Psychological counseling and have long aimed to contribute to development and effective use of known therapeutic effect mechanisms (helping skills) in practice. Research on this issue has frequently discussed and searched as to whether psychological counsellor is effective or whether one specific counseling method is more effective than another. Findings in this direction can be collected under outcome research heading (Schindler, 1996; Straus & Wittmann, 2000). Outcome studies going back many years indicate an abundance of findings which suggest that is both genuinely effective and that a wide variety of different counseling approaches have various effects. No matter which counseling theory is adopted, as stated by Lambert, Bergin, and Garfield (2004), main purpose is to help client to feel better. Therefore, it is very important to identify those factors stimulating changes in client.Considering conducted so far, Grawe (1988) states that actually the science of psychotherapy rarely focuses on its own problems. According to Grawe (1988) and Meyer (1990), real problem is psychotherapeutic phenomenon itself (things going on); in other words, a change can happen at end of psychotherapeutic intervention process. Thanks to procedural developments, both psychological counseling and have acquired a new dimension, especially since 1990s (Grawe, 1992; Greenberg, 1991). With these procedural developments, counseling process has been able to be investigated at micro analytical (behavioral) level. It is now considered that by discussing interaction between client and counsellor in connection with results of psychological counseling, abetter understanding of nature of counseling process can be reached. Which procedural preferences of counseling process may be investigated is an issue that has long been discussed by researchers (Heppner, Wampold, & Kivlighan, 2008; Sanberk, 2014). With this being said however, actual number of studies investigating client-counsellor interactions within counseling process are limited (Gazzola, Iwakabe, & Stalikas, 2003; Greenberg, 2007; Klein & Elliott, 2006; Williams & Hill, 2001).Grawe (1989) indicates that effectiveness of counseling process can no longer be revealed with simple evidence. According to Grawe, it is important not only to know effect mechanisms in counseling process, but also which ones cause change and to what extent they do (Grawe, 1989). For instance, answers to such questions as Under which conditions do psychological counsellors explanations and instructions' affect client more (positively) and What concrete contributions can a counsellor make to cause a change in a client's life and/or behaviors and then help these changes to become permanent? reveal effort in this direction. As stated by Bastine, Fiedler, and Kommer (1989), main questions that researches are trying to answer include What variables play a role in change?, What are indicators showing that a change has occurred?, and In how many different ways can process that provokes a change be classified? However, before finding answers to such questions, it first needs to be determined as to how interaction between client and counsellor should be observed, in other words, type of observation should be determined. The interaction in counseling process can be observed without a standardized tool (directly); a procedural preference in this direction can serve purpose better understanding process (Brandi, 2005; Schindler, 1996). Furthermore, observation's focus should not be only client or counsellor, but should; on contrary, include both sides interacting with each other. Hence, some researchers have developed various observation systems that enable reciprocal investigation of client-counsellor interactions (Connolly, Chris, Christoph, Shapell, Barber, & Luborsky, 1998; Schindler, 1989). …