Cover Crop Management Research Articles

Integrating weed-suppressive cultivar and cover crops for weed management in organic sweetpotato production

AbstractField studies were conducted in 2021 in Kibler and Augusta, AR, to determine the effect of winter cover crops and cultivar selection on weed suppression and sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] yield. The split-split-plot studies evaluated three cover crops [cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) + crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.)], [winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) + crimson clover], and fallow; weeding (with or without); and four sweetpotato cultivars (‘Heartogold’, ‘Bayou-Belle-6’, ‘Beauregard-14’, and ‘Orleans’). Heartogold had the tallest canopy, while Beauregard-14 and Bayou Belle-6 had the longest vines at 5 and 8 wk after sweetpotato transplanting. Sweetpotato canopy was about 20% taller in weedy plots compared with the hand-weeded treatment, and vines were shorter under weed interference. Canopy height and vine length of sweetpotato cultivars were not related to weed biomass suppression. However, vine length was positively correlated to all yield grades (r > 0.5). Weed biomass decreased 1-fold in plots with cover crops compared with bare soil at Augusta. Cover crop biomass was positively correlated with jumbo (r = 0.29), no. 1 (r = 0.33), and total sweetpotato yield (r = 0.34). Jumbo yield was affected the most by weed pressure. On average, sweetpotato total yield was reduced by 80% and 60% with weed interference in Augusta and Kibler, respectively. Bayou Belle-6 was the high-yielding cultivar without weed interference in both locations. Bayou Belle-6 and Heartogold were less affected by weed interference than Beauregard-14 and Orleans.

Challenges and Opportunities for Cover Crop Mediated Soil Water Use Efficiency Enhancements in Temperate Rain-Fed Cropping Systems: A Review

Soils are at the nexus of the atmospheric, geological, and hydrologic cycles, providing invaluable ecosystem services associated with water provision. The immeasurably vital role of water provision is of urgent concern given the intertwined and interdependent challenges of growing human populations, increased agricultural demands, climate change, and freshwater scarcity. Adapting temperate rain-fed cropping systems to meet the challenges of the 21st century will require considerable advancements in our understanding of the interdependent biophysical processes governing carbon and soil-water dynamics. Soil carbon and water are inextricably linked, and agricultural management practices must take this complexity into account if crop productivity is to be maintained and improved. Given the widespread, intensive use of agricultural soils worldwide, it stands to reason that readily adaptable crop management practices can and must play a central role in both soil carbon and water management. This review details challenges and opportunities for utilizing cover crop management to enhance soil carbon stocks and soil water use efficiency in rain-fed cropping systems. A review of the current body of knowledge shows that cover crops can play a more prominent role in soil carbon and water management; however, the more widespread use of cover crops may be hindered by the inconsistencies of experimental data demonstrating cover crop effects on soil water retention, as well as cover crop effect inconsistencies arising from complex interactions between soil carbon, water, and land management. Although these gaps in our collective knowledge are not insignificant, they do present substantial opportunities for further research at both mechanistic and landscape-system scales.

Cover crop termination options and application of remote sensing for evaluating termination efficiency.

Efficient termination of cover crops is an important component of cover crop management. Information on termination efficiency can help in devising management plans but estimating herbicide efficacy is a tedious task and potential remote sensing technologies and vegetative indices (VIs) have not been explored for this purpose. This study was designed to evaluate potential herbicide options for the termination of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cereal rye (Secale cereale L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), and to correlate different VIs with visible termination efficiency. Nine herbicides and one roller-crimping treatment were applied to each cover crop. Among different herbicides used, glyphosate, glyphosate + glufosinate, paraquat, and paraquat + metribuzin provided more than 95% termination for both wheat and cereal rye 28 days after treatment (DAT). For hairy vetch, 2,4-D + glufosinate and glyphosate + glufosinate, resulted in 99 and 98% termination efficiency, respectively, followed by 2,4-D + glyphosate and paraquat with 92% termination efficiency 28 DAT. No herbicide provided more than 90% termination of rapeseed and highest control was provided by paraquat (86%), 2,4-D + glufosinate (85%), and 2,4-D + glyphosate (85%). Roller-crimping (without herbicide application) did not provide effective termination of any cover crop with 41, 61, 49, and 43% termination for wheat, cereal rye, hairy vetch, and rapeseed, respectively. Among the VIs, Green Leaf Index had the highest Pearson correlation coefficient for wheat (r = -0.786, p = <0.0001) and cereal rye (r = -0.804, p = <0.0001) with visible termination efficiency rating. Whereas for rapeseed, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) had the highest correlation coefficient (r = -0.655, p = <0.0001). The study highlighted the need for tankmixing 2,4-D or glufosinate with glyphosate for termination instead of blanket application of glyphosate alone for all crops including rapeseed and other broadleaf cover crops.

Rye–vetch residue quality and plastic mulch affect soil nitrogen dynamics in vegetable production systems

AbstractCover crops can be an important source of nitrogen (N) for organic vegetable production, but N availability depends on the characteristics of the cover crop residues and crop management practices following termination. A 2‐year field experiment in Michigan investigated (1) how the proportion of cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) sown in a cover crop mixture (seven treatments ranging from 100% rye to 100% vetch plus a no‐cover‐crop control) influences cover crop residue quantity and quality and (2) how rye–vetch residue characteristics and the use of black polyethylene mulch (PM) interact to affect soil N dynamics, crop quality, and yield in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and slicing cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production. Positive correlations among pepper marketable yield, leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), and average soil inorganic N support that N fertility was a key driver of treatment effects. Higher sown proportions of vetch and the use of PM were generally associated with higher vegetable yields and soil N. The magnitude of yield response to PM was greater in a year with higher precipitation and greater for pepper than cucumber. Percentage of nonmarketable fruit decreased (pepper) and increased (cucumber) with PM. Pore water nitrate concentration below the root zone reflected plow layer N under PM but was more responsive to precipitation under bare ground. Our results demonstrate that PM can be an important tool for preserving N fertility benefits from high N cover crop residues for vegetable production, particularly on sandy soils.

Comparing cover crop research in farmer-led and researcher-led experiments in the Western Corn Belt

Cover crops can mitigate soil degradation and nutrient loss and can be used to achieve continuous living cover in cropping systems, although their adoption in the Western Corn Belt of the United States remains low. It is increasingly recognized that cover crop integration into corn (Zea mays L.)-based crop rotations is complex, requiring site and operation specific management. In this review, we compared on-farm, farmer-led field scale trials to researcher-led trials carried out in small plots on University of Nebraska-Lincoln experiment stations. Although there is a range of cover crop research conducted in the state, there is no synthesis of the scope and key results of such efforts. Common cover crop challenges and goals in the state are similar to those reported nationwide; challenges include adequate planting timing, associated costs, and weather, while a top goal of cover crop use is to improve soil health. Farmer-led trials most frequently compared a cover crop to a no-cover crop control, likely reflecting a desire to test a basic design determining site-specific performance. Both researcher-led and farmer-led trials included designs testing cash crop planting timing, while some portion of farmer-led trials tested cover crop seeding rates, which are directly related to reported cover crop challenges. Farmer-led trials were carried out on a greater variety of soils, including sandy soils, whereas sandy soils were absent from researcher-led trials. More than half of farmer-led experiments were conducted on fields with slopes of 6–17% while most researcher-led experiments were conducted on fields with slopes of &amp;lt;1%. Mean cover crop biomass production was 600 kg/ha in farmer-led and 2,000 kg/ha in researcher-led trials. Crop yields were not significantly affected by cover crops in either farmer-led or researcher-led trials. Such comparisons demonstrate that in some instances, cover crop research is addressing challenges, and in some instances, it could be expanded. This synthesis expands our knowledge base in a way that can promote co-learning between different scales of experiments, and ultimately, reduce risks associated with cover crop management and further promote continuous living cover of agricultural landscapes.

Assessing long-term impacts of cover crops on soil organic carbon in the central US Midwestern agroecosystems.

Cover crops have been reported as one of the most effective practices to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) for agroecosystems. Impacts of cover crops on SOC change vary depending on soil properties, climate, and management practices, but it remains unclear how these control factors affect SOC benefits from cover crops, as well as which management practices can maximize SOC benefits. To address these questions, we used an advanced process-based agroecosystem model, ecosys, to assess the impacts of winter cover cropping on SOC accumulation under different environmental and management conditions. We aimed to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent do cover crops benefit SOC accumulation, and how do SOC benefits from cover crops vary with different factors (i.e., initial soil properties, cover crop types, climate during the cover crop growth period, and cover crop planting and terminating time)? (2) How can we enhance SOC benefits from cover crops under different cover crop management options? Specifically, we first calibrated and validated the ecosys model at two long-term field experiment sites with SOC measurements in Illinois. We then applied the ecosys model to six cover crop field experiment sites spanning across Illinois to assess the impacts of different factors on SOC accumulation. Our modeling results revealed the following findings: (1) Growing cover crops can bring SOC benefits by 0.33 ± 0.06 MgC ha-1 year-1 in six cover crop field experiment sites across Illinois, and the SOC benefits are species specific to legume and non-legume cover crops. (2) Initial SOC stocks and clay contents had overall small influences on SOC benefits from cover crops. During the cover crop growth period (i.e., winter and spring in the US Midwest), high temperature increased SOC benefits from cover crops, while the impacts from larger precipitation on SOC benefits varied field by field. (3) The SOC benefits from cover crops can be maximized by optimizing cover crop management practices (e.g., selecting cover crop types and controlling cover crop growth period) for the US Midwestern maize-soybean rotation system. Finally, we discussed the economic and policy implications of adopting cover crops in the US Midwest, including that current economic incentives to grow cover crops may not be sufficient to cover costs. This study systematically assessed cover crop impacts for SOC change in the US Midwest context, while also demonstrating that the ecosys model, with rigorous validation using field experiment data, can be an effective tool to guide the adaptive management of cover crops and quantify SOC benefits from cover crops. The study thus provides practical tools and insights for practitioners and policy-makers to design cover crop related government agricultural policies and incentive programs for farmers and agri-food related industries.

Cascading Effects of Cover Crops on the Subsequent Cash Crop Defense against the Polyphagous Herbivore Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).

Recent studies have started to show that the benefits of cover crops can cascade to the cash crop growing seasons. However, the impact of cover crops on the subsequent cash crop defense against herbivores is not well understood. To test this, we conducted a field and laboratory study to assess the possible cascading effects of cover crops such as Vigna unguiculata, Sorghum drummondii, Raphanus sativus, and Crotalaria juncea on the subsequent cash crop (Sorghum bicolor) defense against the notorious polyphagous herbivore fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) across three farms in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Our field and laboratory studies showed that the cash crop planted in the cover crop treatment differentially affected S. frugiperda. More specifically, we found that cover crops have positive effects on the growth and development of S. frugiperda on the subsequent cash crop, including both larval and pupal parameters. However, our experiments on physical and chemical defenses in cash crops failed to show any significant differences between cover and control. Collectively, our results add an additional line of evidence on the effects of cover crops on pest dynamics outside the cash crop season, a key consideration for the selection and management of cover crops and cash crops, whose underlying mechanisms need to be examined further.

The Potential of Cover Crops for Weed Management: A Sole Tool or Component of an Integrated Weed Management System?

Cover crops are an important component of integrated weed management programs in annual and perennial cropping systems because of their weed suppressive abilities. They influence weed populations using different mechanisms of plant interaction which can be facilitative or suppressive. However, the question often arises if cover crops can be solely relied upon for weed management or not. In this review we have tried to provide examples to answer this question. The most common methods of weed suppression by an actively growing cover crop include competition for limited plant growth resources that result in reduced weed biomass, seed production, and hence reductions in the addition of seeds to the soil seedbank. Cover crop mulches suppress weeds by reducing weed seedling emergence through allelopathic effects or physical effects of shading. However, there is a great degree of variability in the success or failure of cover crops in suppressing weeds that are influenced by the cover crop species, time of planting, cover crop densities and biomass, time of cover crop termination, the cash crop following in the rotation, and the season associated with several climatic variables. Several studies demonstrated that planting date was important to achieve maximum cover crop biomass, and a mixture of cover crop species was better than single cover crop species to achieve good weed suppression. Most of the studies that have demonstrated success in weed suppression have only shown partial success and not total success in weed suppression. Therefore, cover crops as a sole tool may not be sufficient to reduce weeds and need to be supplemented with other weed management tools. Nevertheless, cover crops are an important component of the toolbox for integrated weed management.

Strip-tillage and Zonal Cover Cropping Effects on Organic Squash Production

Zonal management of cereal–legume cover crop mixtures may help address weed and nitrogen management challenges common in organic reduced tillage systems. During a field study conducted over 3 years in Michigan, we evaluated the effects of cover crop management, tillage, and supplemental mulch on organically produced acorn squash (Cucurbita pepo). During the fall season before squash production, rye (Secale cereale L.) and vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) cover crop mixtures were sown in two distinct spatial arrangements: a “mixed planting,” in which seeds were sown in the same rows, and a “zonal planting,” in which vetch was planted only in the in-row zone and rye was planted only in the between-row zone of the subsequent squash crop. During the following spring season, cover crops were mowed, and four tillage and cover crop management combinations were established: full-width tillage with the mixed planting of rye–vetch (full-till mixed); strip-till with the same mixed planting (strip-till mixed); strip-till with the rye–vetch zonal planting (strip-till zonal); and strip-till with the zonal planting and additional rye mulch added between crop rows immediately after crop establishment (strip-till zonal plus rye). The strip-till mixed treatment resulted in yields equivalent to those of the full-till mixed treatment despite lower available nitrogen and greater early weed competition in some cases. Within strip-till treatments, zonal planting of rye–vetch provided no benefits relative to full-width planting (treatment 2 vs 3) and resulted in lower total cover crop biomass, a higher density of escaped weeds, and lower squash yields during 1 of 3 years. Supplemental rye mulch improved weed suppression and yields in strip-till zonal treatments and resulted in yields equivalent to those of the full-till mixed treatment in all years, but it provided no benefits relative to strip-till mixed. Our results demonstrate that strip-till organic squash production can produce yields equivalent to full-till production in Northern climates, but that zonal planting and supplemental mulch have limited benefits for addressing ongoing weed and nitrogen management challenges. Growers must weigh costs associated with these challenges against potential benefits for soil and pest regulating ecosystem services before adopting these agricultural conservation practices.

Spontaneous vegetation as an alternative to cover crops in olive orchards reduces water erosion and improves soil physical properties under tropical conditions

This research aimed to study the effects of different cover crops on chemical and physical properties in olive orchards, under tropical conditions, to investigate erosive processes by measuring soil and water losses, and to determine the best management cover crop in olive orchards. We assessed soil and water losses under different cover management practices: olive planted on bare soil (OBS); intercropped olive with spontaneous vegetation (OSV); intercropped olive with jack beans (OJB); intercropped olive with millet (OMI); intercropped olive with sunn hemp (OSH), and bare soil (BS). The experiment was carried out for two hydrological years (2015/2016 and 2016/2017) in the Southern region of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Experimental setup consisted of fifteen standard plots (12 m x 4 m), in a Cambisol, with slope of 0.23 m m-1. In both rainy seasons, treatments with cover crops showed significant efficiency to reduce soil loss. OSV treatment showed good performance in the reduction of water erosion, revealing lower values of total soil loss of 25 Mg ha-1 period-1 and 0.55 Mg ha-1 period-1 in first and second season, respectively. Based on the results, it is recommended to use spontaneous vegetation as a cover crop in olive plantations at least during the first season. This proved to be able to reduce soil and water losses. For subsequent years, a combination or a transition of other cover crops is possible, since soil losses for treatments OJB (0.41 Mg ha-1 period-1), and OSV (0.55 Mg ha-1 period-1) were statistically grouped using a non-metric multidimensional scaling with a good performance (final stress = 0.069). This decision between spontaneous vegetation or a profitable cover crop should be adopted by farmers considering technical and financial aspects.

Estimating the Reduction in Cover Crop Vitality Followed by Pelargonic Acid Application Using Drone Imagery

Cultivation of cover crops is a valuable practice in sustainable agriculture. In cover crop management, the method of desiccation is an important consideration, and one widely used method for this is the application of glyphosate. With use of glyphosate likely to be banned soon in Europe, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the herbicidal effect of pelargonic acid (PA) as a bio-based substitute for glyphosate. This study presents the results of a two-year field experiment (2019 and 2021) conducted in northeast Germany. The experimental setup included an untreated control, three different dosages (16, 8, and 5 L/ha) of PA, and the active ingredients glyphosate and pyraflufen. A completely randomised block design was established. The effect of the herbicide treatments was assessed by a visual estimate of the percentage of crop vitality and a comparison assessment provided by an Ebee+ drone. Four vegetation indices (VIs) calculated from the drone images were used to verify the credibility of colour (RGB)-based and near-infrared (NIR)-based vegetation indices. The results of both types of assessment indicated that pelargonic acid was reasonably effective in controlling cover crops within a week of application. In both experimental years, the PA (16 L/ha) and PA_2T (double application of 8 L/ha) treatments demonstrated their highest herbicidal effect for up to seven days after application. PA (16 L/ha) vitality loss decreased over time, while PA_2T (double application of 8 L/ha) continued to exhibit an almost constant effect for longer due to the second application one week later. The PA dosage of 5 L/ha, pyraflufen, and a mixture of the two exhibited a smaller vitality loss than the other treatments. However, except for glyphosate, the herbicidal effect of all the other treatments decreased over time. At the end of the experiment, the glyphosate treatment (3 L/ha) demonstrated the lowest estimated vitality. The results of the drone assessments indicated that vegetation indices (VIs) can provide detailed information regarding crop vitality following herbicide application and that RGB-based indices, such as EXG, have the potential to be applied efficiently and cost-effectively utilising drone imagery. The results of this study demonstrate that pelargonic acid has considerable potential for use as an additional tool in integrated crop management.

Water dynamics of cover crops: No evidence for relevant water input through occult precipitation

AbstractRising temperatures and disruption of rainfall patterns due to climate change make water a limiting growth factor even in regions of temperate climates. Thus, producing ‘more crop per drop’ is of utmost importance. While cover crops provide many benefits to cropping systems, their influence on soil water is discussed controversially. While an increase in transpiration can lead to soil water depletion, the reduction of evaporation in combination with possible additional water inputs could provide a water benefit for a succeeding crop. Occult precipitation could be such an additional water input. The objective of this study was to quantify whether cover crops provide a net water benefit over a bare fallow due to the occurrence of occult precipitation. In a 2‐year experiment, seven different cover crops were cultivated in pure stands and as a mixture under semi‐controlled conditions in a container experiment. Water fluxes and meteorological conditions were closely monitored. Although favourable conditions occurred during both vegetation periods, we found no evidence of occult precipitation. In autumn, soil water was depleted by fast‐growing cover crops. In winter, soil water was recharged due to the early preparation of a mulch layer combined with high winter precipitation while in early spring rising temperatures increased transpiration losses of a winter‐hardy cover crop, leading to a reduction of soil water. For middle European conditions, this shows that (1) living cover crops do not provide any water benefits and that (2) soil water recharge in winter is highly dependent on meteorological conditions and cover crop management. From a water budget viewpoint, negative effects on a succeeding cash crop can only be prevented if cover crops are terminated early enough for replenishment of soil water.

Effects of cover crop, N and residue management on the financial sustainability of processing tomatoes in Southwestern Ontario

Abstract Given the potential environmental and economic sustainability consequences of cover crop adoption, N fertilizer application, and residue management, this study focuses on the yield and financial effects of these on processing tomato production in Ontario, Canada. The study employs financial modeling using field data from a long-term cover crop experiment (oat, cereal rye, radish, and a radish-rye mixture) from 2010 to 2020. Averaged over six experimental years, compared to no cover (87 Mg ha−1) radish (99.6 Mg ha−1) and radish-rye mix (95.2 Mg ha−1) cover crops produce statistically significantly higher tomato yields as isolated practices, increasing farm net returns by $1120 ha−1 and $604 ha−1, respectively. When combined with N application, rye application additionally results in tomato yields statistically significantly higher than the base practice of no cover crop, zero N application and retained residue. Oat cover does not appear to have a statistically significant effect on tomato yields in this dataset. The application of N fertilizer results in statistically significantly higher tomato yield, increasing net returns by $882 ha−1, while residue management does not.

Corn and Soybean Yield as Affected by Cover Crop and Phosphorus Fertilizer Management

Corn and Soybean Yield as Affected by Cover Crop and Phosphorus Fertilizer Management

Management of Cover Crop Intercropping for Live Mulch on Plant Productivity and Growth Resources: A Review

Cover crops are a valuable tool for improving resources use, soil health, and productivity. However, the effects of intercropping cover crops as live mulches with cash crops can vary depending on the species, management practices, and environmental conditions. This study reviewed the literature on cover crop intercropping and identified key factors to consider for improved plant productivity and resources use when managing these cropping systems. Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used to search for literature on managing cover crop intercropping as live mulches. Research has shown that annual cover crops are typically used in annual field crop systems, while perennial cover crops are typically used in orchards and vineyards. The effects of intercropping annual or perennial cover crops in vineyards, orchards, and field crop systems can vary from positive to negative, depending on the climate, soil, management, and production system. Therefore, there is no one-size-fits-all management strategy. However, there are some key factors that should be considered when managing cover crops, such as: compatibility, intercropping time, planting density, and termination time. The benefits of appropriate cover crop management include: extended growing season, increased soil fertility, resource use optimization, and increased biomass productivity. Cover crop intercropping can be a successful way to improve resource use, soil health and productivity, but it is important to carefully consider the specific crop and management practices to ensure success. Therefore, future research should optimize cover crop intercropping time and planting density in maize-based rainwater harvesting systems on productivity and resource use.

Modelling the impacts of cover crop management strategies on the water use, carbon exchange and yield of olive orchards

Modelling the impacts of cover crop management strategies on the water use, carbon exchange and yield of olive orchards

Fall-sown small grain cover crops for weed suppression and soil moisture management in an irrigated organic agroecosystem

Abstract Adoption of cover crops in arid agroecosystems has been slow due to concerns regarding limited water resources and possible soil moisture depletion. In irrigated organic systems, potential ecosystem services from cover crops also must be considered in light of the concerns for water conservation. A constructive balance could be achieved with fall-sown small grain cover crops; however, their impacts on irrigated organic systems are poorly understood. Our first objective was to determine the ability of fall-sown small grains [cereal rye (Secale cereale L), winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.)] to suppress winter weeds in an irrigated, organic transition field in the southwestern USA. Small grains were planted following the legume sesbania (Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A.W. Hill) during Fall 2012 and Fall 2013. In Spring 2013 and 2014, weed densities and biomass were determined within each cover crop treatment and compared against unplanted controls. Results indicated that both barley and oat were effective in suppressing winter weeds. Our second objective was to compare weed suppression and soil moisture levels among seven barley varieties developed in the western United States. Barley varieties (‘Arivat’, ‘Hayes Beardless’, ‘P919’, ‘Robust’, ‘UC603’, ‘UC937’, ‘Washford Beardless’) were fall-sown in replicated strip plots in Fall 2016. Weed densities were measured in Spring 2017 and volumetric soil moisture near the soil surface (5.1 cm depth) was measured at time intervals beginning in December 2016 and ending in March 2017. With the exception of ‘UC937’, barley varieties caused marked reductions in weed density in comparison with the unplanted control. Soil moisture content for the unplanted control was consistently lower than soil moisture contents for barley plots. Barley variety did not influence volumetric soil moisture. During the 2017–2018 growing season, we re-examined three barley varieties considered most amenable to the cropping system requirements (‘Robust’, ‘UC603’, ‘P919’), and these varieties were again found to support few weeds (≤ 5.0 weeds m−2). We conclude that several organically certified barley varieties could fill the need for a ‘non-thirsty’ cover crop that suppresses winter weeds in irrigated organic systems in the southwestern United States.

Agronomic and economic implications of cover crop and phosphorus fertilizer management practices for water quality improvement.

Phosphorus (P) fertilization practices and winter cover crops are promoted to protect water quality yet can potentially influence crop yield and profitability. This study examined the impacts of three P fertilizer management practices (no P, fall broadcast P, and spring injected P) and winter annual cover crop use on yields, net returns, and water quality in a no-till corn-soybean rotation. Treatments were replicated in a 4-yr field study where sediment, total P, and dissolved reactive P (DRP) losses in edge-of-field surface runoff were continuously monitored. Production budgets were developed for each treatment and coupled with water quality data to identify optimal practices and opportunity costs for improving water quality. Applying P fertilizers increased crop yield regardless of application method or cover crop, but the response was more pronounced in corn than soybean. The cover crop reduced corn grain yield in 1 yr with high temperature and low precipitation but did not impact grain yield in the other corn year or either year of soybean. The most profitable treatment was fall broadcast P fertilizer with no cover crop, which also had the greatest total P and DRP losses and near greatest sediment loss. The lowest-cost methods of reducing total P, DRP, and sediment losses were, respectively, no P fertilizer without a cover crop ($47.56kg-1 total P), spring injected P fertilizer without a cover crop ($56.47kg-1 DRP), and spring injected P fertilizer with a cover crop ($0.16kg-1 sediment). Widespread adoption of these practices will likely require monetary incentives.

Identification of Novel Viruses and Their Microbial Hosts from Soils with Long-Term Nitrogen Fertilization and Cover Cropping Management.

Soils are the largest organic carbon reservoir and are key to global biogeochemical cycling, and microbes are the major drivers of carbon and nitrogen transformations in the soil systems. Thus, virus infection-induced microbial mortality could impact soil microbial structure and functions. In this study, we recovered 260 viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs) in samples collected from soil taken from four nitrogen fertilization (N-fertilization) and cover-cropping practices at an experimental site under continuous cotton production evaluating conservation agricultural management systems for more than 40 years. Only ~6% of the vOTUs identified were clustered with known viruses in the RefSeq database using a gene-sharing network. We found that 14% of 260 vOTUs could be linked to microbial hosts that cover key carbon and nitrogen cycling taxa, including Acidobacteriota, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobiota, Firmicutes, and ammonia-oxidizing archaea, i.e., Nitrososphaeria (phylum Thermoproteota). Viral diversity, community structure, and the positive correlation between abundance of a virus and its host indicate that viruses and microbes are more sensitive to N-fertilization than cover-cropping treatment. Viruses may influence key carbon and nitrogen cycling through control of microbial function and host populations (e.g., Chthoniobacterales and Nitrososphaerales). These findings provide an initial view of soil viral ecology and how it is influenced by long-term conservation agricultural management. IMPORTANCE Bacterial viruses are extremely small and abundant particles that can control the microbial abundance and community composition through infection, which gradually showed their vital roles in the ecological process to influence the nutrient flow. Compared to the substrate control, less is known about the influence of soil viruses on microbial community function, and even less is known about microbial and viral diversity in the soil system. To obtain a more complete knowledge of microbial function dynamics, the interaction between microbes and viruses cannot be ignored. To fully understand this process, it is fundamental to get insight into the correlation between the diversity of viral communities and bacteria which could induce these changes.

Recent cover crop adoption is associated with small maize and soybean yield losses in the United States.

Cover crops are gaining traction in many agricultural regions, partly driven by increased public subsidies and by private markets for ecosystem services. These payments are motivated by environmental benefits, including improved soil health, reduced erosion, and increased soil organic carbon. However, previous work based on experimental plots or crop modeling indicates cover crops may reduce crop yields. It remains unclear, though, how recent cover crop adoption has affected productivity in commercial agricultural systems. Here we perform the first large-scale, field-level analysis of observed yield impacts from cover cropping as implemented across the US Corn Belt. We use validated satellite data products at sub-field scales to analyze maize and soybean yield outcomes for over 90,000 fields in 2019-2020. Because we lack data on cover crop species or timing, we seek to quantify the yield impacts of cover cropping as currently practiced in aggregate. Using causal forests analysis, we estimate an average maize yield loss of 5.5% on fields where cover crops were used for 3 or more years, compared with fields that did not adopt cover cropping. Maize yield losses were larger on fields with better soil ratings, cooler mid-season temperatures, and lower spring rainfall. For soybeans, average yield losses were 3.5%, with larger impacts on fields with warmer June temperatures, lower spring and late-season rainfall, and, to a lesser extent, better soils. Estimated impacts are consistent with multiple mechanisms indicated by experimental and simulation-based studies, including the effects of cover crops on nitrogen dynamics, water consumption, and soil oxygen depletion. Our results suggest a need to improve cover crop management to reduce yield penalties, and a potential need to target subsidies based on likely yield impacts. Ultimately, avoiding substantial yield penalties is important for realizing widespread adoption and associated benefits for water quality, erosion, soil carbon, and greenhouse gas emissions.