Couple-based Interventions Research Articles

A feasibility study of a couple-based illness perception intervention for couples coping with colorectal cancer

PurposeAs a special psychological variable, illness perception significantly affects the cancer adaptions of colorectal cancer couples. No studies focus on facilitating cancer adaption by targeting the illness perception in colorectal cancer couples. This research attempted to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of an illness perception intervention program designed for couples with colorectal cancer, guided by a self-regulation common sense model. MethodsA single-group pilot study including pre- and post-testing was carried out with Chinese couples having colorectal cancer. Six sessions were delivered consecutively by researchers via in-person or telephone for couples. By calculating the rates of recruitment and retention, the feasibility of the intervention was analyzed. Intervention acceptability was evaluated by analysis of the post-intervention quantitative and qualitative data. Outcomes were described as illness perception, cancer-related communication problems, dyadic coping, quality of life, anxiety and depression, and benefit finding. Effect sizes were computed to assess the preliminary program effects. ResultsThe feasibility was confirmed by the recruitment (67.6%) and retention (82.6%) rates. The acceptability was endorsed by the reported participant satisfaction. Validating the program’s preliminary effectiveness, the intervention program has moderate effect sizes (Cohen’s d: 0.33-0.79) that boost illness perception and major cancer adjustment results for patients and their spousal caregivers. ConclusionsThe research proved that the couple-based illness perception intervention among colorectal couples was feasible, acceptable, and initially effective. To investigate this intervention program more thoroughly and apply it to a wider range of disease backgrounds, an extensive randomized controlled experiment is necessary.

Discrepancies in perceptions of PTSD symptoms among veteran couples: Links to poorer relationship and individual functioning.

Veteran and intimate partner perceptions of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may differ, and little is known about how agreement or disagreement on symptom severity is related to relationship satisfaction. Veterans and their partners (N = 199 couples) completed a baseline assessment for a clinical trial evaluating two couple-based PTSD interventions. Veterans completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Partners completed the collateral PCL-5 (PCL-5-C), which asked them to rate the severity of the veteran's PTSD symptoms. Both partner and veteran completed the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32). Intraclass correlations (ICC) assessed agreement between PCL-5 and PCL-5-C total and subscale scores, which was low for total PCL and for all subscales (ICC = 0.15-0.46). Actor-Partner Interdependence Models (APIMs; actor-only pattern) tested associations between relationship satisfaction and PTSD symptom severity (total PCL and subscales), and the magnitude and direction of difference between PCL-5 and PCL-5-C (total and subscales). For veterans, more severetotal PTSD and negative cognition/mood scores were associated with lower relationship satisfaction, and the direction of discrepancy for negative cognition/mood (i.e., higher veteran-rated PTSD symptoms relative to partner's collateral report) was also associated with lower satisfaction. For partners, more severe collateral-reported symptoms for total PTSD and all four subscales were associated with lower relationship satisfaction; further, a larger discrepancy between veterans' and partners' reports of total PTSD, negative cognition/mood, and hyperarousal were associated with lower satisfaction. These results suggest that partners may have different perceptions of PTSD symptoms, and support the potential of fostering a shared understanding of PTSD symptom severity in couples.

Examining the impact of brief couples-based posttraumatic stress disorder treatments on anger and psychological aggression in veterans and their partners.

Anger can adversely impact functioning in veterans. Psychological aggression, which is related to but distinct from anger, is particularly detrimental to veterans' mental health. Research examining anger and psychological aggression following individual therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has demonstrated small effect sizes. Treatments that directly target conflict management and interpersonal functioning, both regarding content and delivery to veterans and their loved ones (e.g., couples-based PTSD treatments), may be more effective in alleviating anger symptoms. This study examined whether larger reductions in anger and psychological aggression would be observed in a couples-based intervention compared to an active comparator at posttreatment and follow-up. Data were derived from a randomized trial comparing brief cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD (bCBCT) and PTSD family education (PFE). Participants were 137 veterans and their intimate partners (bCBCT: n = 92, PFE: n = 45). We observed within-condition significant reductions in angry temperament, d = -0.47, p <.001, and angry reaction, d = -0.26, p =.004, among veterans in bCBCT but not PFE, |d|s = 0.13-0.17, ps =.166-.268. Veterans and partners in both conditions reported reductions in psychological aggression, |d|s = 1.09-1.46, ps <.001. There were no significant differences between the treatment conditions on any outcome, ps =.103-.443, and there were no significant changes in anger between posttreatment and follow-up, |d|s = 0.07-0.24, ps =.052-.582. Couples-based interventions for PTSD, including bCBCT and PFE, can be effective in improving aspects of anger among veterans and their intimate partners.

Together we win! Narratives of couples pursuing a healthy diet and physical activity: A qualitative study.

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The risk of MetS can be transmitted via epigenetic processes from both the mother and the father. Therefore, it is essential that both members of a couple are targeted in pre-conception nutrition and physical activity-based lifestyle programs. However, lifestyle interventions targeting both members of a couple are scarce in the literature. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators of a couples-based lifestyle intervention. Nulliparous couples who had an interest in having children in the future were recruited to the study and each member interviewed separately to gain insight into to gain insight into designing future couples-based lifestyle interventions. Interviews were conducted between June and October 2021. Reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) was applied to conduct and analyse semi-structured, in-depth interviews with nulliparous couples who had an interest in having children in the future. Four major themes were identified in nine couples aged 25-34 years (here referred to as "millennials"): Millennials are committed to preparation for their future offspring; millennials know features of a good program likely to have high adherence and long-term behavior change; millennials acknowledge the importance of couples-based programs; and millennials appreciate that future global emergencies may require lifestyle modifications. This study found that millennial couples showed a strong intention to create optimal emotional, financial, and health conditions for their children. They supported couples-based approach (CBA) lifestyle interventions to mitigate potential epigenetic risks. Couples believed that participating together in these programs would enhance adherence to healthy habits, promoting long-term well-being. The findings advocate for exploring and testing CBA interventions that target both partners, as joint participation not only aids in healthy conception and reduces metabolic syndrome risks but also establishes a foundation for family health. These insights highlight the potential of CBA interventions to positively impact future generations.

The Effect of Group Counselling based on Constructive Couple Communication on Perceived Spousal Support in Uterine and Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Control Trial.

Uterine and Cervical cancer survivors face challenges like the disruption of emotional and sexual relationships, struggle to maintain sexual life and intimacy, and the possibility of divorce. The study aimed to determine the effect of group counseling based on couples' constructive communication on perceived spousal support in uterine and cervical cancer survivors. A randomized controlled trial on 40 women who survived uterine and cervical cancer were recruited using convenience sampling and then randomly allocated to a couple-based constructive communication intervention group and a routine cancer center care control group from June 2019 to March 2020 in Motahhari and Imam Khomeini hospitals in Urmia. The intervention group was involved in a group counseling session weekly for 5 weeks, regarding constructive couple communication skills. Perceived spouse support was assessed using the sources of social support scale which has 4 subscales informational, instrumental, emotional, and negative support before and one week after the end of the intervention in both groups. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24 through Independent and paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon, chi-square, and ANCOVA. P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The effect of the intervention was statistically significant in reducing negative support in the intervention group (2.70±0.80) in comparison with the control group (3.40±1.04) (P=0.03). It was also statistically significant in increasing informational support (3.45±0.71 vs. 2.15±0.80, P<0.001), instrumental support (3.15±0.58 vs. 2.85±0.74, P<0.001), and emotional support (19.40±1.60 vs. 16.10±2.10, P<0.001). Group counseling based on couple constructive communication increased perceived spousal support in uterine and cervical cancer survivors. Trial Registration Number: IRCT20150125020778N22.

(018) PILOT TESTING A NEW COUPLE-BASED SEX THERAPY INTERVENTION FOR SEXUAL INTEREST/AROUSAL DISORDER

Abstract Introduction Sexual interest/arousal disorder (SIAD) includes persistent and distressing symptoms of low sexual desire and/or arousal, which are the most common sexual difficulties among women. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials show that psychological therapies produce moderate to large improvements in clinically low sexual desire (Banbury et al., 2021; Frühauf et al., 2013; Günzler &amp; Berner, 2012). However, these therapies focus on individuals, neglecting the partner’s experience, which is known to affect and be affected by SIAD symptoms (Rosen et al., 2019). Despite the prevalence of SIAD and importance of interpersonal factors in the development and maintenance of low sexual desire, there are no empirically supported couple-based sex therapy interventions for this disorder. Objective To develop a new couple-based sex therapy intervention for SIAD following a cognitive-behavioral couple therapy (CBCT) framework. To test the CBCT intervention for SIAD in terms of feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. Methods Nineteen couples in which a woman was diagnosed with SIAD completed a 16-session CBCT intervention delivered via Zoom by therapists with PhD-level training in clinical psychology. The goals of the CBCT intervention were to re-conceptualize SIAD in biopsychosocial-interpersonal terms, modify psychological and interpersonal factors associated with low sexual desire/arousal (Rosen &amp; Bergeron, 2019), and consolidate skills. Participants completed measures of dyadic sexual desire and sexual distress (primary outcomes) as well as sexual communication, sexual satisfaction, relationship intimacy, and relationship satisfaction (secondary outcomes) at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 6-month follow-up. We assessed preliminary efficacy using multilevel models guided by the actor-partner interdependence model (Kenny et al., 2020) to account for the interdependence of couple members’ data. Results The CBCT intervention was feasible as indicated by therapists’ high adherence to the treatment manual (96.8%) and couples’ high rates of homework completion (82.0%). The intervention was acceptable to couples, based on high session attendance rates (97.4%) and treatment satisfaction ratings (7.39/10 for women, 7.33/10 for partners). The intervention produced moderate to large pre- to post-treatment improvements in women’s dyadic sexual desire for their partner (p = .002, d = 0.73) and couple members’ sexual distress (p = .001, d = -0.93 for women, p = .002, d = -0.54 for partners) that were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Couples also reported moderate improvements in sexual communication and satisfaction immediately post-treatment (ps = .001-.02, ds = 0.40-0.53), but there were little to no changes in relationship intimacy or satisfaction post-treatment (ps = .05-.84, ds = 0.10-0.19). Conclusions Findings show that a couple-based sex therapy intervention grounded in theory and dyadic research evidence reduces SIAD symptoms (greater sexual desire, lower distress) and more broadly improves couples’ sexual wellbeing (improved sexual communication, satisfaction; lower distress). The lack of change in relationship outcomes may have been the result of couples having relatively high relationship wellbeing as a prerequisite for participation in the study. Also, the focus of the CBCT intervention was on sexual, rather than relationship wellbeing. This pilot study was based on a small sample and had no control group by design. A randomized clinical trial of the CBCT intervention is needed. Disclosure No.

Mutual communication intervention for colorectal cancer patient-spousal caregiver dyads: A randomized controlled trial.

Gender could impact the psychosocial outcomes and coping strategies of cancer patients and their spousal caregivers (SCs). This study aims to develop a gender-concerned program for colorectal cancer (CRC) couple-based mutual communication intervention (MCI) and to assess its effectiveness on the intra-couple relationship and the individual functions of the partners. A randomized clinical trial with two study groups was utilized. A total of 144 CRC patients and their SCs were randomly assigned to either MCI or usual care (UC) groups, and all of them were required to complete the measurements at baseline and post-intervention. The primary outcome was for mutual communication, and the secondary outcomes included dyadic coping, relationship satisfaction, anxiety, depression, benefit finding and quality of life. The data were analysed by multi-level modelling. The MCI program was feasible and acceptable for Chinese CRC couples and was effective for the improvement of the intra-couple relationship and the individual functions of each partner. CRC patients showed more improvement in mutual communication and dyadic coping than their SCs in the MCI group. Also, this intervention effectiveness was found to be independent of gender. The MCI program is beneficial for Chinese CRC couple's adaptation outcomes. This suggests that clinical medical staff should consider the gender tendency during the implementation of interventions. More researches are needed to extend the application of the MCI program to different participants (e.g. patients with the diagnosis of other types of cancer and their SCs).

Searching for who benefits most and least: An analysis of moderators of the TRUE Dads fatherhood intervention.

Evaluations of interventions to promote fathers' involvement in family life typically focus on whether or not the intervention has a positive impact. Some evaluations also attempt to describe mediators that explain how the intervention is linked to specific outcomes. An evaluation of TRUE Dads, a Randomized Clinical Trial of a couples-based fatherhood intervention for low-income families, reported results that addressed these two issues. Reporting new analyses, the present study addresses a question asked in only a very few fatherhood intervention studies: Are there moderator variables that define characteristics of participants who benefit most or least from the intervention? A total of 46 potential moderators of 2 significant intervention outcomes - reductions in personal distress and in negative evaluations of the parents' relationship with each other - were selected from a 5-domain risk/protective model of family functioning (Cowan & Cowan, 2018. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 92, 111) and from a set of demographic variables associated with these outcomes. An additional 24 potential moderators were tested on 4 outcomes that did not have direct intervention effects. Only 6 of the 70 moderator tests were statistically significant. The intervention provided greater reductions in parents' personal distress when fathers had more economic resources, co-parents had higher levels of education, and the parents were living in the same household on entering the study. There were greater reductions in negative aspects of their couple or co-parenting relationship when the parents at enrollment described more difficulties in the parent-child relationship, fathers were more involved in the children's daily care and were living in the household with their child. No other moderators were found. The results support the conclusion that TRUE Dads was equally effective for a relatively wide range of participants. This search for potential moderators of TRUE Dads outcomes is presented as an example of a needed direction in the evaluation of fatherhood interventions.

The Illness Perceptions and Coping Experiences of Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.

(1) Background: Illness perception (IP) is an important psychological construct for couples dealing with cancer, which impacts health outcomes and the psychological adjustment to cancer. More research is needed to explore the traits of IP and the efforts of couples coping with cancer. Thus, this study was designed to explore the coping experiences and features of the IPs of couples dealing with cancer. (2) Methods: A total of 24 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and 20 spousal caregivers (SCs) participated in semi-structured interviews. All interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed, and analyzed by using an inductive thematic analysis. (3) Results: Two themes (individualized and predominant IP; IP sharing and restructuring) were developed. A preliminary framework was formulated to illustrate the relations among subthemes and the relations between themes with an adjustment of a positive IP to CRC. In this framework, based on multiple sources and factors, the natural disparities formed the IPs of the partners of couples and determined the incongruence of IPs. The effects of IP incongruence on lives under the disease guided the three directions of coping approaches (i.e., information and available support, appropriate disclosure and reflection, and leaving the CRC diagnosis behind) which were adopted by couples dealing with CRC to share and restructure the IP with their spouses for effective dyadic coping. (4) Conclusions: This study provides insights to healthcare providers into the experiences of couples dealing with CRC and the development of couple-based IP intervention programs: (a) it initially provides adequate factual knowledge for enhancing beliefs in the ability to control illness, (b) encourages illness-centered conversations and disclosure regarding thoughts and emotions for promoting positive congruence of IP between the partners of couples dealing with a hard dilemma, and (c) guides couples to perceive positive changes and explore the illness's meaning. Understanding each theme of personalized IP and adopting effective IP coping approaches can help guide couples dealing with CRC to efficiently promote constructive IP and better health outcomes.

What impact does hearing impairment have on cognitive health in older married couples in China?

Hearing impairment is a common geriatric health problem and chronic stressor, and it is associated with poor cognitive outcomes. However, little is known about the impact of hearing impairment in married couples, particularly its potential spillover effects on the cognitive health among spouses of individuals with impairment. Drawing on a stress-proliferation perspective, we used actor–partner interdependence models to examine (1) whether an individual's hearing impairment influences their spouse's cognitive function; and (2) whether AL, symptoms of depression, and social participation serve as mediators for such an association. We utilized data from the 2015 (baseline) and 2018 (3-year follow-up) waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. 4434 couples were included at baseline, and 2190 couples remained after the 3-year follow-up. Hearing impairment among married women was associated with negative impacts on their spouses' cognitive function. Symptoms of depression and social participation may have served as potential mediators in this relationship. For married men, there was no statistically significant association between hearing impairment and spouses' cognitive function. Our findings suggest that hearing impairment among one spouse can lead to negative impacts on the other, but that this effect may depend on gender. Early diagnosis and couple-based interventions for hearing impairment are important for the cognitive health of both hearing-impaired individuals and their spouses.

Dyadic coping, resilience, and quality of life in young and middle-aged couples after gynecologic cancer: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model

PurposeTo examine the effects of dyadic coping on quality of life (QoL) and the mediating role of resilience in these effects among young and middle-aged couples after gynecologic cancer (GC). MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2022 and June 2023 from one tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China. 240 pairs of young and middle-aged GC couples were recruited. The demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey were used to collect data. The process of dyadic analysis was based on the actor-partner interdependence mediation model. ResultsGC patients' dyadic coping had an actor effect on both their own physical and mental QoL, while spouses' dyadic coping only exerted an actor effect on their own mental QoL. The mediating effects of resilience on the relationship between dyadic coping and QoL were identified in dyads. Moreover, spouses' dyadic coping could indirectly influence patients' QoL through their own and patients' resilience. ConclusionThe findings confirm the dyadic relationships between dyadic coping, resilience, and QoL among young and middle-aged couples facing GC. These results suggest that it is necessary to develop couple-based interventions to improve dyadic coping and resilience, thus enhancing the QoL of both members.

Feasibility of a Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Intervention for Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder

ABSTRACT Female sexual interest/arousal disorder (SIAD) is strongly influenced by interpersonal factors; however, there are no empirically-supported, couple-based sex therapy interventions for this disorder. This pre-registered study tested the feasibility of a cognitive-behavioral couple therapy (CBCT) intervention for SIAD. A sample of 19 couples in which a female partner was diagnosed with SIAD completed a 16-session CBCT intervention delivered online by therapists with PhD-level training in clinical psychology. Women with SIAD (M age = 43.47, SD = 12.76) and their partners (M age = 43.74, SD = 11.68) were in long-term relationships (M = 13.86, SD = 9.15). The CBCT sessions were video recorded and independently coded for treatment manual adherence and therapists reported on the completion of in-session and homework exercises. Participants completed measures of treatment satisfaction following the intervention as well as dyadic sexual desire (women with SIAD only) and sexual distress prior to treatment, post-treatment, and at 6 months follow-up. The therapists exhibited a high level of adherence to the treatment manual and couples had high rates of homework completion. Moreover, couples had low dropout rates, high attendance rates, and reported moderately high global treatment satisfaction and high satisfaction with virtual care. Women with SIAD reported large improvements in dyadic sexual desire and sexual distress from pre-treatment to post-treatment and pre-treatment to 6-month follow-up. Partners reported moderate and small improvements in sexual distress for post-treatment and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Results support the feasibility of an evidence-based CBCT intervention for SIAD and the need for a randomized clinical trial of the intervention.

Examining strength at home couples to prevent intimate partner violence on a military installation: A randomized controlled trial.

In this study, the effectiveness of a couples-based group intervention to prevent intimate partner violence (IPV), Strength at Home Couples (SAH-C), was examined on a military installation relative to a comparison intervention, Supportive Prevention (SP). It was expected that greater reductions in use of physical, psychological, and sexual IPV behaviors, as well as reduced suicidality, would be found among service members and their partners in SAH-C relative to SP. Participants included 138 couples randomized to SAH-C and SP through a clinical controlled trial embedded in a hybrid effectiveness implementation study which took place on a military installation. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales and Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse were used to measure IPV, and 13 Military Suicide Research Consortium common data elements were used to assess suicidality. Service members randomized to SAH-C evidenced greater reductions based on effect sizes across the assessment time points for all IPV variables, including use of overall physical IPV, severe physical IPV, sexual IPV, psychological IPV, and coercive control IPV relative to those randomized to SP. Partners of service members demonstrated a similar general pattern for reductions in use of IPV, but findings were not as robust as for service members. Both service members and partners demonstrated greater reductions in suicidality based on effect sizes when randomized to SAH-C relative to SP. Findings extend prior work demonstrating the promising effects of SAH-C delivered in the military context and highlight the possible benefits of SAH-C in preventing self-harm thoughts and behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Discrete choice experiment for dyadic data collection: eliciting preferences of couple-based smoking cessation interventions.

Discrete choice experiment for dyadic data collection: eliciting preferences of couple-based smoking cessation interventions.

Attitudes Toward the Uptake of Combination HIV Prevention Methods Among Young Black and Latino Heterosexual Couples Living in New York City: A Qualitative Study.

Couple-based HIV interventions that increase uptake of two or more effective biomedical HIV prevention methods may be a promising HIV prevention strategy for young Black and Latino heterosexual couples. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews with 23 Black and Latino adolescent and young adult heterosexual couples that explored their attitudes toward using combination HIV prevention methods (CHPMs). A qualitative hybrid thematic analysis approach was used to identify key themes. Themes included: (a) attitudes that encouraged uptake-CHPMs increased assurance of safety against HIV/sexually transmitted infections and (b) attitudes that impeded uptake-CHPMs are too much to do and are not appropriate for serious relationships. Although Black and Latino adolescents and young adults may recognize the combined protective benefits of using multiple HIV prevention methods, personal and relational considerations play an instrumental role in uptake of CHPMs.

The effectiveness of couple-based interventions on the marital outcomes of women with genital and breast cancer and their partners: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundBreast cancer and genital cancer are known as cancers that affect people’s relationships with their partners. Women with such cancers are emotionally vulnerable and need more support from their partners. The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of couple-based interventions on the marital outcomes of patients with these cancers and their intimate partners.MethodsTo perform this systematic review, Google Scholar and databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, SID (Scientific Information Database), and Magiran were searched systematically. The reviewed studies included randomized controlled trials and quasiexperimental studies in which the intervention group, couple-based interventions, and the control group received routine care, general education or no intervention for cancer treatment. In this study, the included participants were patients with breast cancer or genital cancer and their intimate partners. The primary outcomes considered in this study included patients’ marital adjustment, patients’ marital satisfaction, patients’ marital intimacy, and patients’ marital relationships. The secondary outcomes were partners’ marital adjustment, partners’ marital satisfaction, partners’ marital intimacy, and partners’ marital relationships. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager v. 5.3 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2014; Copenhagen, Denmark). The intervention impacts on continuous outcomes were measured using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval because of the use of various scales to evaluate the outcomes. The quality of evidence presented in the included studies was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. In the subgroup analysis, the studied outcomes were divided into two parts (theory-based and non-theory-based) in terms of the theoretical context of couple-based interventions.ResultsFrom a total of 138 retrieved studies, 14 trials were eligible for inclusion in the study. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the patient’s marital satisfaction increased significantly with couple-based interventions (SMD 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.85; 7 trials, 341 patients, very low certainty) compared to the control group, but the evidence was uncertain. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the partner’s marital satisfaction, the patient’s and partner’s marital adjustment, and the patient’s and partner’s marital intimacy. Additionally, the results of the subgroup analysis showed that the couple-based interventions significantly increased the patient’s marital adjustment (SMD 1.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.06; 4 trials, 355 patients, very low certainty), the partner’s marital adjustment (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.86; 4 trials, 347 partners, very low certainty), the patient’s marital satisfaction (SMD 0.89, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.43; 2 trials, 123 patients, very low certainty), and the partner’s marital satisfaction (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.94; 2 trials, 123 partners, very low certainty) compared to the control group in theory-based studies. In. However, in non-theory-based studies, the results of the meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups.ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrated the impact of couple-based interventions on the marital outcomes of patients with breast and genital cancers. Because of the very low confidence in the evidence, high-quality randomized trials with a sufficient sample size should be conducted considering the proper theoretical context.

A couple-based dyadic coping intervention for colorectal cancer patient-spousal caregiver dyads: A randomized controlled study

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical effects of a couple-focused dyadic coping intervention in colorectal cancer (CRC) couples. MethodsThe study was a single-blinded randomized controlled study which 226 CRC couples were recruited and randomized to either the intervention (N = 113) or the control (N = 113) group. All couples received usual care while the six-week dyadic coping intervention was provided to the intervened couples in psycho-education and skill training methods through face-to-face combined with telephone formats. Measurement data, including dyadic coping, marital satisfaction, quality of life and psychological well-being were collected at pre- and post-intervention periods. And multilevel model (MLM) was applied to analyze the effects of the intervention and the role tendency. ResultsA total of 173 couples completed the program and post-intervention evaluation. The retention rate was 76.5%. Results from MLM showed that the dyadic coping intervention is effective in promoting levels of dyadic coping (P < 0.001), marital satisfaction (P = 0.042), mental health (P = 0.006), and positive psychological well-being (P < 0.001), and alleviating depression (P = 0.015) in CRC couples. For role tendency, the intervention found to be more effective in CRC spousal caregivers’ positive psychological well-being compared to the patients (P = 0.037). ConclusionThe couple-based dyadic coping intervention is effective in promoting dyadic coping and improving psychological adjustment in CRC couples. More studies were needed to further evaluate the program and its long-term efficacy in the future. In addition, given the positive effects of the intervention, clinical nursing stuffs may consider implementing such intervention in their routine work while caring for CRC couples.

Couples motivational interviewing with mobile breathalysers to reduce alcohol use in South Africa: a pilot randomised controlled trial of Masibambisane

IntroductionHeavy alcohol use among people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa can hinder the success of HIV treatment programmes, impacting progress towards United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS goals. Primary partners...

Family-Focused Facilitated Fitness: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Couple-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients and Their Caregiving Partners

Reductions in physical activity (PA) are common among patients following hematopoietic cell transplantation, and a risk factor for poor physical functioning. PA among spouses/cohabiting partners, who frequently serve as the patient's primary caregiver, may also be reduced due to caregiving demands and limited bandwidth for self-care. In addition, the patient-caregiver relationship can be compromised, and communication patterns disrupted. All PA interventions in the hematopoietic cell transplantation setting have focused entirely on patients, ignoring an opportunity to synergistically engage and benefit the caregiver as well. We sought to test feasibility and acceptability of a couple-based intervention entitled Family-Focused Facilitated Fitness (FFFF), designed to improve PA as assessed by daily step counts among both patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation and their caregivers. Guided by interdependence and communal coping perspectives, FFFF is an 8-week, remotely-delivered intervention that provides training in communication skills and joint problem-solving to help patients and caregivers support one another in PA. Participants are also given a Fitbit to track their steps and weekly individualized step prescription based on the 75th percentile ranked value of their last 7 recorded daily step counts. A priori benchmarks for feasibility and acceptability in this single-arm pilot were as follows: 50% of eligible couples would agree to participate, 70% of couples would attend all 8 sessions, 80% of participants would provide valid Fitbit wear data 4/7 days/ week, and among sessions reviewed for treatment fidelity, 85% of treatment protocol elements would be covered. Couples were recruited prior to transplant. Among 26 couples approached and deemed eligible, 17 enrolled (65% agreement) and completed baseline assessment. Three couples later withdrew after transplantation but prior to receiving the intervention, resulting in 14 couples commencing the intervention, on average 21 days post-transplant. Four couples subsequently discontinued due to medical complications (n = 3) or caregiver schedule (n = 1). Among the 10 couples who completed the intervention, the percentage of participants meeting our benchmark of valid Fitbit wear at least 4 days per week was 85% in week 1, 90% in weeks 2 to 7, and 80% in week 8. Treatment fidelity was 95% on average across 24 sessions reviewed (3 cases). Treatment satisfaction scores were uniformly high across multiple dimensions, with all means above 4 on the 1 to 5 scale. Daily step counts among those attending all 8 intervention sessions increased from 2249 ± 302 steps/day in week 1 to 4975 ± 1377 steps/day in week 8 among patients, and from 8676 ± 3760 steps/day in week 1 to 9838 ± 3723 steps/day in week 8 among caregivers. Qualitative feedback indicated perceived mental and physical health benefits of the program. Participants also offered suggestions for adaptations to accommodate medical setbacks and constraints. All a priori feasibility benchmarks were met or exceeded. Results offer promise for utility of the program to engage and leverage patient-caregiver dyads to increase PA following transplant. An investigation using a randomized controlled design will be necessary to adequately examine change over time relative to control and its possible impact on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

A case series of sage: a new couple-based intervention for borderline personality disorder

BackgroundResearch suggests that interpersonal dysfunction may be central to borderline personality disorder (BPD), and that the relationships of people with BPD are particularly impaired. Further, the significant others of people with BPD exhibit elevated psychological problems but little access to mental healthcare. Despite this, most BPD interventions are delivered individually and do not routinely incorporate significant others. This manuscript presents the first case series of Sage, a 12-session manualized intervention for people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and their intimate partners with three targets: a) BPD severity, b) relationship conflict, and c) intimate partner mental health.FindingsFive couples of people with BPD with frequent suicidal/self-injurious behavior or high suicidal ideation and their intimate partners received Sage. Measures of Sage targets as well as tertiary outcomes were administered at pre-, mid-, and post-intervention. Four out of five dyads completed Sage, with high intervention satisfaction ratings. Improvements were generally demonstrated in BPD severity, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior/self-injury. Half of dyads exhibited improvements in conflict, and additional improvements in mental health outcomes for dyad members were demonstrated. One dyad exhibited poor outcomes and speculations regarding this are offered.ConclusionsFindings provide proof of concept of Sage as an intervention that can improve BPD and other mental health outcomes in those with BPD and their intimate partners. Incorporating intimate partners into BPD treatment may optimize and expedite its outcomes. However, further testing is needed.Trial registrationThis project was pre-registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: [NCT04737252]).