Cooperative Clinical Trials Research Articles

Application of CT-based foundational AI and radiomics models for prediction of outcome for non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated on the NRG/RTOG 0617 clinical trial

Abstract Objectives To apply CT-based foundational artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics models for predicting overall survival (OS) for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Data for 449 patients retrospectively treated on the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617 clinical trial were analyzed. Foundational AI, radiomics and clinical features were evaluated using univariate cox regression and correlational analyses to determine independent predictors of survival. Several models were fit using these predictors and model performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation and unseen independent test datasets via area under receiver-operator-characteristic curves, AUC’s. Results For all patients, the combined foundational AI and clinical models achieved AUCs of 0.67 for the Random Forest (RF) model. The combined radiomics and clinical models achieved RF AUCs of 0.66. In the low-dose arm, foundational AI alone achieved AUC of 0.67, while AUC for the ensemble radiomics and clinical models was 0.65 for the support vector machine (SVM). In the high-dose arm, AUC values were 0.67 for combined radiomics and clinical models and 0.66 for the foundational AI model. Conclusions This study demonstrated encouraging results for application of foundational AI and radiomics models for prediction of outcomes. More research is warranted to understand the value of ensemble models toward improving performance via complementary information. Advances in knowledge Using foundational AI and radiomics-based models we were able to identify significant signatures of outcomes for NSCLC patients retrospectively treated on a national cooperative group clinical trial. Associated models will be important for application toward prospective patients.

Outcomes of relapsed favorable-histology Wilms tumor in non-clinical trial setting.

The last major North American cooperative group clinical trial for relapsed favorable-histology Wilms tumor (FHWT) was completed in 2002. The outcomes of patients with relapsed Wilms tumor subsequently treated outside of clinical trials are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of salvage therapies used for patients with FHWT suffering first relapse. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated for first relapse of FHWT at six large North American institutions from January 2002 through August 2018. Ninety-four patients were identified. Thirty-six patients were classified as standard-risk relapse (SRR), 49 patients as high-risk relapse (HRR), and seven patients as very high-risk relapse (VHRR). Two patients were unable to be classified. Twenty-one patients with SRR were treated with Regimen I. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for SRR were 82.4% and 93.3%, respectively, with median follow-up of 72months. Twenty-eight HRR/VHRR patients were treated with ICE therapy, while 13 received National Wilms Tumor Study (5th) (NWTS-5) Stratum C. No patient completed protocol therapy per Stratum C; median maintenance cycles administered were two cycles. The 4-year EFS and OS for HRR/VHRR were 32.6% and 58.3%, respectively, with median follow-up of 33months. Outcomes for all strata of relapsed WT patients treated in a non-clinical setting appear to have similar outcomes to historical cohorts treated on NWTS-5. Improved strategies are urgently needed for HRR and VHRR relapses.

TEAM participation in the irradiation of IROC phantoms for cooperative group clinical trials

The participation of radiation oncology team members in the irradiation of Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) phantom for cooperative group clinical trials is essential to comply with the latest quality management philosophy. Medical dosimetrists are expected to develop treatment plans for the irradiation of IROC phantoms. For advanced treatment techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the irradiation of the IROC phantoms serves as quality audit. If successful, the irradiation processes demonstrate that the institution has the knowledge of the protocol, and has the appropriate equipment to comply with the protocol requirements. This article describes three IROC phantoms used for credentialing external beam photon beam therapy, delivered using conventional medical linear accelerators, to the medical dosimetry community. Guidance and strategies for the development of treatment plans are discussed. Our institutional irradiation of the three IROC phantoms, delivered using the Truebeam medical linear accelerator, resulted in consistent dose accuracy to within ±1%. The participation of the team members may reduce the overall published failing rate stated to be about one-third of all participating institutions.

Moving from conventional to adaptive risk stratification for oropharyngeal cancer.

Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) poses a complex therapeutic dilemma for patients and oncologists alike, made worse by the epidemic increase in new cases associated with the oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). In a counterintuitive manner, the very thing which gives patients hope, the high response rate of HPV-associated OPC to conventional chemo-radiation strategies, has become one of the biggest challenges for the field as a whole. It has now become clear that for ~30-40% of patients, treatment intensity could be reduced without losing therapeutic efficacy, yet substantially diminishing the acute and lifelong morbidity resulting from conventional chemotherapy and radiation. At the same time, conventional approaches to de-escalation at a population (selected or unselected) level are hampered by a simple fact: we lack patient-specific information from individual tumors that can predict responsiveness. This results in a problematic tradeoff between the deleterious impact of de-escalation on patients with aggressive, treatment-refractory disease and the beneficial reduction in treatment-related morbidity for patients with treatment-responsive disease. True precision oncology approaches require a constant, iterative interrogation of solid tumors prior to and especially during cancer treatment in order to tailor treatment intensity to tumor biology. Whereas this approach can be deployed in hematologic diseases with some success, our ability to extend it to solid cancers with regional metastasis has been extremely limited in the curative intent setting. New developments in metabolic imaging and quantitative interrogation of circulating DNA, tumor exosomes and whole circulating tumor cells, however, provide renewed opportunities to adapt and individualize even conventional chemo-radiation strategies to diseases with highly variable biology such as OPC. In this review, we discuss opportunities to deploy developing technologies in the context of institutional and cooperative group clinical trials over the coming decade.

Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas enrolled in phase 2 cooperative group clinical trials: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

The aim of this study was to estimate the event-free survival (EFS) of children and young adults with relapsed or refractory nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) treated in nonrandomized phase 2 studies conducted by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) and predecessor groups to establish a benchmark EFS for future phase 2 NRSTS trials evaluating the activity of novel agents. A retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent or refractory NRSTS prospectively enrolled in nonrandomized phase 2 COG and predecessor group trials between 1994 and 2015 was conducted. EFS was defined as disease progression/relapse or death and calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test and relative risk regression were used to compare EFS distribution by age at enrollment, sex, race, NRSTS histology, prior lines of therapy, calendar year of trial, and type of radiographic response. In total, 137 patients were enrolled in 13 phase 2 trials. All trials used radiographic response rate as a primary outcome, and none of the agents used were considered active on the basis of trial-specified thresholds. The estimated median EFS and 6-month EFS of the entire study cohort was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.8 months) and 19.4% (95% CI, 12.7%-26%), respectively. No difference in EFS was observed by age at enrollment, sex, race, NRSTS histology subtype, prior lines of therapies, and trial initiation year. EFS significantly differed by radiographic response. The EFS for children and young adults with relapsed or refractory NRSTS remains suboptimal. Established EFS can be referenced as a benchmark for future single-agent phase 2 trials incorporating potentially active novel agents in this population.

Durable immunity to EBV after rituximab and third-party LMP-specific T cells: a Children’s Oncology Group study

AbstractPosttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus–infected (EBV+) B cells due to decreased immune function. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, clinical and immunobiological outcomes in pediatric SOT recipients with PTLD treated with rituximab and third-party latent membrane protein–specific T cells (LMP-TCs). Newly diagnosed (ND) patients without complete response to rituximab and all patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease received LMP-TCs. Suitable LMP-TC products were available for all eligible subjects. Thirteen of 15 patients who received LMP-TCs were treated within the prescribed 14-day time frame. LMP-TC therapy was generally well tolerated. Notable adverse events included 3 episodes of rejection in cardiac transplant recipients during LMP-TC therapy attributed to subtherapeutic immunosuppression and 1 episode of grade 3 cytokine release syndrome. Clinical outcomes were associated with disease severity. Overall response rate (ORR) after LMP-TC cycle 1 was 70% (7/10) for the ND cohort and 20% (1/5) for the R/R cohort. For all cohorts combined, the best ORR for LMP-TC cycles 1 and 2 was 53% and the 2-year overall survival was 70.7%. vβT-cell receptor sequencing showed persistence of adoptively transferred third-party LMP-TCs for up to 8 months in the ND cohort. This study establishes the feasibility of administering novel T-cell therapies in a cooperative group clinical trial and demonstrates the potential for positive outcomes without chemotherapy for ND patients with PTLD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02900976 and at the Children's Oncology Group as ANHL1522.

Toward Systematic Assessment and Improvement of Radiation Therapy Plan Quality of Cooperative Group Trial Submissions: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

This study evaluates the quality of plans used for the treatment of patients in the Children's Oncology Group study ACNS1123. Plan quality is quantified based on a scoring system specific to the protocol. In this way, the distribution of plan quality scores is determined that can be used to identify plan quality issues for this study and for future plan quality improvement. ACNS1123 stratum 1 patients (70) were evaluated. This included 50 photon and 20 proton plans. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) structure and dose data were obtained from the Children's Oncology Group. A commercially available plan quality scoring algorithm was used to create a scoring system we designed using the protocol dosimetric requirements. The whole ventricle and boost planning target volumes (PTVs) could earn a maximum of 70 points, whereas the organs at risk could earn 30 points (total maximum score of 100 points). The scoring algorithm adjusted scores based on the difficulty in achieving the structure dose requirements, which depended on the proximity of the PTVs and the dose gradients achieved relative to the organs at risk. The distribution of plan scores was used to determine the mean, median, and range of scores. The median adjusted plan quality scores for the 20 proton and 50 photon plans were 83.3 and 86.9, respectively. The range of adjusted scores (maximum to minimum) was 50 points. The average score adjustment was 7.4 points. Photon and proton plans performed almost equally. Average plan quality by individual structure revealed that the brain stem, PTV boost, and cochlea lost the most points. This report is the first to systematically analyze overall radiation therapy plan quality scores for an entire cohort of patients treated in a cooperative group clinical trial. The methodology demonstrated a large variation in plan quality in this trial. Future clinical trials could potentially use this method to reduce plan quality variability, which may improve outcomes.

The significance of margins in pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: Consensus on surgical margin definition harmonization from the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT).

Margin status following surgery in children, adolescents, and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas is controversial and has been defined differently by various specialties, with definitions changing over time and by cooperative group. The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT) is a collaboration of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, European pediatric Soft Tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the European Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) devoted to improving patient outcomes by pooling and mining cooperative group clinical trial data. The INSTRuCT non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) working group aimed to develop international harmonized recommendations regarding surgical margin assessment and definitions in children and adolescents with soft tissue tumors. This review addresses accepted principles and areas of controversy, including the perspectives of surgeons, pathologists, radiation oncologists, and pediatric oncologists, to develop a framework for building common guidelines for future research.

Consolidation Therapy with Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Measurable Residual Disease Negative Remission: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 Randomized Phase III National Cooperative Clinical Trials Network Trial

Consolidation Therapy with Blinatumomab Improves Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Measurable Residual Disease Negative Remission: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E1910 Randomized Phase III National Cooperative Clinical Trials Network Trial

Determining demographic barriers for cervical and endometrial cancer trial inclusion among women in the Louisiana tumor registry over one year (284)

<b>Objectives:</b> To determine cohorts of women diagnosed with cervical and endometrial cancers in Louisiana, meeting national NCORP clinical trial eligibility criteria based on cancer histology and stage. Then, to determine if there is a disparate rate of disqualification among these cohorts for potential trial participation based on comorbid conditions according to age, race, and socioeconomic markers. <b>Methods:</b> The baseline population for this study was all women with either endometrial or cervical malignancies from the Louisiana Tumor Registry (LTR) between January-December 2019. Based on the eligibility criteria of cooperative group clinical trials open at NCORP sites in Louisiana, a cohort of ‘potentially eligible' trial patients was defined based on cancer stage and histology. This cohort was then further filtered according to registry reported, potentially excluding comorbid conditions (renal and/or hepatic disease, Charlson comorbidity index >6, HIV/AIDs and secondary malignancy) to define those who were ‘eligible and included' versus those who were ‘eligible but excluded.' Summary and comparative statistical analyses were used to determine differences between these groups based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. <b>Results:</b> From the baseline population, 152 (68%) patients were defined as potentially eligible for cervix clinical trials. Comparing women who did and did not meet inclusion criteria, women who were excluded were older (p=0.008) and of lower socioeconomic status (<i>n</i>=8, 38%) (p=0.038). Among those with endometrial cancer, 326 (55%) patients were potentially eligible for endometrial cancer trials. Patients eligible and included were more likely to be younger (p=0.028), of the White race (86%) than Black race (55%) (p=0.002) and privately insured (43%) than publicly insured (54%) (p=0.001). Those eligible and included were more likely to be alive at the time of reporting than those eligible but excluded. <b>Conclusions:</b> Age, race, underinsurance, and lower SES are associated with the exclusion of eligible patients from endometrial and cervical cancer trial enrollment. Critical efforts to address barriers to enrollment into clinical cancer trials, especially for underrepre-sented groups, are required in order to reconsider and tailor eligibility criteria to be more equitable and inclusive.

Inequities in Alliance Acute Leukemia Clinical Trial and Biobank Participation: Defining Targets for Intervention.

Representativeness in acute leukemia clinical research is essential for achieving health equity. The National Cancer Institute's mandate for Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) to define and assume responsibility for cancer control and treatment across a geographic catchment area provides an enforceable mechanism to target and potentially remediate participatory inequities. We examined enrollee characteristics across 15 Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance cooperative group adult acute leukemia clinical trials (N = 3,734) from 1998 to 2013, including participation in optional companion biobanks. We determined enrollment odds by race-ethnicity for all participants adjusted for national incidence, and for those enrolled at CCCs adjusted for catchment area incidence. We modeled biobank participation by sociodemographics using logistic regression. Non-Hispanic (NH)-White patients were more likely to be enrolled than NH-Black, NH-Asian, or Hispanic patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.75, 0.48, and 0.44, respectively; all P < .001), but less likely than NH-Native American patients (OR, 1.91; P < .001), adjusted for national incidence. Enrollment odds were lower for NH-Black, NH-Asian, and Hispanic patients at CCCs adjusted for catchment area incidence (OR, 0.57, 0.26, and 0.32, respectively; P < .001); differences were driven by overenrollment of NH-White patients from outside self-defined catchment areas (18.1% v 12.3%; χ2 P = .01) and by CCCs with less absolute enrollee diversity (rank sum P = .03). Among all enrollees, NH-White race-ethnicity and lower neighborhood deprivation correlated with biobank participation (OR, 1.81 and 1.45, respectively; P = .01 and .03). For CCC enrollees, the correlation of race-ethnicity with biobank participation was attenuated by a measure accounting for their site's degree of enrollment disparity but not neighborhood deprivation. Acute leukemia clinical research disparities are substantial and driven by structural trial enrollment barriers at CCCs. Real-time CCC access and enrollment monitoring is needed to better align research participation with local populations.

Plexin-B2 and Semaphorins Do Not Drive Rhabdomyosarcoma Proliferation or Migration.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma for which subsets of patients have longstanding unmet clinical needs. For example, children with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma and metastases at diagnosis will experience only 8% disease-free 5-year survival for nonlocalized unresectable recurrent disease. Hence, development of novel therapeutic strategies is urgently needed to improve outcomes. The Plexin-Semaphorin pathway is largely unexplored for sarcoma research. However, emerging interest in the Plexin-Semaphorin signaling axis in pediatric sarcomas has led to phase I cooperative group dose-finding clinical trials, now completed (NCT03320330). In this study, we specifically investigated the protein expression of transmembrane receptor Plexin-B2 and its cognate SEMA4C ligands in clinical RMS tumors and cell models. By RNA interferences, we assessed the role of Plexin-B2 in cell growth and cell migration ability in selected alveolar and embryonal RMS cell model systems. Our results affirmed expression of Plexin-B2 across human samples, while also dissecting expression of the different protein subunits of Plexin-B2 along with the assessment of preferred Semaphorin ligands of Plexin-B2. Plexin-B2 knockdown had positive or negative effects on cell growth, which varied by cell model system. Migration assayed after Plexin-B2 knockdown revealed selective cell line specific migration inhibition, which was independent of Plexin-B2 expression level. Overall, these findings are suggestive of context-specific and possibly patient-specific (stochastic) role of Plexin-B2 and SEMA4 ligands in RMS.

Local control of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: An expert consensus guideline from the International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT).

The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium (INSTRuCT) consists of a collaboration between the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS). As part of the larger initiative of INSTRuCT to provide consensus expert opinions for clinical treatment of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, we sought to provide updated, evidenced-based consensus guidelines for local treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma using both existing literature as well as recommendations from the relevant cooperative group clinical trials. Overall, parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma represents a distinctly challenging disease to treat, given its location near many critical structures in the head and neck, frequently advanced local presentation, and predilection for local failure. Definitive chemoradiation remains the standard treatment approach for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma, with surgery often limited to biopsy or salvage therapy for recurrent disease. In this consensus paper, we specifically discuss consensus guidelines and evidence for definitive local management with radiotherapy, with a focus on imaging for radiotherapy planning, dose and timing of radiation, approach for nodal irradiation, various radiation techniques, including proton therapy, and the limited role of surgical resection.

Options of precision medicine in pediatric oncology: literature review

In the last 50 years there has been significant improvement in survival for children with cancer, achieved by the implementation of cooperative clinical research trials that found an opportunity to standardize and to control treatment of childhood cancer. Combined modalities in treatment approaches, intensification of chemotherapy regimens for high-risk disease allow to reach 70 % survival rate of all cases. Yet there is still a need to improve outcomes and decrease side effects of anticancer treatment in groups of unfavorable prognosis. The most promising point is personification of treatment with a special focus on targeted drug therapies and immunotherapy. We reviewed recent international advances and unique options in precision medicine for pediatric cancers.

Clinical impacts of copy number variations in B-cell differentiation and cell cycle control genes in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a single centre experience

BackgroundIKZF1 gene deletions have been identified as a poor prognostic factor in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), especially in the presence of co-occurring deletions (IKZF1plus profile). This study aimed to determine the frequency of IKZF1 deletions and deletions in other B-cell differentiation and cell cycle control genes, and their prognostic impact in Slovenian pediatric B-ALL patients.Patients and methodsWe studied a cohort of 99 patients diagnosed with B-ALL from January 2012 to December 2020 and treated according to the ALL IC-BFM 2009 protocol. Eighty-eight bone marrow or peripheral blood samples were analysed for copy number variations (CNVs) using the SALSA MLPA P335 ALL-IKZF1 probemix.ResultsAt least one CNV was detected in more than 65% of analysed samples. The most frequently altered genes were PAX5 and CDKN2A/B (30.7%, 26.1%, and 25.0%, respectively). Deletions in IKZF1 were present in 18.2% of analysed samples and were associated with an inferior 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 54.8% vs. 85.9%, p = 0.016). The IKZF1plus profile was identified in 12.5% of the analysed samples, and these patients had an inferior 5-year EFS than those with deletions in IKZF1 only and those without deletions (50.8% vs. 75.0% vs. 85.9%, respectively, p = 0.049). Overall survival (OS) was also worse in patients with the IKZF1plus profile than those with deletions in IKZF1 only and those without deletions (5-year OS 76.2% vs. 100% vs. 93.0%, respectively). However, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant.ConclusionsOur results are in concordance with the results obtained in larger cooperative clinical trials. Copy number variations analysis using the SALSA MLPA kit is a reliable tool for initial diagnostic approach in children with B-ALL, even in smaller institutions in low- and middle-income countries.

Reporting of tobacco use and impact on outcomes in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: A systematic scoping review.

40 Background: Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes but the impact of tobacco on many innovative treatments has not yet been well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in cancer clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on specific treatment modalities. We performed a systematic scoping review of the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in clinical trials run by cancer cooperative clinical trial groups. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017 to October 2019 using Medline, Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process &amp; Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using OvidSP. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, involved at least one cancer cooperative group, included &gt; 100 adult patients and reported on at least one primary or secondary endpoint, which included overall survival (OS), disease/progression-free survival (DFS/PFS), response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality of life (QoL). Secondary analyses of previously published trials were excluded. Results: Among 14843 identified studies, 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria. 24% were phase II trials, 2% phase II/III and 74% phase III. Trial start dates ranged from 1995-2015 with most (29%) between 2007-2008; median trial sample size was 406 (range: 100-4994); 86% involved systematic therapy, 35% involved radiation; 14% were lung and 5% were head and neck trials. 51% of trials had a curative intent, 33% were palliative and 16% involved hematologic cancers. 74 studies reported on OS, 73 DFS/PFS, and 88 toxicity/QoL. 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use information, while two reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Of those collecting baseline tobacco use, only 7 reported any analysis of the impact of tobacco on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 5 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status; 4 reported some measure of smoking intensity; none reported on verifying smoking status or second hand smoke exposure. Trials of tobacco related (lung and head and neck) cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use compared to non-tobacco related cancers (83% vs 6% p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants’ baseline tobacco use, and even fewer collect follow up information. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use, both at baseline and follow up in clinical trials, should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the clinical impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.

NRG Oncology Survey of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Use in US Proton Therapy Centers.

Purpose/Objective(s)Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation has appeared in primary commercial treatment-planning systems and various in-house platforms. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques complement MC capabilities. However, no publications have yet reported how proton therapy centers implement these new technologies, and a national survey is required to determine the feasibility of including MC and companion techniques in cooperative group clinical trials.Materials/MethodsA 9-question survey was designed to query key clinical parameters: scope of MC utilization, validation methods for heterogeneities, clinical site-specific imaging guidance, proton range uncertainties, and how implants are handled. A national survey was distributed to all 29 operational US proton therapy centers on 13 May 2019.ResultsWe received responses from 25 centers (86% participation). Commercial MC was most commonly used for primary plan optimization (16 centers) or primary dose evaluation (18 centers), while in-house MC was used more frequently for secondary dose evaluation (7 centers). Based on the survey, MC was used infrequently for gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecology and extremity compared with other more heterogeneous disease sites (P < .007). Although many centers had published DECT research, only 3/25 centers had implemented DECT clinically, either in the treatment-planning system or to override implant materials. Most centers (64%) treated patients with metal implants on a case-by-case basis, with a variety of methods reported. Twenty-four centers (96%) used MAR images and overrode the surrounding tissue artifacts; however, there was no consensus on how to determine metal dimension, materials density, or stopping powers.ConclusionThe use of MC for primary dose calculation and optimization was prevalent and, therefore, likely feasible for clinical trials. There was consensus to use MAR and override tissues surrounding metals but no consensus about how to use DECT and MAR for human tissues and implants. Development and standardization of these advanced technologies are strongly encouraged for vendors and clinical physicists.

The Impact of COVID-19 on National Clinical Trials Network Breast Cancer Trials.

Purpose of reviewThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on virtually all aspects of the healthcare system, including oncology clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to describe the impact of the pandemic on national breast cancer clinical trials.Recent findingsOf the 61 breast cancer–specific cooperative group breast cancer clinical trials open to accrual during the pandemic, 32% of them received supplementary tailored guidance regarding current and foreseeable challenges for clinical sites and investigators due to COVID-19. Many clinical trial sites reported decreases in enrollment and accrual, drastic disruptions to protocol, and challenges related to research infrastructure, staff burden, and assuring social distancing.SummaryThe challenges early in pandemic led to many operational changes in clinical trials, including use of electronic consent for enrollment, telemedicine visits, and mail order pharmacy. The pandemic highlighted aspects of breast cancer clinical trial that could be modernized while maintaining research integrity.

Clinical Research on Antioxidant-Based Modalities in 2020

Clinical Research on Antioxidant-Based Modalities in 2020

Insights into ovarian cancer care: report from the ANZGOG Ovarian Cancer Webinar Series 2020.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is among the top ten causes of cancer deaths worldwide, and is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies in high income countries, with incidence and death rates expected to rise particularly in Asian countries where ovarian cancer is among the 5 most common cancers. Despite the plethora of randomised clinical trials investigating various systemic treatment options in EOC over the last few decades, both progression-free and overall survival have remained at approximately 16 and 40 months respectively. To date the greatest impact on treatment has been made by the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in women with advanced EOC and a BRCA1/2 mutation. Inhibition of PARP, the key enzyme in base excision repair, is based on synthetic lethality whereby alternative DNA repair pathways in tumor cells that are deficient in homologous recombination is blocked, rendering them unviable and leading to cell death. The Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG) is the national gynecological cancer clinical trials organization for Australia and New Zealand. ANZGOG's purpose is to improve outcomes and quality of life for women with gynecological cancer through cooperative clinical trials and undertaking multidisciplinary research into the causes, prevention and treatments of gynecological cancer. This review summarizes current ovarian cancer research and treatment approaches presented by Australian and New Zealand experts in the field at the 2020 ANZGOG webinar series entitled “Ovarian Cancer systems of Care”.