Cosmic Chronometers Research Articles

FLRW cosmology in metric-affine F(R,Q) gravity* *Supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (AP14870191)

We investigated some Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) cosmological models in the context of metric-affine gravity, as proposed in [arXiv: 1205.5266v6]. Here, R and Q are the curvature and nonmetricity scalars using non-special connections, respectively. We obtained the modified field equations using a flat FLRW metric. We then found a connection between the Hubble constant , density parameter , and other model parameters in two different situations involving scalars u and w. Next, we used new observational datasets, such as the cosmic chronometer (CC) Hubble and Pantheon SNe Ia datasets, to determine the optimal model parameter values through a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis. Using these best-fit values of the model parameters, we discussed the results and behavior of the derived models. Further, we discussed the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for the derived models in the context of the Lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM). We found that the geometrical sector dark equation of state parameter behaves just like a dark energy candidate. We also found that both models are transit phase models. Model-I approaches the ΛCDM model in the late-time universe, whereas Model-II approaches quintessence scenarios.

Energy flow of λ in Hořava-Lifshitz cosmology

Hořava-Lifshitz gravity has been proposed as a renormalizable and ghost-free quantum gravity model candidate with an anisotropic UV-scaling between space and time. We present here a cosmological background analysis of two different formulations of the theory, with particular focus on the running of the parameter λ. Using a large dataset consisting of cosmic microwave background data from , Pantheon+supernovae catalog, SH0ES Cepheid variable stars, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), cosmic chronometers, and gamma-ray bursts (GRB), we arrive at new bounds on the cosmological parameters, in particular λ, which runs logarithmically with energy and describes deviation from general relativity, which corresponds to λ=1 For the detailed balance scenario we arrive at the bound λ=1.0406±0.0023, and for beyond detailed balance the limit reads λ=1.0064±0.0002. We also study the influence of different datasets and priors, and we find that removing low-redshift data generally moves λ closer toward UV values, while simultaneously widening the error bars. In the detailed balance scenario, this effect is more noticeable, and without prior λ≥1 it takes on values that are significantly below unity. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Gravitational lensing of dark energy models and ΛCDM using observational data in loop quantum cosmology

This paper investigates the accelerated cosmic expansion in the late Universe by examining two dark energy models, viscous modified Chaplygin gas (VsMCG) and variable modified Chaplygin gas (VMCG), within loop quantum cosmology alongside the ΛCDM model. The objective is to constrain cosmic parameters using the ΛCDM model and 30 of the latest H(z) measurements from cosmic chronometers (CC), including Type Ia Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB), Quasars, and 24 uncorrelated baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurements across a redshift range from 0.106 to 2.33. The latest Hubble constant measurement from Riess in 2022 is included to enhance constraints. In the ΛCDM, VsMCG, and VMCG frameworks, best-fit parameters for the Hubble parameter (H0) and sound horizon (rd) are obtained. The results highlight significant disparities between H0 and rd values from late-time observational measurements, reflecting the known H0 and rd tensions. The gravitational lensing optical depth of the two dark energy models is studied by plotting log⁡(τ(zl)/H0−3τN) vs zl. The probability of finding gravitational lenses (optical depth) in both models increases with lens redshift zl. The change in optical depth behavior for different parameter constraints is graphically analyzed. A joint analysis of VsMCG and VMCG with ΛCDM is conducted. While the models diverge in the early Universe, they are indistinguishable at low redshift. Using the Akaike information criteria, the analysis indicates that neither dark energy model can be dismissed based on the latest observations.

Late-time constraints on interacting dark energy: Analysis independent of H0, rd, and MB

We investigated a possible interaction between cold dark matter and dark energy, corresponding to a well-known interacting dark energy model discussed in the literature within the context of resolving the Hubble tension. We put constraints on it in a novel way, by creating new likelihoods with an analytical marginalization over the Hubble parameter H0, the sound horizon rd, and the supernova absolute magnitude MB. Our aim is to investigate the impacts on the coupling parameter of the interacting model, ξ, and the equation of state of dark energy w and the matter density parameter Ωm, 0. The late-time cosmological probes used in our analysis include the PantheonPlus (calibrated and uncalibrated), cosmic chronometers, and baryon acoustic oscillation samples and the Pantheon for comparison. Through various combinations of these datasets, we demonstrate hints of an up to 2σ deviation from the standard Λ cold dark matter model.

Addressing the rd tension using late-time observational measurements in a novel deceleration parametrization

This paper introduces a novel cosmological model aimed at probing the accelerated expansion of the late Universe through a unique parametrization of the deceleration parameter. We aim to constrain key cosmic parameters by integrating recent measurements of the Hubble parameter obtained from various observational methods, including cosmic chronometers, Type Ia Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB), Quasars, and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) from recent galaxy surveys. With a redshift range spanning 0.106<z<2.33 and incorporating the latest Hubble constant measurement from Riess in 2022, our analysis yields optimal fit values for the Hubble parameter (H0) and sound horizon (rd). Notably, we uncover an inconsistency in H0 values derived from late-time observational measurements, reflecting the well-known H0 tension. In terms of rd, while there is close agreement between Joint analysis and Joint analysis with R22, discrepancies arise upon gradual inclusion of BAO and BAO with R22 datasets. Our model demonstrates excellent fit to observed data and aligns well with the standard ΛCDM paradigm at higher redshifts. However, its most intriguing aspect lies in predicting a super-accelerated expansion in the distant future, in contrast to the de Sitter phase predicted by ΛCDM. Additionally, unique behaviors in the jerk parameter hint at novel dynamics beyond traditional cosmological models. Statefinder and Om Diagnostics tests were conducted, and comparison using the Akaike information criterion indicates neither model can be ruled out based on the latest observational measurements. These findings propose our cosmological model as a compelling alternative to ΛCDM, offering fresh insights into dark energy's nature and the cosmos' future.

Observational Constraints on the Parameters of Hořava–Lifshitz Gravity

AbstractThis study investigates the accelerated cosmic expansion within the Hořava–Lifshitz (HL) Model. To constrain the cosmological parameters of this model, 17 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation points, 31 Cosmic Chronometer points, 40 Type Ia Supernovae points, 24 quasar Hubble diagram points, and 162 Gamma Ray Bursts points, along with the latest Hubble constant measurement (R22) are incorporated. is treated as a free parameter to extract and using late‐time datasets, aiming for optimal fitting values in each model. Treating as free improves precision, reduces bias, and enhances dataset compatibility. The obtained values of and are compared to the model, showing consistency with previous estimates from Planck and SDSS studies. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) favor the Hořava–Lifshitz model, with the model having the lowest AIC. Additionally, and analyses are conducted to assess model preference. Validation using the reduced statistic indicates satisfactory fits for the Hořava–Lifshitz model, while recognizing as the preferred model. Extensions of the analysis warrant further investigation.

Constraints from Fermi observations of long gamma-ray bursts on cosmological parameters

ABSTRACT In this paper, we compile a Fermi sample of the long gamma-ray bursts (GRB) observations from 15 years of GBM catalogue with identified redshift, in which the GOLD sample contains 123 long GRBs at $z\le 5.6$ and the FULL sample contains 151 long GRBs with redshifts at $z\le 8.2$. The Amati relation (the $E_{\rm p,i}$–$E_{\rm iso}$ correlation) is calibrated at $z\lt 1.4$ by a Gaussian Process from the latest observational Hubble data with the cosmic chronometers method so that GRBs at high-redshift $z\ge 1.4$ can be used to constrain cosmological models via the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. From the cosmology-independent GRBs with the GOLD sample at $z\ge 1.4$ and the Pantheon + sample of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) at $0.01\lt z\le 2.3$, we obtain $\Omega _{\rm m} = 0.354\pm 0.018, H_0 = 73.05\pm 0.2\, \rm {km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$ for the flat Lambda cold dark matter ($\Lambda$CDM) model; $w_0 = -1.22^{+0.18}_{-0.15}$ for the flat wCDM model; and $w_{a} = -1.12^{+0.45}_{-0.83}$ for the flat Chevallier–Polarski–Linder model at the 1$\sigma$ confidence level. Our results with the GOLD and FULL sample are almost identical, which are more stringent than the previous results with GRBs.

Model-independent parameterization of H(z) and its implications for cosmic evolution

We investigate the model-independent parameterization of H(z) in spatially homogeneous and isotropic FLRW space-time using Cosmic Chronometers (31 data points) and Pantheon+SH0ES (1701 points) datasets. The best-fit values for the model parameters (H0,A1,A2,A3) are obtained through MCMC analysis. Our results show that the EoS parameter ω transitions from a matter-dominated era through quintessence to ω=−1, indicating convergence to ΛCDM at late times. The current ω values suggest an accelerating universe. Moreover, the model's squared sound speed vs2 evolves from negative to positive, indicating increasing stability. The deceleration parameter q shows a smooth transition from deceleration to acceleration, with transition redshift zt between 0.5 and 0.8. Further, the energy conditions are satisfied, and SEC violation at z=0 supports current acceleration. The ω−ω′ plane lies in the freezing region, and the r−s plane approaches the ΛCDM limit at late times.

Constraints on Tsallis cosmology using recent low and high redshift measurements

Recently Tsallis cosmology has been presented as a novel proposal for alleviating both H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document} and σ8\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\sigma _8$$\\end{document} tensions. Hence a universe filled with matter and radiation as perfect fluids and considering the Tsallis entropy is confronted using recent cosmological measurements coming from cosmic chronometers, type Ia supernovae, hydrogen II galaxies, quasars, and baryon acoustic oscillations. Following a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis and combining the samples, we constrain the main characteristic parameters α=1.031-0.051+0.054\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\alpha = 1.031^{+0.054}_{-0.051}$$\\end{document} and δ=1.005-0.001+0.001\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\delta = 1.005^{+0.001}_{-0.001}$$\\end{document} where the uncertainties are 1σ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1\\sigma $$\\end{document} confidence level. Additionally, we estimate the current deceleration parameter q0=-0.530-0.017+0.018\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$q_0=-0.530^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$$\\end{document}, the deceleration-acceleration transition redshift zT=0.632-0.028+0.028\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z_T=0.632^{+0.028}_{-0.028}$$\\end{document} and the age of the universe τU=12.637-0.066+0.067Gyrs\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\ au _U = 12.637^{+0.067}_{-0.066}\\,\ extrm{Gyrs}$$\\end{document} which are in agreement with the standard cosmology (Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document}CDM) within 1.5σ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1.5\\sigma $$\\end{document}. Furthermore, we find that the dark energy equation of state is consistent with both phantom and quintessence behaviors within 1σ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1\\sigma $$\\end{document} in the past and converging to Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document}CDM in the future. Additionally, we find agreement values of H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document} within 1σ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1\\sigma $$\\end{document} with the SH0ES values when the CMB distance priors are added to the analysis, suggesting that H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document} tension could be alleviated. Finally, Tsallis cosmology is preferred over Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document}CDM by the combined data that motives further studies at the perturbation level.

Exploring new physics in the late Universe’s expansion through non-parametric inference

In this study, we investigate deviations from the Planck-Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document}CDM model in the late universe (z≲2.5\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z \\lesssim 2.5$$\\end{document}) using the Gaussian Processes method, with minimal assumptions. Our goal is to understand where exploring new physics in the late universe is most relevant. We analyze recent Cosmic Chronometers (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SN), and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) data. By examining reconstructions of the dimensionless parameter δ(z)\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\delta (z)$$\\end{document}, which measures deviations of the Hubble parameter from the Planck-Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document}CDM predictions, we identify intriguing features at low (z≲0.5\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z \\lesssim 0.5$$\\end{document}) and high (z≳2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z \\gtrsim 2$$\\end{document}) redshifts. Deviations from the Planck-Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document}CDM model were not significant between 0.5≲z≲2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$0.5\\lesssim z \\lesssim 2$$\\end{document}. Using the combined CC+SN+BAO dataset, we gain insights into dark energy (DE) dynamics, resembling characteristics of omnipotent DE, extending beyond quintessence and phantom models. DE exhibits n-quintessence traits for z≳2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z\\gtrsim 2$$\\end{document}, transitioning with a singularity around z∼2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z\\sim 2$$\\end{document} to usual phantom traits in 1≲z≲2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1\\lesssim z\\lesssim 2$$\\end{document}. DE characteristics differ between scenarios (H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document}-SH0ES and H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document}-Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document} &CMB), with H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document}-SH0ES leaning towards phantom traits and H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document}-Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Lambda $$\\end{document} &CMB towards quintessence. We suggest exploring new physics at z≲0.5\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z\\lesssim 0.5$$\\end{document} and 1.5≲z≲2.5\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$1.5\\lesssim z\\lesssim 2.5$$\\end{document}, particularly around z=2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z = 2$$\\end{document}, to understand cosmological tensions such as H0\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$H_0$$\\end{document} and S8\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$S_8$$\\end{document}.

Can teleparallel f(T) models play a bridge between early and late time Universe?

ABSTRACT The ability of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis theory to accurately predict the primordial abundances of helium and deuterium, as well as the baryon content of the Universe, is considered one of the most significant achievements in modern physics. In the present study, we consider two highly motivated hybrid $f(T)$ models and constrain them using the observations from the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis era. In addition, using late-time observations of Cosmic Chronometers and Gamma-Ray Bursts, the ranges of the model parameters are confined which are in good agreement with early time bounds. Subsequently, the common ranges obtained from the analysis for early and late time are summarized. Further, we verify the intermediating epochs by investigating the profiles of cosmographic parameters using the model parameter values from the common range. From this study, we find the considered teleparallel models are viable candidates to explain the primordial-intermediating-present epochs.

A comprehensive data-driven odyssey to explore the equation of state of dark energy

For the first time, we reconstruct the dark energy equation of the state parameter w from the combination of background and perturbation observations, specifically combining the Hubble parameter data from cosmic chronometer observations and the logarithmic growth rate data from the growth rate observations. We do this analysis using posterior Gaussian process regression without considering any specific cosmological model or parametrization. However there are three main assumptions: (I) a flat Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric is considered for the cosmological background, (II) there is no interaction between dark energy and matter sectors, and (III) for the growth of inhomogeneity, sub-Hubble approximation and linear perturbations are considered. This study is unique in the sense that the reconstruction of w is independent of any derived parameters such as the present values of the matter-energy density parameter and Hubble parameter. From the reconstruction, we look at how the dark energy equation of state evolves between redshifts 0 and 1.5, finding a slight hint of dynamical behavior in dark energy. However, the evidence is not significant. We also find a leaning towards non-phantom behavior over phantom behavior. We observe that the Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\varLambda $$\\end{document}CDM model (w=-1)\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$(w=-1)$$\\end{document} nearly touches the lower boundary of the 1σ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\sigma $$\\end{document} confidence region in the redshift range 0.6≲z≲0.85.\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$0.6 \\lesssim z \\lesssim 0.85.$$\\end{document} However, it comfortably resides within the 2σ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\sigma $$\\end{document} confidence region in the whole redshift range under investigation, 0≤z≤1.5.\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$0\\le z \\le 1.5.$$\\end{document} Consequently, the non-parametric, model-independent reconstruction of dark energy provides no compelling evidence to deviate from the Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\varLambda $$\\end{document}CDM model when considering cosmic chronometer and growth rate observations.

Tensions in cosmology: A discussion of statistical tools to determine inconsistencies

We present a comprehensive analysis of statistical tools for evaluating tensions in cosmological parameter estimates arising from distinct datasets. Focusing on the unresolved Hubble constant (H0) tension, we explore the Pantheon Plus + SH0ES (PPS) compilation, which includes low-redshift Cepheid data from the SH0ES collaboration, along with the latest release of CMB data from the Planck collaboration, Cosmic Chronometers (CC) dataset and the most recent Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) datasets. Employing various tension metrics, we quantitatively assess the inconsistencies in parameter estimates, emphasizing the importance of capturing multidimensional tensions. Our results reveal substantial tension between PPS and Planck 2018 datasets and moderate tension between the BAO data sets and all other datasets. We highlight the importance of adopting these metrics to enhance the precision of future cosmological analyses and facilitate the resolution of existing tensions.

Constraining Extended Teleparallel Gravity via Cosmography: A Model-independent Approach

As a classical approach, the dynamics of the Universe, influenced by its dark components, are unveiled through prior modifications of Einstein’s equations. Cosmography, on the other hand, is a highly efficient tool for reconstructing any modified theory in a model-independent manner. By employing kinematic variables, it offers a profound explanation for cosmic expansion. Although the cosmographical approach has been highly successful in several geometric theories in recent years, it has not been extensively explored in coupled gravities. With this in mind, we intend to constrain an extended teleparallel gravity model, f(T,T) , through cosmographic parameters. We utilize Taylor series expansion, assuming a minimally coupled form, to constrain the unknowns involved in the series. To achieve this, we conduct a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis using three different data sets (cosmic chronometers, baryon acoustic oscillations, and Pantheon+SH0ES). The constrained results obtained from MCMC are then compared and verified using various cosmological parameters. Finally, we compare the resulting models with three well-known f(T,T) models.

An oscillating Chern-Simons universe crossing the phantom divide line and alleviating the Hubble tension

In order to alleviate the Hubble tension, we propose a new law for the Hubble parameter that varies periodically with time and we study the validity of the dynamics of a flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker Universe in the context of a generalized Chern–Simons modified gravity (CSMG). We prove that for specific numerical values of the free parameters in the theory, the phantom divide line is crossed and the universe undergoes decelerating expansion and accelerating expansion alternately without singularity. The deceleration and the jerk parameters oscillate also around numerical values in agreement with astronomical BAO+Pantheon SNeIa+Cosmic Chronometers observations.

Modified holographic Ricci interacting dark energy models: dynamical system analysis and Bayesian comparison

We perform a dynamical system analysis and a Bayesian model selection for a new set of interacting scenarios in the framework of modified holographic Ricci dark energy (MHR-IDE) models. The dynamical analysis shows a modified radiation epoch and a late-time attractor corresponding to an accelerated phase of holographic dark energy. In the Bayesian comparison, we use a combination of background data including type Ia supernovae, cosmic chronometers, the local value of the Hubble constant, baryon acoustic oscillations, and cosmic microwave background data. We find evidence against all the MHR-IDE scenarios studied in comparison with the Λ\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\varLambda $$\\end{document}CDM when the full joint analysis is considered.

Observational constraints on the wet dark fluid model in the fractal gravity

A flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) cosmological model with Wet Dark Fluid has been studied based on fractal gravity. The exact solution of the field equations is obtained using linear time-varying deceleration parameter (Akars̈u and Dereli, 2012) and assuming fractal parameter ξ≠0. The model parameters involved in the model have been constrained using the Hubble datasets H(z) of 77 data points, known as cosmic chronometers (CC), recently published Pantheon, and the joint data (CC+Pantheon samples). Additionally, we compare our model with ΛCDM in standard cosmology via error bar trajectories. We study the physical and the cosmographic parameters, such as the Hubble parameter H(z), deceleration parameter q(z), and the higher derivatives of the deceleration parameter q(z), etc. under cosmic observations. It is observed that our model transits from a decelerating state to an accelerating state at ztr≈2.764. The other astrophysical parameters such as the jerk parameter and snap parameter are also discussed. Finally, we conclude that our model is an accelerating quintessence dark energy model.

Study of pressure parametric dark energy model in the framework of f(Q) gravity

In this work, we have proposed a simple parametrization for the pressure component [Formula: see text] of the dark energy model and have studied the cosmological implications of this model in the framework of [Formula: see text] modified gravity theory, aka, the symmetric teleparallel gravity theory, where Q is known as the nonmetricity scalar. By considering a particular parametric form of [Formula: see text], we obtained the Hubble solution for the [Formula: see text] modified gravity model. In order to see whether this model is consistent with or challenges the [Formula: see text]CDM limits, we tried to put constraints on the model parameters using the recent observational datasets like Hubble data, Cosmic Chronometer data, Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa) data, baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) data. We have employed the [Formula: see text] minimization technique and have carried out the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis using emcee package. We have found that the deceleration parameter shows a smooth transition from positive to negative value in recent past which is essential for the structure formation of the Universe. It has been found that the parametric form of the dark energy pressure parameter is consistent with current cosmological scenario.

Insights on Granda–Oliveros holographic dark energy: possibility of negative dark energy at z≳2\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$z\\gtrsim 2$$\\end{document}

In holographic dark energy (HDE) models, infrared cut-offs with derivatives of the Hubble parameter, such as the Granda–Oliveros cut-off, offer a coherent explanation for late-time acceleration while ensuring causal consistency. We show that such HDE will inevitably mimic the dominant energy forms unless we forcefully calibrate the free parameters. This feature reveals the dependency between the model’s ability to explain the late-time acceleration and the integration constant, highlighting that one cannot arbitrarily set this constant to zero. We see that the origins of HDE and the Friedmann equations from the first law of horizon thermodynamics offer a natural explanation for this behaviour. Thus, the holographic principle naturally extends to all energy components, diverging from the prevalent notion in HDE models. The model also allows dark energy to transit from an early negative energy to a present positive value, with a singular dark energy equation of state parameter, which can relax the tension in the BAO Lyman-α\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\alpha $$\\end{document} observations. Furthermore, we present observational constraints utilizing Pantheon+,\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$^+,$$\\end{document} OHD, CMB Shift parameter, QSO and BAO data, indicating the presence of early negative energy as an unavoidable consequence. Upon using the SH0ES prior, we see that the model accounts for the Hubble parameter at the cost of affecting the matter density while simultaneously relaxing the tensions in BAO Lyman-α\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\alpha $$\\end{document} observations and the age estimations. This study also underscores notable features stemming from the comprehensive utilization of the covariance matrix within cosmic chronometers, BAO and CMB distance prior and clarifies the implications of negative dark energy density derived from the high redshift Pantheon+\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$^+$$\\end{document} sample. Additionally, we provide a brief overview of the theoretical framework surrounding linear perturbation within the wGOHDE model.

Probing the universe's expansion dynamics: The linear correction scenario perspective on dark energy

In this study, we investigate the cosmological evolution of the universe, focusing on the KMMS models in a model-independent approach, particularly the scenario involving linear correction, given by E2(z)=A(z)+β(1+γB(z)), where A(z)=Ωm0(1+z)3 and B(z)=z. By analyzing recent Cosmic Chronometers (CC) and the Pantheon+ samples, we determine the best-fit values of model parameters using a Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis. Our models exhibit unique dynamics, transitioning from super-exponential to exponential expansion, with a significant shift at redshift zt=0.83−0.10+0.11 and present deceleration parameter q0=−0.69−0.17+0.17. The jerk parameter exceeds 1, indicating a faster change in acceleration than predicted by ΛCDM. The energy density parameter is consistent with Planck observations, and the dark sector evolution follows the expected thermal history. The EoS parameter approaches ωde=−1 over time, with a current value of ωde0=−1.06±0.12, aligning with the phantom phase. Our model presents a new dark energy alternative, emphasizing the importance of considering models like KMMS in understanding cosmic evolution.