IntroductionDSM-5 introduced a chapter on trauma- and stressor-related disorders, and modified the chapter on the dissociative disorders. ObjectiveTo review these modifications in the light of the concepts of dissociation as a division of the personality and of hysteria. MethodTo imagine how Pierre Janet might have reacted to the involved formulations in reference to his clinical and theoretical expertise and recent research findings. ResultsThere is some progress in DSM-5's conceptualization of dissociation and dissociative disorders, but much work remains to be done. DSM-5's conceptualization of dissociation is in part inconsistent and contradictory. For example, the system's conceptualization of dissociation sometimes delimits dissociation to negative symptoms, but at other places it (also) includes positive symptoms. Whereas at some places DSM-5's conceptualization involves a division of the personality, at other places the idea seems to be that dissociation can occur in the absence of such a division. Sensorimotor dissociative symptoms and disorders are basically and confusingly addressed as conversion symptoms and disorders. ConclusionDSM-5's concept of dissociation lacks clarity, consistency and specificity, hence is in need of major revision. Delimiting the concept of dissociation to a division of the personality that manifests in negative and positive cognitive-emotional and sensorimotor symptoms opens the prospect of introducing a spectrum of more and less complex trauma-related dissociative disorders in DSM-6.