Correct Response Rate Research Articles

A decision tree for predicting the causative pathogens of community-acquired pneumonia from thin-section computed tomography.

To determine whether decision trees are useful for predicting organisms that cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We developed a decision tree for predicting the organisms that cause CAP based on previously reported characteristic computed tomography findings. Sixteen readers (two student doctors, six residents, and eight radiologists) separately diagnosed 68 randomly selected cases of CAP using chest computed tomography. The first, second, and third most likely causative organisms were estimated for each case, and the percentages of correct answers were evaluated for consistency with the isolated organisms. The same 68 cases were then read again using the decision tree, with the first three most likely organisms again being estimated, and the percentage of agreement was evaluated as the percentage of correct responses after using the decision tree. For student doctors, residents, and radiologists, the percentage of correct responses increased significantly (p < 0.0001) when the decision tree was used to predict the first, second, and third most probable causative organism. The radiologists all obtained an accuracy rate of 80% or higher when estimating up to three candidate organisms using the decision tree. The organism for which the decision tree was most useful was Mycoplasma pneumoniae, followed by Haemophilus influenzae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (p < 0.001). Use of the decision tree made it possible to estimate the organisms responsible for CAP with a high correct response rate.

Korean nurses' knowledge, opinions and current practice of trauma-informed pediatric nursing care in South Korea: a descriptive study.

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, opinions, competence, and barriers of nurses providing trauma-informed care (TIC) to children in hospitals. Data were collected from 198 nurses nationwide using the TIC Provider Survey developed by the Center for Pediatric Traumatic Stress in July, 2024. Descriptive statistics, t tests, and one-way ANOVA were conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (ver. 23.0, IBM Corp.). Of the 13 items assessing knowledge of TIC, seven had a correct response rate of over 90%. However, the correct response rate for these three items were less than 30%. Regarding opinions on the TIC, more than 90% of participants agreed with five of the seven items. In self-rated competence in providing TIC, they were not competent in responding to a child's (or parent's) questions about whether the child is going to die or understanding how traumatic stress may present differently according to developmental stages. The major barriers to providing TIC were time constraints, lack of training, and organizational support. Items with relatively low performance rates were 'teach parents what to say to their child after a difficult/sick/scary experience, and teach child or parents the specific ways to cope with unpleasant experiences'. This study suggests that it can contribute to the development of specific guidelines for nurses to effectively apply TIC in pediatric and family nursing practice, emphasizing the need for educational programs to support this implementation.

Hypertension management: A comparative analysis of garlic, hibiscus, hawthorn, and olive leaf and a survey

Hypertension, a prevalent cardiovascular condition characterized by elevated blood pressure, poses a significant global health challenge. This paper reviews the potential of garlic, hibiscus, hawthorn, and olive leaf in reducing hypertension and improving one’s health. A survey was conducted among first year pharmacy students. The survey included 5 knowledge-based and 5 opinion-based questions, focusing on the four herbal remedies. The knowledge-based questions showed a correct answer rate of 61.1%, with the statement that garlic is generally safe to include in one’s diet, but excessive consumption can lead to adverse effects garnering a 91.1% correct response rate. 58.3% of the respondents failed to know the simple definition of hypertension. Opinion-based questions revealed a positive attitude towards herbal remedies with an average of 81% showing agreement on the potential benefits. Nearly 83% believed in consulting health professionals before integrating olive leaf extract, and about 89% agreed that garlic should be used as an approach to manage hypertension.

Anti-gingivitis natural products: Aloe vera gel, tea tree oil mouthwash, turmeric gel, myrrh extract/mouthwash

Gingivitis is an inflammatory gum disease which occurs around the cervical portion of the gum and is classified by its clinical appearance. Gingivitis is very common, and anyone can be affected including but not limited to poor oral care habits. This paper reviews the potential of Aloe Vera, Tea Tree Oil Mouthwash, Turmeric Gel, and Myrrh Extract/Mouthwash. The study also assessed the knowledge and opinions of first-year pharmacy students. The survey part of the study included 5 knowledge-based and 5 opinion-based questions, focusing on the four herbal remedies. The knowledge-based questions showed a 65.7% correct response rate, with the question on turmeric receiving the highest accuracy (94.3%), while the question surveying the participants’ knowledge about the source of information for herbal products received the lowest correct answer rate at 31.4%. Opinion-based questions revealed a positive attitude towards herbal remedies, with about 67.6% to 94.3% strongly agreeing, or agreeing with the potential benefits of the products. The highest agreement rate at 94.3% was obtained for the statement that myrrh can help reduce inflammation in the gums and inhibit the growth of bacteria, thus assisting in the management of gingivitis. Disagreement of opinions was minimal, ranging from 5.7% to 32.3%, indicating a widespread inclination towards positive agreement.

Adult Individuals Applicable to the Family Health Center Knowledge and Awareness About Osteoporosis

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to determine the knowledge and awareness of adult individuals applying to the Family Health Center (FHC) about osteoporosis. Methods A descriptive design study was conducted at a FHC in Turkey/Istanbul between January and May 2022. The sample of the research consisted of 320 adults selected by purposeful sampling method. Ethical approval and necessary permissions were obtained from the the conduct of the study. Data were collected through a socio-demographic characteristics form, a 20-item single-subscale Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (OKAQ), and a 27-item Osteoporosis Awareness Scale (OAS). Descriptive statistics, normality tests, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analysis. Statistical significance was accepted at p &amp;lt; 0.05. Results T The average age of adults is 60.47±13.17 and 55.9% are female and 44.1% are male. 34.7% had completed middle school. Participants’ highest correct response rate in the osteoporosis knowledge assessment questionnaire was for the item ‘Osteoporosis increases the risk of bone fracture’ (81.6%), while the lowest correct response rate was for the item ‘Osteoporosis generally causes symptoms (such as pain) before fractures occur’ (26.3%). According to the Osteoporosis Awareness Scale, adults’ awareness levels were above average. They scored the highest in the preventive behaviors subscale and the lowest in the risk factors subscale. Adults with university-level education scored significantly higher in all subscales of the OAS compared to other education levels (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Individuals with knowledge about osteoporosis and those who consumed milk regularly scored significantly higher in all subscales of the OAS (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusions Although adults’ awareness of osteoporosis is above average, their correct knowledge about osteoporosis is inadequate. Key messages • An individual’s education level affects osteoporosis knowledge and awareness. • It is recommended to plan educational initiatives to increase osteoporosis knowledge and awareness.

Performance Assessment of GPT 4.0 on the Japanese Medical Licensing Examination.

To evaluate the accuracy and parsing ability of GPT 4.0 for Japanese medical practitioner qualification examinations in a multidimensional way to investigate its response accuracy and comprehensiveness to medical knowledge. We evaluated the performance of the GPT 4.0 on Japanese Medical Licensing Examination (JMLE) questions (2021-2023). Questions are categorized by difficulty and type, with distinctions between general and clinical parts, as well as between single-choice (MCQ1) and multiple-choice (MCQ2) questions. Difficulty levels were determined on the basis of correct rates provided by the JMLE Preparatory School. The accuracy and quality of the GPT 4.0 responses were analyzed via an improved Global Qualily Scale (GQS) scores, considering both the chosen options and the accompanying analysis. Descriptive statistics and Pearson Chi-square tests were used to examine performance across exam years, question difficulty, type, and choice. GPT 4.0 ability was evaluated via the GQS, with comparisons made via the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test. The correct response rate and parsing ability of the GPT4.0 to the JMLE questions reached the qualification level (80.4%). In terms of the accuracy of the GPT4.0 response to the JMLE, we found significant differences in accuracy across both difficulty levels and option types. According to the GQS scores for the GPT 4.0 responses to all the JMLE questions, the performance of the questionnaire varied according to year and choice type. GTP4.0 performs well in providing basic support in medical education and medical research, but it also needs to input a large amount of medical-related data to train its model and improve the accuracy of its medical knowledge output. Further integration of ChatGPT with the medical field could open new opportunities for medicine.

Hemoglobinopathy Awareness Among Middle and High School Students In Karataş, Türkiye

Objective:Hemoglobinopathies are complex and inherited genetic disorders with no definitive cure; however, preventive measures such as genetic counseling and premarital screening may dramatically reduce their prevalence. Therefore, having sufficient information about the mentioned preventive measures is crucial. Methods:All students attending middle and high schools were included without a sample selection. A survey form was administered to students in order to evaluate their knowledge level and attitudes regarding hemoglobinopathies. The results were evaluated using Chi-square and logistic regression analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results:The total number of students agreeing to participate in the study was 877. The mean age of the participants was 14.8 ± 1.5 years; 50.5% of them were male.Of the participating students, 40.3% were previously informed about hemoglobinopathies.The lowest correct response rate among questions in terms of students’ knowledge about hemoglobinopathies was observed in the question that asked the transmission route of the disorders with 13.7%.In the multivariate analysis, maternal education level (OR=1.417; 95% CI) and knowing an affected patient (OR=4.215; 95% CI) were associated with a greater likelihood of being previously informed. Conclusions:Our study demonstrated that students had insufficient knowledge on hemoglobinopathies in a region where the disorders are prevalent. Organizing and sustaining educational activities related to hemoglobinopathies - particularly genetic basics of the disorders - to students, who are the parents of the future, may be useful in combating hemoglobinopathies. Keywords:Hemoglobinopathies, Awareness, School Health, Middle School Students, High School Students

Beyond Words: Enhancing Clinical Guideline Comprehension with Icons

Abstract Background The GRADE (Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework is widely applied in clinical guidelines to facilitate transparent evidence evaluation. While developing Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines on the management of patients with COVID-19, panel members suggested developing and implementing a visual aid to enable quicker identification of key information by providers at bedside seeking guidance. Methods We conducted a mixed-method study evaluating the usability of a newly designed infographic/icon using a survey and focus groups. The survey incorporated a simulated COVID-19 IDSA guideline with and without the icon, followed by comprehension questions. Focus group discussions provided qualitative feedback on the GRADE methodology and icon usability. Results The survey was returned by 289 healthcare providers. There was no statistical difference in the correct response rates between icon-aided and non-icon-aided guideline questions (McNemar’s Chi-squared test, p&amp;gt;0.1 for both questions). Interactions with the icon notably increased the time taken and number of clicks required to respond to the first question (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p&amp;lt;0.01). In contrast, response time didn’t differ between versions for the second question (p=0.38). Most subjects (85%) indicated that the icon improved the readability of the guidelines. A focus group follow-up suggested alternative designs for the icon. Conclusion The study highlights the promise of iconography in clinical guidelines, although the specific icons tested did not measurably improve usability metrics. Future research should focus on icon design and testing within a formal usability framework, considering the impact of GRADE language on user experience.

Assessing acute effects of two motor-cognitive training modalities on cognitive functions, postural control, and gait stability in older adults: a randomized crossover study.

The process of aging often accompanies a decline in cognitive function, postural control, and gait stability, consequently increasing the susceptibility to falls among older individuals. In response to these challenges, motor-cognitive training has emerged as a potential intervention to mitigate age-related declines. This study aims to assess the acute effects of two distinct motor-cognitive training modalities, treadmill dual-task training (TMDT) and interactive motor-cognitive training (IMCT), on cognitive function, postural control, walking ability, and dual-task performance in the elderly population. In this randomized crossover study, 35 healthy elderly individuals (aged 60-75) participated in three acute training sessions involving TMDT, IMCT, and a control reading condition. Assessments of executive function, postural control, gait performance, and cognitive accuracy were conducted both before and after each session. Both TMDT and IMCT improved executive functions. Notably, IMCT resulted in a significant enhancement in correct response rates and a reduction in reaction times in the Stroop task (p < 0.05) compared to TMDT and the control condition. IMCT also led to an increase in dual-task gait speed (p < 0.001) and showed a trend towards improved cognitive accuracy (p = 0.07). Conversely, TMDT increased postural sway with eyes open (p = 0.013), indicating a potential detriment to postural control. The findings suggest that IMCT holds greater immediate efficacy in enhancing cognitive function and gait stability among older adults compared to TMDT, with a lesser adverse impact on postural control. This underscores the potential of IMCT as a preferred approach for mitigating fall risk and enhancing both cognitive and physical functions in the elderly population.

Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multi-institutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education.

Previous studies have demonstrated that radiologists and other providers perceive maging to be higher than they actually are. Thus, pregnant patients were less likely to receive ionizing radiation procedures. While it is imperative to minimize fetal radiation exposure, clinicians must remember that diagnostic studies should not be avoided due to fear of radiation, particularly if the imaging study can significantly impact patient care. Although guidelines do exist regarding how best to image pregnant patients, many providers are unaware of these guidelines and thus lack confidence when making imaging decisions for pregnant patients. This study aimed to gather information about current education, confidence in, and knowledge about emergency imaging of pregnant women among radiology, emergency medicine, and OB/GYN providers. We created and distributed an anonymous survey to radiology, emergency medicine, and OB/GYN providers to evaluate their knowledge and confidence in imaging pregnant patients in the emergent setting. This study included a questionnaire with the intent of knowing the correct answers among physicians primarily across the United States (along with some international participation). We conducted subgroup analyses, comparing variables by specialty, radiology subspecialty, and training levels. Based on the survey results, we subsequently developed educational training videos. 108 radiologists, of which 32 self-identified as emergency radiologists, ten emergency medicine providers and six OB/GYN clinicians completed the survey. The overall correct response rate was 68.5%, though performance across questions was highly variable. Within our 18-question survey, four questions had a correct response rate under 50%, while five questions had correct response rates over 90%. Most responding physicians identified themselves as either "fairly" (58/124, 47%) or "very" (51/124, 41%) confident. Amongst specialties, there were differences in performance concerning the knowledge assessment (p = 0.049), with the strongest performance from radiologists. There were no differences in knowledge by training level (p = 0.4), though confidence levels differed significantly between attending physicians and trainees (p < 0.001). This study highlights deficiencies in knowledge to support appropriate decision-making surrounding the imaging of pregnant patients. Our results indicate the need for improved physician education and dissemination of standardized clinical guidelines.

Radiation information, protection and awareness of healthcare professionals in terms of occupational health and safety: a two–center survey study

Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge, protection and awareness of radiation among healthcare professionals. A total of 413 healthcare professionals from two major training and research hospitals in Istanbul took part in the study. The sample consisted of 26.6% physicians and 73.4% other healthcare professionals. There was considerable variation in the knowledge of radiation content in imaging techniques, with correct response rates of 89.3% for Computed Tomography, 80.1% for digital x-ray, and 52.8% for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. While 69.5% of respondents provided correct answers to questions regarding radiation protection principles, 64.4% demonstrated a lack of sufficient knowledge in this area. It is noteworthy that 48.4% of respondents incorrectly identified the medical imaging technique to which the public is most exposed. It was concluded that further training on radiation-related issues should be provided at the university level and through in-service training for healthcare professionals.

Assessment of ChatGPT-4 in Family Medicine Board Examinations Using Advanced AI Learning and Analytical Methods: Observational Study.

This research explores the capabilities of ChatGPT-4 in passing the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Certification Examination. Addressing a gap in existing literature, where earlier artificial intelligence (AI) models showed limitations in medical board examinations, this study evaluates the enhanced features and potential of ChatGPT-4, especially in document analysis and information synthesis. The primary goal is to assess whether ChatGPT-4, when provided with extensive preparation resources and when using sophisticated data analysis, can achieve a score equal to or above the passing threshold for the Family Medicine Board Examinations. In this study, ChatGPT-4 was embedded in a specialized subenvironment, "AI Family Medicine Board Exam Taker," designed to closely mimic the conditions of the ABFM Certification Examination. This subenvironment enabled the AI to access and analyze a range of relevant study materials, including a primary medical textbook and supplementary web-based resources. The AI was presented with a series of ABFM-type examination questions, reflecting the breadth and complexity typical of the examination. Emphasis was placed on assessing the AI's ability to interpret and respond to these questions accurately, leveraging its advanced data processing and analysis capabilities within this controlled subenvironment. In our study, ChatGPT-4's performance was quantitatively assessed on 300 practice ABFM examination questions. The AI achieved a correct response rate of 88.67% (95% CI 85.08%-92.25%) for the Custom Robot version and 87.33% (95% CI 83.57%-91.10%) for the Regular version. Statistical analysis, including the McNemar test (P=.45), indicated no significant difference in accuracy between the 2 versions. In addition, the chi-square test for error-type distribution (P=.32) revealed no significant variation in the pattern of errors across versions. These results highlight ChatGPT-4's capacity for high-level performance and consistency in responding to complex medical examination questions under controlled conditions. The study demonstrates that ChatGPT-4, particularly when equipped with specialized preparation and when operating in a tailored subenvironment, shows promising potential in handling the intricacies of medical board examinations. While its performance is comparable with the expected standards for passing the ABFM Certification Examination, further enhancements in AI technology and tailored training methods could push these capabilities to new heights. This exploration opens avenues for integrating AI tools such as ChatGPT-4 in medical education and assessment, emphasizing the importance of continuous advancement and specialized training in medical applications of AI.

Performance of ChatGPT on Hand Surgery Board-Style Examination Questions

Background The performance of large-language models, such as ChatGPT, on medical and sub-specialty examinations has been preliminarily explored in fields such as radiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopedic surgery. However, no literature assessing ChatGPT’s ability to answer hand surgery exam questions exists. This study’s purpose was to evaluate ChatGPT’s performance on hand surgery board-style examination questions. Methods All questions from the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) Hand 100 Exam, Beginner, and Intermediate Assessment tools were entered into ChatGPT-3.5. Responses were regenerated two times to identify inconsistencies. Duplicate questions, questions with figures and/or videos, and questions that ChatGPT refused to provide a response to were excluded. ChatGPT’s correct response rate, answer modifications, and human accuracy were recorded. Results 117 questions from the 3 assessment tools were analyzed: 49 from the ASSH Hand 100, 32 from the Beginner, and 36 from the Intermediate Assessment tools. On ChatGPT’s initial attempt, 40.82% (20/49), 50.0% (16/32), 38.89% (14/36) of questions were correctly answered, respectively. Overall, ChatGPT correctly answered 50/117 (42.7%) of questions on the first try. ChatGPT excelled in topics (&gt;60% correct) of mass/tumor, nerve, wrist, and performed poorly (&lt;40% correct) on topics regarding anatomy/basic science/imaging, brachial plexus, congenital, elbow, tendon, and vascular disorders, trauma. On the Beginner and Intermediate Exams, humans correctly answered 56.64% and 62.73% of questions, respectively. Conclusions ChatGPT can correctly answer simpler hand surgery questions but performed poorly when compared to humans on higher-difficulty questions.

An Exploration Of Delirium Awareness Amongst Clinical Staff Working On The Acute Floor Of A Level Three Hospital

Abstract Background Delirium is an acute change in cognitive function that has an organic cause and is likely to be reversible or preventable (HSE Delirium Algorithm, 2021). The Frailty Intervention Team (FIT) based in the Emergency Department (ED) &amp; Acute Medical Assessment Unit (AMAU) comprises of Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Dietetics and is supported by an Older Persons Advanced Nurse Practitioner. The 4AT delirium screen is routinely completed by FIT as part of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. FIT observed limited use of delirium screening in ED/AMAU therefore we proposed to explore delirium awareness amongst all clinical staff on the acute floor. Methods All clinical staff in ED/AMAU were invited to complete an anonymised paper questionnaire to explore their awareness of delirium. Basic statistical analysis of data was completed using Excel. Results Over one week twenty-four questionnaires were completed by medical, nursing, allied health and health care assistants. Six questions explored delirium awareness and a seventh question explored the willingness to engage in delirium information sessions if made available to staff locally. On assessment of delirium awareness an average score of 79.3% (range 16.7%-100%) was achieved. Participants scored strongly on potential causes of and screening for delirium. Questions relating to delirium symptoms and potential outcomes of unrecognised delirium had the least correct response rates. 100% of respondents expressed interest in attending delirium information sessions if made accessible to them within ED/AMAU. Conclusion This study identified overall satisfactory delirium awareness amongst clinical staff on the acute floor and all participants expressed interest in expanding their knowledge in this area. Compliance with use of delirium screening tools in clinical practice was not assessed and we also acknowledge the limited number of participants. Future plans include audit of the use of delirium screening tools, delivery of delirium information sessions and provision of accessible delirium resources in ED/AMAU.

Assessing Student and Physician Fertility Awareness Utilizing the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS).

Medical trainees are delaying childbearing due to competing demands of career, financial constraints, and limited parental leave. Delaying childbearing increases the risk of obstetric complications, with up to one-quarter of female physicians facing infertility. Education on family planning and fertility is rarely discussed among medical trainees, and research on medical trainees' knowledge of fertility and infertility is minimal. Subjects included medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings assigned female at birth. The distributed survey included the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS) instrument to assess for fertility and infertility knowledge. Outcome measures include participant age, stage of training, parity, specialty, and FIT-KS. Of the 291 participants included in the final analysis, participants scored an average of 20/29 (69%) on the FIT-KS. Around 44.8% (n=130) of participants overestimated the fecundability of a 30-year-old woman, and 36.9% (n=107) underestimated the chance of miscarriage in peak reproductive years. Five out of eight questions pertaining to infertility treatment had a <50% correct response rate. About 76.6% (n=216) of participants underestimated in vitro fertilization (IVF) success for a woman <35 years old, and 56% (n=158) overestimated the success of IVF for a woman >44 years old. Around 43.6% (n=123) of participants overestimated the average cost of IVF. Of the main outcome measures, only those participants representing obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) performed better on average than all other specialties (FIT-KS=21.7 vs. 19.5). Participants overestimated fecundity with increasing age and had insufficient knowledge of infertility treatment success. More awareness and early discussion about family planning and fertility goals are needed in medical training.

Assessment of blood pressure measurement technique amongst nurses working at a tertiary care cardiac center

Background Accurate measurement is indispensable for effectively managing hypertension (HTN); any error in technique or instrumentation can lead to misdiagnosis and improper management. Thus, the present study aimed to assess the knowledge and skills of blood pressure (BP) measurement among nurses at a tertiary care cardiac center in Karachi. Materials and methods Nursing staff responsible for BP assessment at various stations were identified, observed, and interviewed to evaluate their skill and knowledge levels regarding BP measurement techniques. Nurses’ skill levels were assessed using a checklist based on the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for BP assessment. Results Seventy-five nurses participated in the study, with 49 (65.3%) being male and a mean age of 32.1 ± 6.2 years. Only 25 (33.3%) nurses reported reading the AHA guidelines for BP measurement. None of the nurses demonstrated excellent skills; 19 (25.3%) showed good skills, while 56 (74.7%) showed poor skills in BP measurement. A poor compliance was observed on a total of 14/31 steps with compliance rate of less than 50%. Similarly, none of the nurses exhibited excellent knowledge; only 3 (4%) had good knowledge, while 72 (96%) had poor knowledge about BP measurement. A poor knowledge was observed on a total of 18/36 items with correct response rate of less than 50%. Conclusion Nurses working at various stations of a tertiary cardiac center exhibited inadequate skills and knowledge regarding BP measurement. This underscores the necessity for comprehensive training and education to enhance the accurate assessment of BP.

Analysis of Responses of GPT-4V to the Japanese National Clinical Engineer Licensing Examination.

Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT; OpenAI) is a state-of-the-art large language model that can simulate human-like conversations based on user input. We evaluated the performance of GPT-4V in the Japanese National Clinical Engineer Licensing Examination using 2,155 questions from 2012 to 2023. The average correct answer rate for all questions was 86.0%. In particular, clinical medicine, basic medicine, medical materials, biological properties, and mechanical engineering achieved a correct response rate of ≥ 90%. Conversely, medical device safety management, electrical and electronic engineering, and extracorporeal circulation obtained low correct answer rates ranging from 64.8% to 76.5%. The correct answer rates for questions that included figures/tables, required numerical calculation, figure/table ∩ calculation, and knowledge of Japanese Industrial Standards were 55.2%, 85.8%, 64.2% and 31.0%, respectively. The reason for the low correct answer rates is that ChatGPT lacked recognition of the images and knowledge of standards and laws. This study concludes that careful attention is required when using ChatGPT because several of its explanations lack the correct description.

A study of attention allocation mode in clinical decision-making in nurses with different professional titles: an eye tracking experiment

Abstract Background: Attention is an important cognitive process. Cognitive and thinking processes can be explored by examining how attention is allocated and the characteristics of visual behavior. Clinical decision-making skills are the focus of nurses’ knowledge and competency development, and the application of attention allocation modalities and visual behavioral traits in the study of clinical decision-making is lacking. Objective: The aim of this experiment was to investigate the way in which attention is allocated in the clinical decision-making process of nurses of different professional rank and titles and associated factors. Methods: Seventy-six subjects from emergency departments of three hospitals in Beijing were recruited in this experiment using the convenience sampling method, including 28 junior nurses, 24 senior nurses, and 24 supervisor nurses. Subjects were required to complete clinical decisions tasks, and datas on subjects’ visual behavior were recorded and analyzed using a Tobii Pro eye-tracker during the decision-making process. Results: Nurses with high professional titles had a higher correct response rate in the nursing diagnosis and ranking of nursing diagnoses part (P&lt;0.05), and it was found that nurses with high professional titles would pay attention to pathophysiological mechanisms of illness earlier when making decisions (F=3.808, P=0.024).The heat maps showed differences in the attention allocation modes of nurses with different titles during the decision-making process. Conclusions: Lower-titled nurses focused more on the symptoms and signs section when making clinical decisions and paid less attention to the auxiliary examination results section, demonstrating a poorer level of active attention. Nurses with higher titles were relatively more comprehensive in their distribution of attention to patient disease information when making decisions and paid attention to the information in the patient’s auxiliary examination section earlier.

Evaluating Intensive Care Nurses' Knowledge of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.

To determine the knowledge levels of nurses working in the ICU about incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in adult ICUs at two private and three public hospitals in a province in Turkey. The study included 296 nurses who agreed to participate in the research. Researchers used the "Nurse Identification Form" and the "IAD Knowledge Test" to collect data on nurses' IAD knowledge. Data analysis included the use of percentage distribution and the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests. The mean age of the nurses was 26.55 ± 3.89 years (range, 20-47 years), and the duration of working in the ICU was 2.71 ± 2.55 years (range, 1-22 years). Of the nurses, 183 (61.8%) worked in general ICUs. Of those, 69 (23.3%) received IAD training. Nurses achieved a 49.8% correct response rate on the IAD knowledge test. Nurses working in tertiary and general ICUs demonstrated higher IAD knowledge levels (Ps = .003 and .047, respectively). There were no relationships between age, career length, institution, ICU type, and IAD knowledge level. Nurses' knowledge level of IAD was low in intensive care. To remedy this, IAD should be added to intensive care nursing certificate programs as content, and the use of IAD risk assessment and diagnosis scales in ICUs should be expanded.

Early Cognitive Function after Deep Sedation Using Different Anesthetic Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objectives: The impact of anesthetic agents on memory and cognitive function following general anesthesia is of great interest, particularly regarding their effects on the developing pediatric brain. While numerous studies have examined the relationship between anesthetic drugs and brain function, research focusing on early cognitive function following sedation remains limited. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 148 pediatric patients scheduled for hematological procedures, specifically bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). Patients were divided into two groups based on the primary anesthetic used: the inhalational sedation group (IHG), in which sevoflurane was used, and the intravenous sedation group (IVG), which received propofol infusion. Apart from the main anesthetic agent, all sedation methods were consistent across both groups. A cognitive function test administered before sedation involved memorizing four distinct images, each associated with a different number. Then, the patients were asked to identify the omitted image upon awakening in the recovery room. Herein, this pre- vs. post-sedation test is called the early recognition assessment (ERA) tool. The primary outcome was the correct response rate after sedation for the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the sedation score, the behavior response score, and the correct response rates according to the number of sedation procedures. Results: This study included 130 patients in the final analysis, with 74 originally assigned to each group. The initial cognitive assessment revealed no significant difference in performance between the anesthetic agents. In addition, no differences were observed in the rates of correct responses or post-sedation scores after repeated procedures. However, the IVG demonstrated higher behavior response scores compared to the IHG. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the rates of correct responses using the ERA tool between the two groups, irrespective of the number of sedation procedures performed. While some differences were noted in preoperative, intraoperative, and post-anesthesia care, these did not significantly impact the cognitive outcomes measured.