Reviews 263 and also certain philosophical arguments of Lacan related to death, particularly his readings of Antigone,and the Lacanian concept of entre-deux-morts.Chapter 1,“Roland and the second death,”is largely informed by Lacan’s ideas on the death drive, and also proposes different approaches to Roland’s death based on the major textual variants of the work. Chapter 2,“The knight as the Thing: courtly love in the non-cyclic prose Lancelot,” explores Lacan’s interpretation of courtly love, argues that the termination of the Arthurian order represents a kind of “collective death drive”(61), and considers some interesting ambiguities associated with Galehot, trapped in the state of entredeux -morts. The following portion of the study,“The ubi sunt topos in Middle French,” focuses on a ballade by Eustache Deschamps and the three ballades from Villon’s Testament related to the ubi sunt topos, including the famous Ballade des dames, highlighting complex patterns and tensions revolving around mortality and sexuality, and“Villon’s intense engagement with existence, extinction, and the literary”(150). In “Ceci n’est pas une marguerite: anamorphosis in Pearl,” the author probes the rich symbolic connotations of the marguerite, which she finds“linked to a debate relating the complex of life, death, and life beyond death to that of desire, love, and poetry” (169). The final chapter treats two works by Chaucer, the Book of the Duchess and the Legend of the Good Women (particularly the prologue). Gilbert (with a nod to Simone de Beauvoir’s Le deuxième sexe) cleverly titles the chapter, “Becoming woman in Chaucer: on ne naît pas femme, on le devient en mourant,” and focuses on women who, in various senses, find themselves between two deaths. To characterize this as a difficult book would be an understatement. The work is intensely theoretical and abstract, weaving ideas from Lacan, Derrida, Irigaray, Butler, and others into an analysis of some important, and sometimes problematic French and English medieval texts. Readers who do not share Gilbert’s familiarity with these theorists may easily lose the thread of some of her most important arguments. Nevertheless, her attempt to apply certain aspects of Lacanian theory to these important texts yields original and revealing readings that are worth the intellectual effort. University of North Carolina, Greensboro David A. Fein Gingras, Francis. Le bâtard conquérant: essor et expansion du genre romanesque au Moyen Âge. Paris: Champion, 2011. ISBN 978-2-7453-2304-0. Pp. 529. 107 a. Gingras has written an ambitious book; as his title and subtitle summarize, his subject is nothing less than the history of the medieval ‘roman’ from the earliest uses of the term through the fourteenth century. Largely focused on origins, the book also includes significant discussion of the genre’s coming of age and concomitant multiplication of forms in the thirteenth century. Given the enormity of the task, the fact that the study is“un peu tortueuse”(45) is almost to be expected. Nevertheless, the volume contains much excellent analysis, and will provide points of reference for medievalists for years to come. Gingras divides his study into three major sections. The first, “Une langue qui se donne un genre,” focuses on linguistics and genre, with chapters on the development of the term ‘roman,’ multilingual Normandy and England, translation, and the medieval concept of genre. Next, “Un genre à faire des histoires” examines thematic elements: history (and story), the protagonist, love, and adventure. The final four chapters consider “[l]es attraits d’un mauvais genre,” the appeal of a‘bad-boy’genre: (excessive) length,prose and verse,parody,and the reception of romance.Although his subject is essentially literary history, Gingras is more literary analyst than historian, and this leads to one of the volume’s great strengths. Moments of textual analysis punctuate the book,contributing to the larger argument and offering excellent micro-readings of individual texts. The result is a study that far exceeds the bounds of traditional literary history. Unfortunately, the thematic analysis leads, more than once, to chronological confusion. Thus, in a section on the term ‘fable,’ the examples discussed move from the Brut, to Chrétien’s Conte du Graal, to the Chanson...