Corneal Curvature Parameters Research Articles

Comparison of corneal power assessment methods after small incision lenticule extraction

Objective: To compare the accuracy of different corneal curvature parameters in assessing the corneal refractive status and tracking corneal power changes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study tracked and recorded total corneal curvature parameters measured by different instruments before and three months after SMILE for myopia. These parameters, including total keratometry (TK) from the IOLMaster 700, total corneal refractive power (TCRP) from the Pentacam AXL, real keratometry (RK) from the CASIA 2, and corrected parameters calculated using the Haigis, Shammas, and Maloney methods, were compared with data obtained using the clinical history method (CHM). Surgically induced changes in TK, TCRP, and RK were analyzed and compared with those in spherical equivalent on the corneal plane (ΔSEco). Results: The study included 40 eyes (40 participants). After SMILE, the difference was smallest between TK [(0.08±0.38) D] and CHM values (P>0.05). However, TCRP, RK, KHaigis, KShammas, and KMaloney were significantly different from CHM data (P<0.05). The width of the 95% limits of agreement of TK (1.49 D) was narrowest, followed by that of RK (1.57 D). Pearson analysis showed that each parameter had a good correlation with CHM data. The differences between the changes in TK, TCRP and RK caused by surgery and ΔSEco were (0.03±0.39) D, (0.17±0.43) D, and (-0.19±0.46) D, respectively. The width of the 95% limits of agreement of ΔTK (1.54 D) was narrowest, and the correlation coefficient of ΔTK (0.951) was highest. Conclusion: The parameter TK of the IOLMaster 700 can provide accurate and objective corneal power evaluation after SMILE.

Stratification of keratoconus progression using unsupervised machine learning analysis of tomographical parameters

PurposeThis study aimed to stratify eyes with keratoconus (KC) based on longitudinal changes in all Pentacam parameters into clusters using unsupervised machine learning, with the broader objective of more clearly defining the characteristics of KC progression. MethodsA data-driven cluster analysis (hierarchical clustering) was undertaken on a retrospective cohort of 1017 kC eyes and 128 control eyes. Clusters were derived using 6-month tomographical change in individual eyes from analysis of the reduced dimensionality parameter space using all available Pentacam parameters (406 principal components). The optimal number of clusters was determined by the clustering's capacity to discriminate progression between KC and control eyes based on change across parameters. One-way ANOVA was used to compare parameters between inferred clusters. Complete Pentacam data changes at 6, 12 and 18-month time points provided validation datasets to determine the generalizability of the clustering model. ResultsWe identified three clusters in KC progression patterns. Eyes designated within cluster 3 had the most rapidly changing tomographical parameters compared to eyes in either cluster 1 or 2. Eyes designated within cluster 1 reflected minimal changes in tomographical parameters, closest to the tomographical changes of control (non-KC) eyes. Thirty-nine corneal curvature parameters were identified and associated with these stratified clusters, with each of these parameters changing significantly different between three clusters. Similar clusters were identified at the 6, 12 and 18-month follow-up. ConclusionsThe clustering model developed was able to automatically detect and categorize KC tomographical features into fast, slow, or limited change at different time points. This new KC stratification tool may provide an opportunity to provide a precision medicine approach to KC.

Repeatability and reliability of measurements obtained by the combined Scheimpflug and Placido-disk tomography in different stages of keratoconus.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of corneal parameters in different stages of keratoconus patients using a combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc analysis system. In this prospective study, three consecutive measurements were performed by the same observer using Scheimpflug-Placido disc anterior segment analysis device in keratoconus patients. Flattest and steepest simulated keratometry and corneal volume, corneal aberrations, thinnest corneal thickness, symmetry index, keratoconus vertex and Baiocchi-Calossi-Versaci index were recorded. Keratoconic eyes were divided into four stages using the Amsler-Krumeich classification. Repeatability was evaluated using within the subject standard deviation, repeatability index (Ri) and coefficient of variation; reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between the parameters evaluated. Two hundred sixty-one eyes of 261 keratoconus patients were included in the study. The repeatability for all corneal curvature parameters decreased as the keratoconus severity increased, and there is a positive correlation between keratometry of the apex and corneal curvature parameters (p < 0.05) except mean simulated keratometry. The corneal aberrations were repeatable in all keratoconus subgroups (Ri < 0.34 μm). There are also positive correlations between keratometry of apex and corneal aberrations (p < 0.05) except total high-order root mean square and spherical aberration. The reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.90) for all indices except keratoconus vertex back. The parameters used in the diagnosis and follow-up of keratoconus in the Sirius corneal tomography system may differ more than expected at stages 3 and 4 of the disease. Awareness of this situation may be helpful in planning follow-up and treatment.

Comparison of corneal curvature parameters obtained from two different instruments-Pentacam and VX120.

To explore whether the same corneal curvature parameters and anterior chamber depth measured by Pentacam and VX120 have a good consistency and can replace each other. This study enrolled 140 eyes of 70 patients ranging in age from 19 to 53y. All eyes underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including an anterior segment analysis with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies, Chartres, France) and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH) respectively. The comparison on corneal curvature parameters was done between Pentacam and VX120 using clustered signed rank test; the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated for each parameter between Pentacam and VX120; the Bland-Altman plot of each parameter was supplemented. The anterior corneal curvature measured by VX120 was Ks: 44.00±1.78 D, KsAt: 89.45±22.18, Kf: 42.84±1.58 D, KfAt: 93.91±79.34; which measured by Pentacam was Ks: 43.80±1.82 D, KsAt: 91.17±21.40, Kf: 42.61±1.64 D, KfAt: 91.16±78.69. There was statistical difference between Pentacam and VX120 for anterior corneal curvature parameter (P<0.001). The posterior corneal curvature measured by VX120 was Ks: -6.42±1.23 D, KsAt: 91.00±23.45, Kf: -5.85±1.24 D, KfAt: 95.93±79.11; which measured by Pentacam was Ks: -6.44±0.32 D, KsAt: 92.24±11.75, Kf: -6.01±1.05 D, KfAt: 74.43±80.64. There was statistical difference between Pentacam and VX120 for posterior corneal curvature parameters (P<0.001). Anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Pentacam and VX120 was statistically different. Pentacam and VX120 achieved high consistency only on corneal anterior surface, including Ks and Kf. The ICCs were 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95, 0.97) and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.94, 0.97) respectively. For other corneal surface curvature parameters, all ICCs of between Pentacam and VX120 were below 0.87. Bland-Altman plots indicated of low consistency of corneal surface curvature parameters measured by Pentacam and VX120. The corneal curvature parameters and anterior chamber depth measured by Pentacam and VX120 were statistically different. Data measured by Pentacam and VX120 is not suggested to replace each other, mixing data measured by Pentacam and VX120 together is not suggested either.

The influence of soft contact lens wear and two weeks cessation of lens wear on corneal curvature

Accurate corneal measurements are crucial in corneal refractive surgery (CRS) to ensure successful outcomes. Soft contact lens (SCL) wear may result in changes to corneal curvature and structure. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pre-operative guidelines recommend that prior to CRS, SCL wearers cease SCL wear for "at least two weeks before examination and treatment" [1]. Corneal curvature changes induced by SCL wear may take longer than two weeks to resolve. To examine the effect of SCL wear on corneal curvature before and following two weeks SCL wear cessation. To explore the possible impact of different SCL materials and years of SCL wear. Retrospective data analysis, between a group of SCL wearers (SCL: n=45); and a non-contact lens control group (NCL: n=45). Corneal curvature parameters were measured using the Pentacam (Oculus, Germany), before and following two weeks cessation of SCL wear. No significant differences in keratometry or Sagittal radius of curvature between SCL and NCL groups prior to or following SCL cessation. Tangential radius of curvature showed significant inferior steepening for the SCL group prior to SCL cessation (SCL vs. NCL; 7.77±0.30mm vs. 7.90±0.30mm; p=0.04). Following two weeks cessation of SCL wear this appeared to have resolved. Two weeks cessation of SCL wear appears sufficient for resolution of corneal curvature changes with modern SCL materials and years of SCL wear. However, further studies with longer lens deprivation periods are required to ensure stability for all SCL wearing patients.

Corneal molding and crosslinking

Abstract Purpose: To develop an experimental setup in human donor eyes to study the feasibility of combining corneal crosslinking (CCL) with molding techniques such as orthokeratology and intracorneal arcuate implants. Methods: 6 pairs of fresh human donor eyes with corneas unsuitable for transplantation but otherwise normal were maintained at constant 20 mm Hg intraocular pressure (IOP). The epithelium was removed and an orthokeratologic PMMA contact lens of 11.8 mm diameter and 10 mm main curvature radius was fixed to one cornea of each pair with 6 sutures of 9‐0 vicyl. A standard CCL protocol (0.1 riboflavin phosphate, 370 nm UVA at 3 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes) was applied simultaneously to both corneas. We measured pre‐ and postoperative IOP, central pachymetry, corneal topography (EyeSys), corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF) (ORA). Results: Average topographic cylinder (SimK) went from 1.66 diopters (D) to 2.01 D and from 1.55 to 1.06 D pre‐ to postoperatively, respectively in the orthoK‐CCL and CCL‐only corneas. Average maximal K value changed from 44.8 to 43.7 D in the orthoK‐CCL and from 43.8 to 43.4 in the CCL‐only group. None of these differences was statistically significant. Average CH went from 11.0 to 13.4 and from 9.0 to 13.7, respectively in the orthoK‐CCL and CCL‐only groups, while CRF went from 11.9 to 14.9 and from 10.7 to 14.6 respectively. Both groups showed a significant increase in pre‐ to postoperative CH and CRF, without significant differences between them. Conclusions: An experimental setup has been devised, able for testing combined CCL and corneal molding techniques in donor human eyes. Corneal molding by a sutured standard orthokeratology contact lens combined with CCL does not appear to induce a permanent change in corneal curvature parameters.