CR Pts Research Articles

1082MO 5-year characterization of complete responses in patients with advanced melanoma who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) or NIVO alone

5-year outcomes of patients (pts) with a CR to NIVO+IPI or NIVO alone and factors associated with continued CR or relapse are unknown. The current pooled analysis addresses these key questions, including a 12-mo CR landmark analysis used to decrease the time guarantee bias. In this post hoc analysis, 5-yr data were pooled from the phase III CheckMate 066 and 067 studies and the phase II CheckMate 069 study of pts with treatment-naive, advanced melanoma. Analyzed pts received either the approved regimen of NIVO+IPI followed by NIVO monotherapy or NIVO monotherapy. Characteristics and outcomes of pts with a CR (by RECIST) were investigated, including 12-mo landmark survival analyses to determine the likelihood of being alive at 5-y among pts in CR by 12 mo (to mitigate the time guarantee bias). Minimum follow-up was 60 mo since randomization of the last pt in each study; pooled median mo of follow-up was 63 for NIVO+IPI (n=409) and 64 for NIVO (n=526). CRs were demonstrated in 96 (23%) NIVO+IPI pts and 102 (19%) NIVO pts; of CR pts alive at 5 yrs, 75/79 (95%) and 85/91 (93%) had not received subsequent systemic therapy. Baseline characteristics significantly associated with CR (Table) were M stage (NIVO+IPI), PD-L1 ≥ 5% (NIVO), normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; both) and fewer disease sites (both). Median duration of CR and median time to subsequent systemic therapy were not reached in either group. Median mo (Q1, Q3) to CR was 9.1 (2.8, 23.1) for NIVO+IPI and 11.8 (5.8, 26.5) for NIVO alone. In pts in CR at 12-mo, 5-y OS for NIVO+IPI and NIVO respectively was 85% and 86%; PFS was 84% and 82%. NIVO+IPI- or NIVO-treated pts in CR at 12 mo have a high likelihood of being alive at 5 y even without subsequent systemic therapy. Several baseline pt characteristics were associated with CR duration. Factors associated with CR may differ for NIVO+IPI and NIVO alone. Biomarker analyses are ongoing.Table: 1082MONIVO+IPINIVOn/NCR % (95% CI)P-valuen/NCR % (95% CI)P-valueLDH status >ULN ≤ULN16/138 80/26912 (7-18) 30 (24-36)<0.000119/191 81/31710 (6-15) 26 (21-31)<0.0001LDH status > 2xULN ≤ 2xULN2/43 94/3645 (1-16) 26 (21-31)0.00202/58 98/4503 (<1-12) 22 (18-26)0.0010M stage M0 M1A M1B M1C9/19 20/62 30/98 37/22947 (24-71) 32 (21-45) 31 (22-41) 16 (12-22)0.00048/35 15/70 30/110 49/31123 (10-40) 21 (12-33) 27 (19-37) 16 (12-20)0.0587No. lesion sites 1 2-3 >353/128 36/211 7/7041 (33-50) 17 (12-23) 10 (4-20)<0.000140/130 50/303 12/9131 (23-40) 16 (12-21) 13 (7-22)0.0007PD-L1 ≥5% <5%20/92 64/26622 (14-32) 24 (19-30)0.650742/139 58/33530 (23-39) 17 (13-22)0.0017ULN, upper limit of normal. Open table in a new tab

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and next generation sequencing (NGS) for minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation: Results of the FORTE trial in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).

8533 Background: The role of MRD by MFC and NGS is well known in MM, with few data on the concordance of the two techniques. We analyzed and compared MRD data from the FORTE trial both by MFC and NGS. Methods: Newly diagnosed MM patients (pts) ≤65 years were randomized to: carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRd) induction-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) - KRd consolidation (KRd_ASCT); 12 KRd cycles (KRd12); carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone (KCd) induction-ASCT-KCd consolidation (KCd_ASCT). Pts were then randomized to maintenance: lenalidomide alone or plus carfilzomib. MRD was assessed by 8-color second generation flow cytometry (sensitivity 10−5) in pts with ≥very good partial response (VGPR) before maintenance. In a subgroup of these pts, next generation flow (NGF; sensitivity 10−5-10−6) was performed. In ≥CR pts, MRD pre-maintenance was also assessed by NGS (Adaptive Biotechnologies; sensitivity 10−5-10−6). Thus, both MFC and NGS evaluations were available only in ≥CR pts. 1-year sustained MRD negativity by MFC and NGS was also analyzed in pts with at least one sample available at least 1 year apart. Results: MFC and NGS data were available in 184/233 (79%) CR pts (66 KRd_ASCT, 67 KRd12 and 51 KCd_ASCT). Median age of this ≥CR population was 57 years (IQR 52-62), 13% had International Staging System (ISS) III and 27% high risk cytogenetics by FISH [either del(17p) or t(4;14) or t(14;16)]. Table reports MRD negativity rate by MFC and NGS at a cut-off of 10−5 and 10−6 among ≥CR negative pts in the 3 arms. NGS negativity at a cut-off 10−6 was found in 36/133 (27%) ≥CR pts (for 51/184 CR pts 10−6 sensitivity was not reached). In evaluable pts, 1-year sustained 10−5 MRD negativity by MFC and NGS was superimposable (83%). We evaluated concordance of MRD results by the two techniques and observed agreement was 86% for MFC and NGS at 10−5 evaluable samples (n: 335; r: 0.61) and 78% for MFC and NGS at 10−6 evaluable samples (n: 56; r: 0.77). Conclusions: In pts who achieved ≥CR, similar rate of pre-maintenance 10−5 negativity by MFC and NGS has been reached in each arm, with 83% pts maintaining 1-year MFC or NGS 10−5 sustained MRD negativity. Concordance between MFC and NGS was good, particularly when the same sensitivity was reached. Longer follow up is needed to draw definitive conclusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02203643 . [Table: see text]

Treatment stratification in B-cell PTLD after solid organ transplantation (SOT) by international prognostic index (IPI) and response to rituximab: Interim results from the PTLD-2 trial.

8045 Background: The PTLD-1 trials have established risk-stratified sequential treatment of B-cell PTLD. After rituximab induction, patients (pts) in complete remission (25 %) received rituximab consolidation, while all others received R-CHOP. The PTLD-2 trial tests modified risk-stratification including clinical risk factors. These are the results of the 2nd scheduled interim analysis (40/60 planned pts). Methods: The prospective, multicenter phase II PTLD-2 trial (NCT02042391) enrols treatment-naïve adult SOT recipients with CD20-positive PTLD. Key exclusion criteria are CNS involvement, ECOG &gt; 2, pregnancy, and severe organ dysfunction or severe, active infection. Treatment consists of rituximab (1400 mg SC; first application 375 mg/m2 IV) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. After restaging, pts in CR as well as those in PR with ≤ 2 IPI risk factors at diagnosis (low-risk group) continue with four three-weekly courses of rituximab. Most other pts (high-risk group) receive 4 cycles of R-CHOP-21, while thoracic SOT recipients who progress under rituximab (very-high-risk group) receive six cycles of alternating R-CHOP-21 and R-DHAOx. The primary endpoint (event-free survival in the low-risk group) is not analyzed here. Secondary endpoints presented here are response and overall response (ORR) by computed tomography, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) overall and by risk group. Results: 40 pts were recruited at 12 centers (2015 – 2019). 21/40 were kidney, 11 lung, 4 liver, 3 heart, and 1 liver/kidney transplant recipients. Median age was 54 years. 38/40 PTLD were monomorphic and 15/40 EBV-associated. 38 pts were evaluated for response at interim staging: 13 were allocated to the low-risk, 17 to the high-risk and 8 to the very-high-risk group. ORR was 28/30 (93 %, CR: 16/30 [53 %]). With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the 1-year/3-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of TTP and OS in the intention-to-treat population (40 pts) were 85 %/80 % and 70 %/70 %, respectively. In the low-risk group, the 2-year KM estimate of OS was 100 %. The frequency of infections (all grades) was 50 %, and TRM occurred in 3/40 pts (8 %). Conclusions: One third of enrolled pts were treated in the low-risk group and the recruitment goal for evaluation of the primary endpoint will likely be reached. Interim efficacy and toxicity data with rituximab SC and modified risk-stratification are encouraging despite the inclusion of 35 % thoracic SOT recipients. Clinical trial information: NCT02042391 .

Clinical activity of cirmtuzumab, an anti-ROR1 antibody, in combination with ibrutinib: Interim results of a phase Ib/II study in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

8036 Background: ROR1 is an onco-embryonic tyrosine kinase receptor that is re-expressed at high levels on many hematologic and solid cancers but not on normal adult tissues. ROR1 binds Wnt5a, resulting in increased tumor growth and survival, cancer cell stemness and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to inhibit the tumor promoting activity of ROR1. In this study, we examined the safety and efficacy of Cirm in combination with ibrutinib (Ibr) in MCL or CLL. Methods: As of Jan 29, 2020, 12 pts with relapsed refractory (RR) MCL were enrolled into Part 1 Dose Escalation (DE). All MCL pts had stage 3/ 4 at original diagnosis, 25% had bulky tumor at study entry, 58% had intermediate/high risk MIPI scores and the majority (83%) had ≥ 2 prior regimens. 34 pts with CLL [12 treatment naïve (TN) and 22 RR pts] enrolled into Part 1 DE (n = 18) or Part 2 Expansion (n = 16). At least 79% of CLL pts were high risk as determined by unmutated IGHV, 17p/p53 loss, and/or del 11q. DE pts received Cirm IV q2wks x 3-5 doses then q4wks plus Ibr (starting D28). Following DE, Cirm 600mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks plus Ibr (420mg/day CLL or 560mg/day MCL) was chosen for Expansion. Results: Safety : only grade 1/ 2 AEs were reported as possibly related to Cirm alone, whereas the safety profile attributed to Ibr or Ibr / Cirm was similar to published data, with no new or unexpected events. Efficacy for MCL: 83% ORR, 33% (4) CR, 50% (6) PR, 17% (2) SD. CRs were achieved at a median of 3.6 mos in heavily pretreated pts, including 2 with bulky disease &gt; 5cm. Prior therapy of the 4 CR pts: 2 pts failed R-Ibr (7-10 mos) and R-hyperCVAD, 1 pt, auto-SCT and allo-SCT, 1 pt, auto-SCT and CAR-T. Efficacy for CLL : 88% ORR (92% TN, 86% RR), 3% (1) CR, 85% (22) PR/ (7) PR-L, 12% (4) SD. In addition, 3 PR pts with CLL met criteria for “Clinical CR, bone marrow biopsy not performed”. The pt achieving a CR had RR disease with del 11q; this pt remains in remission &gt; 6 mos after stopping all therapy. At a median follow-up of 9.9 mos, 100% of CLL pts are free of disease progression and &gt; 82% remain on study. Conclusions: Cirm in combination with Ibr is a well-tolerated and active regimen for RR MCL and TN or RR CLL. In this evaluation of 46 pts, the ORR and PFS continue to improve with longer follow-up and additional pts, supporting continued investigation of this regimen in ROR1 expressing tumors. This study is ongoing and enrolling an Expansion arm for MCL pts and an open-label randomized Phase 2 in CLL pts comparing Ibr alone to Cirm /Ibr. Clinical trial information: NCT03088878 .

Ivosidenib (IVO) prior to hematopoietic cell transplant for patients with IDH1-mutant relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML).

7521 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) provides a potentially curative option for patients (pts) with R/R AML. Disease status at the time of transplant is a major determinant of long-term prognosis, with pts typically receiving salvage chemotherapy prior to HCT to induce a remission. However, older and/or heavily pre-treated pts frequently cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy (IC) or do not obtain adequate disease control to permit an HCT. IVO is an oral, potent, targeted inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) approved for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed AML ≥75 y of age or ineligible for IC, and those with R/R AML. We assessed HCT outcomes in pts with m IDH1 R/R AML who proceeded to HCT after treatment with IVO in a phase I study (NCT02074839). Methods: Baseline characteristics, clinical response (including CR, CRi/CRp, MLFS), and overall survival (OS) for the subgroup of pts with m IDH1 R/R AML who received IVO 500 mg QD, responded to treatment and then underwent HCT are reported. m IDH1 variant allele frequency (VAF) from bone marrow mononuclear cells was assessed using BEAMing digital PCR (0.02–0.04% VAF detection limit). Results: Among 179 pts with R/R AML treated with IVO, 18 proceeded to HCT: median age, 61.5 y (range 36–68); 56% male; 16.7% had secondary AML; 27.8% had ≥3 prior regimens; 11.1% had a prior HCT. The median duration of IVO treatment prior to HCT was 3.9 mo (range 2.1–15.2). The last reported response prior to HCT was 50.0% CR. Six- and 12-mo post-HCT survival rates were 77.8% and 50.0%; median relapse-free survival post HCT was 7.3 mo (range 2.6–NE). Median OS from start of IVO was 16.8 mo (95% CI 9.2, NE) for HCT pts vs 9.0 mo (95% CI 7.1, 10.2) in the entire study cohort; median follow-up time, 33.2 mo (range 3.2–41.9). Eight HCT pts were censored for OS: 5 are in remission, 2 relapsed and are in survival follow-up, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Median OS was not estimable (95% CI 9.1, NE) for the 12 HCT pts who achieved CR after IVO therapy and was 20.5 mo (95% CI 16.4, NE) for the 31 CR pts who did not undergo HCT. m IDH1 was undetectable in 1/18 (6%) pts; 4/18 (22%) pts had reduction below 1% VAF in ≥1 at the last assessment prior to HCT. Conclusions: IVO monotherapy is a putative treatment option to induce remissions prior to HCT for m IDH1 R/R AML pts who are not considered candidates for intensive salvage therapy. Post-transplant survival rates are encouraging and warrant further investigation of IVO monotherapy or combination salvage therapies prior to HCT. Clinical trial information: NCT02074839 .

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from Two Loci Mismatched (≤6/8) Unrelated Donors in Acute Leukemia: On Behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT

Background Data on outcome of allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) from mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) (≤6/8) in leukemic patients (pts) are limited. Methods We assess HSCT results in pts with AML/ALL in CR transplanted between 2000 and 2017 from ≤6/8 MMUD (2-4 HLA mismatches at the allelic level at loci A, B, C and DR) reported to the EBMT. Results A total of 465 pts were allocated, AML-320 and ALL-145. Median age was 50.2 years (range, 18-71.8) and 34.8 years (range, 18.2-62.9); 54% and 64% were males, respectively. Median F/U was 63 and 75 months, respectively. 69% and 66% were in CR1, while 31% and 34% were in CR2. 40% of AML pts had intermediate risk cytogenetics, 10% poor risk and 5% good risk (missing 45%),respectively. 37% of ALL pts were Ph positive, 22% Ph negative and 18% T ALL (17% B ALL with no Ph data,6% missing data). The number of HLA mismatches (HLAMM) was 6/8 - in 82% and 85%,5/8- in 11.5% and 12% and 3-4 in 6% and 3% of AML and ALL pts, respectively. 85% of AML pts and 77% of ALL pts received PBSC graft. Conditioning regimen was myeloablative in the majority of pts (89% of AML and 61% of ALL pts). 82% and 77% underwent in vivo TCD, respectively. GVHD prophylaxis was CSA/MTX in 51% and 67% and CSA/MMF in 21% and 10% of AML and ALL pts, respectively. Engraftment was achieved in 97% and 95% of pts, respectively. The incidence of acute (a) GVHD grade (Gr) II-IV and Gr III-IV was 34% and 41% and 14% and 21% for AML and ALL pts, respectively. Total and extensive chronic(c) GVHD rates at 2y were 38% and 38% and 23% and 14%, respectively. The main causes of death were disease recurrence (37% in both), GVHD (29% and 22%) and infections (22% and 26%).The 2 and 5y outcomes in the entire population were: RI-28% and 33%, NRM-28% and 30%; LFS-44% and 37%, OS- 50% and 41% and GRFS- 33% and 27%, respectively. More than 2 HLA mismatches were associated with a higher incidence of aGVHD Gr II-IV (29% vs 15%, respectively).In MVA, RI was lower for ALL vs AML HR (95% CI) 0.60, p=0.02. Disease status (CR2 vs CR1) was poor prognostic factor for RI, LFS and OS. Age was prognostic factor for NRM, LFS and OS. HLA mismatch at locus DR was poor prognostic factor, giving increased NRM: HR (95% CI) 1.68, p=0.02, and lower LFS: HR (95% CI), 1.42, p=0.03and OS HR (95% CI) 1.46, p=0.03and higher GVHD Gr II-IV HR (95% CI) 1.48, p=0.048. Results of MVA in AML pts in CR1 were similar. GVHD prophylaxis CSA/MMF in comparison to CSA/MTX resulted in higher NRM HR (95% CI) 2.2,p= 0.005 and lower GRFS HR (95% CI) 1.58, p=0.02.Notably, in 154 pts with AML in CR1 transplanted from ≤6/8 UD with T cell depletion c mismatches was associated with higher incidence of cGVHD HR (95% CI) 2.52, p=0.002. Summary and Conclusions HSCT from ≤6/8 MMUD transplantation can provide 40% 5y OS, 37% LFS and GRFS of 27% in leukemic pts. DR mismatch is a poor prognostic factor. cGVHD incidence at 5y is 41% with 21% being severe and is associated in AML pts with HLA C mismatches. CSA and MTX is the preferred GVHD prophylaxis.

Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Patients with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) with Positive Measurable Residual Disease (MRD)

Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Patients with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) with Positive Measurable Residual Disease (MRD)

PET-Adapted Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus ICE As First Salvage Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

PET-Adapted Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus ICE As First Salvage Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Bcl2 Mutations Are Predominant in Patients (pts) with Venetoclax Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Response and Clinical Outcomes in Ultra-Refractory MCL

Non-Bcl2 Mutations Are Predominant in Patients (pts) with Venetoclax Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Response and Clinical Outcomes in Ultra-Refractory MCL

Outcome of Two Loci Mismatched (≤6/8) Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia: ALWP of the EBMT Study

Outcome of Two Loci Mismatched (≤6/8) Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia: ALWP of the EBMT Study

Normalization of Serum B-Cell Maturation Antigen Levels from Treatment Predicts Progression Free and Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Introduction: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is increased in the serum (s) of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). We have previously shown that baseline sBCMA levels predict outcomes for MM pts. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a decrease of sBCMA to normal levels (&lt; 82.69 ng/mL) after initiating treatment predicts both progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among MM pts and its relationship to clinical response status in this pt population. Methods: sBCMA levels were determined using an ELISA (R&amp;D Systems; Minneapolis, MN) in 147 consecutive MM pts whose first treatment was in the frontline (n=87 [59%]) or salvage (n=60 [41%]) settings in a single clinic specializing in MM from February 2009 to April 2019 (observation cut-off: May 31, 2019). We determined sBCMA weekly during the first cycle and then monthly thereafter (median follow-up= 28 mo). An age-matched analysis of 206 healthy donors was used to determine a median normal sBCMA level of 37.6 ng/mL (SD 22.5 ng/mL). A reference threshold value of 82.7 ng/mL was determined using 2 SDs above the median. We defined normalization of sBCMA as a decrease in levels to &lt; 82.7 ng/mL on two consecutive measurements. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare PFS and OS among these pts and compared with responses as defined using the IMWG criteria. All pt samples were obtained following informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: One hundred thirteen pts (77%) had a baseline sBCMA ≥ upper threshold of normal (82.7 ng/mL) with a median of 435.3 ng/mL (range, 84.5-9,153.8 ng/mL) whereas the remaining 34 pts (23%) had baseline levels below 82.7 ng/mL and were excluded from analyses in relationship to normalizing sBCMA during their treatment. sBCMA levels normalized (&lt; 82.7 ng/mL) in over half (55%) of evaluable pts (n=62), and these pts showed a markedly longer PFS (median 33.2 mo) than pts that did not (n=51; median 4.0 mo; p&lt;0.0001). Furthermore, those normalizing their sBCMA levels showed improved OS (p&lt;0.0001). Among those evaluated during their frontline treatment (n=75), those who normalized (n=50) also showed a longer PFS (median 33.9 mo) than those who did not (n=25; median 12.8 mo; p&lt;0.0001). Only 12 of 38 pts undergoing salvage treatment normalized their sBCMA, but these pts experienced both improved PFS (median 8.3 mo vs 3.1 mo; p=0.0115) and OS (p=0.0345). We also compared the PFS and OS of pts in CR to normalization of sBCMA. Pts whose sBCMA normalized (n=62) had both similar PFS (p=0.6257) and OS (p=0.7346) to those who achieved CR (n=26). Notably, every pt who achieved CR had normalized sBCMA and all pts who failed to normalize did not achieve CR (n=51). Pts who failed to normalize had shorter PFS (median 4.0 mo; n=51) than those who did not achieve CR (median 12.7 mo; n=87; p=0.0091). Among the pts who normalized sBCMA, pts who achieved CR (n=26) had similar PFS (p=0.4029) and OS (p=0.6354) to those who did not achieve CR (n=36). Conversely, among the 87 pts who did not achieve CR, pts who normalized their sBCMA (n=36) had markedly longer PFS (median 29.4 mo) than those who did not (n=51; median 4.0 mo; p&lt;0.0001); normalizing pts also showed improved OS (p=0.0072). We examined pts whose best clinical response was ≥ MR to determine if normalization of sBCMA improved upon determination of their PFS and OS. We found that among pts who achieved PR, those who normalized sBCMA (n=26) experienced improved PFS (median 33.2 mo) than those who did not (n=18; median 12.8 mo; p=0.0173); OS was also improved in those PR pts who normalized their sBCMA (p=0.0350). Similar findings were found when analyzing those achieving MR or PR, with PFS (p=0.0006) and OS (p=0.0326) for pts who normalized (n=30) being longer than for pts who did not normalize sBCMA (n=28). Of those achieving at least an MR, both PFS (median 33.9 vs 12.8 mo; p&lt;0.0001) and OS (p=0.0052) were longer for normalizing pts (n=59) than pts who failed to normalize (n=28). Conclusion: We have demonstrated that among MM pts starting new treatment with baseline elevated sBCMA levels, normalization of sBCMA levels (&lt; 82.7 ng/mL) predicts markedly longer PFS and OS. Patients who achieve normalization have similar outcomes to those in CR. Additionally, our findings suggest that normalization of sBCMA predicts longer PFS and OS for pts who achieve ≥ MR. Therefore, normalization of sBCMA may be a novel approach to predict clinical outcomes for MM pts starting new treatment. Disclosures Chen: Oncotraker Inc: Equity Ownership. Swift:Bristol Mayers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jansen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Berenson:Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation.: Consultancy, Research Funding; OncoTracker: Equity Ownership, Other: Officer; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amag: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Pivotal Safety and Efficacy Results from Transcend NHL 001, a Multicenter Phase 1 Study of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B Cell Lymphomas

Pivotal Safety and Efficacy Results from Transcend NHL 001, a Multicenter Phase 1 Study of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B Cell Lymphomas

Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Updated Results of a Phase Ib/II Randomized Study

Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Updated Results of a Phase Ib/II Randomized Study

Clinical Outcomes Under Hydroxyurea and Impact of ELN Responses in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: A PV-NET Real World Study

Clinical Outcomes Under Hydroxyurea and Impact of ELN Responses in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: A PV-NET Real World Study

A Multicenter Phase I Study Combining Venetoclax with Mini-Hyper-CVD in Older Adults with Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A Multicenter Phase I Study Combining Venetoclax with Mini-Hyper-CVD in Older Adults with Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) with Different Intensity Conditioning Regimens in Children with Very High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (VHR ALL): A Single-Center Experience

Background: Allo-HSCT with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) has traditionally been performed in patients with ALL and has been associated with significant transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is used in patients not eligible for conventional conditioning therapy due to poor performance status and severe toxic complications after previous chemotherapy. RIC is a well-established treatment strategy in adult patients with comorbidities or in elderly patients. In contrast to the adults, the RIC pediatric experience is still sparse. The aim: to compare efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for allo-HSCT in children suffering from very high risk (VHR) ALL. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective analysis performed in 233 patients (pts) with ALL (age - from 4 month till 18 y.o. (mediana 11 y.o.)), who received allo-HSCT at R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute of Children Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation between 12/2000 and 12/2017. MAC (busulfan or treosulphan containing) was used in 159 pts: 1st CR - 26 pts, 2nd CR -57 pts, 3rd or 4th CR 23 - pts, relapse -53 pts. Allo-HSCT with RIC was performed in 74 pts: 1st CR - 14 pts, 2nd CR -29 pts, 3rd or 4th CR - 12 pts, relapse -20 pts. RIC consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + melfalan (70 mg/m2/d x 2 days) or fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d x 5 days) + busulfan (4 mg/kg/d x 2 days). The disease status was not different between groups (p=0.674) Indication for RIC allo-HSCT was poor performance status (Lanskoy/Karnovsky&lt;70%), organ dysfunction due to previous therapy or infectioous complications at the moment of allo-HSCT. Allo-HSCT from matched related donor was performed in 41 pts, from matched unrelated donor - in 131 pts, haploidentical - in 61 pts. Post-transplant Cy was included in GVHD prophylaxis regimens in 102 pts (44%). Results: Median follow-up was 5 years for МАС, 4.5 years for RIC. In both groups the median time to neutrophil engraftment &gt;=0,5x109/l was D+18 (range D+8-48). Transplant engraftment was observed in 64 pts (86%) after RIC and 150 pts (93%) after MAC (p=0,224). OS pts after RIC allo-HSCT performed in 1 CR 70% and after MAC - 85% (p=0,043), in 2 CR 56% after RIC and 49% after MAC (p=0,436), in 3 or 4 CR 34% after RIC and 25% after MAC (p=0,394). OS in patients with active disease was 16% in RIC-group and 18% in MAC-group (p=0,432). The transplant-related mortality rate was 18% after RIC and 20% after MAC (p=0,40). Risk of relapse was 37% after RIC and 42% after MAC (p=0,39). Acute GVHD II-IVgr developed in 32% pts after RIC and 33% after MAC (p=0,883), early infections were diagnosed in 63% in RIC-group, and 59% in MAC-group (p=0,356). Early toxic complications were observed (CTC): mucositis III-IV gr in 13% pts after RIC and in 54% pts after MAC (p=0,001), nephrotoxicity in 7% pts and in 21% pts (p=0,042), hepatitis gr II-III in 24% pts and in 57% pts, respectively (p=0,034), neurological complications in 22% pts and 42% pts, resp. (p=0,046). Conclusion: RIC allo-HSCT of VHR ALL in 2,3 or 4 CR pts ≤ 18 y.o. is effective and comparable with MAC allo-HSCT. Early toxic complications after RIC were less frequent. Possibly, the use of RIC can maintain efficacy while minimizing regimen-related toxicity in children who have undergone previous intensive treatment. Disclosures Moiseev: Pfizer: Other: Travel grants; BMS: Other: Travel grants; MSD: Other: Travel grants; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Takeda: Other: Travel grants.

Three Year Update of the Phase II ABT-199 (Venetoclax) and Ibrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (AIM) Study

Background: The phase II AIM trial (Tam et al, NEJM 2018; NCT02471391), using combination BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (IB) and BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) therapy achieved excellent 16 week complete remission rates (CRR) (primary endpoint; 62%) in patients (pts) with poor prognosis mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), higher than currently approved second line IB monotherapy. Additionally, overall response rate (ORR) by PET of 71%, with attainment of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was reported. At the time of primary endpoint analysis (median follow up 15.9 months), median progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) had not been reached. Herein, we update our results with an additional 21.6 months of follow-up and report the outcomes of pts who electively interrupted treatment. Methods: Pts with MCL who had relapsed or refractory disease (R/R; n=23) or were treatment naïve but inappropriate for chemotherapy (n=1) were enrolled. Pts commenced treatment with IB 560mg/d for 4 weeks, followed by weekly ramp-up of VEN to 400mg/d. Initially, pts were intended to continue IB and VEN until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity; a later amendment allowed pts to electively interrupt both drugs if MRD-negative CR was reached. Pts who elected to interrupt therapy were closely monitored by peripheral blood flow MRD testing and regular CT scans, and were allowed to recommence both study drugs at MRD recrudescence or clinical progression. Results: Median age was 68 years (range, 47-81), median number of previous treatments was 2 (range, 0 to 6), and 50% had aberrations of TP53. As previously reported, the flow MRD-negative and ASO-PCR MRD-negative rates were 67% and 38%, respectively. For the current analysis, the median follow-up was 37.5 months (range, 1.4-45.3).The median DOR and TTP had not been reached and were estimated to be 74% and 60% at 30 months, respectively. The median PFS was 29 months (95% CI of 13-NE) (Figure 1), and the median OS was 32 months (95% CI of 27-NE) (Figure 2). For pts with TP53 aberrant MCL (n=12), the CRR was 50% (95% CI 21-79) with and without PET. In this group the ORR was 58% (95% CI 28-85) without PET and 50% (CI 21-79%) with PET. The DOR in 6 responders with TP53 aberrant MCL (excluding one pt with CRu) was 12+, 24+, 26+, 35+, 36+ and 38+ months from study commencement. In contrast, pts with ATM aberrant MCL (n=10) the CRR was 90% (95% CI 55-100) with and without PET, and the ORR was 90% (95% CI 55-100) with and without PET. Of the 9 responders with ATM aberrant MCL, the DOR was 9+, 9+, 12+, 24+, 31+, 35+, 36+, 37+ and 38+ months from study commencement. Of 13 deaths, 8 were due to PD. Of the other 5 deaths, 2 were due to infection, and 1 each to cardiac failure, glioblastoma, and graft versus host disease after an allograft that occurred after PD on trial. Five pts in MRD negative PET-confirmed CR electively interrupted treatment after a median 18.5 months (range 18-33) of therapy: one pt had radiological progression after 7 months, and the other 4 remained free of clinical or MRD progression after 6, 13, 17 and 18 months off therapy. Conclusions: The median PFS for the IB-VEN combination was 29 months. Treatment interruption was feasible for pts in MRD-negative complete remissions, raising the prospect of limited duration targeted-agent therapy in the management of R/R MCL. Disclosures Handunnetti: Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Other: Travel Grant. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Employment, Patents &amp; Royalties: Institute receives royalties for venetoclax, and I receive a fraction of these.. Hicks:Clarity: Research Funding; Ipsen: Research Funding; Telix Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership. Bressel:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Koldej:NanoString Technologies: Other: Travel grant. Ritchie:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Imago: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Roberts:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents &amp; Royalties: Institute receives royalties for venetoclax, and I receive a fraction of these.; AbbVie: Other: Unremunerated speaker for AbbVie, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Research Funding. Tam:AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: While ibrutinib is FDA approved for use in relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma, venetoclax and combination venetoclax and ibrutinib are not licensed for use in mantle cell lymphoma. The use of venetoclax and ibrutinib for this indication is investigational.

OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH AGGRESSIVE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA WHO FAILED TO PROCEED TO OR RELAPSED AFTER HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY AND AUTOLOGOUS HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION

Background: Patients with high-risk or relapsed aggressive lymphoma are usually treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Aim: We evaluated patients who were referred to auto-HCT and who failed to proceed to or relapsed after auto-HCT. Methods: We evaluated data from 101 consecutive patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: DLBCL (n= 86) and PMBL (n=15), who were planned for HDT and auto-HCT at our institution between 2012 and 2017 including 45 female and 56 male, median age (range) of 49 (20-69), clinical stage III/IV in 85 (85%) pts. Results: After first-line treatment, CR and PR was achieved in 51 (50%) and 43 (43%), respectively. Twenty three patients (23%) were not eligible for transplant: 7 pts failed stem cell mobilization, and 16 patients progressed before transplantation. 78 pts underwent HDT and auto-HCT: 21 pts in the first remission, and 57 pts after a median of 2 (2-4) lines of treatment. At transplant, 46 (60%) and 31 (40%) patients were in CR, and PR, respectively. Relapse after transplant occurred in 30 (38%) patients including 6 pts in first remission and 24 pts in subsequent remission (p=0.24), and 12 (26%) pts in CR and 18 (58%) in PR (56%) (p=0.003). The HR for progression in pts with response less than CR was 2.89 (95%CI: 1.51, 6.66) compared to pts with CR at transplant. With a median (range) PFS of 20 months (0-79), 1-year PFS was 66% (95%CI: 56%, 76%). Median (range) PFS for patients who relapsed post-transplant was 3 (0-40) months. With a median (range) follow up of 21 (0-79) months, 1- year OS for all transplanted patients was 69% (95%CI: 59%, 79%). Median (range) OS for pts who relapsed after auto-HCT was 6 (0-40) months.Conclusion: Around 20% of patients with high-risk or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma were not able to proceed to HDT/auto-HCT, and around 40% of those who did, progressed after transplantation. Non-CR at transplant increased the risk of progression after transplantation. Taken together, 60% of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma referred to HDT/auto-HCT at our institution might be candidates for novel therapies. Keywords: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); high-dose therapy (HDT). Disclosures: Romejko-Jarosinska, J: Honoraria: Roche, Takeda; Other Remuneration: Travel grant- Takeda, Servier. Paszkiewicz-Kozik, E: Honoraria: Roche, Takeda; Other Remuneration: Travel grant- Roche. Popławska, L: Other Remuneration: Travel grant- Roche. Targonski, L: Other Remuneration: Travel grant- Roche, Celgena. Szymanski, M: Other Remuneration: Travel grant- Roche. Walewski, J: Consultant Advisory Role: Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Servier, Amgen, Incyte Abbvie; Honoraria: Roche, Takeda, Celgene Janssen Cilag, Servier; Research Funding: Roche, GSK/Novartis, Takeda Janssen Cilag; Other Remuneration: Travel grant- Roche.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) for patients (pts) with acute leukemia following venetoclax-based therapy.

7047 Background: BCL-2 inhibitor Ven has shown a promising benefit in pts with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). There is paucity of information about the safety and efficacy of alloSCT post Ven. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 35 AML/ALL pts who received alloSCT following Ven-based therapies between 2013-2018 at MDA. Results: Median age at alloSCT was 60 years and 15 (43%) pts had an age-adjusted HCT-CI score ≥ 4. Disease diagnosis – AML (n = 31; 89%), ALL (n = 4; 11%). Disease status at transplant was CR1 (n = 17; 49%), CR2/CR3 (n = 9; 26%) or refractory (n = 9; 26%). 20/26 (77%) CR pts were MRD-negative. Median # of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-7) and 4 (11%) pts had failed a prior alloSCT. AML pts were classified by ELN 2017 criteria to have favorable, intermediate and adverse risks in 16%, 23% and 61% respectively. Ven was provided in combination of hypomethylating agents (HMA) or other chemotherapies in 26 (74%) and 9 (26%) pts, respectively. Among pts treated with Ven + HMA, some also received IDH1/2 inhibitors (n = 7, 20%), FLT3 inhibitors (n = 4; 11%) or anti-PD1 (n = 3, 9%). Median duration of Ven-based treatment was 2 months (range 0.5- 4.6). Ven was discontinued in 6 (17%) pts due to adverse events (n = 4) or progression (n = 2); the remaining pts (83%) continued their Ven-therapy as a bridge to alloSCT. The median time from last Ven dose and transplant was 26 days. Conditioning regimens were melphalan-based reduced intensity (n = 26, 74%), or busulfan-based myeloablative regimens (n = 9; 26%). Donor source was matched -unrelated (n = 14, 40%), -related (n = 9; 26%) or haplo- (n = 12; 34%). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus with either PT-Cy in 25 (71%) pts or methotrexate in 10 (29%) pts. All pts engrafted (median day 30 donor cells = 100%). Median days to ANC &gt; 500 and platelets &gt; 20K was 15.5 and 22.5, respectively. With a median follow up of 5.7 months (range 0.7-15.4), the 1-year rates of OS, PFS, and NRM were 71%, 63% and 3% respectively. CI of acute grade 2-4 and 3-4 GVHD were 26% and 3% respectively. Four pts died: 3 because of disease relapse and 1 of infection. Conclusions: AlloSCT is a safe and feasible consolidation treatment option in acute leukemia pts who were pre- treated with Ven, without excessive risk of NRM or acute GVHD. Larger prospective studies are required to validate our observations.

Long-Term Follow-up of Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of Juliet Study

Background Tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, has demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) in the global, multicenter, pivotal, phase 2, JULIET trial (NCT02445248). The primary endpoint, overall response rate (ORR), was met at the interim analysis (ORR: 59% [CR, 43%; PR, 16%]). Here, we report an updated analysis with a median 19 mo follow-up. Methods Adult pts ≥18 y with r/r DLBCL that had progressed after ≥2 lines of therapy including rituximab and an anthracycline and who were ineligible for or failed autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) were enrolled. Tisagenlecleucel was manufactured from autologous T cells at 2 facilities (Morris Plains, NJ, USA [main cohort]. and Leipzig, Germany [cohort A]) and provided to pts at 27 treatment centers in 10 countries across the globe. Efficacy analyses include all pts with ≥3 mo of follow-up or earlier discontinuation. Safety analyses include all infused pts. Results In the JULIET study, 115 pts (99 in main cohort; 16 in cohort A) received a single dose of tisagenlecleucel infusion as of 21 May 2018. Prior to infusion, 90% of infused pts received bridging chemotherapy and 93% received lymphodepletion chemotherapy. Pts were a median 56 y (range, 22-76 y); 77% of pts had stage III/IV and 17% had double/triple-hit disease at the time of entry. Approximately half (51%) of pts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy (range, 1-6); 49% received prior ASCT. ORR was 54% (40% CR, 13% PR; 95% CI, 43%-64%) with a median follow-up of 19.3 mo post-infusion. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. The relapse-free probability was 66% (95% CI, 51%-78%) at 6 mo and 64% (95% CI, 48%-76%) at 12 or 18 mo. Consistent ORR was reported across prognostic subgroups (eg, prior ASCT; double/triple-hit lymphoma) and DOR was similar among age groups and disease status (Figure). Median OS was not reached for pts in CR and was 11.1 mo (95% CI, 6.6 mo-NE) for all infused pts. The probability of OS was 48% (95% CI, 38%-57%) at 12 mo and 43% (95% CI, 33%-53%) at 18 mo (max follow-up, 29 mo). No pts proceeded to allogeneic SCT or ASCT while in remission. During the first 8 wks post-infusion, grade 3/4 adverse events of special interest were cytopenias lasting >28 days (34%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 23%, by the Penn scale), infections (19%), febrile neutropenia (15%), neurologic events (11%; 1 case of grade 2 cerebral edema), and tumor lysis syndrome (2%). Tocilizumab was administered to 16% of pts with CRS, and no treatment-related death was reported. Conclusions This updated analysis with longer follow-up confirms earlier findings. Tisagenlecleucel produced a durable high ORR, consistent efficacy across all predefined subgroups, and had a manageable safety profile in pts with r/r DLBCL.