Abstract
The conflict that arises is related to the abuse of authority by government officials in Indonesia. The problem that can be analyzed is to analyze it from a criminal law perspective related to examining the abuse of authority by government officials in corruption cases. This research uses a normative juridical research approach. The decisions and/or actions of government officials as objects of examination for abuse of authority in the Administrative Court (PTUN) are decisions and/or actions that involve administrative errors and result in state losses, as well as deviations in the criminal process. Therefore, in conclusion, the provisions in Article 21 of the Administrative Law can provide certainty regarding whether or not there is an abuse of authority by government officials in making decisions from an administrative perspective without necessarily involving corruption cases.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
