Endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) has been shown to have similar perioperative mortality and shorter hospitalization compared with open repair but increased reinterventions due to restenosis. Covered stents (CSs) are associated with less restenosis, recurrence of symptoms, and reinterventions than bare-metal uncovered stents (UCSs). This study intends to revisit endovascular management of CMI and to evaluate differences in patients who received CSs or UCSs. Clinical data were obtained retrospectively for CMI patients at a single center from 2010 to 2015. Patients included were treated with either UCS or CS, were diagnosed with CMI, and had radiographic evidence of mesenteric disease. Patients who were excluded had acute mesenteric ischemia or procedures performed at an outside hospital. Sixty patients with an average age of 70.7 ± 9.4 years were involved in the study. Comorbidities included type 2 diabetes (21/60), hypertension (51/60), hyperlipidemia (51/60), and smoking history (52/60; Table I). Fisher exact test was performed, and there was a difference between the specific mesenteric vessel intervention completed and the number of diseased mesenteric vessels (P < .001). No difference was seen between UCS and CS with vessel intervened on (P = .290). There was no significant difference in symptom recurrence (48.8% vs 42.1%), reintervention rates (34.2% vs 26.3%), number of reinterventions (1 [1-4] vs 1 [1-2], median [range]), or hospital length of stay (1 [0-28] days vs 1 [0-8] days) between UCS and CS interventions, respectively (P > .05). Reintervention rates were similar despite antiplatelet regimen (no antiplatelet, 40%; single antiplatelet, 48.4%; or dual antiplatelet, 47.4%; P > .05). No significant difference in death rate (43.9% vs 68.4%) was seen, and all-cause mortality from index operation was 2.6 years (0.1-7.2 years; Table II). In this retrospective review, there was no significant difference in success rate for revascularization, recurrence, or complications with the use of CSs or UCSs. Larger randomized studies may be needed to determine the superiority of one stent type over another.Table IDemographics of patients receiving uncovered stents (UCSs) and covered stents (CSs) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI)Age, years70.7 ± 9.4Type 2 diabetes35%Sex63.3% MHypertension85%36.7% FHyperlipidemia85%Total patients60Smoking86.70% Open table in a new tab Table IIDifferences in outcomes between interventions completed for uncovered stents (UCSs) and covered stents (CSs)UCSsCSsSymptom recurrence48.8042.10Incidence of reintervention34.2026.30Total No. of reinterventions1 (1-4)1 (1-2)Hospital length of stay, days1 (0-28)1 (0-8)Death rate43.9068.40Categorical variables are presented as percentage. Continuous variables are presented as median (range). Open table in a new tab