ABSTRACT Accurate estimation of fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is of great significance to agricultural production. Crop residue management affect crop residue cover (CRC) over croplands. Crop and crop residue on the soil surface both contribute to overall canopy reflectance. Few studies, however, have examined the effect of crop residue on vegetation indices (VIs) and estimated FVC. The present study evaluated the response of eight commonly used VIs to crop residues and FVC uncertainty caused by crop residue based on the dimidiate pixel model (DPM) by using simulated reflectance of low-tilled cropland via a three-dimensional radiative transfer model. The absolute difference (AD) was used to quantify the spectral difference between crop residues and soils in red and near infrared wavelengths. Increases in normalized difference VI (NDVI), ratio VI (RVI), transformed soil-adjusted VI (TSAVI), and normalized difference phenology index (NDPI) were observed when green crops were mixed with crop residue that had negative ADs with soils, but decreases in enhance VI (EVI), perpendicular VI (PVI), SAVI, and litter-soil-adjusted VI (L-SAVI) were observed when crop residue was present under medium and high vegetation cover. The presence of crop residue with a positive AD with soils reduced NDVI, RVI, TSAVI, and NDPI while increased the other VIs. Crop residue had the least impact on EVI- and SAVI-based DPMs, with FVC-estimated uncertainty less than 0.1, followed by the NDPI- and L-SAVI-based model, while DPMs based on NDVI- and RVI performed poorly. Each VI-based DPM’s estimated uncertainty was highly correlated with AD values. Furthermore, the majority of the VI-based models were sensitive to solar position except for the NDPI-based model. Our findings highlight the need of considering the impact of crop residue on FVC retrieval over low-tilled cropland in future research.
Read full abstract