Evidence Of Convergent Validity Research Articles

Developing a reading proficiency scale for Chinese as a second language: a confirmatory factor analysis approach

There is a long history of operationalizing theoretical constructs of language proficiency by developing language proficiency scales. However, existing scales are not directly applicable in teaching and assessing Chinese as a second language (CSL) reading in US higher education contexts. Teachers need guidance regarding what component reading skills/knowledge should be taught and measured. This study developed a CSL Reading Proficiency Scale aligning to Koda’s (2005) theoretical framework that models L2 reading as a three-factor construct. The scale development began with modeling the construct of CSL reading ability on the basis of literature review. Drawing on this process, an operational descriptive scheme and a descriptor pool were established and subjected to expert review of content validity. Descriptors that survived expert review were then compiled into a Likert-scale questionnaire. This instrument was tested through teachers’ evaluations (N = 179) of whether CSL learners ‘can do’ what were denoted by descriptors. Confirmatory factor analysis exhibits solid goodness of fit between descriptors and the hypothesized three-factor model. The total score and the three subscale scores show high reliability. Evidence of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity indicates that the Scale measures CSL reading ability as intended.

A coping self-insight scale for adults: development and preliminary psychometric properties

ABSTRACT Background Self-insights focused on the coping process are implicated in the refinement of capacities for resilience. To advance this research, we must identify key coping self-insights and develop a concise measurement tool. Objective The purpose of this paper is to develop evidence for the construct dimensionality and validity of a measure of coping self-insight. Methods Items measuring 13 coping self-insight dimensions were generated via consultation with theoretical work, subject matter experts, and pre-testing items for clarity. Thereafter, the dimensionality of items was assessed with undergraduate students (N = 232) and an online sample (N = 800) via exploratory and confirmatory analyses. Finally, a multi-trait, multi-method approach was used to test discriminant validity in a further sample of students (N = 228). Results The initial item list was reduced to five key dimensions that balanced data-driven and conceptual considerations. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed moderate-to-strong correlations (r = .47–.80) among dimensions. We also demonstrated evidence of internal reliability, convergent, criterion, and discriminant validity. Invariance tests for sub-groups of interest (e.g., sex, sample type) frequently demonstrated metric or scalar invariance, except for age sub-groups. Conclusions Findings offer a starting point regarding the types of coping self-insights important for the emergence of resilience and a validated tool for future research.

Validation of the European Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease in Spain

AbstractBackgroundThe Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) is a novel comprehensive neuropsychological battery developed from a multicultural approach. We aimed to validate the CNTB in patients from the majority population with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia stages, and Parkinson’s disease with MCI (PD‐MCI).MethodsThirty patients with AD‐MCI, 30 with AD‐dementia (AD‐D), and 30 with PD‐MCI were enrolled. Each clinical group had a specific healthy control group (HC) with no differences in sex, age, or years of education. We performed intergroup comparisons, ROC analysis, and calculated the corresponding cut‐off points based on Youden’s index.ResultsAD‐MCI showed lower scores than HC in those subtests associated with episodic memory and verbal fluency, while AD‐D also scored lower in executive function and visuospatial tests with large effect sizes. Participants with PD‐MCI showed lower performance in memory and executive function, particularly on error scores, with large effect sizes, compared with HC. While AD‐MCI showed lower memory scores, PD‐MCI had a lower performance in executive functions, comparing both groups. We found evidence of convergent validity with standardized neuropsychological tests measuring the same cognitive domains. Cut‐off scores were similar to previous studies conducted in other cultures.ConclusionsThe CNTB showed appropriate diagnostic properties and convergent validity in AD and PD, including the early stages of the disease. This supports the utility of the CNTB for the early detection of cognitive impairment in AD and PD.

Measurement properties of Brief-BESTest scores from children, adolescents, and youth with visual impairments

Purpose: This study aimed to vet the measurement properties of Brief-BESTest scores in children, adolescents, and youth with visual impairment and blindness (YVI). Methods: A cross-sectional sample of YVI (N = 101) completed the Brief-BESTest, a modified version of the Y-Balance Test, the 360-degree turn test, bipedal quiet stance, and Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scales. Thirty-seven YVI completed test-retest of the Brief-BESTest using a one-year interval. Using classical test theory, various forms of total and item-level Brief-BESTest score reliability and validity were investigated in YVI. Results: All inter-rater reliability coefficients were ≥ .80. When considering the eight items of the Brief-BESTest, 27 of the 28 possible correlations were statistically significant (p<.05). Various internal consistency and item difficulty results were strong. When taking total Brief-BESTest scores and their association with the complementary balance tasks/metrics into account, 11 of 13 associations were statistically significant (p<.05) providing strong convergent validity evidence. Being multimorbid and degree of vision significantly predicted total Brief-BESTest scores (p<.001) suggesting construct (i.e. known groups) validity. Numerous test-retest results (e.g. coefficients, limits of agreement) following the one-year interval were indicative of score stability. Conclusion: Practitioners and researchers should have confidence in, and consider adopting, the Brief-BESTest to examine multidimensional balance in YVI.

Development and testing of the Night Sky Connectedness Index (NSCI)

Whilst there is a growing interest in people's relationship with the natural world, much of the literature in this area tends to focus on daytime behaviour. There is far less research that attempts to understand the importance of people's relationship to natural environments at night and particularly towards the night sky. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to design, develop and validate a new measure - the Night Sky Connectedness Index (NSCI). The items of the NSCI were created and based on relevant theory, similar types of measures, and stakeholder consultation – for both the generation and selection of items. The psychometric properties were assessed using a sample of 406 people from the general population – with any level of interest in the night sky - and of these 115 completed a test-retest follow-up survey. Exploratory Factor Analysis and reliability testing resulted in a 12-item measure with two subscales: Connection to, and Protection of the night sky. The NSCI demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency for the overall scale and for each of its subscales and shows strong test-retest reliability. There was also strong evidence for the scale's convergent, discriminant and construct validity. In addition, the findings indicated that a greater connection to the night sky was significantly and positively related to a person's mental health and happiness. Our research also suggests that those people who live in more light-polluted areas are less connected to the night sky and feel less likely to protect it. The NSCI may be useful when, (i) investigating pro-environmental and conservation behaviour, (ii) assessing the efficacy of strategies or interventions aimed at reducing light pollution, (iii) helping to restore the human-night sky relationship, (iv) informing policy and responsible lighting use, and (v) rewilding our night skies to protect our natural environment and cultural heritage.

Psychometric Properties of a New Mexican Optimism Scale: Ethnopsychological Approach.

In this paper, a Mexican Optimism Scale was constructed to investigate and estimate psychometric properties (reliability and validity based on the measurement model). The convergent validity and validity criterion were evaluated for a sample of young Mexicans. The scale was presented to 848 Mexican young people aged between 17 and 30 years from three different regions of Mexico. The scale was reduced to 20 items on the basis of CFA and analyses of internal consistency. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested a three-factor structure of optimism: affective resources, positive vision and hope. The data provided evidence for convergent validity with positive affect, negative affect and coping. Additionally, males scored higher on affective resources and positive vision than females. Finally, the results support the reliability of the instrument. The psychometric properties of the Mexican Optimism Scale proved to be highly acceptable and allow for a novel assessment of optimism from an ethnopsychological perspective. Validity, reliability and invariance were determined, as well as percentiles for the practical use of the scale. This scale may be of crucial importance for future research on optimism and health.

Examining the Association Between the Computer-Aided Scoring and Manual Scoring for the Beery Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration (Beery VMI) and Children’s Handwriting Skills: A Convergent Validity Study

ABSTRACT Introduction Visual motor integration (VMI) is an important underlying mechanism for children’s handwriting. The Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI) is commonly used to assess children’s VMI skills, using a manual scoring method which can be prone to individual subjectivity and impact its sensitivity. This study investigated the use of the Computer-Aided Scoring System for scoring the Berry VMI (CASS-Beery VMI) to assess school-aged children’s VMI and handwriting skills. Specifically, the convergent validity between the CASS-Beery VMI and three standardized handwriting assessments was investigated. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional design was used. Thirty-five neurotypical Australian students aged 6–9 years completed the Beery-VMI–6th edition, Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA), Evaluation Tool of Children’s Handwriting – Manuscript (ETCH-M) and the Here’s How I Write Assessment – Child version (HHIW-C). The Berry-VMI was scored using its original scoring method and the CASS-Beery VMI. Thirty parents of the child participants completed the Here’s How I Write Assessment – Parent version (HHIW-P). Descriptive statistics, Spearman rho correlations and regression analyses using bootstrapping were completed. Results The CASS-Beery VMI error scores were significantly correlated with the Beery-VMI score, and subscales of the MHA, ETCH and HHIW-P scores (r = 0.341– −0.555; p = .045–0.001). The CASS-Beery VMI error scores and Beery VMI raw scores were found to be significant predictors of the ETCH-M number legibility scores (adjusted R2 = 0.209; p = 0.017) and MHA form scores (adjusted R2 = 0.220; p = 0.007). Individually, the CASS-Beery VMI score was a significant predictor of the ETCH-M word legibility scores (Adjusted R2 = 0.305; p = 0.001). Conclusion Findings indicate that the CASS-Beery VMI can be used to assess children’s VMI skills. The significant correlations between the CASS-Beery VMI and other standardized handwriting assessments (MHA, ETCH-M and HHIW) adds to the body of convergent validity evidence that the CASS-Beery VMI can be a sensitive scoring method for Beery VMI when assessing children’s handwriting performance.

Factorial and Convergent Validity of the Short Form of the "Questionnaire of Thoughts and Feelings" (QTF-14) for Borderline Personality Disorder

The "Questionnaire of Thoughts and Feelings" (QTF) is being used as screening instrument as well as tool for treatment planning and treatment evaluation for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The primary goal of this study was the validation of the dimensional structure of the short version with 14 items, QTF-14. Additionally, item characteristics, reliability and evidence of convergent validity were examined. A diagnostically homogenous sample of patients with BPD (N=3035) of a psychosomatic clinic was presented with several self-assessment inventories, including the QTF-14. The expected single-factor model of the structure of the FGG showed unacceptable model fit indices (CFI=0.751; TLI=0.706; RMSEA=0.115; SRMR=0.073). Exploratory factor analysis showed evidence of two or three specific factors. In a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis, a bifactor model with two specific factors proved to be preferable (CFI=0.956; TLI=0.936; RMSEA=0.054; SRMR=0.034). The internal consistency of the total scale as well as the suggested subscales "Relationship Difficulties and Emotional Dysregulation" and "Autoaggression" was acceptable to good (ω=.81-.84; α=.79-.85). Associations with similar scales were as expected. Good psychometric properties of the QTF-14 can be confirmed in this study. Using the suggested subscales could support treatment planning.

Psychometric Properties of the CES-D, PCL-5, and DERS in a Honduran Adult Sample

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of Latin American Spanish-language versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5), and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Methods: Measures were translated, backtranslated, and adapted for use with a Honduran sample ( N = 970). Results: Support for the construct validity of the PCL-5 and moderate support for the CES-D were evident. Internal consistency, correlations, and mean differences across groups demonstrated good evidence of internal consistency and convergent validity. The original factor structure for the DERS did not show evidence of construct validity, but internal consistency for the overall scale was good, and there was evidence of convergent validity. Conclusions: The findings provide support for these versions of the PCL-5 but suggest that future work should examine exploratory factor analyses of the CES-D and DERS.

11 The Psychometric Characteristics of a Novel Metamemory Questionnaire for Children

Objective:Metamemory is a component of metacognition that includes both the knowledge of factors that affect memory (i.e., declarative metamemory) and knowledge and application of factors in one's own learning and recall performance (i.e., procedural metamemory; Kreutzer et al., 1975). Previous researchers have examined children's metamemory through interviews and found that metamemory abilities are positively associated with age and performance on memory measures (see Godfrey et al., 2022 for review). However, there is not yet a standardized measure to evaluate children's metamemory. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric characteristics of a declarative metamemory questionnaire, the Measure of Metamemory (MoM-10), for children ages 6-12 years old. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that performance on the MoM-10 would not be associated with sex but would be positively associated with age and learning and memory performance.Participants and Methods:A total of 75 English-speaking typically developing children between the ages of 6 to 12 years old were recruited for the current study (M age=9.1+1.92; females 49%). Participants completed the MoM-10 which assessed declarative metamemory via 10 multiple choice questions (accuracy score of 0 or 1 points per question) and required participants to provide an explanation for their multiple-choice answer (explanation score of 0, 1, or 2 points per question). The metamemory questionnaire provided two outcome variables: an Accuracy score of 10 possible points, and an Explanation score of 20 possible points. Additionally, participants completed a 3-trial pictorial learning/memory task which provided an Immediate Recall score and Delayed Recall score.Results:As hypothesized, there were no sex differences on the MoM-10 Accuracy scores (t(73)=0.71, p=0.48) or Explanation scores (t(73)=-73, p=0.47). Consistent with our hypothesis, age was significantly associated with Accuracy (r=0.31, p&lt;0.01) and Explanation scores (r=0.79, p&lt;0.001). Internal consistency of the MOM-10 was moderate for the Explanation score (Cronbach's alpha=0.68) and low for the Accuracy score (KR-20=0.54). Lastly, after controlling for age, participants' MoM-10 Accuracy score was significantly associated with Immediate Recall (r=0.32, p&lt;0.01) on the learning/memory task and the Explanation scores were significantly associated with the Immediate Recall (r=0.36, p&lt;0.01) and Delayed Recall scores (r=0.32, p&lt;0.01) on the learning/memory task.Conclusions:The current study presents an initial review of psychometric properties of a metamemory questionnaire for children ages 6 to 12 years old. Additionally, as hypothesized, these results suggest the MOM-10 performance is significantly positively associated with participants' age and immediate and delayed recall performance on a pictorial learning/memory task. These associations provide lines of evidence for convergent validity given the expected maturation of metamemory with both age and with improvements in actual memory performance. However, based on the low internal consistency of the accuracy scores, further refinement will be explored including possibly rephrasing questions from the current item set or perhaps excluding current items in future use of the scale.

Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.

Moral foundations theory has been a generative framework in moral psychology in the last 2 decades. Here, we revisit the theory and develop a new measurement tool, the Moral Foundations Questionnaire-2 (MFQ-2), based on data from 25 populations. We demonstrate empirically that equality and proportionality are distinct moral foundations while retaining the other four existing foundations of care, loyalty, authority, and purity. Three studies were conducted to develop the MFQ-2 and to examine how the nomological network of moral foundations varies across 25 populations. Study 1 (N = 3,360, five populations) specified a refined top-down approach for measurement of moral foundations. Study 2 (N = 3,902, 19 populations) used a variety of methods (e.g., factor analysis, exploratory structural equations model, network psychometrics, alignment measurement equivalence) to provide evidence that the MFQ-2 fares well in terms of reliability and validity across cultural contexts. We also examined population-level, religious, ideological, and gender differences using the new measure. Study 3 (N = 1,410, three populations) provided evidence for convergent validity of the MFQ-2 scores, expanded the nomological network of the six moral foundations, and demonstrated the improved predictive power of the measure compared with the original MFQ. Importantly, our results showed how the nomological network of moral foundations varied across cultural contexts: consistent with a pluralistic view of morality, different foundations were influential in the network of moral foundations depending on cultural context. These studies sharpen the theoretical and methodological resolution of moral foundations theory and provide the field of moral psychology a more accurate instrument for investigating the many ways that moral conflicts and divisions are shaping the modern world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale: a Bifactor-ESEM approach in a youth sample (15–24 years)

BackgroundThe Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale is a widely used scale designed to measure general attitudes toward vaccinations. However, evidence for the VAX’s structural, convergent, and discriminant validity is still limited, especially in youth samples.MethodsThe present study examined the psychometric multidimensionality and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the VAX using the bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling approach (bifactor-ESEM). Using a sample of 803 Serbian adolescents and young adults (Mage = 18.23, SDage = 2.66, age range = 15–24 years, 59.2% female), we contrasted the original four-factor model of the VAX with alternative solutions (ESEM, bifactor-CFA, and bifactor-ESEM), and investigated associations between vaccination attitudes and a variety of external criteria.ResultsThe results supported the bifactor-ESEM solution with one general factor of vaccination attitudes and four specific factors (Mistrust of vaccine benefit, Worries about unforeseen future effects, Concerns about commercial profiteering, and Preference for natural immunity) as the best representation of the data. The general factor was well-defined, and three specific factors showed good validity and specificity after the general factor was taken into account. The results of convergent validity analyses showed that the general factor of vaccine attitudes and one specific factor (Mistrust of vaccine benefit) were good predictors of vaccine conspiracy beliefs, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19, and trust in healthcare. The remaining three specific factors’ contributions to external criteria were generally weak and nonsignificant. Evidence of the discriminant validity of the VAX scores was supported by weak positive associations of the general factor with medical fears and paranoid worry.ConclusionsThe present findings indicate that distinguishing general and specific components of vaccination attitudes offers a more nuanced assessment and understanding of vaccination attitudes.

IBehavior-a preliminary proof of concept study of a smartphone-based tool for the assessment of behavior change in neurodevelopmental disabilities.

The purpose of the present study was to describe the content and function of iBehavior, a smartphone-based caregiver-report electronic ecological momentary assessment (eEMA) tool developed to assess and track behavior change in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs), and to examine its preliminary validity. Ten parents of children (ages of 5-17 years) with IDDs (n = 7 with fragile X syndrome; n = 3 with Down syndrome) rated their child's behavior (aggression and irritability, avoidant and fearful behavior, restricted and repetitive behavior and interests, and social initiation) using iBehavior once daily for 14 days. At the conclusion of the 14-day observation period, parents completed traditional rating scales as validation measures, as well as a user feedback survey. Across the 140 possible observations, 8 were skipped, leading to a 94% response rate over 10 participants' observation periods. Participants also completed 100% of items for each of their logged observations. Parent ratings using iBehavior showed emerging evidence of convergent validity among domains with traditional rating scales including the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2 (BRIEF-2), and Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C). iBehavior was feasible in the sample, and parent feedback indicated high overall satisfaction. Results of the present pilot study indicate successful implementation and preliminary feasibility and validity of an eEMA tool for use as a behavioral outcome measure in IDDs.

Helping Clinicians Conceptualise Behavioural Insomnia in Children: Development of the Manifestations and Vulnerabilities of Behavioural Insomnia in Childhood Scale (MAVBICS).

This paper outlines the development and psychometric evaluation of the Manifestations and Vulnerabilities of Behavioural Insomnia in Childhood Scale (MAVBICS), an instrument intended to assess the manifestations of, and factors underpinning, child behavioural insomnia. The MAVBICS comprises two sections: a more general sleep and bedtime information section (Section1), and a psychometric measure of six theoretically derived factors that underlie, contribute to, and are manifestations of, child sleep problems (Section2), that is the focus of this research. Study 1 comprised an exploratory factor analysis of Section2 items (EFA; n = 328 parents of children aged 3-12years), with a final 25 items found to load highly onto 6 factors; Sleep Maintenance Problems (4 items, α = 0.88), Co-Sleeping Behaviours (4 items, α = 0.93), Bedtime Routines (5 items, α = 0.82), Bedtime Resistance (5 items, α = 0.88), Bedtime Worries (3 items, α = 0.85) and Bedtime Fears (4 items, α = 0.86). Study 2 comprised a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of Section2 items and tests of convergent validity (n = 313), with results confirming the factor structure and providing evidence for convergent validity through correlations in expected directions between MAVBICS scores and other sleep, anxiety and behaviour measures. Study 3 tested the test-retest reliability of Section2 items (n = 53), and found support for the temporal stability of the MAVBICS over a 2-week period. Overall, the results provide strong preliminary evidence for the validity of the MAVBICS total score and its subscales, although the Bedtime Routines subscale may be less useful.

Psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in healthcare professionals, Ancash Region, Peru.

Burnout syndrome (BS) among healthcare professionals in Peru demands immediate attention. Consequently, there is a need for a validated and standardized instrument to measure and address it effectively. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) among healthcare professionals in the Ancash region of Peru. Using an instrumental design, this study included 303 subjects of both sexes (77.56% women), ranging in age from 22 to 68 years (M = 44.46, SD = 12.25), selected via purposive non-probability sampling. Appropriate content validity, internal structure validity, and item internal consistency were achieved through confirmatory factor analysis, and discriminant validity for the three dimensions was obtained. Evidence of convergent validity was found for the Emotional Exhaustion (EE) and Personal Accomplishment (PA) dimensions, with reliability values (ω > .75). The EE and PA dimensions exhibited acceptable levels of reliability (ω and α > .80). However, the Depersonalization (DP) dimension demonstrated significantly lower reliability (α < .60 and ω < .50). A correlated three-factor model was confirmed, with most items presenting satisfactory factor loadings and inter-item correlations. Nonetheless, convergent validity was not confirmed for the DP dimension.

The development and validation of the experiential avoidance rating scale (EARS): A self-report questionnaire that might actually measure experiential avoidance

Serious concerns have been raised regarding the validity of popular experiential avoidance measures. We developed a new “experiential avoidance rating scale” (EARS) to address some of the psychometric concerns with existing measures. Candidate items were generated according to the original functional contextual definition of experiential avoidance and reviewed by experts and public members for content validity and readability. Items then underwent validation involving n = 3628 participants. Exploratory factor analyses (n = 1069) identified six items with good underlying common variance. Confirmatory factor analyses from college student (n = 1068) and community samples (n = 1413) demonstrated excellent fit. In all samples, the EARS demonstrated evidence of content, factorial, concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity. The EARS also demonstrated evidence of incremental validity by predicting significant additional variance above-and-beyond neuroticism and extant experiential avoidance measures in depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, alcohol use problems, and general mental health measures. Measurement invariance analyses indicated that the EARS demonstrated residual (strict) invariance between cisgender men and women; clinical and non-clinical participants; White Non-Hispanic, White Hispanic, Black, and Asian participants; and heterosexual and bisexual individuals. We suggest that the EARS be further investigated as a brief measure of experiential avoidance in additional studies, particularly with clinical populations. We also discuss areas of future psychometric study and implications.

Reliability and Validity of the Spanish Adaptation of the Stanford Proxy Test for Delirium in Two Clinical Spanish-Speaking Communities

Delirium is the most prevalent neuropsychiatric syndrome experienced by patients admitted to inpatient clinical units, occurring in at least 20% of medically hospitalized patients and up to 85% of those admitted to critical care units. Although current guidelines recommend the implementation of universal prevention strategies, the use of management strategies largely depends on constant surveillance and screening. This allows for the timely diagnosis and correction of its underlying causes and implementation of management strategies. It was to adapt and analyze the Spanish adaptation of the Stanford Proxy Test for Delirium (S-PTDsv) instrument for its use among Spanish-speaking populations. The S-PTD is an instrument consisting of 13 observational items to be completed by a clinician observer, usually the patient's nurse. The completion of the questionnaire takes about 1 minute and does not require the active participation of the person evaluated, which has important clinical advantages compared to other available instruments (e.g., the Confusion Assessment Method). The psychometric properties of the S-PTDsv were evaluated in a population of 123 patients using a quantitative, cross-sectional design. All subjects were over 18 years of age and hospitalized in various inpatient medico-surgical and intensive care unit services, either at the Barcelona Clinical Hospital (Barcelona, Spain) or the UC-Christus Health Network Clinical Hospital (Santiago, Chile, S.A.). The ultimate diagnosis of delirium was made by a member of the Psychiatry Consult Service by means of an independent neuropsychiatric evaluation based on the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria, published in 2013, which is the latest version of the diagnostic manual. All study tests were performed by study personnel who were blinded to each other's test results within an hour of each other. In the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the S-PTDsv demonstrated excellent classification qualities when compared with the DSM-5 as the classification reference standard. Using a cutoff point of ≥3, the S-PTDsv had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 97%. The area under the curve indicator was equal to 0.95, suggesting the S-PTDsv has an excellent overall performance in accurately identifying cases of delirium. Accordingly, the S-PTDsv's positive predictive value=0.93, and the negative predictive value=0.97. The internal reliability measured with Cronbach's alpha was 0.96. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a 1-dimensional structure with high loadings (>0.72), demonstrating that all items similarly contribute to the total diagnostic dimension, suggesting adequate construct validity. This provided evidence of convergent validity. The performance of the S-PTDsv, as compared to a blinded neuropsychiatric assessment based on DSM-5, indicates that it is an effective instrument for the detection of delirium, in the Spanish-speaking populations. These results are comparable and consistent with previously published studies in the English language version.

Negative emotional reactivity to minority stress: measure development and testing

ABSTRACT The purpose of the present investigation was to develop and test a measure of negative emotional reactivity to racial/ethnic minoritized stress. In Study 1, we developed item content for a measure of negative emotional reactivity to racial/ethnic minoritized stress. We then evaluated item performance and produced a refined 15-item scale among a large sample of racial/ethnic minority adults (N = 1,343). Results supported a unidimensional construct and high levels of internal consistency. The factor structure and internal consistency were replicated and extended to a sample of Latinx persons who smoke (N = 338) in Study 2. There was evidence of convergent validity of the Emotional Reactivity to Minoritized Stress (ERMS) total score in terms of theoretically consistent and statistically significant relations with indices of mental health problems, social determinants of health, and substance use processes. There was also evidence that the ERMS demonstrated divergent validity in that it was negatively associated with psychological well-being, health literacy, subjective social status in Study 1, and positive abstinence expectancies in Study 2. Overall, the present study establishes the reliability and validity of measuring individual differences in negative emotional reactivity to racial/ethnic minority stress with the ERMS and that such responsivity is associated with behavioral health problems.

Development of the Stressors among Parents in Youth Sport Survey (SPYSS)

ObjectivesParents of youth sport athletes report a variety of stressors associated with their child’s participation in youth sport settings. However, research examining associations between parents’ stressors and relevant outcomes is limited due to the lack of a comprehensive and validated measure of parents’ stressors in youth sport. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to develop and provide preliminary validation of the Stressors among Parents in Youth Sport Survey (SPYSS). MethodIn Study 1 we developed an initial version of the survey and tested the factor structure of the scale using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with a sample of 1187 Canadian parents of minor hockey athletes. In Study 2, we administered the SPYSS to an independent sample of 783 parents with children participating in multiple sports, who also completed measures of parent stress and well-being, as well as parent-athlete outcomes, to establish convergent and divergent validity evidence and test associations with relevant outcomes for youth sport parents. ResultsThe results from Study 1 supported the development of a 42-item survey of parental stressors in youth sport. Results from Study 2 provided further evidence for the factor structure and validity evidence of a measure assessing parental stressors in youth sport. ConclusionsThe SPYSS assesses the frequency and intensity of a variety of stressors relevant for parents of youth sport athletes. The measure may be a useful tool for researchers, sport organizations, and practitioners to assess, monitor, and target the stressors experienced by parents in youth sport settings.

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI-40) in iranian non-clinical and clinical samples

BackgroundSome individuals may manifest psychotic symptoms that do not fulfill the requisite clinical criteria for a formal diagnosis of psychosis. The assessment of susceptibility to delusions, encompassing both clinical and non-clinical cohorts, frequently makes use of the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI-40). This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI-40) in Iranian non-clinical and clinical samples.MethodsThe present study employed a cross-sectional, correlational design in 2020. A total of 1402 Iranian participants were recruited for the study, which consisted of three distinct stages. The first stage involved an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) conducted on a non-clinical sample of 512 participants. The second stage comprising different non-clinical sample 764 participants to perform a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). In the third stage, a clinical sample of 126 psychotic patients was compared to a non-clinical sample. All participants completed the PDI-40, the Community Assessment of Psychotic Experiences (CAPE-42), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The internal structure of PDI-40 was examined through the analysis of its factor structure using LISREL 8.8.ResultsThe EFA analysis unveiled nine components within Persian version of PDI-40. The CFA analysis demonstrated an excellent fit of the nine-factor structure of Persian PDI-40 to the data. The total score exhibited high internal reliability, as indicated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.92. Moreover, Persian PDI-40 exhibited satisfactory evidence of convergent validity, as significant correlations were observed between dimensions of PDI-40 and subscales of CAPE-42 and DASS-21. Lastly, findings indicated that psychotic participants scored higher than non-clinical participants in all components of the PDI-40(p < 0.05).ConclusionPersian version of the PDI-40 demonstrates strong reliability and validity for assessing delusion proneness in both non-clinical and clinical samples in Iran. The observed distinctions between psychotic and non-clinical participants underscore its potential as a valuable tool for discerning delusion proneness in diverse contexts.