Medical EducationVolume 39, Issue 7 p. 753-753 Free Access erratum First published: 16 June 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02241.xCitations: 1AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat The copyright line of two articles published in the January 2005 issue may have caused confusion.1,2 The two articles were published online in 2004 but published in print in the January 2005 issue. The copyright lines read: © Blackwell Publishing Ltd MEDICAL EDUCATION 2004; 39: 83–89, and © Blackwell Publishing Ltd MEDICAL EDUCATION 2004; 39: 98–106, respectively. To rectify this problem the copyright lines should read: © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2005; 39: 83–89, and © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2005; 39: 98–106, respectively. References 1 Brice J, Bligh J. Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility. Med Educ 2005; 39: 83– 9. 2 Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2005; 39: 98– 106. Citing Literature Volume39, Issue7July 2005Pages 753-753 ReferencesRelatedInformation