Brugada Syndrome was first described in 1992 in eight patients showing recurrent episodes of aborted sudden cardiac death [1,2]. Typically the hearts of affected patients did not show any structural disease, however, a common sign of the syndromewas right bundle branch block with a coved type ST-segment elevation in the precordial electrocardiogram (ECG) leads (type I Brugada ECG) [3,4]. Mutations of key cardiac ion channels have been found responsible for a spectrum of several heritable cardiac arrhythmia syndromes like Brugada syndrome, long QT-syndrome (LQTS) and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) [5]. Around 300 pathogenic variations in 16 genes are attributed to the channelopathies of Brugada syndrome. A pathology of the SCN5A gene can be found in 25%e30% of diagnosed patients [4,6]. However, recent findings questioned the concept of Brugada syndrome as a monogenic disease, and suggested a key role for three genes: SCN10A, SCN5A and HEY2 [7,8]. In Europe the prevalence was reported 1 to 5 of 10,000, however, in Southeast Asia the prevalence is more than double with a men towomen ration of 8:1 [6,9]. Due to this significant prevalence in Asia, Brugada syndrome might be the main reason for natural death in Asian men younger than 50 years [4]. In 2011 the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyophathies recommended genetic testing for Brugada syndrome as follows: