Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Research Articles

Management of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A Delphi consensus survey by Shoulder & Elbow Society, India (SESI)

PurposeThe study aimed to report the results of the Delphi survey conducted by the Shoulder, Elbow Society India (SESI), to achieve consensus on ambiguous topics in managing type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. MethodsThis study was based on responses from the Shoulder Elbow Society India (SESI) panel of peer-selected twenty senior surgeons practicing shoulder orthopedics. They participated in two rounds of the survey to obtain consensus on several topics pertaining to the management of type III ACJ dislocations. Consensus was achieved when at least 70 % of the panel members selected at least a 4-point on a 5-point Likert scale. ResultsOur Delphi survey reached a consensus on seven topics of ambiguity. An anteroposterior and axillary view of the shoulder without any traction or weight in hand is sufficient in the setting of a suspected type III ACJ dislocation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely indicated in type III ACJ dislocation. Either cross-arm adduction X-rays or clinical examination may be used to distinguish between ISAKOS (International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee surgery and Orthopaedics Sports medicine) IIIA and B classification of ACJ to identify stable and unstable injuries. Conservative treatment can be offered to patients who have stable injuries and who are not high-demand individuals in acute type III ACJ dislocations. In conservative management of type III ACJ dislocation, a two-week sling suffices. Jones strapping has no clear advantage over a shoulder sling. Coracoclavicular reconstruction with an autograft is an acceptable way to treat symptomatic, chronic grade III ACJ dislocation. ConclusionThe survey helped achieve consensus on several controversial issues related to type III ACJ dislocations. However, there remains ambiguity on the definition of chronicity of such dislocations, the necessity of bilateral Zanca views, and the duration of conservative trial before switching to a surgical line of management.

Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of the coracoclavicular stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction in comparison to two established techniques for highly unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer type V)

BackgroundTreatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures with bony avulsion of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments often warrants surgical fixation, yet a gold-standard surgical technique is to be defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical fixation strength of a new fixation technique, the CC stand-alone Cow-Hitch suture reconstruction, and to compare this technique with a clavicle hook plate and a lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction. MethodsSimulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures fractures of the clavicle were created in 18 cadaveric shoulders, which were matched by age and gender in 3 groups: (1) clavicle hook plate (Group HP), (2) lateral locking plate fixation with CC suture reconstruction (Group LPCC) and (3) CC stand-alone suture reconstruction using the Cow-Hitch technique (Group CH). After preconditioning with 25 N for 10 cycles the specimens were cycled in the coronal plane for 500 cycles from 10N to 70N. Displacement and ultimate load to failure were documented and analyzed with the data acquisition system. ResultsThere was a significant difference in the fracture displacement during cyclic loading between the LPCC group and the HP group (0.6 vs. 1.7 mm; p=0.02), and between CH and HP groups (0.5 vs. 1.7 mm; p=0.004). Fracture displacement was not different between the LPCC and the CH groups (p=0.544). The CH group and the LPCC group showed a significant higher stiffness compared to the HP group (p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). The CH group showed a significant higher ultimate load to failure compared with the HP group (429 vs. 172 N; p=0.005), and showed a tendency towards higher ultimate load to failure when compared with the LPCC group (429 vs. 258 N; p=0.071). ConclusionThe CC stand-alone Cow-Hitch suture reconstruction and the locking plate with CC reconstruction showed higher fixation strength compared with the hook plate for simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. There was a tendency of higher ultimate load to failure with the Cow-Hitch technique compared with the lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction, and given the potential advantages of less soft tissue stripping, metal-free fixation, low costs, and simple surgical technique, clinical application of the all-suture CC reconstruction using the Cow-Hitch for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures appears warranted.

Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with Modified Weaver–Dunn Operation Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft Comparative Study

Abstract Background: The dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is recognized as one of the most frequently occurring injuries most often after either direct or indirect force is applied to the affected shoulder. The best method of AC reconstruction is still controversial. Modified Weaver–Dunn operation (WD) is one of the popular operations. Recent ACJ reconstruction methods include the usage of the gracilis, semitendinosus auto grafts, synthetic grafts, end buttons, nonabsorbable sutures, suture anchors, and tight-rope system. Aim and Objectives: Clinical and radiological results of hamstring autograft versus modified WD operation for reconsrtuction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments. Patients and Methods: This prospective study was carried out at the orthopedic department of Benha University Hospital carried out on 30 cases with chronic ACJ dislocation. They divided into two groups. The modified WD technique was employed on 15 patients, whereas an autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft was used on the other 15. There was a comparison of radiographs taken before and after surgery. Results: Mean surgical time and coracoclavicular (CC) distance differed statistically between groups. Neither demographic data nor postoperative information (pain, range of motion, and postop) showed a difference of statistical significance between the groups. Constant score and post operative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) and post operative complications show no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Both AC and CC reconstruction by hamstring tendon autograft showed good-to-excellent outcomes with no implant-related complications as some other treatment methods, also more anatomical procedure more than WD operation with better biomechanical vertical and horizontal stability.

PROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES ON A NOVEL TECHNIQUE FOR COMBINED REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT DISLOCATIONS

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations is a common disorder amongst our population for which numerous techniques have been described. It is thought that by using this novel technique combining a CC and AC repair with a reconstruction will result in high maintenance of anatomical reduction and functional results.12 consecutive patients ACJ dislocations were included. An open superior clavicular approach is used. Firstly, the CC ligaments are repaired after which a CC reconstruction is performed using a tendon allograft. Secondly, the AC ligaments are repaired using an internal brace construct combined with a tendon allograft reconstruction (Figure 1).The acute:chronic ratio was 6:6. Only IIIB, IV and V AC-joint dislocations were included. The Constant-Murley Score improved from 27.6 (8.0 – 56.5) up to 61.5 (42.0 – 92.0) at 12 months of follow up. Besides one frozen shoulder from which the patient recovered spontaneously no complications were observed with this technique. The CCD was reduced from 18.7 mm (13.0 – 24.0) to 10.0 mm (6.0 – 16.0) and 10.5 mm (8.0 – 14.0) respectively 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively.There is some evidence, suggesting to address as well as the vertical (coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments) as the horizontal (acromioclavicular (AC) ligaments) direction of instability. This study supports addressing both entities however comparative studies discriminating chronic as acute cases should be conducted to further clarify this ongoing debate on treating ACJ instability.This study describes a novel technique to treat acute and chronic Rockwood stage IIIB – IV ACJ dislocations with promising short-term clinical and radiological results. This suggests that the combined repair and reconstruction of the AC and CC ligaments is a safe procedure with low complication risk in experienced hands. Addressing the vertical as well as horizontal stability in ACJ dislocation is considered key to accomplish optimal long-term results.

Complications following arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular stabilization in patients with unstable lateral clavicle fractures.

Lateral clavicle fractures are unstable and prone to nonunions, which is why they are often treated surgically rather than conservatively. Despite the variety of surgical techniques found in the literature, the best method for treating this rare fracture type has not yet been determined. Our case series aimed to describe a coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction technique and to assess complications and patient outcomes 1year postoperatively. Nineteen patients who underwent surgery for an unstable lateral clavicle fracture (IIB, IIC, IID) with a suture button device (Dog Bone, Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA) were available for clinical and radiological follow-up. The assessments included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) score, the Constant Score (CS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), as well as the ipsilateral and contralateral coracoclavicular distance. The median age was 50years (IQR 28-59), 13 (68.4%) were male and the delay to surgery was 5days (IQR 2-9). The median clinical scores were 100 (ASES), 91 (CS), and 95 (SSV). The CC distance improved postoperatively (p = 0.003). However, nonunion occurred in 3 (15.8%) patients, 5 (26.3%) had other complications, and 5 (26.3%) needed revision surgery (4 plate removals and 1 pseudoarthrosis). The overall complication rate was 36.8%. Restoring the CC ligaments alone could not reliably achieve fracture stability, with more than one-third of cases in this series experiencing major complications. Given the high revision and nonunion rates, we do not recommend this type of surgical technique.

Functional and Radiological Outcome after Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Type III to Type V Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Using Semitendinous Autograft

INTRODUCTION: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation is a commonly encountered shoulder injury. Various surgical methods are available for the treatment of complete ACJ dislocation (type III to VI), however, optimal surgical treatment is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological and functional outcome of anatomic coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) using semitendinosus autograft with suture augmentation for type III to V ACJ dislocation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a single centered, cross sectional, observational study conducted at Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dhulikhel Hospital. Twenty-three consecutive patients who underwent ACCR with semitendinosus autograft from Jan 2017 to Dec 2019 were included in the study. Patients below 18 years of age and patients with previous ipsilateral shoulder injury were excluded. The radiological outcome was assessed using coracoclavicular (CC) distance and functional outcome using DASH score and Constant score. Paired t-test and Pearson correlation were used for inferential analysis. RESULTS: Mean age of the patient was 33.83 ± 7.08 years. Mean duration of follow up was 28.17 ± 6.19 months. Mean CC distance at final follow up was 9.93 ± 1.12 mm. Mean DASH score was 5.60 ± 5.35 and mean Constant score was 88.04 ± 12.13. There were 12 (52.17%) excellent outcomes, 6 (26.08%) good outcomes, 2 (8.69%) fair outcomes and 3 (13.04%) poor outcomes based on Constant scores. CONCLUSIONS: ACCR with suture augmentation is an effective method for management of type III to V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Treatment of Failed Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions: Primary Acromioclavicular Ligament and Capsular Reconstruction and Revision Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are a common injury affecting 2 of every 10,000 people in the general population and comprise 9% to 12% of all injuries to the shoulder. Most injuries occur through contact activity, which drives the acromion inferiorly with the clavicle remaining in its anatomic position, initiating a cascade of injury propagating from the AC ligament followed by failure of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Many techniques have been described for AC joint injuries, without a consensus gold standard. The revision setting offers even less consensus on treatment options and countless difficulties for surgeons. There have been more than 60 described procedures regarding AC and coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions, with significant controversy regarding the optimal intervention for each injury. When these techniques fail, it is important to pinpoint the mechanism of failure to construct a successful plan for revision. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred method of primary AC and revision coracoclavicular reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft semitendinosus as well as TightRope fixation.

Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis.MethodsFifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured.ResultsFifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05).ConclusionHO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes.

Differences between Coracoclavicular, Acromioclavicular, or Combined Reconstruction Techniques on the Kinematics of the Shoulder Girdle

Background: Although the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments are classically reconstructed after acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, biomechanical studies over the past decade have indicated the importance of an additional reconstruction of the AC ligaments. To date, no kinematic study has investigated the kinematic differences between these reconstruction strategies. Purpose: To evaluate the restoration of shoulder motion after an AC injury using a CC ligament, an AC ligament, or a combined reconstruction technique. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: After creating a Rockwood grade V lesion in 14 cadaveric shoulders, the AC joint injury was treated with either a CC ligament reconstruction using a suspension device, an in situ AC ligament reconstruction using 2 coupled soft tissue anchors, or a combination of these 2 techniques. Joint motions were registered during humerothoracic elevation in the coronal plane and protraction in the intact shoulder in a Rockwood V lesion and after the 3 reconstruction strategies. An optical navigation system measured 3-dimensional rotation in the sternoclavicular and scapulothoracic joints, and both rotation and translation were analyzed in the AC joint. Results: In the sternoclavicular joint, the CC and combined reconstruction techniques adequately restored clavicular axial rotation, while the AC reconstruction technique showed a better correction of clavicular elevation. Scapulothoracic joint rotations were best restored by reconstructing the AC ligaments. In the AC joint, the relative tilting position and the lateral rotation of the scapula compared with the clavicle were best restored by the suspension device and combined reconstruction. The AC ligament reconstruction technique demonstrated a better restoration of the relative protracted position and resulted in a better correction of the translation of the scapula relative to the clavicle. Conclusion: This study illustrates that there are kinematic differences between AC, CC, or combined ligament reconstruction strategies. Although each technique was able to restore different elements of the joint kinematics, none of the strategies completely restored the shoulder girdle to its preinjured state. Clinical Relevance: Humerothoracic movements after Rockwood V lesions are best restored using the CC reconstruction technique, and scapulothoracic movements are best restored using the AC ligament reconstruction technique.

Soft tissue reconstruction on the very late presenting neglected acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood type IV. A case report.

Introduction and importanceAcromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation Rockwood type IV is a rare condition characterized by the posterior displacement of the distal clavicle and soft tissue damage. The rate of soft tissue healing markedly decreases as time from injury increases. In this case report, we had a very late presenting neglected AC joint dislocation Rockwood type IV successfully treated by AC and coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction.Case presentationA 24-year-old female presented with pain around her right shoulder since a motorcycle accident four years prior to current presentation. She was diagnosed with a posterior AC joint dislocation and suggested undergoing surgery, but she refused and chose to seek an alternative treatment. The patient felt pain chronically and could not elevate her shoulder, and she decided to come to our hospital. We performed a physical and radiograph examination that showed an AC joint dislocation Rockwood type IV. The management, suggested to the patient, was AC and CC soft tissue reconstruction.Clinical discussionThe advantages of using this procedure were to restore effective anatomy and avoid bone-to-bone contact between the clavicle and acromion. The disadvantages were increased cost and needed to be evaluated for long-term results. We considered the idea of maintaining AC joint reduction by biologic soft tissue healing of the graft and augmentation fixation to replace the CC ligaments. We could not rely on biological soft tissues healing themselves due to the chronicity.ConclusionAC and CC reconstruction can be an option of treatment in neglected AC joint dislocation Rockwood type IV with excellent clinical and radiographic results.

Semitendinosus vs Gracilis Grafts With 1- vs 2-Tunnel Techniques for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

Background: Despite the evolution of acromioclavicular joint surgery to a more anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction, no definitive guidance regarding the number and position of bone tunnels in the clavicle, as well as the ideal graft choice, is established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the reconstruction of the CC ligament complex between gracilis- and semitendinosus-tendon grafts in 1- and 2-tunnel techniques. It was hypothesized that the gracilis tendon graft will provide comparable primary stability in both tunnel techniques while utilizing a smaller tunnel diameter. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 24 cadaveric shoulders (13 men, 11 women; 66 ± 7.5 years) were randomly allocated to 4 repair groups: gracilis with 1 tunnel (GT-1), gracilis with 2 tunnels (GT-2), semitendinosus with 1 tunnel (ST-1), and semitendinosus with 2 tunnels (ST-2). First, specimens were tested for native anterior, posterior, and superior translations. Then, specimens were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 CC reconstruction groups before undergoing the same testing, followed by cyclic loading and load to failure (LTF). Results: The GT-2 reconstruction demonstrated significantly less translation when compared with ST-2 in anterior (P = .024) and posterior (P = .048) directions. GT-1 and ST-2 both showed significantly less translation than ST-1 in anterior and superior directions (P < .001). All reconstructions demonstrated less superior translation compared with native testing, with GT-1 and ST-2 significantly less than ST-1 (P < .001). There were no significant differences for peak displacement and LTF between groups. Conclusion: Gracilis tendon grafts using a 1- or 2-tunnel technique for CC ligament reconstruction provided comparable translation, displacement, and LTF as corresponding semitendinosus grafts. Therefore, the gracilis tendon should be considered as a biomechanical equivalent graft choice for the reconstruction of the CC ligament complex. Clinical Relevance: In a cadaveric model, the gracilis tendon demonstrated adequate fixation with minimal translation in CC ligament reconstruction while utilizing smaller diameter bone tunnels, which may help minimize the risk of complications such as loss of reduction and fracture.

Arthroscopically Assisted Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Reconstruction with a Looped Braided Polyester Suture Band and Buckle Device

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries occur with a traumatic load to the lateral aspect of the shoulder and account for 9% of all shoulder girdle injuries. Rockwood classified AC joint injuries as type I though type VI, based on severity of injury, radiographic findings, and reducibility of the AC joint. Type I and II injuries are typically managed nonoperatively, whereas type IV, V, and VI are managed operatively to address the significant soft tissue disruption, persistent AC joint instability, and apical shoulder deformation. Treatment of type III injuries remain controversial. Several techniques have been described to treat AC joint injuries with no consensus for optimal treatment. “Anatomic” double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction is one currently popular technique to address AC joint injuries; however, clavicle and coracoid fractures are well-described complications of this technique. The objective of this technical report is to describe our preferred technique to address AC joint injuries. This technique involves using a looped braided polyester prosthetic band and low-profile buckle with allograft augmentation using a device to pass materials around the coracoid process.

Occult clavicle osteomyelitis caused by Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A case report and review of the literature.

IntroductionClavicle osteomyelitis is a rare, but serious complication following operative repair of acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations. Cutibacterium Acnes (C. acnes) is rarely a causative pathogen in clavicle osteomyelitis and diagnosis can be challenging due to the indolent nature of this organism.Case presentationA 45–50 year old female with a chronic AC joint separation underwent an open coracoclavicular reconstruction using semitendinosus allograft and FiberTape (Arthrex, Naples, FL). At the six month follow up, the patient complained of mild persistent pain. Imaging demonstrated widening of the medial suture tunnel with distal clavicle osteolysis, which was concerning for osteomyelitis. This was successfully treated with implant removal revision surgery and additional intravenous antibiotics. Cultures of the graft material were positive for C. acnes. The patient continued to have osteolysis of the distal left clavicle for a period of time despite resolution of osteomyelitis.DiscussionC. acnes osteomyelitis of the clavicle is difficult to diagnose because of its vague associated symptoms when implicated in infections. There are no known obvious predisposing factors for C. acnes clavicle osteomyelitis. Literature suggests management should include aggressive irrigation and debridement, removal of any hardware, and extended intravenous antibiotic administration.ConclusionC. acnes clavicular osteomyelitis is uncommon, thus established treatment guidelines have not yet been formed. Revision surgery to remove graft material, irrigate, and debride in addition to antibiotic treatment was successful for our patient. Additional pathologic manifestations of C. acnes infections could include continued clavicular erosion post-clearance of infection, although further investigation is necessary.

Anteroinferior bundle of the acromioclavicular ligament plays a substantial role in the joint function during shoulder elevation and horizontal adduction: a finite element model

BackgroundPostoperative acromioclavicular (AC) ligament deficiency has been identified as a common cause of failure after isolated coracoclavicular reconstruction. The two-bundle arrangement of the acromioclavicular ligament has recently been reported in histological and anatomical research. In addition, a clear structural advantage of the superoposterior bundle (SPB) over the less consistent anteroinferior bundle (AIB) was also found. However, the current understanding of the function of the acromioclavicular ligament in joint stability is based on uniaxial bone loading experiments and sequential ligament sectioning. Consequently, these rigid biomechanics models do not reproduce the coupled physiological kinematics, neither in the normal joint nor in the postoperative condition. Therefore, our goal was to build a quasi-static finite element model to study the function of the acromioclavicular ligament based on its biomechanical performance patterns using the benefits of computational models.MethodsA three-dimensional bone model is reconstructed using images from a healthy shoulder. The ligament structures were modeled according to the architecture and dimensions of the bone. The kinematics conditions for the shoulder girdle were determined after the osseous axes aligned to simulate the shoulder elevation in the coronal plane and horizontal adduction. Three patterns evaluated ligament function. The peak von Mises stress values were recorded using a clock model that identified the stress distribution. In addition, the variation in length and displacement of the ligament during shoulder motion were compared using a two-tailed hypotheses test. P values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.ResultsThe peak von Mises stress was consistently observed in the AIB at 2:30 in coronal elevation (4.06 MPa) and horizontal adduction (2.32 MPa). Except in the position 2:00, statistically significant higher deformations were identified in the two bundles during shoulder elevation. The highest ligament displacement was observed on the Y- and Z-axes.ConclusionsThe AIB has the primary role in restricting the acromioclavicular joint during shoulder motion, even though the two bundles of the AC ligament have a complementary mode of action. During horizontal adduction, the SPB appears to prevent anterior and superior translation.

Outcomes Following Different Fixation Strategies of Neer Type IIB Distal Clavicle Fractures.

Multiple surgical techniques for fixation of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures have been described without consensus on optimal treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare functional and radiographic results with surgical management of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures at a single institution. Sixty-three patients with acute Neer type IIB fractures treated operatively were evaluated. Patients with a minimum of two year follow up were included. Functional scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Likert patient satisfaction (1 to 5). Radiographs were assessed for osseous union and coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Thirty-eight patients met inclusion with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years. Patients were divided into five groups based on fixation technique: suture-only CC fixation (n=6), CC screw fixation only (n=3), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) without CC fixation (n=8), hook plate fixation (n=4), and ORIF with suture CC reconstruction (n=17). Outcome scores for the entire cohort were 91.8 for ASES, 90.2 for SANE, and 10.8 for STT. Patients with hook plates had significantly lower SANE score (p=0.016), but no other significant differences in functional, satisfaction, or radiographic outcomes were found between groups. Sixteen patients (42.1%) required reoperation. Treatment of Neer type IIB fractures via suture- only fixation, plate-only fixation, or a combination of both demonstrated satisfactory mid to long term outcomes. While implant removal was more common in the CC screw and ORIF groups, no fixation technique proved functionally superior.

Anatomic Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with and without Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study.

The purpose of this study was to determine if adding a reconstructed superior acromioclavicular (AC) joint ligament adds significant biomechanical stability to the AC joint over anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction alone. Fourteen cadaver shoulders were used for the comparison of biomechanical stability among the anatomic CC ligament reconstruction alone, CC and AC ligament reconstruction, and the intact groups by measuring the displacement under cyclic loads. A load to failure test was then performed in the vertical direction at a loading rate of 2 mm /sec to determine surgical-repair joints' tolerance to the maximum failure load. The average peak-to-peak displacement induced by cyclic load in the sagittal axis and vertical axis direction was not significantly different between CC ligament reconstruction, CC and AC ligament reconstruction, and intact groups. The maximum failure load for the CC reconstruction (224.9 ± 91.8 N (Mean ± SEM)) was lower than CC/AC reconstruction groups (326.2 ± 123.3 N). The CC/AC reconstruction group failed at a significantly higher load (t test, p = 0.016) than the CC reconstruction group. CC/AC reconstruction surgical technique yielded a better shoulder stability than CC ligament alone reconstruction that may better maintain reduction of the AC joint.Level of Evidence: Level II.

Hook plate fixation with versus without coracoclavicular reconstruction for distal clavicular fractures.

Hook plate fixation is one of the most frequently used methods for unstable distal clavicular fractures, but it is still unknown if there is a need for coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hook plate fixation with versus without CC reconstruction for distal clavicular fractures. Eighty-one patients who underwent hook plate fixation (HP group, n = 45) or hook plate fixation plus suture anchor reconstruction (HPA group, n = 36) for Neer type II or V clavicular fractures were enrolled. Demographics, fracture characteristics, and surgical data were recorded. Union time, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), post-operative complications, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were compared between HPA and HP groups. Constant score in the HPA group was higher than that in the HP group (91.8 ± 3.6 vs 88.8 ± 6.0, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences in union time, DASH score, CCD, and post-operative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Hook plate fixation combined with CC reconstruction costed more (3023.7 ± 202.6 vs 2416.2 ± 167.6 EUR, P < 0.001) and prolonged operative duration (78.2 ± 9.2 vs 73.7 ± 8.3 min, P = 0.023) compared with hook plate fixation alone. Hook plate fixation with or without suture anchor reconstruction achieved satisfactory outcomes for Neer type II or V clavicular fractures. However, hook plate fixation plus CC reconstruction showed better functional outcomes compared with hook plate fixation alone.

Clavicular Tunnel Complications after Coracoclavicular Reconstruction in Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Coracoid Loop versus Coracoid Tunnel Fixation.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare clavicular tunnel complications after coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction between a coracoid loop fixation group and a coracoid tunnel fixation group. We hypothesized that clavicular tunnel complications would be more common in the coracoid loop group.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated 24 patients who underwent CC reconstruction using coracoid tunnel fixation (n = 14) and coracoid loop fixation (n = 10). Radiographic measurements included the CC distance and clavicular tunnel diameter. Clavicular tunnel complications such as tunnel widening and clavicular tunnel fractures were investigated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score and the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder score.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 17.5 months (range, 11–38 months). The final clavicular tunnel diameter and the increase in the clavicular tunnel diameter in millimeter and percentage were significantly greater in the coracoid loop group than in the coracoid tunnel group (all p < 0.05). Clavicular tunnel widening more than 100% was found in 5 patients, all belonging to the coracoid loop group. Clavicular tunnel fractures occurred in 3 patients (all in the coracoid loop group). Fracture was associated with severe tunnel widening (more than 100% increase). The mean value of the final clavicular tunnel diameter in patients with fractures was significantly larger than that in patients without (12.7 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.4 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.016).ConclusionsClavicular tunnel complications such as significant tunnel widening and fractures after CC reconstructions in acromioclavicular dislocations were common with the coracoid loop fixation technique. A greater clavicular tunnel widening and resultantly enlarged tunnel diameter might increase the risk of fracture through the clavicular tunnel.

Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.

Optimal treatment of chronic unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations (stage 3-5 according the Rockwood classification) is still debated. Anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction is a reliable option in terms of two-dimensional radiographic reduction, clinical outcomes, and return to sports, but there remain concerns regarding anterior-posterior stability of the AC joint with CC ligament reconstruction alone. The aim of the present study was to describe the mid-term results of a new hybrid technique with CC and AC ligament reconstruction for chronic AC joint dislocations. Twenty-two patients surgically treated for chronic AC joint dislocations (grade 3 to 5) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were assessed before surgery and at final follow-up with the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The CC vertical distance (CCD) and the CCD ratio (affected side compared to unaffected side) were measured on Zanca radiographs preoperatively, at 6months postop and at final follow-up. The same surgical technique consisting in a primary fixation with a suspensory system, coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction with a double loop of autologous gracilis and acromioclavicular ligaments reconstruction with autologous coracoacromial ligament was performed in all cases. Twenty-two shoulders in 22 patients (19 males and 3 females) were evaluated with a mean age of 34.4 ± 9years at the time of surgery. The mean interval between the injury and surgery was 53.4 ± 36.7days. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 49.9 ± 11.8months. According to the Rockwood classification, there were 5 (22.6%) type-III and 17 (77.2%) type-V dislocations. Mean preoperative ASES and CMS were 54.4 ± 7.6 and 64.6 ± 7.2, respectively. They improved to 91.8 ± 2.3 (p = 0.0001) and 95.2 ± 3.1 (p = 0.0001), respectively at final FU. The mean preoperative CCD was 22.4 ± 3.2mm while the mean CCD ratio was 2.1 ± 0.1. At final FU, the mean CCD was 11.9 ± 1.4mm (p = 0.002) and the mean CCD ratio was 1.1 ± 0.1 (p = 0.009). No recurrence of instability was observed. One patient developed a local infection and four patients referred some shoulder discomfort. Heterotopic ossifications were observed in three patients. The optimal treatment of chronic high-grade AC joint dislocations requires superior-inferior and anterior-posterior stability to ensure good clinical outcomes and return to overhead activities or sports. The present hybrid technique of AC and CC ligaments reconstruction showed good clinical and radiographic results and is a reliable an alternative to other reported techniques. Level IV.

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Combined with Open Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using Knot Hiding Clavicular Implants Is a Stable Solution

PurposeThe purpose of this noninterventional, register-based study was to report the outcomes and wound healing of surgically treated chronic acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations using a tendon graft and knot-hiding titanium implants.MethodsThirty-two cases with chronic AC separation underwent an arthroscopic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction and an open AC ligament reconstruction using knot-hiding titanium implants. The wound healing was assessed 2 months after the operation. The Nottingham Clavicle score, Constant score, and Simple Shoulder Test were obtained postoperatively and at a minimum of one-year postsurgery. The radiographic change in distance between the clavicular and coracoid cortices and clavicular tunnel diameter was measured. General patient satisfaction with the outcome (poor, fair, good, or excellent) was also assessed 1 year postoperatively.ResultsThe mean Nottingham Clavicle score increased from a preoperative mean of 41.66 ± 9.86 to 96.831 ± 5.86 (P ≤ .05). The Constant score increased from a preoperative mean of 44.66 ± 12.54 to 93.59 ± 7.01 (P ≤ .05). The Simple Shoulder Test score increased from a preoperative mean of 7.00 ± 2.14 to 11.84 ± .63 (P ≤ .05). The coracoclavicular distance increased from 11.32 ± 3.71 to 13.48 ± 3.79 mm (P ≤ .05). The clavicular drill hole diameter increased from 6 mm to a mean of 6 to a mean of 8.13 ± 1.12 mm. Twenty-three (71.9%) patients reported an excellent outcome, and nine (28.1%) reported a good outcome. One clavicular fracture occurred but no coracoid fractures. There was one reconstruction failure leading to a reoperation.ConclusionsIn this series, combining the arthroscopic CC ligament reconstruction to an open reconstruction of the AC joint with a tendon graft proved to be a stable solution. The knot-hiding titanium implant effectively eliminated the problems related to the clavicular wound healing.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.