Abstract Introduction Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class I recommendation in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), namely ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST acute coronary syndrome (NST-ACS). Reported mortality and recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events are still unacceptably high in these patients. Purpose To assess CV outcomes of patients enrolled in a CR program and its association with ACS presentation. Methods Single-center, retrospective observational study that included all consecutive post-ACS patients enrolled in a phase 2 CR program in 2017, with a follow-up of 24 months. Group 1 were patients with STEMI; group 2 were patients with NST-ACS. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as a composite of death, non-fatal ACS, non-fatal stroke, and unplanned revascularization. Results Of the 202 ACS patients who attended the CR program in 2017, 4 were excluded due to missing data. Of the 198 patients analyzed (age 60.3±10.7 years, 82% male), 101 patients had a STEMI and 97 NST-ACS. STEMI patients were significantly younger (57±9.5 vs. 63±10, p<0.001), with fewer CV risk factors (diabetes 16% vs. 32%, p=0.008; hypertension 51% vs. 72%, p=0.002; obesity 17% vs. 31%, p=0.020; dyslipidemia 54% vs. 77%, p<0.001), except for active smoking (53% vs. 29%, p=0.001), and were less likely to have previous history of coronary artery disease (9% vs. 31%, p<0.001). During the 3-month CR program, both groups achieved significant reduction in body mass index, LDL-Cholesterol, functional capacity, and smoking cessation rates. At 3-, 12-, and 24-months evaluation, both groups showed no differences in risk factor management, nor differences in lipid-lowering therapy, namely percentage of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe use. STEMI patients were treated more frequently with ticagrelor (86% vs. 67%, p=0.001) at baseline. MACE occurrence was significantly lower in STEMI patients (11% vs. 28%, p=0.003), driven mainly by recurrent ACS (4% vs. 15%, p=0.006). Conclusions In our study, NST-ACS patients had significantly higher CV disease burden and worse outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Despite the heightened CV risk in this group, secondary prevention treatment intensity was similar in both groups.