Corruption Cases In Indonesia Research Articles

Reconstruction of Investigation Regulations in Absentia Criminal Corruption Cases in Indonesia Based on Justice Values

Regulations for eradicating Corruption Crimes in Indonesia have regulated the examination of cases without the presence of the defendant in Court, however examinations at the investigation stage are not regulated, thus having an impact on the effectiveness of eradicating criminal acts of corruption. The aim of this research is to analyze the regulations for investigating cases of corruption crimes that have not been fair and to explore the weaknesses in the rules for investigating in absentia cases of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia which are based on the value of justice. The paradigm used in this research is the Constructivism Paradigm, a type of normative juridical research and the research approach used is a statutory approach, a case approach, using primary and secondary data. The research results were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of research into in absentia investigations into cases of criminal acts of corruption can give rise to differences in interpretation among law enforcement officials ranging from Investigators, Public Prosecutors to Judges, each of whom has inherent authority in examining cases of criminal acts of corruption, especially in examining cases involving prospective witnesses. suspects, suspects and defendants are not present even though they have been legally summoned without giving a proper and reasonable reason, the legal vacuum regulating in absentia investigations of corruption cases can be used by perpetrators of corruption crimes to evade the law enforcement process by running away and can be used as an excuse not to continue the investigation and transfer the case from the investigator to the public prosecutor and can be used as a reason to refuse prosecution by the Public Prosecutor. To realize the eradication of criminal acts of corruption based on the value of justice, it is necessary to reconstruct the regulations for investigations in absentia in the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes by regulating 1) the exclusion of examining witnesses before being named as suspects with conditions; 2) waiver of examination of the suspect with conditions; 3) procedures/mechanisms for examining cases without the presence of the suspect; 4) waiver of handover of responsibility for the case from the investigator to the public prosecutor without the presence of the suspect with conditions; and 5) restrictions on case examinations that can be carried out without the presence of the suspect.

Establishment Of The Asset Confiscation Law To Minimize Corruption In Indonesia

This research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach, namely describing a number of things that are closely related to confiscation of assets in criminal law, criminal acts of corruption, and other things. The data used in this research is secondary data in the form of the Criminal Code, Civil Code, statutory regulations, the official website of the House of Representatives, other credible websites, and so on. The researchers analyzed the data using grammatical and systematic legal analysis techniques, namely interpreting every word in the legislation and connecting it with other secondary data or other related legislation. The result in this article show there are three major urgencies for the presence of the Law on Asset Confiscation in Indonesia, namely to provide instruments that are stricter than the current regulations because in the Criminal Code, asset confiscation is only an additional crime and not the main crime, providing a deterrent effect for corruptors and potential corruptors, and of course minimizing corruption cases in Indonesia. Under existing legal structures, state losses resulting from criminal acts of corruption cannot be recovered. Recovering state losses takes years and may not even be returned at all. What is meant to provide a deterrent effect in this research is to impoverish corruptors, change the nomenclature of words whose nature is emphasized from facultative to imperative, and change its status not only to become an additional crime, but also to become a principal crime. On this basis, researchers are of the opinion that the presence of asset confiscation laws in Indonesia can be effective in minimizing the occurrence of corruption in Indonesia.

Contante Justitie System in Corruption Cases in Indonesia: A Legal Constructivism System Paradigm

The legal consequences of Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 stating that Law Number 31 of 199 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes which is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and specifically deletes the phrase "can" in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption Law have a legal impact on the characteristics of the offense. This was normative legal research which uses a statutory and conceptual approach. Results showed that the Financial Audit Board's future arrangements can fulfill the principle of Contante Justitie, namely speeding up the investigative examination process. It was applied by delegating authority from the Central BPK to the Regional BPK Representative auditors so that the latter have independent investigative audit authority to speed up the investigative Audit Result Report process in handling corruption to fulfill the legal system constructivism concept.

Crisis of Mega-Corruption on the Eve of Indonesian General Elections: Its Implications for The Quality of Elected Governance

Corruption cases in Indonesia typically peak in the year leading up to general elections, often accompanied by the emergence of the National Mega Corruption phenomenon. The high logistics costs of general elections have historically fueled corruption. This study analyzes corruption, including mega corruption, following Indonesia’s adoption of an open election system and assesses the impact of corruption on government service quality and regulations. Research methods include Exploratory Data Analysis, Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), and Comparative Ordinary Least Square. Findings show that (1) Democracy in Indonesia is closely linked to corruption and mega corruption at both central (executive and legislative) and regional (regional head election) levels; (2) Corruption and mega corruption trends preceding general elections are expected to persist in the 2024 and 2029 elections; (3) Political corruption leads to poor government service quality and regulation; (4) The shock of pre-election corruption will affect government quality for over two decades. This research emphasizes the need for electoral process and corruption enforcement reforms in Indonesia. Unmitigated, pre-election corruption can lead to poor governance and reduced public welfare.

Anti-corruption Policy Analysis: Indonesian Open Government Study

The central role of the Indonesian government in campaigning for open government is not in line with the findings of corruption cases in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze anti-corruption open government bibliometrics and the content of Indonesia’s open government anti-corruption policies. This research uses a qualitative approach with bibliometric analysis and content analysis methods. This study analyzes 200 papers on the Google Scholar database published in the 2018–2022 period and analyzes Indonesia’s open government anti-corruption policies. This research found 4587 citations, h-index 37, g-index 57, 172 keywords, 22 clusters, 2531 total link strengths, and 784 occurrences in open government anti-corruption papers. Anticorruption, data disclosure, open data, open government, e-government, information disclosure, transparency, open government data, public procurement, and beneficial ownership are the most popular open government anti-corruption trends. In the same time period, the Indonesian government established 10 anti-corruption policies covering public procurement, beneficial ownership, and elections. This research concludes that although the Indonesian government’s corruption index is unsatisfactory, anticorruption policies in Indonesia are in line with global anti-corruption trends, especially in several popular policies such as open data, transparency, information disclosure, public procurement, and beneficial ownership.
 Keywords: anti-corruption, open government Indonesia, bibliometric analysis, content analysis

Pengaruh Moralitas, Kompensasi, Kompentensi dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kecurangan Pengelolaan APBDes

The rise of corruption cases in Indonesia should be immediately prevented to prevent fraud from the management of the APBDes so that the funds that have been distributed can be useful for building. Various factors cause the fraud, such as morality, compensation, competence and internal control system in the management of the APBDes.In this study will be tested the relationship of each variable with apbdes management fraud in Lubuk Batu Jaya district. This study uses quantitative research methods with primary data types. Techniques in collecting data using questionnaires that will be given to respondents totaling 63 taxpayers as a sample of 180 population. This study used purposive sampling technique .To test the researchers used multiple linear regression method. The results of this study showed that that morality(X1) showed that the count (-0.421) <ttable (2.001) and the significance level of 0.675 > 0.05, it can be concluded that the morality variable (X1) against cheating (Y) or the first hypothesis (H1) was rejected. compensation(X2) shows that the count (3.377) >ttable (2.001) and the significance level of 0.001 < 0.05, it can be concluded that the compensation variable (X2) against fraud (Y) or the second hypothesis (H2) is accepted. competence(X3) shows that the count (0.057) < ttable (2.001) and the significance level of 0.955 > 0.05, it can be concluded that the competence variable (X3) against fraud (Y) or the third hypothesis (H3) rejected. Internal control(X4) shows that the count (-0.670) <ttable (2.001) and the significance level of 0.505 > 0.05, it can be concluded that the variable of Internal Control (X4) against fraud (Y) or the fourth hypothesis (H4) is rejected.0,060>0,05.

Mediatization of corruption cases in Indonesia through comics journalism in Tempo magazine

Corruption in Indonesia is a never-ending and pervasive issue, as the numerous cases prove. Many public officials, businesspeople and private parties have been involved and found guilty in corruption trials. The verdict of the judges’ panel against the accused of corruption cases in Indonesia did not dampen the enthusiasm of several corruption perpetrators who were incarcerated at Sukamiskin Prison in Bandung. This research aims to examine the construction of news in the comics journalism format in Tempo magazine, specifically focusing on how corrupt behaviour in the form of bribery committed by criminals in Sukamiskin Prison is portrayed. This analysis is motivated by the mediatization theory, which is further supported by the mediatization of journalism. This research uses a semiotic-material approach that analyses Tempo comics journalism texts with a focus on elements of symbolism, timing and frames. The research found that Tempo mediated the news about bribery by grafters in Sukamiskin Prison through elements of comics based on journalistic practices. The mediation effort consists of two distinct stages: firstly, journalists on the field engage in the work and, secondly, the composer of the comic constructs the mediation.

The Differences between the Attorney General and The Corruption Eradication Commission in Prosecuting Corruption Cases in Indonesia: A Legal Analysis

Corruption cases are complicated since they involve a number of parties. The goal of this study is to comprehend the distinctions between the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Attorney in Indonesian corruption cases that are intriguing to examine from both a sociological and ontological perspective. Undertaking a legal normative analysis is an intriguing way to investigate the issue. Data were gathered by observation and documentation. Legal data analysis was used to analyze the data. The results indicate that a thorough investigation is required to completely comprehend the distinctions in prosecution between the attorney and the commission for the eradication of corruption in Indonesian corruption cases. This will help academics and state agencies, as well as practitioners and public officials, create more effective laws and policies.

Law Enforcement Against Corruption Crimes in Indonesia

Corruption is a criminal act of abuse of power against the public for the sake of enriching themselves. This act of lawlessness is a frequent occurrence in the country of Indonesia, whose existence continues to exist and increase every year. The Indonesian government has tried various ways to stop the occurrence of corruption. The government established the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as a party that has the role of an anti-corruption commission. The existence of the KPK has not greatly reduced the number of corruption cases in Indonesia. In fact, even the existence of binding laws does not limit the movement of corruptors to satisfy their greedy desires. This certainly states that all the efforts of the government and the applicable laws are still unable to work effectively in preventing corruption. The eradication of corruption has become the main focus of the Indonesian government, looking for new efforts that can be made to be able to further narrow the space for perpetrators of corruption. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the background and factors of corruption, and understand the pattern of corruption. In this article, the efforts of the Indonesian government are explained as a sustainable effort, which can support their efforts in the process of eradicating corruption. This article is structured using a descriptive normative method, in order to make it clear to understand the contents of the article with a comprehensive and clear presentation of laws and legal theories.

Perbandingan hukum perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia, Singapura Dan Hongkong

Corruption in law is a chronic issue with corrosive effects. In Indonesia, there institutions involved in handling criminal acts of corruption; the prosecutor`s Office, the Police, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). However, corruption cases in Indonesia continue to increase and fluctuate in their eradication efforts. The KPK is the main institution tasked with combating corruption in Indonesia, but it is perceived as not yet maximizing the seizure of assets resulting from corrupt activities. Singapore has a reputation for being stringent in combating corruption, boasting a powerful anti-corruption institution known as the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), which holds authority to investigate and prosecute corruption cases without political intervention. Hong Kong has an Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) that has significantly succeeded in eradicating corruption. A comparative study of laws regarding the confiscation of assets resulting from acts of corruption in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong is needed to identify similarities, differences, and to analyze the similarities and differences in asset seizure resulting from corruption between the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission and the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau Singapore, and the Independent Commission Against Corruption Hong Kong

Developing the integrity of corruption crime judges: evidence in Indonesia

This research seeks to further investigate issues pertaining to enhancing the integrity of judges handling corruption cases in Indonesia. The research employs a normative juridical perspective and utilizes a qualitative method that is descriptive and analytical in character. This method aims to objectively describe the relationship between a phenomena, idea, data, or fact. The data collection methods involved conducting library research and analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, including scientific contributions published in academic research databases. Meanwhile, the research employs descriptive qualitative analysis for data analysis. Research indicates that it is imperative to cultivate the integrity of judges involved in corruption cases, as judges play a pivotal role in ensuring a fair and responsible legal system. A judge who possesses integrity in cases involving corruption is characterized by intellectual honesty, a commitment to prioritize their judicial responsibilities over personal interests, adherence to the law, astuteness in interpersonal interactions and other endeavors, adeptness in managing personal funds, and a rigorous and meticulous approach. Perform judicial responsibilities to establish an organizational culture rooted in the principle of absolute intolerance against criminal acts of corruption, bribery, and violations of laws and regulations. Thus, by enhancing the integrity of judges involved in corruption cases in Indonesia through the implementation of human resource management characteristics, it is expected that the impartiality and responsibility of judges in handling corruption cases would be considered to fulfill the standards of fairness and legal assurance. Therefore, it is anticipated that the results of this study will have a beneficial impact on upholding and enhancing the integrity and prestige of judges and the judicial system in Indonesia with regards to corruption offenses.

Empowerment of PT. MSEs/Individual for Participating in Government Procurement of Goods and Services

The obstacles faced by micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in participating in public procurement even though they are legal entities are related to the system, culture, and human resources implementing public procurement. The first obstacle is Indonesia's rigid and inflexible public procurement system. The qualification requirements set by the government often do not match the capabilities of MSMEs. In addition, the lack of internet network access support in the regions makes it difficult for MSMEs to participate in the procurement of goods and services. The second obstacle is the culture of corruption, collusion, and nepotism (KKN) that is still inherent in the Indonesian bureaucracy. Goods and services procurement is one of the biggest contributors to corruption cases in Indonesia. The third barrier is the limited human resources, both in terms of numbers and competencies, owned by MSMEs. MSMEs often have inadequate quality of human resources, especially in terms of knowledge and skills in the field of goods and services procurement. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The purpose of this research is to find out what causes MSEs to be difficult to participate in the procurement of government goods and services even though they are legal entities. This research is expected to contribute to the development and improvement of the public procurement system, so that in practice it can involve more micro, small, and medium enterprises, especially those that already have legality and meet technical requirements.

Konten Meme Sebagai Media Terkini Sebagai Upaya Edukasi dan Sosialisasi Anti Korupsi pada Generasi Muda Indonesia

The rise of corruption cases in Indonesia is considered increasingly concerning. This condition over time will affect the mentality of the younger generation in a negative direction and form a deep-rooted culture of corruption. Indonesian youth are the next golden generation of the nation who must have a strong mentality and high integrity. This realization can be done through anti-corruption education based on the latest social media content. The formulation of the problem studied in this study is the potential of meme content as the latest media for anti-corruption education and socialization in Indonesia and how meme content works as a medium for anti-corruption education and socialization. This research was prepared using a qualitative approach and is included in the type of literature research. The results of the research found are that the potential use of meme content as an anti-corruption education medium is considered quite high. Based on this potential, meme content included in social media can be an anti-corruption education tool for the younger generation. The way meme content works as an educational medium is done through the creation of pages that are integrated with the participation of the government, academics, and society in general.

Optimizing Legal Strategies: Combating Corruption through Anti-Corruption Education in Universities

This research proposes an innovative approach to combating corruption, through anti-corruption education within the university environment. Given the increasing cases of corruption in Indonesia, a preventive approach through education is essential in cultivating a generation that is aware of the negative consequences of corruption. The methodology employed is normative research with a legal and literature analysis approach. The analysis results indicate that anti-corruption education in universities holds significant potential in shaping anti-corruption attitudes and values among students. This finding underscores the urgency of integrating courses that examine corruption issues and ethics into university curricula. Based on these findings, the legal strategy of anti-corruption education in universities plays a significant role in reducing corrupt practices. Strengthening educational content that fosters anti-corruption awareness, along with active collaboration among educational institutions, the government, and society, is considered necessary for implementing this strategy.

Peran Mediasi Materialisme Pada Pengaruh Harga Diri dan Iklim Etika Terhadap Intensi Korupsi Kader Partai Politik

Corruption cases in Indonesia involving members of Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) asrepresentatives of society are still occurring. The elected DPR members come from political parties, whichare organizations where people have democracy. Previous studies have shown that self-esteem and ethicalclimate in organizations affect the intensity of corruption. In addition, materialism becomes a mediatorbetween self-esteem and corruption intentions. This research was conducted to determine the intensity ofcorruption in political party cadres from a new perspective. The data obtained from a sample of a politicalparty was then processed using a linear regression technique with the help of IBM version 22 software. Theresults show that self-esteem has an effect of -0.152 (p = 0.002) and ethical climate has an effect of-0.163 (p = 0.001) on corruption intentions. Meanwhile, materialism becomes a partial mediator ofthe influence of self-esteem on corruption intentions. Internal factors within party cadres play an essentialrole in reducing the intensity of corruption. Programs of training activities that can improve the ethical climatein political party organizations are also urgently needed, such as Politik Cerdas Berintegritas Terpadu (PCBTerpadu) organized by Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) together with political parties to realizeIndonesian politics with integrity.

Legal Review of Administrative Law Related to the Examination of Abuse of Authority by Government Officials in Corruption Cases in Indonesia

The conflict that arises is related to the abuse of authority by government officials in Indonesia. The problem that can be analyzed is to analyze it from a criminal law perspective related to examining the abuse of authority by government officials in corruption cases. This research uses a normative juridical research approach. The decisions and/or actions of government officials as objects of examination for abuse of authority in the Administrative Court (PTUN) are decisions and/or actions that involve administrative errors and result in state losses, as well as deviations in the criminal process. Therefore, in conclusion, the provisions in Article 21 of the Administrative Law can provide certainty regarding whether or not there is an abuse of authority by government officials in making decisions from an administrative perspective without necessarily involving corruption cases.

Analysis of the Application of Plea Bergaining In Settlement of Curruption Cases in Indonesia

Objective: The application of Plea Bergaining in the Settlement of Corruption Cases in Indonesia is carried out for the welfare of the people. The law on the eradication of criminal acts of corruption actually regulates several provisions that use the perspective of recovering state financial losses. Theoretical Framework: The framework of setting up a national legal system as the character of the Indonesian nation. Legal issues in Indonesia are right now exceptionally overpowering. Method: However, in practice, law enforcers are still oriented towards corporal punishment (prison). Therefore, a breakthrough in the field of law in dealing with corruption is urgently needed. A new method or concept of handling corruption problems should be put forward with more emphasis on efforts to recover state losses. Results and conclusions: The settlement of corruption cases within the Joined Together States is settled utilizing supplication bartering, this can be due to the solid proof of the open prosecutor and the accused/defendant voluntarily admitting blame. Research Implications: Attention is the concept of Plea Bargaining which is commonly used in criminal justice practices used in common law countries, especially in the United States, which has been adopted in the Draft Law on Criminal Procedure Law under the name of the particular way concept. Originality/value: An update and breakthrough is basically required inside the criminal value system in Indonesia, which in this case is certainly based on a foothold that an overhaul in texture and formal criminal law has finished up a ask.

Recognising and detecting patterns of village corruption in Indonesia

The increasing trend of village-level corruption cases in Indonesia needs to be addressed by the government. The National Strategy of Corruption Prevention (NSCP) policy couldn't improve Indonesia's corruption perception score. Corruption prevention policies have so far not targeted villages with certain characteristics. The Village Development Index (IDM), measured by the Ministry of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration, should identify villages affected by corruption cases. This research uses the qualitative descriptive method. The results show that those most affected by corruption cases in Indonesia are developing villages on Java Island. Other results find the need for an analysis of fraud or fraud analytics in villages using information technology or data processing. The practical implication of the research is a basis for revising corruption prevention and detection policies and determining the target groups.

ANALISIS KONSEP PEMIMPIN IDEAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF IMAM AL-GHAZALI (AT-TIBRU MASBUK FII NASHIHATI AL-MULUK)

A leader must be an effective leader. The goal shared by all leaders is the same, which is to be able to guide people to a better life and help solve problems in the organization or community. The research methodology uses the qualitative method of Literature Review systematically the relevance of the data determined. The primary data source of At-Tibru Masbuk Fii Nashihati Al-muluk by Imam Al-Ghazali and the secondary data source of the work are still continuous. An Islamic leader, that is the criterion of an ideal leader, namely: having knowledge, perfection of the five senses, ability, maturity, male, progressive, independent, justice, ahead of the pious person. A leader according to Imam Al-Ghazali there are 1) Principles of Faith, 2) Points of Justice include the Points of justice, not committing tyranny, being close to scholars, educating, not being arrogant, not betraying, not ignoring the needs of society, not greedy, not authoritarian, loving his religion, not seeking the pleasure of the people who are not in accordance with the teachings of the Shari'a. Collaborative governance in eradicating corruption cases in Indonesia requires structured cooperation between government, private and community institutions through personal dialogue, trust building, commitment to the process, mutual understanding, intermediate results

Urgency and Role Attorney in Apply Restorative Justice to Settlement Case Act Criminal Corruption in Indonesia

Attorney as apparatus enforcer given law _ authority by Constitution For eradicate follow criminal corruption emit policy in circular form by prosecutor Young Great Action Criminal Special with Number : B- 1113/F/Fd.1/05/2010 about Priority And Achievement in Handling Case follow Criminal Corruption Which instruct For make an effort return loss country use approach restorative justice For follow criminal corruption with loss country scale small . Problems Which lifted in study This is How What is the urgency and role of the prosecutor's office in applying restorative justice to the settlement of corruption cases in Indonesia. Study uses method normative juridical with analysis qualitative. The restorative justice approach used by the Attorney General is by prioritize settlement case scale big fish Andmake an effort return loss country.