Cranial Vault Remodeling Research Articles

The removal of cranial springs used in the treatment of scaphocephaly: A minimal access approach

The treatment of non-syndromic scaphocephaly with spring-activated cranioplasty offers acceptable outcomes with the potential for reduced surgical morbidity when compared with cranial vault remodelling procedures. A disadvantage of this technique is the need for a second operative intervention to remove the implanted devices. There are many descriptions of the surgical technique for performing spring-activated cranioplasty available in the literature; however, little is documented regarding the procedures used for device removal. The published accounts of spring removal demonstrate a wide range of approaches, from the reopening and dissection of the entire previous surgical field, to attempts to limit the incisions and dissection. In this study we describe our technique for the minimally invasive removal of cranial springs used in the treatment of scaphocephaly. Our technique focuses on minimal soft tissue disruption and uses a Kirschner wire cutter to divide the spring at its mid-point so as to relieve any residual internal forces acting on the footplates.

Postoperative Drain Use in Cranial Vault Remodeling: A Survey of Craniofacial Surgeon Practices and a Review of the Literature.

The use of subgaleal drains following primary cranioplasty for craniosynostosis has undergone limited investigation. Proposed benefits include prevention of seroma, detection of postoperative bleeding, and cerebrospinal fluid leak. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and surveyed craniofacial surgeons to ascertain the current evidence pertaining to drain use following primary cranioplasty for craniosynostosis and to determine surgical practice patterns. PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Abstracts were reviewed by 2 investigators, and a Cohen κ statistic was calculated. Patient demographic and outcome data were extracted and compared. A 9-question survey was e-mailed to active and associate members of the American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons. A total of 7395 unique citations were identified. Only 2 retrospective chart reviews met inclusion criteria. All objective parameters demonstrated no difference between patients with and without drains. A subjective benefit of limiting facial swelling was proposed without objective analysis. Fifty (32.5%) of the 154 craniofacial surgeons responded to the survey. Forty-two percent used postoperative drains. A significant association (P = .01) was found between the belief that drains limited facial swelling and their use. The literature examining postoperative drain use in primary cranioplasty for craniosynostosis is restricted. The current studies show no definite benefit to drain use but are limited in their assessment of key outcomes. There is wide variability among surgeons regarding drain use, and this seems to be motivated by belief and tradition.

Impact of Cardiac Risk Factors on Complications Following Cranial Vault Remodeling: Analysis of the 2012 to 2016 National Safety Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Database.

Congenital cardiac malformations have been reported in 8% of patients with craniosynostosis undergoing cranial vault remodeling (CVR), but associations with surgical outcomes are unknown. This study evaluated postoperative complications in patients who underwent CVR for craniosynostosis with or without cardiac risk factors (CRF) using the National Safety Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database. NSQIP-P database was queried for patients <2 years with craniosynostosis who underwent CVR from 2012 to 2016 based on diagnosis and procedure codes. The primary outcome was a composite of available NSQIP-P complications. Analysis compared patients with craniosynostosis based on the presence or absence of CRF. Univariate and multiple logistic regression identified risk factors associated with postoperative complications. A total of 3293 patients met inclusion criteria (8% with CRF). Two-thirds of patients experienced at least 1 complication, though patients with CRF experienced a greater proportion (74% vs 66%, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis identified associations between post-operative complications and age, ASA class, supplemental oxygen, neuromuscular disorders, preoperative nutritional supplementation, interventricular hemorrhage, and CRF. On multivariate regression, only older age (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36) and longer operative duration (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.01) were associated with greater odds of postoperative complications. The most common complication in patients with craniosynostosis who undergo CVR is bleeding requiring transfusion. Older age and longer operative duration were associated with postoperative complications. Although patients with CRF have more postoperative complications, CRF was not a risk factor on adjusted analysis.

Virtual Surgical Planning Decreases Operative Time for Isolated Single Suture and Multi-suture Craniosynostosis Repair.

Background:Cranial vault reconstruction is a complex procedure due to the need for precise 3-dimensional outcomes. Traditionally, the process involves manual bending of calvarial bone and plates. With the advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP), this procedure can be streamlined. Despite the advantages documented in the literature, there have been no case-control studies comparing VSP to traditional open cranial vault reconstruction.Methods:Data were retrospectively collected on patients who underwent craniosynostosis repair during a 7-year period. Information was collected on patient demographics, intraoperative and postoperative factors, and intraoperative surgical time. High-resolution computed tomography scans were used for preoperative planning with engineers when designing osteotomies, bone flaps, and final positioning guides.Results:A total of 66 patients underwent open craniosynostosis reconstruction between 2010 and 2017. There were 35 control (non-VSP) and 28 VSP cases. No difference in age, gender ratios, or number of prior operations was found. Blood loss was similar between the 2 groups. The VSP group had more screws and an increased length of postoperative hospital stay. The length of the operation was shorter in the VSP group for single suture and for multiple suture operations. Operative time decreased as the attending surgeon increased familiarity with the technique.Conclusions:VSP is a valuable tool for craniosynostosis repair. We found VSP decreases surgical time and allows for improved preoperative planning. Although there have been studies on VSP, this is the first large case-control study to be performed on its use in cranial vault remodeling.

Single-stage Total Cranial Vault Remodeling for Correction of Turricephaly: Description of a New Technique

Background:Turricephaly is considered one of the most difficult cranial deformities to correct as addressing cranial height can result in increased intracranial pressure. We describe a new technique of total calvarial remodeling with bony transposition to simultaneously correct turricephaly and brachycephaly while preserving intracranial volume.Methods:A retrospective review of patients undergoing single-stage cranial vault remodeling by a single surgeon (J.G.M.) at a single center between 2007 and 2015 was performed. The procedure consists of a frontal bandeau followed by a 1 cm 360o axial strip craniectomy. The strip is then rotated 90 degrees into a coronal orientation and interposed between fronto-parietal and parito-occipital segments. Modification for occipital widening can also be performed.Results:Six patients with turribrachycephaly underwent the procedure over the 8-year period. Four patients were operated at less than 1 year of age, one patient underwent surgery at 2 years, and one at 9 years. Mean operative time was 4 hours, and mean transfusion was 300cc. There were no major complications. Mean cranial height reduction achieved was 1.6 cm (range, 1.0–2.0 cm), and mean anterior–posterior expansion was 3.4 cm (range, 2.3–4.5 cm). Patients also showed improvement in supraorbital retrusion.Conclusion:Single-stage cranial vault remodeling with axial strip craniectomy and coronal interposition is safe and allows for simultaneous correction of turricephaly and brachycephaly while preserving intracranial volume.

Safety Outcomes in Endoscopic Versus Open Repair of Metopic Craniosynostosis

Premature fusion of the metopic suture leads to a range of clinical presentations, with more severe patients presenting characteristically with trigonocephaly. Endoscopic-assisted correction of craniosynostosis is emerging as an alternative to the gold-standard open cranial vault remodeling. While there are several documented benefits of endoscopic correction, the management of craniosynostosis varies widely in the literature with little consensus as to the preferred timing and surgical technique for repair. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety outcomes of endoscopic versus open surgery at our institution. This retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with metopic craniosynostosis who underwent open or closed surgical management and received at least 6 months of follow-up. Data extraction was performed via chart review and included demographic information and safety outcome variables. During the study period, 17 patients who met our inclusion criteria were treated by the multidisciplinary craniofacial team at our institution. Eight patients underwent endoscopic surgery and 9 underwent open surgery. The mean age at surgery was significantly higher in the open surgery group than the endoscopic surgery group (13.7 months versus 2.3 months, respectively). Estimated blood loss, percent estimated blood volume lost, transfusion volume, procedure length, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were all significantly higher in the open surgery group compared with the endoscopic group. In our patient population, endoscopic surgery for metopic craniosynostosis had an improved safety profile versus open surgery based on reduced procedure length, estimated blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, and length of stay in the ICU and hospital.

Surgical Outcome After Less "Rigid" Fixation in Open Cranial Vault Remodeling for Craniosynostosis.

Retrospective review of patients who underwent open craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis at the Hospital Kuala Lumpur between January 2011 and December 2016 were performed. Demographic data, surgical complications, and postoperative aesthetic outcomes and reoperations were evaluated using Whitaker classification. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. Thirty-four (n = 34) cases were included in this review consisting of 16 males and 18 females (ratio 1:1.25). Sixteen patients were syndromic with multiple suture synostoses: Apert syndrome (n = 8), Crouzon syndrome (n = 6), and Muenke's syndrome (n = 2). Eighteen patients were nonsyndromic: isolated single-suture craniosynostosis (n = 12) and multiple suture involvement (n = 6). Mean age of presentation was 17.4 months (4-16 months) with mean age of surgery of 23.8 months (6-68 months). Mean length of surgery was 6.1 hours (range 3-10 hours) and mean length of hospital stay was 10 days (mean 7-20 days). Mean duration of follow-up was 2.2 years (6 month-4 years). There were a total of 9 complications postoperatively: massive blood loss (n = 4), seroma (n = 2), exposure keratitis (n = 1), hand extravasation (n = 1), and occipital sore (n = 1). Analysis showed multiple suture craniosynostoses were associated with longer operative times (4.3 hours vs 6.5 hours, P = 0.0082 < 0.05) and higher blood transfusion (170 mL vs 275 mL, P = 0.0274 < 0.05). Older age was also associated with higher blood transfusion (135.5 mL; <12 months vs 250.2 mL; 12-24 months vs 302.1 mL; >24 months of age, P = 0.00059). Patients were categorized as 88.2% (n = 30) Whitaker I and II and 11.8% (n = 4) Whitaker III and IV. Reoperation rates were 2.9% (n = 1). Whitaker III and IV class were higher among patients with syndromic synostosis, unicoronal and multiple suture synostoses. Our technique of open cranial reconstruction with nonabsorbable suture nylon 2/0 as sole method of fixation has resulted in good aesthetic outcome with low reoperations and complications rate. Longer follow-up is needed to ascertain our long-term results.

Incomplete reossification after craniosynostosis surgery-incidence and analysis of risk factors: a clinical-radiological assessment study.

OBJECTIVE One of the principles of the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis includes the release of fused bone plates to prevent recurrence. Such bone defects require a reossification process after surgery to prevent a cosmetic problem or brain vulnerability to damage. The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the radiological and clinical evolution of bone defects after craniosynostosis. METHODS From January 2005 to May 2016, 248 infants underwent surgical correction of craniosynostosis at HUiP La Fe Valencia; the authors analyzed data from 216 of these cases that met the inclusion criteria for this study. Various surgical techniques were used according to the age of the patient and severity of the case, including endoscopic-assisted suturectomy, open suturectomy, fronto-orbital advancement, and cranial vault remodeling. Clinical follow-up and radiological quantitative measurements in 2 periods-12-24 months and 2 years after surgery-were analyzed; 94 patients had a postoperative CT scan and were included in the radiological analysis. RESULTS At the end of the follow-up period, 92 of 216 patients (42.59%) showed complete closure of the bone defect, 112 patients (51.85%) had minor bone defects, and 12 patients (5.56%) had significant bone defects that required surgical intervention. In the multivariate analysis, age at first surgery was not significantly associated with incomplete reossification (p = 0.15), nor was surgical site infection (p = 0.75). Multivariate analysis identified area of cranial defect greater than 5 cm2 in the first CT scan as predictive of incomplete reossification (p = 0.04). The mean area of cranial defect in the first CT scan (12-24 months after surgery) was 3.69 cm2 in patients treated with open surgery and 7.13 cm2 in those treated with endoscopic-assisted procedures; in the multivariate analysis, type of procedure was not related to incomplete reossification (p = 0.46). The positive predictive value of palpation as evaluation of bone cranial defects was 50% for significant defects and 71% for minor defects. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of cranial defects due to incomplete reossification requiring cranioplasty was 5.56% in our series. Defects greater than 5 cm2 in the first postoperative CT scan showed a positive association with incomplete reossification. Patients treated with endoscope-assisted procedures had larger defects in the initial follow-up, but the final incidence of cranial defects was not significantly different in the endoscope-assisted surgery group from that in the open surgery group.

Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis: A 3-D Photogrammetric Analysis of Cranial Vault Outcomes.

To evaluate 3-dimensional (3-D) photogrammetry as a tool for assessing the postoperative head shape of patients who had undergone cranial vault remodeling for metopic synostosis. We prospectively analyzed images of patients with metopic craniosynostosis who had undergone anterior cranial vault remodeling and age-matched controls. To ensure standardized facial orientation, each 3-D image was positioned to "best fit" the preoperative face by aligning 6 soft tissue landmarks. Forehead measurements were taken from a standardized position behind the surface of the face to landmarks placed in a ray configuration across the forehead. Academic teaching hospital. Thirteen pediatric patients with metopic craniosynostosis who had undergone anterior cranial vault remodeling and age-matched controls. Images were taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and over 1-year postoperatively. Forehead contours preoperatively and postoperatively, with statistics performed using a multivariate analysis of variance shape analysis. Mean postoperative follow-up was 1.8 (0.6) years. The average distance from the origin to forehead landmarks was 55.1 (3.4) mm preoperatively, 59.3 (0.7) mm immediate postoperatively, 59.1 (1.0) mm 1-year postoperatively, and 59.4 (0.6) mm in controls. Postoperative metopic forehead contours varied significantly from preoperative contours ( P < .01), while there was no statistical difference between the 2 postoperative time points ( P = .70). One-year postoperative patients were not significantly different from their age-matched controls ( P > .99). Preoperative metopic forehead contours varied significantly from postoperative contours. Cranial reconstructions approximated the foreheads of normal controls, and reconstructions were stable at more than 1-year follow-up.

Predictors of Postoperative Complications of Craniosynostosis Repair in the National Inpatient Sample.

Timing of intervention and complication profiles in surgical repair of craniosynostosis have been widely debated. Early intervention is frequently promoted as a means of decreasing morbidity while maintaining favorable outcomes via minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic strip craniectomy. Immediate postoperative morbidity due to complications of early vs late intervention remains a key element in comparing timing and technique for craniosynostosis repair. In addition, concurrent fronto-orbital advancement with open cranial vault remodeling may increase the risk of postoperative complications. We present an evaluation of surgical timing and the presence of fronto-orbital advancement as independent predictors of in-hospital complications after craniosynostosis repair. Retrospective analysis was performed in the National Inpatient Sample database from 1998 to 2009. Patients younger than 3 years having undergone elective surgical repair for craniosynostosis were identified. Comorbidities, demographics, transfusion status, and syndromic diagnosis were included as covariates. A multivariate regression model was used to characterize the association between age at the time of surgery and in-hospital complications. A subgroup analysis using the variable of concurrent fronto-orbital advancement was restricted to patients 8 to 24 months of age to exclude endoscopic craniosynostosis repair, which is traditionally repaired less than 6 months of age. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the impact of concurrent fronto-orbital advancement on postoperative complications. A total of 6010 craniosynostosis surgery cases (42.9%, age 0-7 months; 29.5%, age 8-12 months; and 27.6%, age 13-36 months) were included. Patients in the 7-to 12-month age group were more likely to experience complications when compared with the 0- to 6-month age group (odds ratio [OR],1.32; P < 0.05) and 13-to 36-month age group (OR, 1.32; P = 0.056). Syndromic patients (OR, 1.92; P < 0.001) and patients receiving an intraoperative blood transfusion (OR, 1.60; P < 0.05) demonstrated an increased risk for complications. In the subanalysis of 2936 patients aged 8 to 24 months, 15.1% of patients received frontoorbital advancement, which was associated with a significantly increased risk of complications (OR, 1.43; P < 0.05). Intermediate age (7-12 months) and concurrent fronto-orbital repair were independent risk factors for immediate postoperative complications. These findings may better inform the decision-making process for craniosynostosis repair in terms of timing and need for concurrent fronto-orbital reconstruction.

Twenty-Year Outcome Experience With Open Craniosynostosis Repairs: An Analysis of Reoperation and Complication Rates.

Surgical intervention during infancy for both syndromic and nonsyndromic patients with craniosynostosis remains the criterion standard of treatment with the 2 main options being open vault remodeling versus minimally invasive surgery. Although open cranial vault remodeling was initially considered a high-risk procedure, many advances have improved its safety. Despite this, there is a paucity of literature on the long-term outcomes of contemporary open craniosynostosis repair. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary open cranial vault repair for craniosynostosis by a single surgeon (J.A.A.) at New York-Presbyterian Hospital from 1995 to 2015 was performed. For primary open repair, 81 patients (46 males, 35 females) were analyzed, and affected sutures included unicoronal (28), bicoronal (7), metopic (24), sagittal (11), lambdoid (2), and multisuture (9). Fourteen patients (17.3%) were syndromic. Mean (SD) operative patient age was 13.81 (16.24) months: 34 (42%) were 0 to 6 months; 26 (32%), 7 to 12 months; and 21 (26%), 12 months of age or older. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean (SD) estimated blood loss for the plastic surgery portion of all cases was 74.53 (72.34) mL, and total estimated blood loss was 174.93 (182.23) mL. Mean (SD) hospital length of stay was 4.31 (1.59) days. One syndromic patient was readmitted for a wound infection (1.2%) that was successfully treated with antibiotics, and 2 syndromic patients (2.5%) had reoperation for fronto-orbital readvancement. This 20-year experience demonstrates the safety of modern open craniosynostosis repairs at a large academic medical center with low rates of mortality (0%), complications (1.2%), and reoperations (2.5%).

Changes in intracranial volume and cranial shape in modern Koreans over four decades.

This study investigated whether there was any secular change in cranial vault morphology among Koreans born between the 1930s and 1970s, a period of dramatic shift in Korea's socioeconomic conditions. Using three-dimensional MRI volumetry, we obtained the intracranial volume (ICV) and craniometric measurements of 115 healthy Koreans: 58 individuals (32 males and 26 females) born in the 1930s (1926-1936) and 57 (28 males and 29 females) born in the 1970s (1972-1979). The intracranial volume of males was 1502.3 ± 110.3 cm3 for the 1930s group and 1594.1 ± 99.5 cm3 for the 1970s group, and for females, it was 1336.0 ± 53.0 cm3 for the 1930s group and 1425.9 ± 79.6 cm3 for the 1970s group. On average, ICV increased by 94 cm3 in males and by 90 cm3 in females. Cranial measurements for the 1970s group were significantly larger than the 1930s group for both sexes except in female cranial length. Each measurement was significantly correlated with ICV [cranial height (R = 0.720), breadth (R = 0.706), and length (R = 0.531)]. The cephalic index decreased from 0.846 to 0.828 in males, indicating the cranium became narrower relative to the cranial length. In females, the cephalic index increased from 0.831 to 0.850. Sex and birthyear were marginally interrelated in cephalic indices. From the 1930s to 1970s, the Korean Peninsula experienced important historical shifts, and we speculate that the consequent shift in socioeconomic status is the most likely factor responsible for Koreans' cranial vault remodeling.

Early postnatal cranial vault reduction and fixation surgery for severe hydrocephalic macrocephaly

OBJECTIVE Infants with severe hydrocephalus and extreme macrocephaly typically undergo CSF diversion early in life, which can result in significant cranial deformity due to CSF overdrainage. In this scenario, overlap of the cranial plates can precede the development of secondary synostosis and/or severe, permanent cranial deformity. As a result, extensive cranial vault remodeling is sometimes undertaken later in life, which is often challenging and has been associated with mortality and a high morbidity rate. The authors have previously described a technique for early postnatal cranial vault reduction and fixation (CVRF), in which the calvarial bones are stabilized using absorbable fixation plates in the neonatal period, in an attempt to facilitate patient positioning, simplify hydrocephalus management, and improve cosmesis. Here, the authors describe their institutional experience managing patients with extreme neonatal hydrocephalus with CSF diversion, with and without CVRF, over the past 12 years. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of infants with extreme hydrocephalus (head circumference > 49 cm) treated at their children's hospital with ventriculoperitoneal shunting, with or without CVRF, between 2005 and 2017. Data collected included age, sex, etiology of hydrocephalus, type of CVRF performed (anterior, posterior, or combined), follow-up duration, orbitofrontal circumference, craniometric measurements, intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, and postoperative complications. Developmental data were collected using the third edition of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. Photographic imaging was used to demonstrate esthetic outcomes, and family questionnaires were used to evaluate satisfaction with the esthetic outcome. RESULTS Eleven patients with extreme neonatal hydrocephalus underwent CSF shunting; 5 underwent shunting alone and 6 patients underwent shunting and CVRF. For patients who underwent shunting and CVRF, the median age at CVRF was 6 days and the median interval between shunt placement and CVRF was 2.5 days. The mean extent of calvarial vault volume reduction was 44.5% (± 3.9%). The mean duration of the CVRF procedure was 108 minutes, and 5 of 6 patients required intraoperative transfusion. Of the 5 patients who underwent shunting alone, 3 developed severe cranial deformities. Of 6 patients who underwent shunting and CVRF, 1 had a poor cosmetic outcome. In the shunting-alone group, 2 patients died and 1 required extensive cranial vault correction at 10 years of age. One patient in the shunting and CVRF group also died. CONCLUSIONS CVRF in combination with CSF shunting in the neonatal period can simplify the treatment of the rare case of severe hydrocephalic macrocephaly and leads to cosmetic outcomes that are considered good by their families.

Evaluating Trends in Headache and Revision Surgery following Cranial Vault Remodeling for Craniosynostosis.

The recommended treatment for craniosynostosis, is cranial vault expansion to prevent increased intracranial pressure and optimize developmental outcomes. Some patients complain about postoperative headaches and occasionally require revision to treat increased intracranial pressure. This study examines whether specific factors are associated with an increased risk of postoperative headaches or intracranial hypertension. This retrospective cohort included patients with craniosynostosis from 1995 and 2010. Primary outcomes included headaches and delayed intracranial hypertension. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations with clinical characteristics. The cohort included 383 patients, of whom 127 (33 percent) complained of headaches. The positive predictive value of a headache indicating intracranial hypertension was only 9.4 percent among all patients and 6.7 percent among patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Headaches occurring in the morning, more than once per week, and associated with nausea, vomiting, or decreased activity level were most likely to be associated with delayed intracranial hypertension. Only 21 patients (6 percent) required revision surgery, and these patients were more likely to have syndromic craniosynostosis (OR, 5.6; 95 percent CI, 2.1 to 14.9), Chiari malformation (OR, 5.8; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 19.5), or secondary craniosynostosis (additional sutures fused on the 2-year postoperative CT scan) (OR, 5.4; 95 percent CI, 2.2 to 13.5). Headaches are common after cranial vault remodeling but are not very predictive of who will need revision surgery for intracranial hypertension. Patients with specific headache characteristics, syndromic craniosynostosis, secondary synostosis, and Chiari malformations have the highest risk of developing delayed intracranial hypertension. Risk, III.

A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cleft and Craniofacial Surgery

This study presents a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cleft and craniofacial surgery. All studies reporting on RCTs in cleft and craniofacial surgery were identified on PubMed using the search terms "cleft," "velopharyngeal insufficiency," "velopharyngeal dysfunction," "nasoalveolar molding," "gingivoperiosteoplasty," "Pierre Robin sequence," "craniofacial," "craniosynostosis," "craniofacial microsomia," "hemifacial microsomia," "hypertelorism," "Le Fort," "monobloc," "distraction osteogenesis," "Treacher Collins," and "Goldenhar." Studies were excluded if they were not randomized, did not focus primarily on topics related to cleft or craniofacial surgery, included repeat publications of data, or were unavailable in English. Studies were evaluated on demographic and bibliometric data, study size, specific area of focus, and findings reported. Four hundred forty-seven unique studies were identified. One hundred eighty-three papers met inclusion criteria (115 cleft lip and palate, 65 craniofacial, and 3 spanning both disciplines). Sixty-six (36%) were dedicated to topics related to surgical techniques. There were no studies comparing current cleft lip or soft palate repair techniques and no studies on cleft rhinoplasty. The most frequently reported surgical topic was cleft palate. There were several studies on orthognathic techniques which compared distraction osteogenesis to traditional advancement. Most craniofacial operations, such as cranial vault remodeling and frontofacial advancement/distraction, were not represented. Several standard operations in cleft and craniofacial surgery are not supported by Level I evidence from randomized controlled trials. Our community should consider methods by which more RCTs can be performed, or redefine the acceptable standards of evidence to guide our clinical decisions.

The Role of Preoperative Imaging in the Management of Nonsyndromic Lambdoid Craniosynostosis.

The necessity of imaging for patients with craniosynostosis is controversial. Lambdoid synostosis is known to be associated with additional anomalies, but the role of imaging in this setting has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative imaging on intraoperative and postoperative management among patients undergoing operative intervention for lambdoid craniosynostosis. A retrospective review of patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling for lambdoid craniosynostosis between January 2006 and 2014 was conducted. Patient demographics, age at computed tomography scan, age at surgery, results of the radiologic evaluation, operative technique, and modification of the diagnosis following the radiologic studies were analyzed. A pediatric neuroradiology and the surgical team interpreted the radiographs. The primary outcome was change in intraoperative or postoperative management based on imaging results. A total of 11 patients were diagnosed with lambdoid synostosis. Of these patients, 81.8% had abnormalities on imaging relevant to operative planning. The most common anomalies were Chiari I malformation (45%) and venous anomalies of the posterior fossa (36%). Preoperative imaging altered the management of 9 (81.8%) patients. Closer follow-up was required for 6 patients (54%). Suboccipital decompression was performed in 4 patients (36%). Venous anomalies were found in 4 patients (36%). The diagnosis was changed from positional plagiocephaly to lambdoid synostosis in 2 patients (18%). Given the frequency and significance of radiographic abnormalities in the setting of lamboid synostosis, preoperative imaging should be considered during the operative planning phase as it can affect postoperative and intraoperative management.

Variability in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Minimally invasive approaches to the surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis are gaining favor as an alternative to open cranial vault remodeling. In this systematic review, the reviewers evaluate the variability in described surgical techniques for minimally invasive correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. Articles were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria from an online literature search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. Extracted data included the incisions, method of dissection, osteotomies performed, and type of force therapy utilized.A total of 28 articles from 15 author groups were included in the final analysis. Of the 28 articles, 17 distinct techniques were identified. Significant variation existed in both the technique and the terminology used to describe it. Access to the cranium varied between a standard bicoronal incision (n = 2), a "lazy S" incision (n = 2), and multiple short incisions along the fused sagittal suture (n = 13). Additional variations were found in the size and design of the osteotomy, the usage (and duration, if applicable) of force therapy, and the age of the patient at the time of surgical intervention.This systematic review demonstrates that minimally invasive approaches to sagittal craniosynostosis vary widely in technique with respect to the incisions, osteotomies, and force therapy used. Additionally, the terminology employed in describing minimally invasive approaches is inconsistent across centers. This discrepancy between technique and terminology presents challenges for reporting and interpreting the increasing body of literature on this subject. We recommend standard terminology be used for future publications on minimally invasive techniques.

Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery followed by helmet therapy.

Background:Surgical methods to treat craniosynostosis have evolved from a simple strip craniectomy to a diverse spectrum of partial or complete cranial vault remodeling with excellent results but often with high comorbidity. Therefore, minimal invasive craniosynostosis surgery has been explored in the last few decades. The main goal of minimal invasive craniosynostosis surgery is to reduce the morbidity and invasiveness of classical surgical procedures, with equal long-term results, both functional as well as cosmetic.Methods:To reach these goals, we adopted endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery (EACS) supplemented with helmet molding therapy in 2005.Results:We present in detail our surgical technique used for scaphocephaly, trigonocephaly, plagiocephaly, complex multisutural, and syndromic cases of craniosynostosis.Conclusions:We conclude that EACS with helmet therapy is a safe and suitable treatment option for any type of craniosynostosis, if performed at an early age, preferably around 3 months of age.

Longitudinal Assessment of Developmental Outcomes in Infants Undergoing Late Craniosynostosis Repair.

Evaluation of infants with craniosynostosis for surgical intervention, as opposed to conservative management, remains a challenge within the field of craniofacial surgery. Studies have consistently demonstrated that surgical repair of craniosynostosis is ideally performed between 3 and 12 months of age. As such, there is limited data regarding neurocognitive development in infants who initially present with uncorrected craniosynostosis after 12 months of age. Moreover, the impact of cranial vault surgery on neurocognitive development at all ages remains under investigation. A prospective, nonrandomized study was performed. All children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis who presented for initial evaluation after 12 months of age were enrolled. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III) was utilized to assess pre- and postoperative cognitive development and comparisons were made to normative values. Developmental delay is defined as scoring < 85. Five infants, average age 26 months (13-43 months) at initial presentation, underwent cranial vault remodeling and developmental testing. Fused cranial sutures involved: metopic (n = 4), and right coronal (n = 1). Cognitive testing demonstrated that 4 of 5 infants (80%) were developmentally delayed at presentation (scores: 60, 70, 72, and 80), and 1 infant was within normal limits (score: 100). Postoperative testing was performed between 2 and 12 months postoperatively. Universal improvement was observed in infants who were delayed prior to surgery (80, 80, 75, and 90, respectively). The infant who was not delayed prior to surgery remained within normal limits after surgery. This study demonstrates an association between cranial vault surgery and cognitive improvement in infants presenting late with developmental delay.

Location of the euryon in scaphocephalic vs. non-scaphocephalic controls: A novel assessment of cranial vault remodeling outcomes

We describe a novel measurement of cranial morphology in pre- and post-operative scaphocephalic patients to complement the cephalic index. This will better describe restoration of normal skull and head shape, further defining the nuances of the corrected skull. In this retrospective comparative study the location of the euryon on the skull was statistically significantly different in preoperative scaphocephalic patients versus non-scaphocephalic controls. This difference was resolved with surgical cranial vault remodeling, indicating restoration of a normal skull profile. Additional measurements of the location of the euryon in relation to the forehead prominence, combined with validated cephalic index measurements, can further describe postoperative outcomes in scaphocephaly. More sensitive clinical measurements such as these can aid the craniofacial surgeon in assessing outcomes in cranial vault remodeling. Further, large-scale study is needed to determine if additional anterior skull metric points may be useful in documenting skull shape restoration.