This systematic review aims to elucidate the use of corticosteroids in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics and small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed corticosteroid use during both the induction and maintenance phases, highlighting areas needing standardization and improvement in clinical research. We selected placebo-controlled phase 3 RCTs involving adults with moderate to severe IBD. These studies included detailed reports on corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance phases, with clinical remission and/or corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR) as primary endpoints. Initially, 324 studies were identified and refined to 26 RCTs after screening. Analysis revealed variability in corticosteroid administration. Over time, corticosteroid use showed a decreasing trend (Spearman ρ = -0.42, P = .045). Studies allowing higher corticosteroid doses (up to 40mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) reported a higher proportion of corticosteroid users (51.8%, range: 42.9%-61%) compared to those excluding patients on doses >20mg/day (37.5%, range: 31.6%-51.8%; P = .007) or >30mg/day (41.1%, range: 29.6%-53.7%; P=.023). Trials with mandatory tapering protocols showed a narrower gap between overall clinical remission and CSF-CR rates, with an average difference of 6% in the group without mandatory tapering and 1.2% in the group with forced tapering (T-test P=.038; Cohen's d ≈ 1.1). This review highlights the variability in corticosteroid use across RCTs and its impact on evaluating new IBD therapies. Standardizing tapering protocols and defining CSF-CR are essential for accurate outcomes.
Read full abstract