Litigation has been cumbersome to the indigent persons in the country. This is due to the legal technicalities that are relied on in court, complex procedures, high cost and delays in the settlement of disputes . Further, there are challenges that the poor persons, as well as the marginalized and the uneducated persons, face in their course of seeking justice. They include long distance to the courts, illiteracy, high advocacy fees, lack of infrastructure to reach the courts as well as lack of information . As a result, the rights and fundamental freedoms of these class of persons are denied, violated or infringed hence brings dissatisfaction among them; and makes them be biased against these courts that are mandated to administer justice to all regardless of any one status in the society. There is a need to reach the poor, uneducated, marginalized and those other underprivileged persons in the society. Therefore, alternative dispute resolution comes to the rescue. It is the savior to those who seek for justice. To begin with, it is cost effective. It is cheaper as compared to litigation. For litigation, one has to part with the advocates and court fees which poor persons cannot afford . However, many at times the services provide through alternative dispute resolution are cheaper. Secondly, alternative dispute resolution is flexible. For litigation, there are legal technicalities that have to be followed. This causes backlog of cases in courts due to the many cases that have been filed in courts that await hearing and also need to follow these legal technicalities. A case in point is the cases that involve land. Research shows that more than 55% of the land cases have never progressed beyond the mention stage. The average duration of the cases is over 30 years . However, the cases that go through the alternative dispute resolution could last for days, weeks or months but not beyond a year. Thirdly, alternative dispute resolution is easily accessible as compared to courts. There are areas which lack courts to adjudicate their matters thus impeding their access to justice. There are others who are forced to travel long distances to get access to the courts. This is an obstacle to the indigent persons who at times lack money to aid their transport to these courts. Apart from that, traditional dispute resolutions have aided access to justice due to the fact that the sessions are conducted by either the cultural elders, village elders or the local administration . The parties involved feel safer when their matters are dealt with by the council of elders as compared to the judges probably by the fact that the council of elders have known these parties for a long time; thus a rapport has been developed. Another possibility being that the council of elders are held with high regard in the communities and; secondly, they are closest to the people in these communities; thus the people prefer taking their cases before these council of elders. Fourthly, alternative dispute resolutions are less formalistic. In fact, the parties have the liberty to use their language of preference for communication. There are very few procedural technicalities. In my paper, I will begin by defining the terms alternative dispute resolution and access to justice. Thereafter, I will discuss the role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in enhancing access to justice in Kenya. I will also highlight the challenges faced in alternative dispute resolution in Kenya.
Read full abstract