A 55-year-old white woman, cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody-positive, underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (LTx) for alcoholic cirrhosis. Twenty-six units of blood products were transfused during surgery. Postoperative immunosuppression combined low-dose prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). She received no antiviral prophylaxis. By day 16, she developed fever, encephalopathy, ascites, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was normal and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed no meningitis. Abdominal computed tomography was consistent with diffuse small bowel inflammation. Repeated esogastroduodenoscopies showed an inflammatory mucosa with numerous large ulcerations on the esophagus and the whole duodenum (Fig. 1). Biopsies revealed an abraded mucosa, and nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusions were seen in submucosal cells. In CSF, human herpes virus (HHV)-6 DNA was found positive by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) whereas researches for other viruses (herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus, CMV, and Epstein-Barr virus; PCR Herpes Consensus, Argène Biosoft) (1) and JC virus (in-house technique) were negative. HHV-6 DNA, but not CMV or other herpes virus DNA, was also positive in plasma, ascites, and on esophageal and duodenal biopsies. Immunohistochemical examination of these biopsies (anti-HHV-6 monoclonal mouse antibody, 10G6, immunoglobulin G1 isotype; Argène Biosoft, France) showed positive staining inside submucosal cells whereas anti-CMV immunostaining was negative. Viral genome sequencing demonstrated a variant B virus.FIGURE 1.: Diffuse bowel inflammation with thickened and spontaneously enhanced intestinal wall on abdominal computed tomography (A). Large and diffuse esophagal ulcerations observed during an esogastroduodenoscopy (B).A switch to ciclosporin, MMF reduction, and antiviral therapy had no effect. The patient initially received Foscavir, which was discontinued after 11 days because of renal failure, followed by a 4-week course of ganciclovir. Despite antiviral therapy, ascites, diarrhea, and encephalopathy worsened. HHV-6 DNA remained persistently positive in plasma, ascites, and on repeated esophageal and duodenal biopsies. The patient experienced polymicrobial bacteremia (Enterobacter cloacae, Bacteroïdes fragilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) attributed to intestinal inflammation, and died on day 65 of related septic shock. Consent for autopsy was not obtained. HHV-6 serology was retrospectively realized in the recipient using two different techniques (indirect immunofluorescent assay and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Biotrin International Ltd, Lyon, France). It was found negative on a pretransplant serum and positive 3 weeks after LTx. Both anti-HHV-6 antibodies and HHV-6 DNA PCR detection on the donor serum were negative. Due to a 96.4% seroprevalence rate (2), HHV-6 infection mostly represents reactivation in adult transplant recipients. Although it usually causes little symptoms, severe organ involvement including encephalitis, pneumonitis, and pancytopenia have been reported (3, 4). HHV-6 primary infection is exceptional. Fatal hemophagocytic syndrome after HHV-6A primary infection has been documented after kidney transplantation (5). We describe a case of HHV-6B primary infection with diffuse involvement of esophagus, duodenum, and small bowel. HHV-6-related digestive ulcerations have not been reported so far. In the observation of Randhawa et al. in a heart transplant recipient, HHV-6A infection was associated with gastroduodenitis but no ulceration was found (6). Our case emphasizes the pathogenic role of HHV-6 on the digestive tract. The virus was thought to have been transmitted more likely by the blood products required during surgery, rather than by the graft, because the donor was seronegative for HHV-6. Both HHV-6A and HHV-6B are susceptible in vitro to ganciclovir, Foscavir, and cidofovir (7). Foscavir and ganciclovir, either alone or in combination, have been advocated for the treatment of HHV-6-related neurological diseases (8). However, due to the lack of controlled trial, no specific recommendation can be made for the treatment or prophylaxis of HHV-6 infection in solid organ transplant recipient (7). In our observation, no response to antiviral therapy was observed. Disseminated HHV-6 infection may involve the digestive tract in transplant recipients. Antiviral therapy should be pursued in suspected or documented symptomatic infection, even if clinical and virological responses may be disappointing, as in this case. Whether primary HHV-6 infection is more severe than reactivation is uncertain. The impact of CMV-targeting antiviral prophylaxis remains unknown. Matthieu Revest Christophe Camus Infectious Diseases and Medical Intensive Care Unit Rennes Teaching Hospital Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes, France Pierre-Nicolas D'Halluin Department of Gastroenterology Rennes Teaching Hospital Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes, France Sophie Cha Department of Bacteriology, Virology, and Hospital Hygiene Rennes Teaching Hospital Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes, France Philippe Compagnon Karim Boudjema Department of Digestive Surgery Rennes Teaching Hospital Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes, France Ronald Colimon Department of Bacteriology, Virology, and Hospital Hygiene Rennes Teaching Hospital Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes, France Rémi Thomas Infectious Diseases and Medical Intensive Care Unit Rennes Teaching Hospital Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes, France
Read full abstract