Introduction The use of the split skin graft as reconstructive technique is commonplace. This process involves the creation of a superficial wound that is the donor site.The focus of this review is the post harvest management of the Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG) donor site. The aim of donor management is to maintain an environment that promotes optimal healing and prevents morbidity that may include, pain, infection and ultimately delayed healing. The focus of research in this area relates mainly to the type of dressings used. The recent developments in dressing technology, the continued variability in practice and persistent recommendations to use non-moist wound healing methods as an alternative demonstrate the need for a systematic review in this area of care. Objectives To conduct a systematic review to determine the best available evidence related to the post harvest management of STSG donor sites. Specific review questions addressed; interventions/dressings used in the management of the STSG donor site, interventions/dressings used in managing infected STSG donor sites, and interventions managing the healed STSG donor site. Criteria for considering studies in this review This review considered all studies that included patients of any age and that related to the objectives of the review. Outcomes included measures of healing, infection rate, and pain scores. The review primarily considered any intra-individual trials (IITs) and prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) relating to the management of STSG donors but also considered other studies when RCTs and IITs were not identified. Search strategy for identification of studies The search sought to find published and unpublished studies. The databases searched included; CINAHL, Medline, Pre-Medline, Cochrane Library, Current Contents, Healthstar, Embase, Expanded Academic Index, and Dissertation Abstracts International. Studies were additionally identified from reference list of all studies retrieved. Assessment and data extraction All studies were checked for methodological quality, and data extracted using a data extraction tool. Results Interventions relating to the post harvest management of STSG donor sites The objectives in managing a STSG donor site are, to achieve healing as rapidly as possible, without complication, maximising patient comfort and at a cost effective price. Treatment regimes vary considerably in terms of their ability to achieve these objectives and cost in particular can be a significant factor. The circumstances of the patient will dictate which of these objectives have priority. Moist verses non-moist wound healing products The analyses for this comparison revealed with a strong degree of confidence based on many acceptable RCT/IITs that moist wound healing products are significantly superior to non-moist products in terms of healing, infection rates and pain/comfort. Calcium alginates There were insufficient studies of sufficient quality to make any judgement between the performance of calcium alginates and other moist wound healing products or between specific products within the calcium alginate group. Well designed clinical trials should be conducted to compare calcium alginates with other moist wound healing products. Hydrocolloids Hydrocolloids were found to be superior to non-moist wound products in relation to healing, pain, and infection. The studies comparing hydrocolloids with other non-moist products in relation to healing are insufficient to indicate that they are superior to other moist wound healing products. The results for the outcomes of pain and rates of infection suggest that hydrocolloids are not superior to other moist products. The overall cost of any of the treatments used in wound management is greatly affected by frequency of dressing changes. It has been suggested that when hydrocolloids leak that reinforcement rather than changing the dressing outright is appropriate and has no greater risk of morbidity, this should be more rigorously TRUNCATED AT 600 WORD