Drug Costs Research Articles

Costs, challenges and opportunities of decentralised chimeric antigen receptor T-cell production: a literature review and clinical experts’ interviews

The objectives were to summarise the evidence and clinical experts’ views comparing the use of decentralised produced chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies versus commercially available products, regarding drug costs,...

Predicting hospitalization costs for pulmonary tuberculosis patients based on machine learning

BackgroundPulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a prevalent chronic disease associated with a significant economic burden on patients. Using machine learning to predict hospitalization costs can allocate medical resources effectively and optimize the cost structure rationally, so as to control the hospitalization costs of patients better.MethodsThis research analyzed data (2020–2022) from a Kashgar pulmonary hospital’s information system, involving 9570 eligible PTB patients. SPSS 26.0 was used for multiple regression analysis, while Python 3.7 was used for random forest regression (RFR) and MLP. The training set included data from 2020 and 2021, while the test set included data from 2022. The models predicted seven various costs related to PTB patients, including diagnostic cost, medical service cost, material cost, treatment cost, drug cost, other cost, and total hospitalization cost. The model’s predictive performance was evaluated using R-square (R2), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics.ResultsAmong the 9570 PTB patients included in the study, the median and quartile of total hospitalization cost were 13,150.45 (9891.34, 19,648.48) yuan. Nine factors, including age, marital status, admission condition, length of hospital stay, initial treatment, presence of other diseases, transfer, drug resistance, and admission department, significantly influenced hospitalization costs for PTB patients. Overall, MLP demonstrated superior performance in most cost predictions, outperforming RFR and multiple regression; The performance of RFR is between MLP and multiple regression; The predictive performance of multiple regression is the lowest, but it shows the best results for Other costs.ConclusionThe MLP can effectively leverage patient information and accurately predict various hospitalization costs, achieving a rationalized structure of hospitalization costs by adjusting higher-cost inpatient items and balancing different cost categories. The insights of this predictive model also hold relevance for research in other medical conditions.

Biologics and Biosimilars in Albania; Consumption and Costs

Biological therapies use proteins that have been produced with biological technology to generate targeted effects within the body, impact the body's immune system, and reduce inflammation at various stages. Biologics are used in the treatment of conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus, ankylosing spondylitis, arthropathic psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis. The aim of the study is to conduct a comprehensive review and analyze the market dynamics related to the use of these treatments in Albania. Methods: This is a retrospective and observational study based on FDSKSH’s data for 2023. Results: The total annual reimbursement cost for 2023 was ALL 188,208,780 (1 ALL = 0.01 USD). The average reimbursement cost per patient was ALL 209820.2679. The use of biologics and biosimilars represents 0.028% of all prescriptions and accounts for 1.56% of the total reimbursement costs for drugs. In 2023, the reimbursement cost covered by FDSKSH was 7.14% lower than in 2022. 87.17% of the patients were treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitors. Etanercept 25 mg (biosimilar) had the highest price reduction of 32.83% in 2024. The most expensive drug in 2023 was Secukinumab 150 mg. Biologics account for 61% of the total annual reimbursement cost, while biosimilars account for 39%. Conclusions: The prescription of biologics is lower compared to biosimilars, but they are associated with significant costs that impact the overall reimbursement costs. The prices of biologics and biosimilars were lower than those in Kosovo, Italy, Greece and will decrease in 2024. Costeconomic evaluations of the most expensive biologics and biosimilars are important for the management of financial resources.

Patient Assistance Programs—A New Era of Law and Policy

This Viewpoint from authors at PORTAL discusses the importance of patient assistance programs in covering the cost of prescription drugs, highlights 2 recent rulings that illustrate the substantial barriers to regulating these programs, and calls for continued evaluation of these programs’ effectiveness and costs.

Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin as part of various treatment regimens for prevention of cardiovascular death and achieving the target indicator "Reduction of cardiovascular mortality" of the State Program "HealthCare Development" in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aim. To evaluate the dapagliflozin as part of various treatment regimens in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) ≤40% receiving medications within federal preferential drug program to achieve the "Reduction of cardiovascular mortality" of the State Program "HealthCare Development". To estimate the costs of reducing the cardiovascular mortality rate by 1 death per 100 thousand of population and achieving 1 percentage point of the target indicator "Reduction of cardiovascular mortality".Material and methods. The target patient population was Russian patients aged over 18 years diagnosed with NYHA class II-IV HFrEF (≤40%), included in the federal preferential drug program. We used model developed based on the DAPA-HF study results. We assessed the costs of drugs, the number of lives saved, the impact of therapy on achievement of the target indicator "Reduction of cardiovascular mortality" and other indicators in the Russian Federation (RF) as a whole and in each subject of the Russian Federation while using dapagliflozin as part of various treatment regimens for HFrEF including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), beta blockers, diuretics, mineralocorticoid antagonists, cardiac glycosides.Results. In 2024, the treatment cost of 181351 patients with HFrEF included in the federal preferential drug program with dapagliflozin in combination with standard therapy (ST) will be RUB9265,4 million; in combination with ST without ARNi (ST including ACEi/ARB) — RUB8161,7 million; in combination with ST including ARNi — RUB17837,3 million. The additional number of lives saved when using dapagliflozin in combination with standard therapy was 2394, in combination with standard therapy without ARNi — 2340, in combination with standard therapy, including ARNi — 2913. Costs of therapy per patient per year when using dapagliflozin in combination with standard therapy amounted to RUB51090,90; in combination with standard therapy without ARNI — RUB45004,72; in combination with standard therapy, including ARNI — RUB98358,00. In 2024, the percentage (%) of achievement of the federal target for dapagliflozin in combination with ST is 11,22%, while in combination with standard therapy without ARNi (ST including ACEi/ARB) — 10,96%, in combination with ST including ARNi — 13,65%. Achievement of a 1% target reduction in cardiovascular mortality in 2024 reqiored RUB828,1 million for dapagliflozin in combination with ST, while in combination with ST without ARNI (ST including ACEi/ARB) — RUB748,2 million, in combination with ST including ARNi — RUB1293,3 million.Conclusion. Among the 3 options considered for adding dapagliflozin to ST (ARNi or ACEi/ARB, including ACEi/ARB, including ARNi), ST without ARNI (ST including ACEi/ARB) has the lowest cost required to achieve a 1% target reduction in cardiovascular mortality. At the same time, the standard therapy with ARNI has the highest cost required to achieve a 1% target reduction in cardiovascular mortality, which indicates its least cost-effectiveness.

Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Literature Review.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory disease characterised by a variety of clinical manifestations. Considering the economic burden posed by PsA and the increasing number of treatment options, economic evaluations are required to better allocate available resources. This work aims to update a previous published literature review on PsA cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness analysis. A search was performed of English-language literature between January 2017 and March 20, 2024 in Medline/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library using the terms 'psoriatic arthritis', 'cost of illness' and 'cost effectiveness'. Data on decision model, time horizon, population, treatment options, perspective, type of costs, relevant results and authors' conclusion were extracted from the reviewed articles. Finally, the quality of the included studies was evaluated. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria: 16 cost-of-illness and 11 cost-effectiveness/cost-utility analyses. PsA is characterised by high direct and indirect costs. Drug costs as well as hospitalisation and absenteeism were the major drivers of the observed costs. The cost-effectiveness analyses reported the dominance or the cost effectiveness of biologic therapies compared with non-biologic PsA treatment. Biological options like bimekizumab and ixekizumab have demonstrated a better cost-effectiveness profile in PsA patients compared with other treatments (i.e., other biological treatments). There was an increased number of economic evaluations compared with the previous review. PsA is still associated with significant economic burden worldwide. The main cost was represented by therapies, specifically biological therapies. Amongst the biological therapies, bimekizumab and ixekizumab appear to provide the most economic benefit. Finally, new economic studies are needed to enrich knowledge on the economic burden of subgroups of PsA patients as well as early treatment of PsA with new therapies.

Status of incremental costs of first-line treatment recommended in Japanese clinical guidelines for metastatic breast cancer patients.

The increasing incidence and prevalence of breast cancer alongside diagnostic and treatment technology advances have produced a debate about the financial burden cancer places on the healthcare system and concerns about access. This study was conducted at 51 hospitals belonging to the Breast Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group using a web-based survey. The survey period conducted from July 2021 to June 2022. The study population included patients with metastatic breast cancer who received the related treatment as their first-line therapy. The proportion of patients who selected that regimen as their first-line treatment was tabulated. The total cost increase for each current standard therapy in comparison to conventional treatments was calculated. A total of 702 patients (pts) were surveyed. Of those enrolled, 342 (48.7%) received high-cost treatment [estimated monthly drug costs exceeding ~500 000 Japanese Yen (JPY)]. Of these, 16 pts (4.7%) were receiving very high-cost treatment, amounting to more than 1 000 000 JPY per month. Fifty three (15.5%) of the patients who received high-cost treatment were 75years of age or older. Of these, 1pt (0.3%) were receiving very high-cost treatment. Analyses of incremental costs by current drugs showed that abemaciclib was costly with total additional cost of 6 365 670 JPY per patient. The total additional cost of the regimen per patient that included palbociclib was the second highest at 4011248 JPY, followed by atezolizumab at 3209033 JPY. The findings indicate that evaluating the financial implications of high-cost treatments requires considering not only drug prices but also analysis of total cost increase.

Current Treatments, Emerging Therapeutics, and Natural Remedies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, lifelong disorder characterized by inflammation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The exact etiology of IBD remains incompletely understood due to its multifaceted nature, which includes genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and host immune response dysfunction. Currently, there is no cure for IBD. This review discusses the available treatment options and the challenges they present. Importantly, we examine emerging therapeutics, such as biologics and immunomodulators, that offer targeted treatment strategies for IBD. While many IBD patients do not respond adequately to most biologics, recent clinical trials combining biologics with small-molecule drugs (SMDs) have provided new insights into improving the IBD treatment landscape. Furthermore, numerous novel and specific therapeutic targets have been identified. The high cost of IBD drugs poses a significant barrier to treatment, but this challenge may be alleviated with the development of more affordable biosimilars. Additionally, emerging point-of-care protein biomarkers from serum and plasma are showing potential for enhancing the precision of IBD diagnosis and prognosis. Several natural products (NPs), including crude extracts, small molecules, and peptides, have demonstrated promising anti-inflammatory activity in high-throughput screening (HTS) systems and advanced artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted platforms, such as molecular docking and ADMET prediction. These platforms are advancing the search for alternative IBD therapies derived from natural sources, potentially leading to more affordable and safer treatment options with fewer side effects.

Assessment of national reimbursement anticancer medications availability in China: based on a medical institution perspective

BackgroundHigh clinical value national reimbursement anticancer medications (NRAMs) are pivotal treatments for patients with cancer. However, the availability of NRAMs in medical institutions is unknown. This study aimed to assess the availability of NRAMs in national and provincial medical institutions.MethodsThis cross-sectional study utilized national health insurance data to access the availability of NRAMs in national and provincial medical institutions. Further statistical analyses and visualizations were conducted in terms of medical institution level and daily cost. Using the Spearman’s rank correlation test (α = 0.05), we calculated the correlation between the availability rates of NRAMs and their negotiation access time, daily cost, per capita disposable income, provincial gross product, and number of policy releases.ResultsOverall, 81 NRAMs, with an average availability rate of approximately 1.01% nationwide, were included. There were significant differences between provinces for each drug, and the availability of NRAMs gradually decreased in tertiary (13.41%), secondary (1.58%), and primary medical institutions (< 0.05%). Differences were also observed in the availability rate of NRAMs in various daily drug cost ranges. Among the factors examined, negotiation access time (r1 = 0.425), daily cost (r2 = − 0.326), per capita disposable income (r3 = 0.645), provincial gross product (r4 = 0.433), and number of policy releases (r5 = 0.461) were all correlated with the availability of NRAMs.ConclusionsThe low availability of NRAMs in national and provincial medical institutions indicates that their willingness to equip NRAMs needs to be improved. All factors examined in this study affected the availability of NRAMs. Our findings can guide policymakers in improving relevant policies.

Budget impact of resmetirom for the treatment of adults with non-cirrhotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with moderate to advanced liver fibrosis (consistent with stages F2 to F3 fibrosis)

Aims This study assessed the budget impact of resmetirom as a treatment for adults with non-cirrhotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with moderate-to-advanced liver fibrosis and estimated total costs for a hypothetical private payer in the United States. Materials and methods A three-year budget impact analysis based on an open cohort state transition model was developed for a hypothetical one-million-member private health plan. The comparator was Standard of Care (SOC), defined as routine care for non-cirrhotic NASH patients with moderate-to-advanced liver fibrosis. Each year, the number of resmetirom treatment-eligible patients was estimated through prevalent, incident, and diagnostic rate estimates. Costs included resources incurred by the medical and pharmacy benefits of private payers, including resmetirom drug acquisition costs, diagnosis and monitoring, other medical and other prescription costs stratified by disease progression status (i.e. non-cirrhotic vs. cirrhotic/advanced liver diseases). Resmetirom adverse event management costs were included in sensitivity analysis. Drug costs were estimated based on the average wholesale acquisition cost as of March 2024. Other costs were based on published sources and inflated to 2023 US dollars. Budget impact outcomes were presented in aggregate, net, and on a per-member per-month (PMPM) basis. Results Compared with a scenario without resmetirom, the introduction of resmetirom yielded results ranging from 50 to 238 treated patients, net budget impact of $2.2 to $9.5 million, and PMPM from $0.19 to $0.80 over years one and three. Net costs excluding resmetirom declined over time. In sensitivity analyses, results were most sensitive to diagnostic and epidemiologic inputs. Limitations Market shares are based on internal forecasts, a short time horizon, average treatment effects, and other limitations common to BIMs. Conclusion The adoption of resmetirom on the formulary for the treatment of non-cirrhotic NASH with moderate-to-advanced liver fibrosis resulted in a moderate increase in budget impact with declining costs related to NASH progression.

A new decision-support tool in a multi-center randomized trial for personalized, optimized, and simplified fertility treatment in non-PCOS patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, in achieving the following outcomes: reducing the total cumulative dosage of Gonadotropins (Gns) used during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles and reducing the repeated ultrasonograms (USG) for monitoring follicular growth without compromising the number of good quality blastocysts obtained. The study design employed a multi-center randomized trial. The study enrolled 115 women aged 25-45 years undergoing IVF. Among the participants, 55 were randomly assigned to the intervention group (Opt-IVF), and 60 were randomly assigned to the control group. The intervention involved using a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, to guide Gn dosing and trigger dates. The participants in the intervention group required significantly lower cumulative Gn dosage. The intervention group had higher numbers of oocytes retrieved and M2 retrieved than the control group. The number of good-quality blastocysts, the good-quality blastocyst rate, the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and the pregnancy rate in the intervention group were significantly higher than in the control group. The utilization of the clinical decision support tool led to several positive outcomes, including eliminating the need for ultrasound exams after day 5, reducing the dosage of Gn required, and yielding significantly higher numbers of high-quality blastocysts and higher pregnancy rates. Thus, Opt-IVF can successfully provide a personalized, optimized, and simplified approach to superovulation. Opt-IVF consistently outperformed the clinical teams in most of the outcomes. Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID - NCT05811065). Date of Registration: 15 March 2023. Date of enrollment of the first subject: 20 March 2023. The high cost of IVF is a result of costly drugs, fixed prices for infrastructure, extensive testing required, and labor costs for physicians and other healthcare personnel. Superovulation, which involves the drug-induced release of multiple eggs needed for IVF, accounts for a significant share of these costs. Current approaches to superovulation involve almost daily monitoring of follicle development using ultrasound and/or blood tests. The daily dosage of stimulatory hormones is then prescribed by physicians based on empirical data and clinical experience. However, the dose is not optimized for each patient, and overstimulation complications can occur. The cost of testing and drugs makes this stage very expensive. To overcome the shortcomings of this system, we have developed a decision support tool (Opt-IVF) that can provide a personalized model-optimized dosage profile for each patient. The clinical results show that Opt-IVF optimizes and personalizes dosage, reduces testing, and provides better outcomes for patients.

High-cost treatments for advanced lung cancer in Japan (Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group).

The treatment of lung cancer has made dramatic progress in the past decade, but due to the high cost of drugs, the total pharmaceutical cost has been rising explosively. There are currently no data available in Japan on which regimens are used, to what extent they are used, and what their total cost is. Sixty Japanese centers belonging to the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were surveyed for information about the first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer in practice from July 2021 to June 2022. Three types of cancer were included: driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Recent treatment costs for ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapy were about 20-55 times higher than those for conventional chemotherapy. Of the 3738 patients with driver gene aberration-negative NSCLC, 2573 (68.8%) received treatments with monthly cost of 500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) or more; 2555 (68.4%) received ICI therapy. Of the 1486 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, 1290 (86.8%) received treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more; 1207 (81.2%) received osimertinib. ICI treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more were administered to 607 (56.3%) of 1079 patients with ES-SCLC. Elderly NSCLC patients received slightly more high-cost treatment than younger patients. Recent treatments cost many times more than conventional chemotherapy. This study revealed that high-cost treatments were widely used in advanced lung cancer and some of high-cost treatments were used despite the lack of clear evidence. Physicians should pay attention to the cost of treatments they use.

Efficiency of periodontal treatment to improve type 2 diabetes mellitus outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of economic evaluations.

To assess the efficiency of periodontal treatment (PT) in improving diabetes-related outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and periodontitis, providing an updated and comprehensive synthesis from economic evaluations (EE). Seven databases and one register were independently searched by two reviewers for articles published up to 8 May 2024. Studies that assessed the efficiency of PT versus no treatment or other dental treatments were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2, ROBINS-I and ECOBIAS tools for the first stage of EE and the CHEERS checklist and NICE quality appraisal tool for overall EE. Qualitative and quantitative syntheses of the articles were conducted and assessed using the GRADE approach. Eleven studies were included. PT reduces total healthcare costs, including inpatient and outpatient, diabetes-related costs and other drug costs (low to moderate certainty). A total incremental net benefit of USD 12 348 (2022 currency, 95% CI 12 195-12 500) was estimated from three high-quality model-based cost-utility analyses (high certainty). The inclusion of PT in the comprehensive treatment of patients with T2DM and periodontitis is cost-effective. Future research is required to ensure the transferability of these findings and inform decision makers from different countries. PROSPERO CRD42023443146.

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in China and the US.

Background: Pembrolizumab is a potentially valuable treatment. However, patients, doctors, and healthcare decision-makers are uncertain about its cost-effectiveness and an appropriate pricing for this new therapy. This study aims to appraise the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients in China and the United States (US). Methods: A Markov model was constructed from the perspectives of healthcare systems in both China and the US for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Patient baseline characteristics and key clinical data were sourced from the KEYNOTE-966 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636). Costs and utilities were collected from drug cost websites and published literature. Cumulative costs (in USD), life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured and compared. Price simulations were conducted under given willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds to provide pricing scheme references. The model's robustness was analyzed through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Basic data analysis illustrates that pembrolizumab ($2662.41/100mg) in combination with chemotherapy regimen was not cost-effective relative to chemotherapy regimens at the WTP threshold of $38,201.19 in China, and the additional cost relative to chemotherapy regimens was $77,114.94 (ICER $556,689.47/QALY) while increasing 0.14 QALYs. Pembrolizumab ($54.71/1mg) also increased efficacy by 0.14 QALYs in the US, but remained also not cost-effective at the US WTP threshold of $229,044, and the total cost increased by $160,425.24 (ICER $1,109,462.92/QALY). Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy reduces the disease of burden. However, at its current price, it may not be a cost-effective treatment for advanced BTC in both China and the US. This study can aid decision-makers in making optimal choices.

Budget Impact of Disease-Modifying Treatments and a CRISPR Gene-Edited Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

Treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD) has traditionally focused on symptomatic and preventative care. Recent advances in novel therapeutic developments, likely to be orphan-designated, are anticipated to carry a substantial price tag. This study assesses the potential budget impact of adopting disease-modifying treatments, crizanlizumab and voxelotor, and pioneering CRISPRgene-edited therapy, CTX001, in the Belgian healthcare system. The perspective of the Belgian healthcare payer (RIZIV-INAMI including patient copayments), a 5-year horizon with a 2-10% uptake of disease-modifying interventions, and a 2% uptake of CTX001 were considered. Data, encompassing target population, current (chronic and acute management, curative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and new (crizanlizumab, voxelotor, and CTX001) interventions, clinical effectiveness, adverse events, healthcare resource utilization, and associated costs, were gathered through a comprehensive literature review (first phase) and two Delphi panels involving hematologists (second phase). The cost difference between a "world with and without crizanlizumab, voxelotor, and CTX001" was calculated to obtain the budget impact.Three scenario analyses were conducted: a 5-13% and 4% uptake analysis, a 10-18% and 8% uptake analysis, respectively for disease-modifying treatments (crizanlizumab and voxelotor) and CTX001, and a 0% crizanlizumab uptake and managed entry agreements analysis .A ± 20% univariate sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the analysis. The total five-year cumulative budget impact was estimated at €30,024,968, with 91% attributed to drug acquisition costs. The largest budget impact share was for CTX001 (€25,575,150), while crizanlizumab (€2,301,095) and voxelotor (€2,148,723) was relatively small. In scenarios one and three, a two-fold increase of the cumulative budget impact to €60,731,772 and a four-fold increase to €120,846,256 from the base case was observed. In scenario three, this budget impact decreased by 63% to €11,212,766. Patient population size, number of treated patients, and drug costs influenced the analysis the most, while discontinuation, acute crisis, and adverse event rates had comparatively minimal impact. Belgian decision-makers may consider alternative financing models, such as outcome-based risk-sharing agreements or annuities, to ensure sustainable coverage of these treatments. This study adheres to recommended practices for assessing budget impact of orphan drugs, distinguishing it from earlier studies with potentially weaker methodologies.

Long-Term Temporal Trends of Real-World Healthcare Costs Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PEM + AXI) are first-line (1L) treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), although the long-term trends in their associated real-world healthcare costs are not well defined. We compared the real-world healthcare costs of patients with aRCC who received 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI over 24months. Adults with RCC and secondary malignancy who initiated 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI were identified in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (01/01/2004 to 09/30/2021). All-cause and RCC-related healthcare costs (unadjusted and adjusted) were assessed per patient per month (PPPM) at 6-month intervals post-treatment initiation (index date) up to 24months, and differences between the NIVO + IPI and PEM + AXI cohorts were compared. Of 325 patients with aRCC, 219 received NIVO + IPI and 106 received PEM + AXI as the 1L treatment. According to patients' follow-up length, the analyses for months7-12 included 210 patients in the NIVO + IPI cohort and 103 in the PEM + AXI cohort; months13-18 included 119 and 48 patients, respectively; and months19-24 included 81 and 25 patients. PPPM unadjusted all-cause total costs were $46,348 for NIVO + IPI and $38,097 for PEM + AXI in months1-6; $26,840 versus $27,983, respectively, in months7-12; $22,899 versus $25,137 in months13-18; and $22,279 versus $27,947 in months19-24. PPPM unadjusted RCC-related costs were $44,059 for NIVO + IPI and $36,456 for PEM + AXI in months1-6; $25,144 versus $26,692, respectively, in months7-12; $21,645 versus $23,709 in months13-18; and $20,486 versus $25,515 in months19-24. PPPM costs declined more rapidly for patients receiving NIVO + IPI compared to those receiving PEM + AXI, resulting in significantly lower all-cause costs associated with NIVO + IPI during months19-24 (difference - $10,914 [95% confidence interval - $21,436, - $1091]) and RCC-related costs during months7-12 (- $4747 [(- $8929, - $512]) and 19-24 (- $10,261 [- $20,842, - $421]) after adjustment. Cost savings for NIVO + IPI versus PEM + AXI were driven by differences in drug costs which, after adjustment, were significantly lower in months7-12 (difference - $5555 [all-cause], - $5689 [RCC-related]); 13-18 (- $7217 and - $6870, respectively); and 19-24 (- $16,682 and - $16,125). Although the real-world PPPM healthcare costs of 1L NIVO + IPI were higher compared with PEM + AXI in the first 6months of treatment, the costs associated with NIVO + IPI rapidly declined thereafter, resulting in significantly lower costs vs. PEM + AXI from months7 to 24.

Composition and influencing factors of hospitalization expenses for epilepsy patients based on path analysis

ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand the composition and influencing factors of epilepsy patients’ hospitalization expenses, thus providing a reference for reducing the disease burden of epilepsy patients in low- and middle-income developing countries.MethodsA total of 4206 hospitalized cases of epilepsy from 2018 to 2020 were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to understand the patient cost composition, path analysis was used to understand the direct and indirect factors of hospitalization expenses.ResultsFrom 2018 to 2020, the average hospitalization expenses for epilepsy patients was 4,299.93 RMB yuan, and the average length of stay was 2.47 days. The highest proportion of hospitalization expenses was diagnosis costs (> 50%), followed by comprehensive medical service costs and drug costs. In terms of the total effect coefficient, the major factors affecting the hospitalization expenses were length of stay (0.880), emergency admission(0.463), and the comorbidities and complications(> 0.250). Hospital length of stay, discharge mode(death) and number of hospitalizations(2 times) affect hospitalization expenses through direct effect. Long-term hospitalization (> 30 days), admission routes(emergency), the comorbidities and complications, presence of drug allergy, and age also affect hospitalization expenses through indirect effects.ConclusionDiagnosis costs and length of stay are important factors affecting the medical expenses of epilepsy inpatients. In general, the quality control of the hospital is good, but it still needs to standardize the diagnosis and treatment behavior of medical staff through the clinical path.

A Pilot Study on the Drug Price Revision Strategy in Japan: A Comparison Among Fiscal Years 2018, 2020, and 2022

Objective: Japan has resumed its health technology assessment to decide how to reduce high-cost drug prices. While drug price rules in Japan are comprehensive, they do not necessarily capture differences in product characteristics. This study examined the drug price revision strategy in Japan using migraine treatment with triptans as an example. Cost data from fiscal years (FY) 2018, 2020, and 2022 were utilized. Methods: A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the perspective of healthcare payers, focusing on Japanese patients aged over 18 years experiencing migraines. The study employed a base-case model with probabilities derived from a network meta-analysis. Direct costs included medical and drug costs. Effectiveness was assessed using the European Quality of Life 5-dimensions—3-level questionnaire. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the level of uncertainty. Results: In FY2018, sumatriptan and eletriptan were cost-effective; however, the other triptans were dominated by sumatriptan. In FY2020, sumatriptan and eletriptan were cost-effective, and rizatriptan was extended-dominated; nevertheless, the other triptans were dominated by sumatriptan. In FY2022, naratriptan and eletriptan were cost-effective; however, the other triptans were dominated by naratriptan. The hierarchy of triptan strategies varied in each fiscal year. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the drug price revision strategy in Japan. The variations could be problematic because in Japan, formulary management of triptans, for example, those for migraine, may face revaluation every other year. Discussions regarding this issue will be further explored in the future.

Comparing Quality, Costs, and Outcomes of VA and Community Primary Care for Patients with Diabetes.

The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act expanded access to independent community providers outside the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Little is known how quality, costs, and outcomes of primary care received in the community compare to that of the VA. To compare quality, costs, and outcomes of community and VA-provided primary care for patients with diabetes over a 12-month episode. A cross-sectional study using VA administrative data and community care claims. Adjusted analyses were conducted using inverse probability weighted regression adjustment to balance patient characteristics. Veterans with diabetes receiving primary care in the VA or community. Quality measures included receipt of hemoglobin A1C tests, eye exams, microalbumin urine tests, and flu shots. Outcomes were measured by hospitalizations for an ambulatory care sensitive condition (ACSC). Costs were measured for VA and community outpatient care, inpatient care, and prescription drugs. There were 652,648 VA patients and 3650 community care patients. VA patients were less likely to be White, had shorter mean drive time to VA primary care, and were less likely to be rural than community care patients. In adjusted analyses, community care patients had significantly lower probability of receiving a hemoglobin A1C test, eye exam, microalbumin urine test, and flu shot compared to the VA group. There was no difference in probability of an ACSC hospitalization. Community care patients had higher mean total costs ($1741 [95% CI, $431, $3052]), driven by higher inpatient and prescription drug costs but lower emergency care costs than VA patients. Patients receiving community primary care had worse diabetes quality and higher costs than patients receiving VA primary care. There was no difference in health outcomes. Care provided by an integrated delivery system may have advantages in quality and value.

Reducing Cancer Drug Cost: 3-Year Analysis of Automated Dose Rounding in Electronic Health Records.

Globally, cancer drug expenditure exceeds $185 in US dollars (USD) billion, with the United States contributing $75 (USD) billion. Many cancer drug doses are calculated on the basis of body weight or body surface area, which often results in leftover drug in partially used single-dose vials (SDVs). The cost of wasted drug is a huge financial burden on the US health care system. We evaluated the cost savings resulting from the reduction of SDV wastage, achieved through the implementation of automated dose rounding rules in electronic health records (EHRs). Mayo Clinic implemented automated dose rounding rules within the EHR. These rules were designed to round calculated doses to the nearest SDV if the vial size closely matched the original calculated dose, within a 10% threshold. We assessed doses administered between January 2019 and December 2021, and computed cost-savings, waste reduction, and cost of waste for chemotherapy drugs. In 3 years, 36.1% of doses were rounded down, 35.8% were rounded up, and 28.1% were exact doses. By rounding doses down to a vial size, we achieved cost-savings of $39.75 (USD) million and prevented 62,065 SDV of cancer drugs from going to waste. By rounding doses up, we avoided wasting $9.95 (USD) million worth of drugs. However, there were still instances where the rounding fell outside of the 10%, resulting in wasted drugs worth $25 (USD) million. The substantial burden imposed on patients and the US health care system because of cancer drug wastage is of significant concern. Although the automated dose rounding system represents a partial solution for this issue, a comprehensive approach involves the imperative development of policy and legislative solutions to effectively mitigate the challenges associated with cancer drug waste.