made. This paper provides definitions, key messages, and recommendations for handling the uncertainty surrounding the clinical diagnosis, assessing severity, management, and follow-up of patients with CAP in the community setting. Diagnosis and decision on hospital referral in primary care is based on clinical judgement and the CRB-65 score. Unlike some other respiratory infections (e.g. acute bronchitis) an antibiotic is always indicated when a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia is made. Timing of initial review will be determined by disease severity. When there is a delay in symptom or radiographic resolution beyond six weeks, the main concern is whether the CAP was a complication of an underlying condition such as lung cancer.

Definite, probable, and possible bacterial aetiologies of community-acquired pneumonia at different CRB-65 scores

According to the recommendations of the Swedish Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) guidelines, the selection of empirical antibiotic therapy should be based on the CRB-65 rule. The guidelines recommend empirical therapy directed predominantly against Streptococcus pneumoniae for patients with low CRB-65 scores and broad-spectrum therapy for patients with high CRB-65 scores. In order to study the utility of the recommendations, we analyzed the data from an aetiological study previously performed on 235 hospitalized adult CAP patients at our medical centre. A definite, probable, or possible bacterial aetiology was noted in 194 cases (83%), including 112 cases (48%) with S. pneumoniae aetiology. The following frequencies of definite-probable aetiologies were noted in the patients with CRB-65 score 0-1 (n=155) and CRB-65 score 2-4 (n=80): S. pneumoniae 30% and 35%, Haemophilus influenzae 6.5% and 14% (p=0.063), Mycoplasma pneumoniae 15% and 5.0% (p=0.019), Chlamydophila species 2.6% and 1.2%, Legionella pneumophila 1.9% and 0%, and Staphylococcus aureus 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively. The high frequency of S. pneumoniae in the study supports the recommendations to predominantly cover this bacterium in the empirical therapy of patients with low CRB-65 scores. In the case of treatment failure in these patients, the study indicates that coverage against M. pneumoniae and H. influenzae should be considered.

Prognostic assessment in community-acquired pneumonia by pneumonia severity scores and biomarkers

Classical biomarkers like C-reactive protein (CRP) or the leucocyte count are only inaccurate tools for predicting the severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Procalcitonin (PCT) was found to predict 28-day mortality in CAP (area under the curve (AUC) 0.8) similar to the combination of PCT and CRB65 score (AUC 0.83) [1]. Novel prognostic biomarkers, such as Pro-ET1 and MR-ProADM, were shown to correlate with CAP severity [2]. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy to predict mortality and ICU admission of clinical severity scores, biomarkers and their combination.

Severity of illness scoring systems in patients with bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia: implications for the intensive care unit care

Severity of illness scoring systems are useful for decisions on the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including assessing the need for intensified therapy and monitoring, or for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We compared the accuracy of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), the CURB-65 and CRB-65 score, the modified-American Thoracic Society score (ATS), the IDSA/ATS guidelines and the Pitt Bacteraemia score (PBS) in evaluating severity of illness in 766 patients with bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) and the accuracy of the classification in predicting 14-day mortality. The PSI and the IDSA/ATS guidelines were the most sensitive whereas the PBS and modified-ATS scoring systems were the most specific in predicting mortality. The NPV was comparable for all four scoring systems (all above 90%), but the PPV was highest for PBS (54.2%) and lowest for PSI (23.2%). The predictive accuracy and discriminating power as measured by the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was highest for the PBS. Both the modified-ATS and the PBS scoring systems identified those patients who might benefit most from intensified care and monitoring. The PBS and modified-ATS proved superior to the IDSA/ATS guidelines, CURB-65 and CRB-65 with respect to their specificity and PPV. The low PPV of the PSI rendered it not usable as a parameter for decision-making in severely-ill patients with pneumococcal bacteraemia.

Inflammatory parameters predict etiologic patterns but do not allow for individual prediction of etiology in patients with CAP – Results from the German competence network CAPNETZ

BackgroundAim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of inflammatory markers procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte count (WBC) with microbiological etiology of CAP.MethodsWe enrolled 1337 patients (62 ± 18 y, 45% f) with proven CAP. Extensive microbiological workup was performed. In all patients PCT, CRP, WBC and CRB-65 score were determined. Patients were classified according to microbial diagnosis and CRB-65 score.ResultsIn patients with typical bacterial CAP, levels of PCT, CRP and WBC were significantly higher compared to CAP of atypical or viral etiology. There were no significant differences in PCT, CRP and WBC in patients with atypical or viral etiology of CAP. In contrast to CRP and WBC, PCT markedly increased with severity of CAP as measured by CRB-65 score (p < 0.0001). In ROC analysis for discrimination of patients with CRB-65 scores > 1, AUC for PCT was 0.69 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.71), which was higher compared to CRP and WBC (p < 0.0001). CRB-65, PCT, CRP and WBC were higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitalised patients in comparison to outpatients.ConclusionPCT, CRP and WBC are highest in typical bacterial etiology in CAP but do not allow individual prediction of etiology. In contrast to CRP and WBC, PCT is useful in severity assessment of CAP.

New perspectives on community-acquired pneumonia in 388 406 patients. Results from a nationwide mandatory performance measurement programme in healthcare quality

Background:The database of the German programme for quality in healthcare including data of every hospitalised patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) during a 2-year period (n = 388 406 patients in...

CRB-65 for the assessment of pneumonia severity: who could ask for more?

According to a widespread consensus reflected in all authoritative guidelines, assessment of severity is the key step in the management of patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). It is a major criterion in the decision where to treat a patient and it widely determines the amount of diagnostic workup as well as the selection of initial empiric antimicrobial treatment. Overall, it has major implications in terms of outcomes and costs. Two lines of investigation have resulted in two competing tools of severity assessment: the pneumonia severity index (PSI)1 and the CURB score and its modifications (CURB-65, CRB-65).2–5 In the meantime, it has become evident that the PSI and the CRB-65 score, as the most simple modification of the original CURB score, perform equivalent in terms of prediction of inhospital death. Both predict death in a class 3 pattern, with mortality rates of approximately 1–3% (PSI class I–III, CRB-65 class 1), 8–10% (PSI class IV and CRB-class 2) and 20–30% (PSI class V and CRB-65 class 3).5 6 Both scores also work reasonably well in ambulatory patients.5 However, as the CRB-65 score is far easier to remember and to compute, being based exclusively on variables which can be immediately determined without any technical expense other than blood pressure measurement, this score is the one which will gain general acceptance.7 It is intriguing that such a simple rule is able to predict the risk of death so accurately. Nevertheless, in this issue of Thorax , Chalmers and colleagues8 provide convincing data from a large population showing that the CRB-65 score can be simplified …

Systolic blood pressure is superior to other haemodynamic predictors of outcome in community acquired pneumonia

Introduction:Admission blood pressure (BP) assessment is a central component of severity assessment for community acquired pneumonia. The aim of this study was to establish which readily available haemodynamic measure on...

Predicting mortality with pneumonia severity scores: importance of model recalibration to local settings

In patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) prediction rules based on individual predicted mortalities are frequently used to support decision-making for in-patient vs. outpatient management. We studied the accuracy and the need for recalibration of three risk prediction scores in a tertiary-care University hospital emergency-department setting in Switzerland. We pooled data from patients with CAP enrolled in two randomized controlled trials. We compared expected mortality from the original pneumonia severity index (PSI), CURB65 and CRB65 scores against observed mortality (calibration) and recalibrated the scores by fitting the intercept alpha and the calibration slope beta from our calibration model. Each of the original models underestimated the observed 30-day mortality of 11%, in 371 patients admitted to the emergency department with CAP (8.4%, 5.5% and 5.0% for the PSI, CURB65 and CRB65 scores, respectively). In particular, we observed a relevant mortality within the low risk classes of the original models (2.6%, 5.3%, and 3.7% for PSI classes I-III, CURB65 classes 0-1, and CRB65 class 0, respectively). Recalibration of the original risk models corrected the miscalibration. After recalibration, however, only PSI class I was sensitive enough to identify patients with a low risk (i.e. <1%) for mortality suitable for outpatient management. In our tertiary-care setting with mostly referred in-patients, CAP risk scores substantially underestimated observed mortalities misclassifying patients with relevant risks of death suitable for outpatient management. Prior to the implementation of CAP risk scores in the clinical setting, the need for recalibration and the accuracy of low-risk re-classification should be studied in order to adhere with discharge guidelines and guarantee patients' safety.

The Modified APACHE II Score Outperforms Curb65 Pneumonia Severity Score as a Predictor of 30-Day Mortality in Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia

To compare the predictive accuracy for 30-day mortality of the CURB65 score adopted by the British Thoracic Society and the simpler CRB65 score to APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1,200-bed urban teaching hospital. Adult patients requiring hospitalization identified to have MRSA pneumonia. Retrospective data collection from automated hospital, microbiology, and pharmacy databases. Two hundred eighteen patients with MRSA pneumonia were identified over a 3-year period. Forty-four patients (20.2%) died during hospitalization. All three prediction rules had high negative predictive values but relatively low positive predictive values at most cut-off points examined. APACHE II had the greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.805; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.743 to 0.866) compared to CURB65 (0.634; 95% CI, 0.541 to 0.727) and CRB65 (0.643; 95% CI, 0.546 to 0.739) [p < 0.05 for both comparisons]. Similar results were obtained when the subgroups of community-acquired MRSA pneumonia and health-care-associated MRSA pneumonia were examined separately. APACHE II outperformed CURB65 and CRB65 for initial prognostic assessment in MRSA pneumonia.

Procalcitonin predicts patients at low risk of death from community-acquired pneumonia across all CRB-65 classes

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), of procalcitonin (PCT) compared with the established inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte (WBC) count alone or in combination with the CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate >or=30 breaths x min(-1), low blood pressure (systolic value <90 mmHg or diastolic value <or=60 mmHg) and age >or=65 yrs) score. In total, 1,671 patients with proven CAP were enrolled in the study. PCT, CRP, WBC and CRB-65 score were all determined on admission and patients were followed-up for 28 days for survival. In contrast to CRP and WBC, PCT levels markedly increased with the severity of CAP, as measured by the CRB-65 score. In 70 patients who died during follow-up, PCT levels on admission were significantly higher compared with levels in survivors. In receiver operating characteristic analysis for survival, the area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for PCT and CRB-65 was comparable (0.80 (0.75-0.84) versus 0.79 (0.74-0.84)), but each significantly higher compared with CRP (0.62 (0.54-0.68)) and WBC (0.61 (0.54-0.68)). PCT identified low-risk patients across CRB classes 0-4. In conclusion, procalcitonin levels on admission predict the severity and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia with a similar prognostic accuracy as the CRB-65 score and a higher prognostic accuracy compared with C-reactive protein and leukocyte count. Procalcitonin levels can provide independent identification of patients at low risk of death within CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate >or=30 breaths x min(-1), low blood pressure (systolic value <90 mmHg or diastolic value <or=60 mmHg) and age >or=65 yrs) risk classes.

Pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and pro-vasopressin to predict severity and prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most important clinical infection. Therefore, the CAP competence network CAPNETZ was instituted in Germany. The aim of this substudy was to evaluate the value of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and pro-vasopressin (CT-proAVP) for severity assessment and outcome prediction in CAP. Prospective observational study. German CAP competence network CAPNETZ. We enrolled 589 patients (age 61+/-18 years, 46% female) with proven CAP. MR-proANP, CT-proAVP, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and CRB-65 score were determined on admission. MR-proANP, CT-proAVP and PCT levels, but not CRP, increased with increasing severity of CAP, classified according to the CRB-65 score. In patients who died during 28-day follow-up, median MR-proANP and CT-proAVP levels (respectively 237.0 vs. 93.5 pmol/l and 44.2 vs. 12.4 pmol/l, each p<0.0001) were significantly higher than in survivors. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for survival, the area under the curve (AUC) values for CT-proAVP (0.86, 95% CI 0.83-0.89) and MR-proANP (0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.80) were similar to the AUC of CRB-65 (0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). In multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses including MR-proANP/CT-proAVP, coexisting illnesses and CRB-65, increased MR-proANP and CT-proAVP concentrations were the strongest predictors of mortality. MR-proANP and CT-proAVP are useful new biomarkers for the risk stratification of CAP patients. They are significantly lower in CAP survivors and correlate with the severity of the disease measured by CRB-65 score.

Sepsis severity predicts outcome in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia

Easily performed prognostic rules are helpful for guiding the intensity of monitoring and treatment of patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the predictive value of the sepsis score and the Confusion, Respiratory rate (> or =30 breaths.min(-1)), Blood pressure (systolic value <90 mmHg or diastolic value < or =60 mmHg) and age > or =65 yrs (CRB-65) score in 105 patients with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. In addition, the influence of timing of the antimicrobial treatment on outcome was investigated. The sepsis and the CRB-65 scores were used to allocate patients to subgroups with low, intermediate and high risk. Comparable, highly predictive values for mortality were found for both scores (sepsis score versus CRB-65): 1) low-risk group, 0 versus 0%; 2) intermediate-risk group, 0 versus 8.6%; 3) high-risk group, 30.6 versus 40%, with an area under the curve of 0.867 versus 0.845. Patients with ambulatory antibiotic pre-treatment had less severe disease with a lower acute physiology score, lower white blood cell count and a faster decline of C-reactive protein levels. No pre-treated patient died. In summary, both scores performed equally well in predicting mortality. The prediction of survival in the intermediate-risk group might be more accurate with the sepsis score. Pre-hospital antibiotic treatment was associated with less severe disease.

Severity assessment in community-acquired pneumonia: moving on

The CURB65 score displays moderate to good discriminatory value in validation studies involving over 11000 patients Severity assessment is recognised as a pivotal step in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Consequently, much effort over the last three decades has gone into developing tools to aid this process. The Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) was introduced in 1997 following a study in over 50 000 patients and is well established as a robust severity assessment tool in patients with CAP.1 The CURB65 and CRB65 scores—which take account of the presence of Confusion, raised Urea (in the case of CURB65), raised Respiratory rate, low Blood pressure and age >65 years—were introduced more recently in 2003.2 One of the main benefits of the CURB65 and CRB65 scores is their simplicity in comparison with the PSI which comprises 20 variables. A number of studies over the last 2 years have therefore sought to confirm the value of these scores in different healthcare settings. In this issue of Thorax , Man et al 3 report a large and well conducted validation study of these three severity assessment tools—the PSI, CURB65 and CRB65 scores ( see page 348 ). They recruited 1016 adults with CAP seen in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Hong Kong and found that all three severity assessment tools performed equally well at discriminating patients into mortality risk groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) …

CRB‐65 predicts death from community‐acquired pneumonia*

The study was performed to validate the CURB, CRB and CRB-65 scores for the prediction of death from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in both the hospital and out-patient setting. Data were derived from a large multi-centre prospective study initiated by the German competence network for community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ) which started in March 2003 and were censored for this analysis in October 2004. Out- and in-hospital patients in 670 private practices and 10 clinical centres. Analysis was done for n = 1343 patients (n = 208 out-patients and n = 1135 hospitalized) with all data sets completed for the calculation of CURB and repeated for n = 1967 patients (n = 482 out-patients and n = 1485 hospitalized) with complete data sets for CRB and CRB-65. None. 30-day mortality from CAP was determined by personal contacts or a structured interview. Overall 30-day mortality was 4.3% (0.6% in out-patients and 5.5% in hospitalized patients, P < 0.0001). Overall, the CURB, CRB and CRB-65 scores provided comparable predictions for death from CAP as determined by receiver-operator-characteristics (ROC) curves. However, in hospitalized patients, CRB misclassified 26% of deaths as low risk patients. Availability of the CRB-65 score (90%) was far superior to that of CURB (65%), due to missing blood urea nitrogen values (P < 0.001). Both the CURB and CRB-65 scores can be used in the hospital and out-patients setting to assess pneumonia severity and the risk of death. Given that the CRB-65 is easier to handle, we favour the use of CRB-65 where blood urea nitrogen is unavailable.

Was gibt es Neues in der Behandlung der ambulant erworbenen Pneumonie?

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most important infectious disease in Germany. After 3 years of data recording, the country-wide competence network CAPNETZ presents reliable data on etiology and course of the disease, based on more than 3,500 prospectively observed patients. In the acute phase, lethality is as high as nearly 10%, and in the 6-month follow-up period after the acute infection, lethality is > 15%. A reliable detection of the underlying pathogen is possible in less than half of all patients studied. The most frequent pathogens are Streptococcus pneumoniae (40%), Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (8% each). Legionella (3%) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (< 1%) are rarely found, and gram-negative enterobacteriaceae (< 5%) are restricted to high-risk patient groups (nursing home, multimorbidity). CAPs due to pneumococci, legionella or enterobacteriaceae were associated with increased lethality. Problems with resistances had not been found in Germany, except for a decreasing susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to macrolides. Viruses could be detected in nearly 15% of all pneumonia patients. The CRB-65 score allows a reliable discrimination between patients with a high and low risk of dying. The new S3 guideline for diagnosis and treatment of CAP recommends a risk-adapted treatment. Low-risk patients shall receive a monotherapy with, e. g., amoxicillin, high-risk patients should be treated with a broad-spectrum combination therapy (beta-lactam and macrolide).

Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia

The CURB-65 score (Confusion, Urea > 7 mmol x L(-1), Respiratory rate > or = 30 x min(-1), low Blood pressure, and age > or = 65 yrs) has been proposed as a tool for augmenting clinical judgement for stratifying patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) into different management groups. The six-point CURB-65 score was retrospectively applied in a prospective, consecutive cohort of adult patients with a diagnosis of CAP seen in the emergency department of a 400-bed teaching hospital from March 1, 2000 to February 29, 2004. A total of 1,100 inpatients and 676 outpatients were included. The 30-day mortality rate in the entire cohort increased directly with increasing CURB-65 score: 0, 1.1, 7.6, 21, 41.9 and 60% for CURB-65 scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The score was also significantly associated with the need for mechanical ventilation and rate of hospital admission in the entire cohort, and with duration of hospital stay among inpatients. The CURB-65 score (Confusion, Urea > 7 mmol x L(-1), Respiratory rate > or = 30 x min(-1), low Blood pressure, and age > or = 65 yrs), and a simpler CRB-65 score that omits the blood urea measurement, helps classify patients with community-acquired pneumonia into different groups according to the mortality risk and significantly correlates with community-acquired pneumonia management key points. The new score can also be used as a severity adjustment measure.

Was gibt es Neues in der Behandlung der ambulant erworbenen Pneumonie?

Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is the most important infectious disease in Germany. In the acute phase, lethality is almost 10%, and in the six months follow up period following the acute infection, lethality is more than 15%. Problems with resistances had not been found in Germany, except for a decreasing susceptibility of S. pneumoniae against macrolides. The CRB-65 score allows a reliable discrimination between patients with a high and low risk of dying. The new S3 guideline for diagnosis and treatment of community acquired pneumonia recommends a risk adapted treatment. Low risk patients shall receive a monotherapy with e. g. amoxicillin, high risk patients should be treated with a broad spectrum combination therapy (beta-lactam and macrolide).

Progression and regression of cervical lesions. Review of smears from women followed without initial biopsy or treatment.

Cervical smears were reviewed from patients in whom a cytological abnormality was followed, after an interval without interference, either by regression to ;negative' or else by progression to invasive carcinoma. Twenty-eight cases were from a previously analysed series with positive smears and an interval of at least two years before investigation, resulting from refusal or failure to trace. Slides were also reviewed from 25 cases in which ;positive' smears had regressed to negative without escaping from surveillance, and from 10 patients subsequently developing invasive carcinoma whose previous slides, taken several years earlier, showed abnormalities on review. None of these 63 patients had any biopsy or other surgical procedure to the cervix between the initial smear and the outcome. Slides showing ;superficial cell dyskaryosis' and/or well-differentiated ;parabasal cell dyskaryosis' were found only among the groups with subsequent regression. Those showing dissociated poorly differentiated dyskaryotic parabasal cells regressed to negative in two cases and progressed to invasion in nine. This suggests that many examples of spontaneous regression correspond to mild dysplasias which are not precancerous, and overdiagnosis must often have resulted in unnecessary surgical procedures in the past.;Regressing' and ;progressing' groups both included cases in which the spatula had removed coherent pieces of undifferentiated epithelium. These are difficult to interpret cytologically. In nine of them (including four which regressed) the cytological picture was that of carcinoma in situ. The remainder (14 cases) were probably examples of reserve cell hyperplasia, and it is noteworthy that, of the 21 cases subsequently progressing to invasive carcinoma, five were preceded by appearances of this type. It is concluded that cell aggregates suggesting an unusual degree of reserve cell hyperplasia are a danger signal and require careful surveillance.