INTRODUCTION was delighted to receive the Notable Lifetime Contribution in Behavioral Accounting Literature Award. The previous winners were: Bob Ashton, Jake Birnberg, Mark Dirsmith, Anthony Hopwood, Bob Libby, Ken Merchant, Ted Mock, Bill Waller, and Michael Shields. All ave had some influence on my research, particularly the early research of Bob Ashton and Bob ibby. Last year, Mike Shields 2009 provided a personal perspective of his trip through the ehavioral accounting literature. The perspective in Shields 2009 is through a management ccounting lens while my perspective considers the audit judgment and decision-making JDM iterature from the 1970s to present. It is not intended to be a comprehensive literature review but utlines some of the changes in the audit JDM research that directly impacted my own work. It lso illustrates the perspective of a non-American researcher including the opportunities and hallenges faced. The initial study to systematically examine auditor judgments was Ashton 1974 , which onsidered consensus, stability, and cue usage of individual auditor judgments. At the same time here was judgment research using the Brunswik lens model by Libby 1975 looking at individual redictions of corporate failures and research on human information processing in accounting nformation systems Driver and Mock 1975 . In the auditing arena there were lots of extensions of Ashton 1974 particularly in Journal f Accounting Research . These extensions tested for various moderating variables and the genralizability of the earlier results. With hindsight, the literature could have moved faster if the