Courses Of BEP Research Articles

Complex treatment of residual metastatic germ cell cancer: A single center experience

BackgroundTesticular cancer is the most common solid malignancy among men aged 15–35. Radical orchiectomy and platinum-based chemotherapy (BEP) are curative in the majority of patients, including advanced, metastatic cases. According to current urooncology guidelines all non-seminoma patients harbouring post-chemotherapy residual masses of ≥ 1 cm should undergo salvage retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). However, only 10% of residual tumors contain viable disease. ObjectiveTo assess patient outcomes and complications considering different treatment regimens and clinical characteristics. Materials and methodsIn a retrospective cross-sectional study patients (n=127) who underwent postchemotherapy RPLND between 2007 and 2023 at our referral center were evaluated. The patients received systemic treatment at various oncology centers. The number of BEP cycles received were occasionally different from standard. Only patients with normal postchemotherapy serum tumor markers and primary testicular or extragonadal germ cell neoplasms were included. Treatment groups were established according to the number of BEP cycles received, and the extent of RPLND (bilateral or modified template). Treatment outcomes and complications were assessed. ResultsStandard 3–4 courses of BEP were received by 100 (78,7%) patients, while 11 (8,7%) patients underwent less, and 16 (12,6%) more courses than standard. On histopathologic evaluation viable germ cell tumor, teratoma, and necrosis/fibrosis was present in 26 (20,5%), 67 (52,7%) and 34 (26,8%) of specimen, respectively. In the 5–6 BEP series subgroup high rate of viable disease (37,5%) was found and significantly more nephrectomies were performed, than other chemotherapy subgroups. Extratesticular GCT, viable disease in residual mass or progression after RPLND indicated lower survival. Mild (Clavien-Dindo I-II) or no postoperative complications were reported in 93,7% of cases. ConclusionsThe study suggests no significant benefit from exceeding 3–4 courses of BEP. Timely salvage RPLND should be performed in high volume centers for optimal treatment outcomes with acceptable complication rates. Adherence to the Heidenreich criteria is advisable where practical.

Risk-Adapted Treatment in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer: The SWENOTECA Management Program

To offer minimized risk-adapted adjuvant treatment on a nationwide basis for patients with clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous germ-cell testicular cancer (NSGCT). The aim was to reduce the risk of relapse and thereby reducing the need of later salvage chemotherapy while maintaining a high cure rate. From 1998 to 2005, 745 Norwegian and Swedish patients were included into a prospective, community-based multicenter Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Project (SWENOTECA) management program. Treatment strategy depended on the presence or absence of vascular tumor invasion (VASC). VASC-positive patients were recommended brief adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP), whereas VASC-negative patients could choose between ACT and surveillance. At a median follow-up of 4.7 years, there have been 51 relapses. On surveillance, 41.7% of VASC+ patients relapsed, compared with 13.2% of VASC- patients. After one course of BEP, 3.2% of VASC+ and 1.3% of VASC- patients relapsed. The toxicity of adjuvant BEP was low. Eight patients have died, none died from progressive disease. One course of adjuvant BEP reduces the risk of relapse by approximately 90% in both VASC+ and VASC- CS1 NSGCT, and may be a new option as initial treatment for all CS1 NSGCT. One course of adjuvant BEP for VASC+ CS1 reduces the total burden of chemotherapy compared with surveillance or two courses of BEP. SWENOTECA currently recommends one course of BEP as standard treatment of VASC+ CS1 NSGCT, whereas both surveillance and one course of BEP are options for VASC- CS1 NSGCT.

Treatment outcomes of patients (pts) with primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCT): The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) experience

14538 Background: PMGCT are uncommon germ cell malignancies. Mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have a poor prognosis, whereas pure seminoma (Sem) has a good or intermediate prognosis irrespective of mediastinal presentation. Methods: We retrospectively identified 19 male pts with PMGCT seen at MDACC between October 1998 and September 2004 from a clinical database. Pts with resectable NSGCT were offered surgery upon plateau of their chemotherapy response. Prior to referral, 1 pt had primary surgical resection without preoperative (preop) chemotherapy. Results: There were 14 pts with NSGCT and 5 with good prognosis Sem. The median age was 29.5 (20–60). Seven pts with NSGCT had mixed or undifferentiated histology, and the remainder had pure yolk sac (5 pts) or choriocarcinoma (2 pts). The estimated median survival (Kaplan-Meier) for all patients (Sem + NSGCT) was 21 months. All pts with Sem were alive and disease-free at last follow-up (median 12 months, range 7–34). All pts with Sem received 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP); one also received bleomycin (BEP); one received radiotherapy consolidation; none received surgery. Of the pts with NSGCT, 9 (64%) have died, including 1 who refused surgery. Five pts with NSGCT were alive at last follow-up and 3 (21%) were disease-free (15+, 27+ and 35+ months). Four pts with NSGCT (29%) reached beyond 2 years survival (27+, 28, 35+, and 63+ months) including 3 with lung metastases and one with elevated preop alpha-fetoprotein (28,022 ng/ml). Each of these pts received 6–10 courses of multiple-regimen preop chemotherapy, and 2 received initially 4 courses of BEP without marker normalization. Conclusions: Mediastinal Sem treated with 4 courses EP had an excellent outcome without surgery. Pts with mediastinal NSGCT had a 64% mortality rate despite aggressive treatment. Several pts with mediastinal NSGCT did achieve long-term survival following aggressive chemotherapy and surgery, even with lung metastases and failure to normalize markers. A phase III trial of BEP versus dose-dense chemotherapy for poor-prognosis NSGCT is now in progress at MDACC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Current concepts about testicular cancer

In the past 20 years, testicular cancer, which occurs in the young, has become a curable malignancy; 90% of the patients treated will achieve long-term survival. However, there is a significant morbidity associated with the management of the disease process. The literature was reviewed concerning the current treatment strategies and prognosis, as well as the long-term sequelae of the various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Surveillance has become a key element in the management of patients with a primary (stage I) testicular non-seminoma. Although approximately 25% of these patients will relapse, 100% survival can be achieved with cisplatin in combination with etoposide and bleomycin (BEP). Patients with a disseminated non-seminoma are usually treated with 4 courses of BEP; an 80% survival rate can be achieved. The long-term effects of chemotherapy include Raynaud's phenomenon, acral paraesthesia, hyperlipidaemia, nephrotoxicity, infertility and hormonal disturbances. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or resection of residual disease following chemotherapy are associated with a low mortality and morbidity rate, ejaculatory dysfunction excepted. However, with specific modifications in technique (e.g. nerve-sparing) antegrade ejaculation can be preserved in the majority of patients. Radiotherapy is used in stage I and II seminoma. With the conventional dose of 25-30 Gy to the retroperitoneal and ipsilateral iliac lymph nodes, temporary dysfunction of the germ and Leydig cells of the remaining testis may occur by scatter radiation. Patients with advanced seminoma are treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. To date, testicular cancer patients can receive appropriate curative treatment with acceptable acute toxicity, depending on the therapy given. The detrimental effects of late toxicities require careful study and follow-up. However, little attention is paid currently to quality of life aspects, in particular the impact of the disease and its treatment on general well-being, including sexual function.