Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Research Articles

53. Determination of risk benefit thresholds for corrective adult spinal deformity surgery with consideration of frailty and severity of sagittal malalignment at presentation

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Adult spinal deformity is associated with severe pain and disability. Recent literature has shown that surgical intervention can significantly improve patient's quality of life and lessen disease burden. As many patients requiring spine surgery are elderly and often frail, restoration of alignment targets may differ. There is paucity in literature on whether different frailty and deformity states may warrant a different level of surgical invasiveness. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To investigate the effect of frailty and deformity severity on appropriate surgical invasiveness. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective cohort study from multicenter database. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> This study included 381 adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Complications; health-related quality of life (HRQL); Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). <h3>METHODS</h3> Operative ASD patients (scoliosis >20, SVA>5cm, PT>25, or TK>60) with available baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) radiographic and HRQL data were included. The ASD-FI was used to stratify patients into 2 categories: Not Frail (NF): 20. Four groups were formed by frailty and deformity severity: NF Low, F Low, NF Sev, F Sev. ANCOVA determined differences in Surgical Invasiveness (SI) among F/D groups. Logistic regression determined significant association between SI and reaching Ideal Clinical outcome (ICO), defined as: no major complications, no reoperations, and reaching MCID for ODI. Surgical Invasiveness (SI) was normalized to a scale of 0-100 using the SI range. Thresholds for invasiveness and achieving ICO were found through conditional inference tree (CIT) analysis. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 381 ASD patients (59.3±15yrs, 26.9± kg/m2, CCI: 1.52±1.6, FI: 3.09±1.6) were included and underwent surgery (11.6±4 lvls fused, EBL: 1522±1275 mL, op time: 337±124 min, LOS: 7.3±3.9 days), with 62.2% having a posterior-only approach, 36.5% combined approach, 46% having a decompression and 65% an osteotomy. By deformity severity: 60% Low-Mod, 40% Severe, while frailty assessment was 49% NF, and 51% F. This categorized the patients into deformity/frailty groups as follows: 35% NF Low, 13% NF Sev, 22% F Low, 25% F Sev. Patients had a significantly different degree of SI: 35 NF Low/Mod, 38 F Low/mod, 48 NF Sev, 50 F Sev (p<0.001). CIT analysis found NF Sev patients had a higher likelihood of reaching ICO with an SI below 40 (OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.1-12.1, p=.037), and F Sev with a SI below 30 (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.7-12.6, p=.003). Low/mod groups revealed no significant association between invasiveness and achieving ICO. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Analysis of increasing surgical invasiveness in patients stratified by frailty and baseline deformity showed frail severely deformed patients, compared with non-frail severely deformed patients, had a lower invasiveness threshold above which there was a higher risk of major complications, reoperations and failure to reach clinically important improvement in ODI. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Prevalence and Modes of Posterior Hardware Failure With a Staged Protocol for Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A 13-Year Experience

One of the common complications of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction is the failure to relieve pain. This may result from the failure of implanted hardware to provide adequate stabilization. While numerous studies exist, characterizing complications that can occur with minimally invasive correction of ASD and data regarding hardware failure in this setting are limited. This article characterizes the rate and mode of posterior hardware failure in the setting of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) for ASD correction. Patients undergoing staged CMIS correction of ASD from January 2007 to September 2018 were identified. Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included in the study. A total of 263 patients (168 women and 95 men) were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 64 years (21-85, SD 13.7), and the mean length of follow-up was 90 months (24-164, SD 40.2). An average of 6 levels (3-16, SD 3.15) was fused per patient.Eight patients had a mechanical hardware failure and required revision surgery (3.04%). No catastrophic failures were noted in our series. Hardware failures were characterized as follows: 2 patients with broken screws, 5 patients with loose screws, and 1 patient who had symptomatic T12-L1 and L5-S1 nonunion with bilateral distal rod fractures, iliac set screw loosening, and proximal T12 screw loosening. Following revision surgery, all of these patients had confirmed solid fusion on computed tomography (CT) scan at their latest follow-up visit.Interestingly, 3 other patients had loosening of the set screw on their iliac bolts. Five patients had rod fractures between L5 and S1 or below S1. All 8 of these patients were asymptomatic with confirmed fusion at L5-S1 on CT scans. The prevalence of clinically significant hardware failure needing revision in our series was low at 3.04%. Symptomatic hardware prominence requiring revision was 2.3%. Specifically, rod fractures were not common (2.2%). Our study suggests that in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS to correct ASD without osteotomies may result in acceptable rates of hardware failure. Future studies should compare the results of CMIS deformity correction to a matched population of patients undergoing open deformity correction. This study suggests that in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS to correct ASD without osteotomies may result in acceptable rates of hardware failure.

The lexicon of multirod constructs in adult spinal deformity: a concise description of when, why, and how.

The use of multirod constructs in the setting of adult spinal deformity (ASD) began to prevent rod fracture and pseudarthrosis near the site of pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) and 3-column osteotomies (3COs). However, there has been unclear and inconsistent nomenclature, both clinically and in the literature, for the various techniques of supplemental rod implantation. In this review the authors aim to provide the first succinct lexicon of multirod constructs available for the treatment of ASD, providing a universal nomenclature and definition for each type of supplementary rod. The primary rod of ASD constructs is the longest rod that typically spans from the bottom of the construct to the upper instrumented vertebrae. The secondary rod is shorter than the primary rod, but is connected directly to pedicle screws, albeit fewer of them, and connects to the primary rod via lateral connectors or cross-linkers. Satellite rods are a 4-rod technique in which 2 rods span only the site of a 3CO via pedicle screws at the levels above and below, and are not connected to the primary rod (hence the term "satellite"). Accessory rods are connected to the primary rods via side connectors and buttress the primary rod in areas of high rod strain, such as at a 3CO or the lumbosacral junction. Delta rods span the site of a 3CO, typically a PSO, and are not contoured to the newly restored lordosis of the spine, thus buttressing the primary rod above and below a 3CO. The kickstand rod itself functions as an additional means of restoring coronal balance and is secured to a newly placed iliac screw on the side of truncal shift and connected to the primary rod; distracting against the kickstand then helps to correct the concavity of a coronal curve. The use of multirod constructs has dramatically increased over the last several years in parallel with the increasing prevalence of ASD correction surgery. However, ambiguity persists both clinically and in the literature regarding the nomenclature of each supplemental rod. This nomenclature of supplemental rods should help unify the lexicon of multirod constructs and generalize their usage in a variety of scientific and clinical scenarios.

Combined anterior-posterior versus all-posterior approaches for adult spinal deformity correction: a matched control study.

Anterior approaches are gaining popularity for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries especially with the introduction of hyperlordotic cages and improvement in MIS techniques. Combined Approaches provide powerful segmental sagittal correction potential and increase the surface area available for fusion in ASD surgery, both of which would improve overall. This is the first study directly comparing surgical outcomes between combined anterior-posterior approaches and all-posterior approach in a matched ASD population. This is a retrospective matched control cohort analysis with substitution using a multicenter prospectively collected ASD data of patients with > 2year FU. Matching criteria include: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score, Lumbar Cobb angle, sagittal deformity (Global tilt) and ODI. In total, 1024 ASD patients were available for analysis. 29 Combined Approaches patients met inclusion criteria, and only 22 could be matched (1:2 ratio). Preoperative non-matched demographical, clinical, surgical and radiological parameters were comparable between both groups. Combined approaches had longer surgeries (548 mns vs 283) with more blood loss (2850ml vs 1471) and needed longer ICU stays (74h vs 27). Despite added morbidity, they had comparable complication rates but with significantly less readmissions (9.1% vs 38.1%) and reoperations (18.2% vs 43.2%) at 2years. Combined Approaches achieved more individualised and harmonious deformity correction initially. At the 2years control, Combined Approaches patients reported better outcomes as measured by COMI and SRS scores. This trend was maintained at 3years. Despite an increased initial surgical invasiveness, combined approaches seem to achieve more harmonious correction with superior sagittal deformity control; they need fewer revisions and have improved long-term functional outcomes when compared to all-posterior approaches for ASD deformity correction.

Two- and three-year outcomes of minimally invasive and hybrid correction of adult spinal deformity.

Previous studies have demonstrated the short-term radiographic and clinical benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (i.e., minimally invasive anterior or lateral interbody fusion with an open posterior approach) techniques to correct adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, it is not known if these benefits are maintained over longer periods of time. This study evaluated the 2- and 3-year outcomes of cMIS and hybrid correction of ASD. A multicenter database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing cMIS or hybrid surgery for ASD. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age and had one of the following: maximum coronal Cobb angle (CC) ≥ 20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) ≥ 10°, or pelvic tilt (PT) > 20°. Radiographic parameters were evaluated at the latest follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared at 2- and 3-year time points and adjusted for age, preoperative CC, levels operated, levels with interbody fusion, presence of L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and upper and lower instrumented vertebral level. Overall, 197 (108 cMIS, 89 hybrid) patients were included with 187 (99 cMIS, 88 hybrid) and 111 (60 cMIS, 51 hybrid) patients evaluated at 2 and 3 years, respectively. The mean (± SD) follow-up duration for cMIS (39.0 ± 13.3 months, range 22-74 months) and hybrid correction (39.9 ± 16.8 months, range 22-94 months) were similar for both cohorts. Hybrid procedures corrected the CC greater than the cMIS technique (adjusted p = 0.022). There were no significant differences in postoperative SVA, PI-LL, PT, and sacral slope (SS). At 2 years, cMIS had lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (adjusted p < 0.001), greater ODI change as a percentage of baseline (adjusted p = 0.006), less visual analog scale (VAS) back pain (adjusted p = 0.006), and greater VAS back pain change as a percentage of baseline (adjusted p = 0.001) compared to hybrid techniques. These differences were no longer significant at 3 years. At 3 years, but not 2 years, VAS leg pain was lower for cMIS compared to hybrid techniques (adjusted p = 0.032). Those undergoing cMIS had fewer overall complications compared to hybrid techniques (adjusted p = 0.006), but a higher odds of pseudarthrosis (adjusted p = 0.039). In this review of a multicenter database for patients undergoing cMIS and hybrid surgery for ASD, hybrid procedures were associated with a greater CC improvement compared to cMIS techniques. cMIS was associated with superior ODI and back pain at 2 years, but this difference was no longer evident at 3 years. However, cMIS was associated with superior leg pain at 3 years. There were fewer complications following cMIS, with the exception of pseudarthrosis.

Predictive Analytics for Determining Extended Operative Time in Corrective Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

More sophisticated surgical techniques for correcting adult spinal deformity (ASD) have increased operative times, adding to physiologic stress on patients and increased complication incidence. This study aims to determine factors associated with operative time using a statistical learning algorithm. Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database containing 837 patients undergoing long spinal fusions for ASD. Conditional inference decision trees identified factors associated with skin-to-skin operative time and cutoff points at which factors have a global effect. A conditional variable-importance table was constructed based on a nonreplacement sampling set of 2000 conditional inference trees. Means comparison for the top 15 variables at their respective significant cutoffs indicated effect sizes. Included: 544 surgical ASD patients (mean age: 58.0 years; fusion length 11.3 levels; operative time: 378 minutes). The strongest predictor for operative time was institution/surgeon. Center/surgeons, grouped by decision tree hierarchy, a and b were, on average, 2 hours faster than center/surgeons c-f, who were 43 minutes faster than centers g-j, all P < 0.001. The next most important predictors were, in order, approach (combined vs posterior increases time by 139 minutes, P < 0.001), levels fused (<4 vs 5-9 increased time by 68 minutes, P < 0.050; 5-9 vs < 10 increased time by 47 minutes, P < 0.001), age (age <50 years increases time by 57 minutes, P < 0.001), and patient frailty (score <1.54 increases time by 65 minutes, P < 0.001). Surgical techniques, such as three-column osteotomies (35 minutes), interbody device (45 minutes), and decompression (48 minutes), also increased operative time. Both minor and major complications correlated with <66 minutes of increased operative time. Increased operative time also correlated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS), increased estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL), and inferior 2-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Procedure location and specific surgeon are the most important factors determining operative time, accounting for operative time increases <2 hours. Surgical approach and number of levels fused were also associated with longer operative times, respectively. Extended operative time correlated with longer LOS, higher EBL, and inferior 2-y ODI outcomes. We further identified the poor outcomes associated with extended operative time during surgical correction of ASD, and attributed the useful predictors of time spent in the operating room, including site, surgeon, surgical approach, and the number of levels fused.

Management of severe adult spinal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgical strategies without posterior column osteotomies: a 13-year experience.

To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) without posterior column osteotomies for severe adult spine deformity (ASD) correction. All patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up undergoing staged CMIS correction of ASD from January 2007 to July 2018 were identified. All included patients had fusion of 3 or more interbody levels that spanned the L5-S1 junction. Only patients with severe deformity, Coronal Cobb > 50° or at least one SRS-Schwab ++ sagittal modifier (SVA > 95mm, or PI-LL > 20, or PT > 30) were included. All complications were noted. 136 patients met inclusion criteria; mean age of patients was 63.6years (21-85, SD 13.7). The mean follow-up was 82.8months (24-159, SD 36.6). The mean number of levels fused was 7 (3-16, SD 3). A total of 40 (29.4%) major complications were noted at final follow-ups: 2 (1.4%) intra-operative, 12 (8.9%) peri-operative (≤ 6weeks from index), 26 (19.1%) post-operative (> 6weeks from index). There was a total of 53 (40.0%) minor complications. Seven (5.1%) patients who developed radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis. Three patients (2.2%) developed proximal junctional failure. There were 8 (5.9%) cases of pseudarthrosis. Five of these occurred in patients undergoing AxiaLIF. All patients experienced improvements in patient-perceived outcomes (VAS, TIS, ODI, and SRS-22) and radiographic parameters at last follow-up when compared to pre-op (p < 0.05). Rates of complications with CMIS correction of severe ASD are lower than published rates of complications seen with open ASD correction. Specifically, the incidence of catastrophic complications is lower. Furthermore, CMIS is associated with significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes, low rates of pseudarthrosis and proximal junctional kyphosis. Therefore, in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS may be an excellent alternative approach to addressing severe ASD.

Is frailty responsive to surgical correction of adult spinal deformity? An investigation of sagittal re-alignment and frailty component drivers of postoperative frailty status.

Frailty has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Recently, a novel frailty index for preoperative risk stratification in patients with adult spinal deformity was developed. Components of the ASD-FI utilize patient comorbidity, clinical symptoms, and patient-reported-outcome-measures (PROMS). Our purpose was to investigate components of the Adult Spinal Deformity Frailty Index (ASD-FI) responsive to surgery and drivers of overall frailty. Operative ASD patients ≥ 18years, undergoing multilevel fusions, with complete baseline, 6W, 1Y and 2Y ASD-FI scores. Descriptive analysis assessed demographics, radiographic parameters, and surgical details. Pearson bivariate correlations, independent and paired t tests assessed postoperative changes to ASD-FI components, total score, and radiographic parameters. Linear regression models determined the effect of successful surgery (achieving lowest level SRS-Schwab classification modifiers) on change in ASD-FI total scores. 409 6-week, 696 1-year, and 253 2-year operative ASD patients were included. 6-week and 1-year baseline frailty scores were 0.34, 2years was 0.38. Following surgery, 6-week frailty was 0.36 (p = 0.033), 1year was 0.25 (p < 0.001), and 2years was 0.28 (p < 0.001). Of the ASD-FI variables, 17/40 improved at 6weeks, 21/40 at 1year, and 18/40 at 2years. Successful surgery significantly predicted decreases in 1-year frailty scores (R = 0.27, p < 0.001), SRS-Schwab SVA modifier was the greatest predictor (Adjusted Beta: - 0.29, p < 0.001). Improvement in sagittal realignment and functional status correlated with improved postoperative frailty. Additional research and deformity sub-group analyses are needed to describe associations between specific functional activities that correlated with frailty improvement as well as evaluation of modifiable and non-modifiable indices.

440 Have We Made Temporal Advancements in Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and Recovery for High Risk Spinal Deformity Patients?

INTRODUCTION: Surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has high rates of complication. However, patients often derive significant benefits in functional status and quality of life from surgery despite high-risk status. It has yet to be investigated whether spine surgeons are improving surgery for high risk patients and minimizing poor outcomes. METHODS: Included: operative ASD pts =18 yrs with pre-(BL) and 2-year (2Y) postop radiographic/HRQL data. Pts were categorized as having undergone surgery from 2009 to 2013[Early] or 2014 to 2018[Late]. High risk [HR] pts were defined as meeting =2 of the following BL criteria: 1) ++PILL or SVA by SRS-Schwab, 2) elderly [=70yrs], 3) severe frailty[Miller index], 4) high CCI [=1 SD above cohort mean], 5) three column osteotomy, and 6) fusion of &gt;12 levels, or &gt;7 levels for elderly pts. Differences in Smith et al. best/worst clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets(SRS-Schwab, age-adjusted, GAP score), and complication rates were assessed by time of surgery(Early/Late) for HR pts. RESULTS: 725 ASD pts included (61yrs, 77%F, CCI: 1.82±1.74, levels fused 11.0±4.4). 18.5% underwent 3CO. SRS-Schwab modifiers at BL: 41.4% ++PI-LL, 30.3% ++SVA, 28.8% ++PT. 47% of pts (n=338) had surgery prior to 2014[Early], and 53% (n=387) underwent surgery in 2014 or later[Late]. Overall, 52% of pts (n=377) were deemed high risk[HR]. There was a higher proportion of HR pts in the Late group (p=0.028). In terms of individual HR criteria: Late pts were older, more likely to be ++PI-LL at BL, had higher CCI, and were less likely to undergo 3CO (all p&lt;0.05). Analysis of HR pts by Early/Late status showed no significant differences in radiographic alignment by SRS-Schwab, age-adjusted target, or GAP score by 2Y (all p&gt;0.05). Late/HR pts were less likely to have a poor outcome by Smith et al. definition for SRS and ODI (both p&lt;0.01). Late/HR pts had lower rates of complication, reoperation, deep surgical infection, early PJK (before 6 months), and PJF by 2Y (p&lt;0.05). CONCLUSION: Over time in our data set, spine surgeons have both increased and optimized operating on high risk patients, while minimizing the occurrence of poor clinical outcomes and reducing complication rates.

450 Minimally Invasive Multiple-Rod Constructs With Robotics Planning in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION: Multiple rod constructs (MRCs) are often used in adult spinal deformity correction for increased stability and rigidity. There are currently no reports showing minimally invasive robotic multi-rod long-segment posterior fixation and its technical feasibility through preoperative software planning. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from medical records of 6 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive multiple-rod constructs with robotics planning by a single surgeon at an academic center between March-August 2020. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients (4 females, mean age 69.7 years) underwent minimally invasive long-segment (6+) posterior fixation with multiple rods (3+) using the Mazor X Stealth Edition robotics platform. Average follow-up was 9.3 months. All patients underwent oblique lumbar interbody fusion as a first stage, followed by second stage posterior fixation in the same day. The mean number of levels posteriorly instrumented was 8.8. One patient underwent 3 rod fixation (1 iliac, 2 S2AI) and 5 patients underwent quad rod fixation (2 iliac, 2 S2AI). The mean time to secure all rods was 8 minutes 36 seconds. Mean improvement in spinopelvic parameters was -4.9 cm sagittal vertical axis, 18.0° lumbar lordosis, and -10.7° pelvic tilt with an average pelvic incidence of 62.5°. Mean EBL was 200 cc with no blood transfusions, and all but one patient ambulated on postoperative day 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: The preoperative software planning required of spinal robotics allows for not just the accurate placement of each pedicle screw in isolation, but the fine-detailing of an entire spine construct design. This concept is demonstrated in this case series where rod placement in a minimally invasive approach depends upon the preoperative design of the whole construct. Spinal robotics brings us into this new era of minimally invasive construct design. To our knowledge, this is the first description of the technical feasibility of multiple-rod constructs in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity surgery.

Complications in the Elderly Population Undergoing Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Study DesignSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ObjectivesThe elderly have an increased risk of perioperative complications for Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) corrections. Stratification of these perioperative complications based on risk type and specific risk factors, however, remain unclear. This paper will systematically review perioperative risk factors in the elderly undergoing ASD correction stratified by type: medical, implant-related, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and need for revision surgery.MethodsA systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. A query of PubMed was performed to identify publications pertinent to ASD in the elderly. Publications included in this review focused on patients ≥65 years old who underwent operative management for ASD to assess for risk factors of perioperative complications.ResultsA total of 734 unique citations were screened resulting in ten included articles for this review. Pooled incidence of perioperative complications included medical complications (21%), implant-related complications (16%), PJK (29%), and revision surgery (13%). Meta-analysis calculated greater preoperative PT (WMD 2.66; 95% Cl .36–4.96; P = .02), greater preoperative SVA (WMD 2.24; 95% Cl .62–3.86; P = .01), and greater postoperative SVA (WMD .97; 95% Cl .03–1.90; P = .04) to significantly correlate with development of PJK with no evidence of publication bias or concerns in study heterogeneity.ConclusionsThere is a paucity of literature describing perioperative complications in the elderly following ASD surgery. Appropriate understanding of modifiable risk factors for the development of medical and implant-related complications, proximal junctional kyphosis, and revision surgeries presents an opportunity to decrease morbidity and improve patient outcomes.

Comparison of Hybrid Posterior Fixation and Conventional Open Posterior Fixation Combined with Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity.

We compared radiological and clinical outcomes between multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) + hybrid posterior fixation (PF) and multilevel LLIF + conventional open PF in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for ASD in a single institution between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-six patients (hybrid PF, 30; open PF, 26) who underwent ASD correction surgery were enrolled between 2014 and 2018. We evaluated patients’ demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographical parameters in each group. There was significantly less estimated blood loss in the hybrid PF group (662.8 mL vs. 1088.8 mL; p = 0.012). The CRP level 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the hybrid PF group (2.9 mg/dL vs. 4.3 mg/dL; p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other demographic variables, visual analog scores for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis. There was a significantly higher percentage of major complications in the open PF group (42.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.039). Thus, LLIF + hybrid PF for ASD corrective surgery may be comparable to LLIF + open PF in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes.

The Clinical Impact of Failing to Achieve Ideal Proportional Realignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

The impact of not achieving ideal realignment in the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score in adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction on clinical outcomes is understudied at present. To identify the clinical impact of failing to achieve GAP proportionality in ASD surgery. Retrospective cohort. Operative ASD patients with fusion to S1/pelvis and with pre-(BL) and 2-year (2Y) data were included. Patients were assessed for matching their 6-week (6W) age-adjusted alignment goals. 1 Patients were stratified by age-adjusted match at 6W postoperatively (Matched) and 6W GAP proportionality (proportioned: GAP-P; moderately disproportioned: GAP-MD; severely disproportioned: GAP-SD). Groups were assessed for differences in demographics, surgical factors, radiographic parameters, and complications occurring by 2Y. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent effects of not achieving GAP proportionality on postoperative outcomes for Matched and Unmatched patients. Included: One hundred twenty three ASD patients. At baseline, 39.8% were GAP-SD, and 12.2% GAP-SD at 6W. Of 123 patients, 51.2% (n =63) had more than or equal to one match at 6W. GAP-SD rates did not differ by being Matched or Unmatched ( P = 0.945). GAP-SD/Unmatched patients had higher rates of reoperation, implant failure, and PJF by 2Y postop (all P <0.05). Regressions controlling for age at BL, levels fused, and CCI, revealed 6W GAP-SD/Unmatched patients had higher odds of reoperation (OR: 54 [3.2-899.9]; P =0.005), implant failure (OR: 6.9 [1.1-46.1]; P =0.045), and PJF (OR: 30.1 [1.4-662.6]; P =0.031). Compared to GAP-P or GAP-MD patients, GAP-SD/ Matched patients did not have higher rates of reoperation, implant failure, or junctional failure (all P >0.05). The regression results for both Matched and Unmatched cohorts were consistent when proportionality was substituted by the continuous GAP score. In ASD patients who meet age-adjusted realignment goals, GAP proportionality does not significantly alter complication rates. However, GAP proportionality remains an important consideration in patients with sub-optimal age- adjusted alignment. In these cases, severe global disproportion is associated with higher rates of reoperation, implant failure, rod fracture, and junctional failure.

Analysis of measurement changes in pelvic incidence according to pelvic rotation using a three-dimensional model

BackgroundPelvic incidence (PI) is used as a key parameter in surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, reflecting the exact center or inclination of the three-dimensional anatomical structures on the two-dimensional (2D) sagittal radiographs is limited, resulting in measurement errors. Therefore, we evaluated whether there is a change in PI measurement according to the actual rotation of the pelvis, and conducted a study on a more accurate method for PI measurement using 2D sagittal radiographs.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2015, the data of 30 patients who visited our outpatient clinic were analyzed retrospectively. CT scans including those of the lower lumbar spine, pelvis, and both femurs in the DICOM format were imported to Mimics Research 17.0 (Materialise NV, Belgium), SolidWorks (Dassault systems, France), and AutoCAD 2014 (AUTODESK, US). The changes in PI according to vertical and horizontal pelvic rotations were evaluated.ResultsThe average PIs according to the horizontal pelvic rotations measured on AutoCAD with 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°, and 40° were 48.8°, 48.7°, 48.3°, 47.8°, 46.9°, 45.6°, 44.0°, 42.2°, and 39.9°, respectively. The PI with an acceptable error of 6° on radiographs was 35° in the horizontal pelvic rotation. The average PIs according to the vertical pelvic rotations measured on AutoCAD with 0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°, and 40° were 48.8°, 49.0°, 49.5°, 50.2°, 51.3°, 52.7°, 54.4°, 56.6°, and 59.4°, respectively. The PI with an acceptable error of 6° on radiographs was 30° in the vertical pelvic rotation.ConclusionsThis study revealed that the PI value could differ from the actual anatomical value due to the horizontal and vertical rotation of the pelvis while acquiring the radiograph. Regarding whole-spine lateral radiographs, errors in PI measurement may occur due to pelvic rotation or nonvertical projection of X-rays. In the standing pelvic lateral radiographs, ensuring superposition of the femoral heads at the center and obtaining the straight sacral endplate by referring to CT or magnetic resonance imaging would be a more accurate measurement method to define PI.

Patient outcomes after circumferential minimally invasive surgery compared with those of open correction for adult spinal deformity: initial analysis of prospectively collected data.

Circumferential minimally invasive spine surgery (cMIS) for adult scoliosis has become more advanced and powerful, but direct comparison with traditional open correction using prospectively collected data is limited. The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected, multicenter adult spinal deformity data. The authors directly compared cMIS for adult scoliosis with open correction in propensity-matched cohorts using health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures and surgical parameters. Data from a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, minimum 1-year follow-up, and one of the following characteristics: pelvic tilt (PT) > 25°, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10°, Cobb angle > 20°, or sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm. Patients were categorized as undergoing cMIS (percutaneous screws with minimally invasive anterior interbody fusion) or open correction (traditional open deformity correction). Propensity matching was used to create two equal groups and to control for age, BMI, preoperative PI-LL, pelvic incidence (PI), T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), SVA, PT, and number of posterior levels fused. A total of 154 patients (77 underwent open procedures and 77 underwent cMIS) were included after matching for age, BMI, PI-LL (mean 15° vs 17°, respectively), PI (54° vs 54°), T1PA (21° vs 22°), and mean number of levels fused (6.3 vs 6). Patients who underwent three-column osteotomy were excluded. Follow-up was 1 year for all patients. Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (p = 0.50), Scoliosis Research Society-total (p = 0.45), and EQ-5D (p = 0.33) scores were not different between cMIS and open patients. Maximum Cobb angles were similar for open and cMIS patients at baseline (25.9° vs 26.3°, p = 0.85) and at 1 year postoperation (15.0° vs 17.5°, p = 0.17). In total, 58.3% of open patients and 64.4% of cMIS patients (p = 0.31) reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI at 1 year. At 1 year, no differences were observed in terms of PI-LL (p = 0.71), SVA (p = 0.46), PT (p = 0.9), or Cobb angle (p = 0.20). Open patients had greater estimated blood loss compared with cMIS patients (1.36 L vs 0.524 L, p < 0.05) and fewer levels of interbody fusion (1.87 vs 3.46, p < 0.05), but shorter operative times (356 minutes vs 452 minutes, p = 0.003). Revision surgery rates between the two cohorts were similar (p = 0.97). When cMIS was compared with open adult scoliosis correction with propensity matching, HRQOL improvement, spinopelvic parameters, revision surgery rates, and proportions of patients who reached MCID were similar between cohorts. However, well-selected cMIS patients had less blood loss, comparable results, and longer operative times in comparison with open patients.

Hidden blood loss in extreme lateral interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity

BackgroundExtreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) is often used with posterior spinal fixation (PSF) to treat adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, the amount of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) reported for XLIF may underestimate the total blood loss (TBL). The objective of this study was to determine the total perioperative blood loss in XLIF for ASD. MethodsWe assessed 30 consecutive ASD patients with Schwab-SRS type L (mean age: 68.7 ± 8.2 years; mean follow-up 2.0 ± 1.3 years) who were treated by multilevel XLIF (mean, 2.5 ± 0.6 levels) followed by PSF after 3–5 days. We calculated the TBL after XLIF by the Gross equation, by hemoglobin (Hb) balance, and by the Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) formula. We defined hidden blood loss (HBL) as the difference between the TBL and IBL. Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to investigate the risk factors related to HBL. ResultsPost-XLIF blood tests showed a significant decrease in the Hb (from 11.8 ± 1.1 mg/dl to 10.6 ± 1.1 mg/dl) and hematocrit (from 36.0 ± 3.2% to 32.5 ± 3.2%). Although the mean IBL was relatively small (33 ± 52 mL), we calculated the TBL as 291 ± 171 mL (Gross equation) and the HBL as 258 ± 168 mL by Gross equation, which was 8 times greater than the IBL on average. There was no difference in the results obtained using the three methods. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated preoperative lumber lordosis was the risk factor of high HBL (Odds ratio = 1.085, 95%CI: 1.006–1.170, p = 0.035). ConclusionsThe HBL in XLIF was 8 times greater than the IBL. During the perioperative course of correction and fusion surgery for ASD with XLIF, surgeons need to pay attention not to underestimate the TBL.

Advantages of L5 lamina hook in surgical correction for adult spinal deformity and its indications

Advantages of L5 lamina hook in surgical correction for adult spinal deformity and its indications

Surgical correction for adult spinal deformity increases acetabular lateral coverage of femoral heads

BackgroundStudies explaining the relationship between hip and spine reported that spinal corrective surgery affected acetabular orientation and changes in pelvic tilt were capable of influencing radiographic measures of acetabular coverage. This study aimed to assess the change in coronal parameters for acetabular coverage as a result of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction and to analyze the relationship between the postoperative changes in sagittal spinopelvic parameters and coronal acetabular coverage parameters.MethodsFifty-two consecutive patients who had undergone multilevel spinal surgical correction were enrolled and evaluated. Coronal acetabular coverage parameters included Tönnis angle (TA), lateral center edge angle (LCEA), and the angle of Sharp (SA). All radiographic parameters were evaluated at the preoperative and the postoperative 1 year. Paired t test was used to determine whether there were significant changes between the time points. Bivariate correlation and linear regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between the postoperative changes of spinal alignment and acetabular orientation.ResultsThe surgical correction resulted in significant decrease of TA, increase of LCEA and SA, respectively (p < 0.001). The changes in pelvic tilt (PT) demonstrated weak correlation on TA (β = 0.117, p < 0.001 for right; β = 0.111, p < 0.001 for left).ConclusionsAlthough the surgical correction of ASD significantly changed PT resulting in increased acetabular lateral coverage parameters, the correlation between the changes of PT following sagittal correction of ASD and acetabular coverage parameters was low.Trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered with approval by the institutional review board (IRB) of our institution (approval number: KHNMC-2020-10-010).

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity correction: Clinical and radiographic risk factors for early instrumentation failure

BackgroundEarly instrumentation failure (EIF) after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a known complication of adult spine deformity (ASD) correction. In contrast to the more common failure that occurs secondary to pseudarthrosis, early instrumentation failure (<6 months after surgery) and its risk factors are not as well understood. ObjectiveTo identify risk factors for EIF in patients undergoing PSO for ASD correction. MethodsPatients with ASD who underwent correction with PSO from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics, number of rods, spinopelvic parameters, bone density derived from computed tomography (CT) attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU), Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, and type of instrumentation failure were evaluated. Potential risk factors for EIF were analyzed. Results9 out of 46 (19.5%) patients who underwent PSO had EIF. All 9 patients with EIF had 2-rod constructs and failed secondary to rod fracture. The number of rods used in the EIF group was significantly lower than the non-EIF group (2.00 ± 0.00 vs 2.81 ± 0.995, p = .000. The EIF group demonstrated a significantly higher pre-op PI (77.33 ± 13.23), p = .022, pre-op PT (37.22 ± 6.46),p = .012, and post-op SVA (89.96 ± 23.85), p = .028 compared to the non-EIF group. ConclusionHigh pre-op PI, pre-op PT, and post-op SVA were significant risk factors associated with EIF after PSO. Use of multiple rod constructs are protective and may help mitigate risk of EIF in these patients.

The Intradiscal Osteotomy: An Alternative Technique for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction has changed considerably since the initial description of a Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO), including pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO), and more minimally invasive techniques. Here, we introduce and describe the intradiscal osteotomy (IDO), a novel variation of Schwab type 3 and 4 osteotomies allowing pedicle and vertebral body preservation, and its advantages and disadvantages.After pedicle screw placement, the posterior elements (except pedicles) are removed from the appropriate vertebrae, including the superior/inferior articulating processes, laminae, and spinous processes. An osteotome is used to remove the posterior aspect of the superior and inferior endplate, followed by the entire disc, creating more working room for eventual cage insertion. After the careful release of the annulus, an intradiscal distractor is used to distract the endplates and allow interbody cage insertion as anteriorly as possible. Pedicle and vertebral body preservation allow increased fixation and endplate cage support, which lengthens the anterior column and acts as a fulcrum when compressing posteriorly to restore lordosis. By allowing for anterior and posterior column release, the IDO technique provides a feasible, all-posterior approach for the correction of fixed or flexible kyphoscoliotic curves.This technical report introduces and describes the IDO as an alternative method for thoracic and/or lumbar ASD correction. More studies are required to fully elucidate its outcome vs. complication profile compared to other deformity correction techniques.