Conventional Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Research Articles

Dosimetric Comparison between the HyperArc and Conventional VMAT in Cervical Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Background: This research aims to evaluate the usability of the HyperArc (HA) technique in stereotactic radiosurgery for cervical spine metastasis by comparing the dosimetry of the target and organs at risk, specifically the spinal cord, between HA and VMAT and conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: A RANDO® phantom and QFix EncompassTM and support system were used to simulate three target types (A, B, and C) based on RTOG0631 guidelines. Treatment plans included one VMAT and two HyperArc techniques with different SRS NTO values (100 and 250). Dosimetric parameters such as conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), R50, and spinal cord sparing were analyzed. Gamma analysis was performed using portal dosimetry to validate the dose delivery accuracy. Results: HyperArc plans demonstrated higher conformity, sharper dose fall-off, and improved quality assurance (QA) results compared to VMAT plans. HA with SRS NTO 250 showed even better results in terms of conformity, dose fall-off, and spinal cord dose reduction (V10 and Dmax) compared to HA with SRS NTO 100. Although the mean gamma passing rates were slightly lower, all plans achieved rates above 95%. Conclusion: The findings suggest that HA provides superior dosimetric benefits over VMAT and could be effectively utilized for cervical spine radiation therapy.

Investigation of the linear accelerator low dose rate mode for pulsed low-dose-rate radiotherapy delivery

Purpose. Pulsed volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was proposed as an advanced treatment that combines the biological benefits of pulsed low dose rate (PLDR) and the dosimetric benefits of the intensity-modulated beams. In our conventional pulsed VMAT technique, a daily fractional dose of 200 cGy is delivered in 10 arcs with 3 min intervals between the arcs. In this study, we are testing the feasibility of pulsed VMAT that omits the need to split into ten arcs and excludes any beam-off gaps. Methods. The study was conducted using computed tomographic images of 24 patients previously treated at our institution with the conventional PLDR technique. Our newly installed Elekta machine has a low dose rate option on the order of 25 MU min−1. PLDR requires an effective dose rate of 6.7 cGy min−1 with attention being paid to the maximum dose received within any point within the target not to exceed 13 cGy min−1. The quality of treatment plans was judged based on dose-volume histograms, isodose distribution, dose conformality to the target, and target dose homogeneity. The dose delivery accuracy was assessed by measurements using the MatriXX Evolution 2D array system. Results. All cases were normalized to cover 95% of the target volume with 100% of the prescription dose. The average conformity index was 1.03 ± 0.08 while the average homogeneity index was 1.05 ± 0.02. The maximum reported dose rate at any point within the target was 10.44 cGy min−1. The mean dose rate for all pulsed VMAT plans was 6.88 ± 0.1 cGy min−1. All cases passed our gamma analysis with an average passing rate of 99.00% ± 0.48%. Conclusion. The study showed the applicability of planning pulsed VMAT using Eclipse and its successful delivery on our Elekta linac. Pulsed VMAT using the machine’s low dose rate mode is more efficient than our previous pulsed VMAT delivery.

HyperArcTM volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypopharyngeal cancer with solitary recurrence in the cervical vertebra: A case report and literature review.

It is difficult to reirradiate head and neck cancers because of the toxicity from previous radiation dose delivery. Conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy often have poor target coverage. The new HyperArcTM VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach reportedly has better target coverage, higher conformity, and can spare normal organs compared to conventional VMAT; however, research on recurrent head and neck cancers is limited. Here, we report the clinical outcomes of HA-VMAT for previously irradiated hypopharyngeal cancer with solitary recurrence in the first cervical vertebra (C1). A 52-year-old Asian male was diagnosed with a hypopharyngeal cancer. The patient received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a radiation dose of 70 Gy in 33 fractions and achieved complete clinical response. Two years later, solitary recurrence was observed in the C1 vertebra. Solitary recurrence in the C1 vertebra. Owing to concerns regarding the toxicity to adjacent organs, we decided to use HA-VMAT to achieve better tumor coverage and critical organ sparing. Tumor regression was observed on the imaging. At 9 months follow-up, the patient was disease-free and had no late toxicities. This is the first report regarding the clinical outcomes of HA-VMAT for previously irradiated hypopharyngeal cancer with solitary recurrence over the C1 vertebra. HA-VMAT achieves highly conformal dose distribution and excellent sparing of critical organs. There was a favorable initial clinical response with no toxicity. Long-term follow-up is essential in such cases.

Evaluation of conventional IMRT and VMAT strategies for postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate implant-based reconstruction using the new ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines.

This study evaluated the usability of conventional templates based on the new contour guidelines of the European Society of Radiation and Oncology and Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) for treatment plans of postmastectomy radiotherapy after immediate implant-based reconstruction. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans generated with two different treatment planning systems (TPSs, Eclipse and Monaco) were examined. Six computed tomography scans of patients aged 35-54years were retrospectively analysed who had undergone mastectomy and breast reconstruction using silicone implants after being diagnosed with left breast cancer. Six radiation oncologists participated in this study, and each of them contoured the target volume of one left breast using conventional contour (CTV-CONV) and new contour (CTV-ESTRO) methods. This study showed that compared with CTV-CONV, using CTV-ESTRO with objectives and cost functions similar to those of TPSs worsened the target volume coverage and increased the total number of monitor units. Considering the organs at risk, CTV-ESTRO tended to increase the mean dose delivered to the contralateral lung. It is concluded that the approach used for the new ESTRO-ACROP contour method cannot be applied in a manner similar to that for the conventional breast contour method, implying that the new ESTRO-ACROP contour method may require more time for improving plans for a given treatment.

Comparison of photon energies and field techniques for ovarian dose reduction in volumetric modulated arc therapy

For fertility preservation in young female patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer, lateral ovarian transposition (LOT) is a procedure that moves the ovaries away from the radiation field. However, it is still challenging to fully protect the ovaries from radiation damage in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In this study, we optimized VMAT techniques and simulated the effect of the LOT position on the ovarian dose. Ten cervical cancer patients who received pelvic radiotherapy after LOT were retrospectively analyzed. A restricted arc plus split field technique, which incorporated beam avoidance sectors, split field, fixed jaw, and orthogonal collimator orientation with 10 MV energy (rasf-10MV-VMAT), was designed to minimize the dose to the ovaries. This technique was compared with dual-arc conventional VMAT (dac-6MV-VMAT) and restricted arc and field VMAT (raf-6MV-VMAT) techniques with 6 MV energy. Ovarian dose, target coverage, and organs at risk (OAR) sparing were compared. The location of the ovaries in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions was changed to simulate the effect of the LOT position on the ovarian dose. Compared to dac-6MV-VMAT and raf-6MV-VMAT, rasf-10MV-VMAT decreased the ovarian dose significantly more, especially for a low-dose volume. Both ovaries, received a 44.0–52.1 % lower volume of >3 Gy dose, and (0.5–1.9 Gy) lower maximum and mean doses with rasf-10MV-VMAT (p < 0.05). Rasf-10MV-VMAT also improved target conformity and coverage more than raf-6MV-VMAT (p < 0.05) and reduced the bladder mean dose more than dac-6MV-VMAT (p < 0.05). The ovarian dose decreased with the distance from the target contour, and placing the ovaries near the mid-frontal plane or as high as possible after the LOT lowered ovarian exposure. This technique, using 10 MV photon energy combined with field technique optimization, reduced the ovarian dose, particularly by decreasing the low-dose exposure of ovarian tissue and improving the target conformity simultaneously. The ovarian dose could be minimized by a proper LOT position. This optimized technique could enhance ovarian protection and fertility preservation for young female survivors of cervical cancer.

Locoregional breast radiotherapy including IMN: optimizing the dose distribution using an automated non-coplanar VMAT-technique

Background Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) offers better conformity, homogeneity and sparing of the heart and ipsilateral lung for locoregional radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). However, conventional coplanar VMAT (cVMAT) can result in higher doses to the normal tissue on the contralateral side. This study investigates a non-coplanar VMAT-technique (ncVMAT) to mitigate this issue. Material and methods CT series of 20 left sided breast cancer patients were included for planning of locoregional breast radiotherapy including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Three treatment plans; 3D-CRT, cVMAT and ncVMAT, were generated for each patient with a prescription dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. Both VMAT-techniques consisted of a single arc in the axial plane, while ncVMAT included an additional arc in the sagittal plane. All plans were optimized to cover the clinical target volume (CTV) by 38.05 Gy for the breast and 36.05 Gy for lymph nodes, with as low as possible dose to organs at risk. Results Full CTV coverage was achieved for all plans. Both cVMAT and ncVMAT delivered more conformal and homogeneous target doses than 3D-CRT. Doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung were significantly lower with ncVMAT compared to both cVMAT and 3D-CRT. ncVMAT reduced doses to both the contralateral breast and lung compared to cVMAT and achieved levels similar to 3D-CRT for the contralateral breast and moderately higher doses for the contralateral lung. Delivery of high doses (>30 Gy) to the contralateral side was completely avoided with ncVMAT, contrary to the results for cVMAT and 3D-CRT. Conclusion ncVMAT reduced doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung as compared to both cVMAT and 3D-CRT. All contralateral dose metrics were reduced with the novel ncVMAT technique compared to cVMAT, and the mean contralateral breast doses were similar to 3D-CRT.

Comparative Dosimetry for Hippocampal-Avoidant Whole Brain Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy and VMAT Planning Techniques

The advent of hippocampal-avoidant whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) has allowed for substantial improvements in cognition without compromising the efficacy of palliative whole brain radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a form of rotational intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), allows for rapid treatment delivery and minimizes fractional treatment time. However, given the intrinsic complexity of HA-WBRT planning, standard VMAT techniques require significant departmental resources and often fail to achieve planning objectives. We hypothesize that treatment planning and delivery on a helical tomotherapy (HT) unit improves OAR dosimetry compared to standard VMAT techniques. Patients with multiple brain metastases who received WBRT with palliative intent were included in this single institution dosimetric study. Treatment objectives and dose constraints for HA-WBRT from NRG CC001 were utilized. Three separate plans were generated for each patient including Dual-Arc Conventional VMAT (DAC), Split-Arc Partial-Field VMAT (SAPF), and HT for dosimetric comparison. VMAT plans were generated using 6-MV photon beams with a maximum dose rate of 600 MU/min with a 120-leaf MLC. DAC plans utilized 2 coplanar arcs each with jaw tracking. SAPF plans used four partial arcs, and the field size of each beam was reduced to allow the MLC to block the centrally located hippocampus without sacrificing the whole brain PTV coverage. HT plans with a dose rate of 1000MU/min and Helical Delivery mode used a 2.5cm dynamic Jaw setting. Mean differences in target volume coverage and OAR dosimetry between planning approaches were calculated. Two-tailed, paired Student's t-tests were employed to determine statistically significant differences between DAC, SAPF, and HT plans. A total of 15 treatment plans were generated for five patients (5 DAC, 5 SAPF, and 5 HT plans). HT was seen to significantly reduce hippocampal D100% compared to both DAC (∆-114.16 cGy, p = 0.001) and SAPF (∆-125.76 cGy, p < 0.001). Moreover, HT hippocampal D0.03cc was significantly lower than DAC (∆-80.26 cGy p = 0.003) and SAPF (∆-174.40 cGy, p < 0.001). At the same time, PTV coverage as determined by D98% was significantly higher compared to both DAC (∆ +372.66 cGy, p = <0.001) and SAPF (∆ +304 cGy, p = <0.001). Compared to both DAC and SAPF, HT planning for HA-WBRT provides significant improvements in target coverage and OAR sparing. Additional research is warranted to determine whether further reductions in dose to the hippocampi provide additional clinical benefit.

Developing CAR‐T‐sparing Radiotherapy ‐ early dosimetric results

Background/objective: Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective treatment for residual lymphoma following CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. However, there are concerns regarding the potential effect of RT on CAR-T, particularly early after infusion. We initiated a prospective protocol to explore the effect of different RT planning parameters and techniques on dose to the blood, and thus CAR-T cells, in order to develop a “CAR-T sparing RT” for early RT after CAR-T therapy. Methods: We analysed 33 RT treatment plans for 11 lesions in 7 patients. Each lesion was planned 3 times; (1) a conventional plan using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, (2) a plan with optimisation for blood vessels in the region as well as blood-rich organs and bone marrow, and (3) same as plan 2 but delivered with Flattening Filter-Free (FFF) beams to increase dose rate. Plans were compared with regards to planning target volume (PTV) coverage, dose homogeneity, organs at risk (OAR) doses including blood vessels, dose rate and beam-on time. Results: Using CAR-T sparing techniques, the mean dose to major blood vessels was reduced by a mean of 12% compared to the conventional VMAT plan. The beam-on time was reduced by a mean of 60% due to the increase in dose rate. The blood-rich organ doses were not significantly affected. There was no detrimental effect on the overall quality of plans in terms of PTV coverage and dose homogeneity. The effect of different planning measures employed varied in different cases depending on the PTV volume, the anatomical location, and the proximity of blood vessels. Examples of clinical cases will be presented in the meeting. Conclusion: Reduction of radiation dose to the blood is possible using a variety of technical adjustments as well as reduction of the beam-on time. Further work continues to understand the relative contribution of the individual parameters and optimise RT in the post-CAR-T setting. Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Cellular therapies, Radiation Therapy Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. N. G. Mikhaeel Honoraria: Gilead, Educational meeting honoraria, Oct 2022

Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques

Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A "normal tissue" structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose. Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy.

A Dosimetric Analysis of Modified Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Bone Marrow Sparing Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer-An alternative Approach to Conventional VMAT

External beam radiotherapy remains the primary treatment modality in cervical cancer. Nowadays Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are increasingly being used to reduce normal tissue toxicity. The drawback of conventional VMAT is that a considerable volume of pelvic bone marrow receives a low dose. We analyzed whether there was a way to reduce the volume of the low dose regions of bone marrow, and assessed the potential benefit of conventional-4Arc (C-4Arc VMAT), and Modified-4Arc (M-4Arc VMAT) over the conventional 2 ARC VMAT. Twelve clinically proven locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy by Conventional VMAT (RapidArc) in dual rotation mode (C-2Arc VMAT) were selected for this study.C-4Arc VMAT and M-4Arc VMAT dose plans were generated for these twelve patients and these three different types of plans were evaluated for the quality and compared dosimetrically. M-4Arc VMAT designs exhibited a greater bone marrow sparing when compared with conventional VMATs with respect to volume receiving 5Gy to 35Gy without compromising PTV dose coverage. M-4Arc VMAT plans, the bone marrow volume receiving 30 Gy (V30Gy),40Gy (V40Gy), and mean doses were lower than the C- 4 Arc plan and a similar result was observed for V50(Gy) also when comparing with the standard 2 Arc plan. In modified VMAT plans, the rectum and bladder dose volumes were lower than standard VMAT. Similarly, the bowel bag V35(Gy), V40(Gy), V50(Gy), mean doses. The right and left femoral head doses were reduced significantly when compared to conventional VMAT plans. The M-4Arc VMAT plans are better than the C-2Arc and C-4Arc VMAT plans for reducing the dose to bone marrow by limiting the MLC field width travel.

Low-Dose Radiation Therapy for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Comparison of Dosimetry with Conventional AP-PA Fields and Bone Marrow Sparing VMAT

Purpose/Objective(s)Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) to lungs has shown encouraging results in COVID-19 patients in some clinical trials. However, there has been some concern regarding the long-term risk of radiation induced cancer (RIC). Compared to conventional AP-PA field technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can potentially reduce the dose to marrow and other organs-at-risk (OARs) and thus minimize the risk of cancer. We designed a dosimetry study to study if VMAT can reduce the exposure to marrow and other OARs.Materials/MethodsWe retrieved the CT scan data of 10 patients (aged 40-60 years) who have been already treated for any malignancy in the region of thorax. A dose of 1.0 Gy in single fraction was prescribed to both lungs. All the organs were delineated as per the established guidelines. The dosimetry achieved by the two plans (conventional AP-PA field technique and VMAT) were compared to find the difference.ResultsPTV coverage parameters like conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) were significantly better with VMAT (p value <0.05 for all). As shown in Table 1, Mean dose to most OARs was significantly lower with VMAT (p value <0.05 for all). Mean dose to marrow was significantly lower with VMAT (59.05 vs 81.9 cGy with p value <0.05).ConclusionCompared to conventional technique, VMAT provides better OAR dosimetry for lung irradiation (prescription dose of 1.0 Gy or more) in COVID-19 pneumonia. We therefore suggest, if lung LDRT is used for COVID-19 patients, VMAT as the preferred technique for a prescription dose of ≥1.0 Gy.

Half-Field Segmented VMAT Spares Organs at Risk from Postoperative Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> To investigate the efficacy and applicability of the half-field segmented volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in postoperative left breast cancer radiotherapy. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> The dosimetric characteristics of 6 MV 12 × 16 cm2 full field and jaw blocked half field were studied using a water phantom. Half-field segmented VMAT plans were designed for 20 left breast cancer patients. These patients underwent conventional full-field VMAT postoperative radiotherapy and received a prescription dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Dosimetric parameters and treatment efficiency for the target volume and the organs at risk were compared between the two techniques. Furthermore, the planned dose distributions were assessed using the ideal dose predicted by PlanIQ. <h3>Results</h3> Compared with the full-field VMAT, the half-field segmented VMAT plan significantly reduced V5, V30, and Dmean of the affected lung, the heart, and the cardiac substructures, as well as V20 of the affected lung (P < 0.05). The dosimetric metrics for the target volume and the planned monitor units (MUs) were similar in both settings (P > 0.05), with the half-field segmented VMAT plan having fewer MUs. Except for the right lung, other organs at risk achieved the ideal dose in the half-field segmented VMAT plan, with significantly lower doses in V30 of the heart and Dmean of the left ventricle than those of the predicted ideal dose (P < 0.05). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The half-field segmented VMAT achieved better dose conformality to the target volume and better protected the heart and the left lung for left breast cancer patients.

Redefine the Role of Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for the Single Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

PurposeTo explore the role of using Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) proton beam therapy in single lesion brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we developed and validated a dosimetric in silico model to assist in the selection of an optimal treatment approach among the conventional Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) and Spot-scanning Proton Arc (SPArc).Material and MethodsA patient’s head CT data set was used as an in silico model. A series of targets (volume range from 0.3 cc to 33.03 cc) were inserted in the deep central and peripheral region, simulating targets with different sizes and locations. Three planning groups: IMPT, VMAT, and SPArc were created for dosimetric comparison purposes and a decision tree was built based on this in silico model. Nine patients with single brain metastases were retrospectively selected for validation. Multiple dosimetric metrics were analyzed to assess the plan quality, such as dose Conformity Index (CI) (ratio of the target volume to 100% prescription isodose volume); R50 (ratio of 50% prescription isodose volume to the target volume); V12Gy (volume of brain tissue minus GTV receiving 12 Gy), and mean dose of the normal brain. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of brain radionecrosis (RN) was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model and total treatment delivery time was calculated. Six physicians from different institutions participated in the blind survey to evaluate the plan quality and rank their choices.ResultsThe study showed that SPArc has a dosimetric advantage in the V12Gy and R50 with target volumes > 9.00 cc compared to VMAT and IMPT. A significant clinical benefit can be found in deep centrally located lesions larger than 20.00 cc using SPArc because of the superior dose conformity and mean dose reduction in healthy brain tissue. Nine retrospective clinical cases and the blind survey showed good agreement with the in silico dosimetric model and decision tree. Additionally, SPArc significantly reduced the treatment delivery time compared to VMAT (SPArc 184.46 ± 59.51s vs. VMAT: 1574.78 ± 213.65s).ConclusionThe study demonstrated the feasibility of using Proton beam therapy for single brain metastasis patients utilizing the SPArc technique. At the current stage of technological development, VMAT remains the current standard modality of choice for single lesion brain SRS. The in silico dosimetric model and decision tree presented here could be used as a practical clinical decision tool to assist the selection of the optimal treatment modality among VMAT, IMPT, and SPArc in centers that have both photon and proton capabilities.

Fully automated planning and delivery of hippocampal-sparing whole brain irradiation.

The goal of this study is to fully automate the treatment planning and delivery process of hippocampal-sparing whole brain irradiation (HS-WBRT) by combining a RapidPlan (RP) knowledge-based planning model and HyperArc (HA) technology. Additionally, this study compares the dosimetric performance of RapidPlan-HyperArc (RP-HA) treatment plans with RP plans and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Ten patients previously treated with HS-WBRT using conventional VMAT were re-planned using RP-HA technique and RP model for HS-WBRT. Treatment plans were generated for 30Gy in 3Gy fractions using 6MV photon beam on a TrueBeam linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with high definition multileaf collimator (HDMLC). Target coverage, homogeneity index (HI), Paddick Conformity index (CI), dose to organs-at-risk (OARs) provided by the 3 planning modalities were compared, and a paired t-test was performed. Total number of monitor units (MU), effective planning time and beam-on-time time were reported and evaluated for each plan. RP-HA plans achieved on average a 4% increase in D98% of PTV, a 26% improvement in HI, a 2.3% increase in CI, when compared to RP plans. Furthermore, RP-HA plans provided on average 11% decrease in D100% of hippocampi when compared to VMAT plans. All RP-HA plans were generated in less than 30 minutes while RP plans took 40 minutes and VMAT plans required on average 9 hours to complete. Regarding beam-on-time time, it was estimated that RP-HA plans take on average 5 minutes to deliver while RP and VMAT plans require 6.5 and 10 minutes, respectively. RP-HA method provides fully automated planning and delivery for HS-WBRT. The auto-generated plans together with automated treatment delivery allow standardization of plan quality, increased efficiency and ultimately improved patient care.

Feasibility of function-guided lung treatment planning with parametric response mapping.

PurposeRecent advancements in functional lung imaging have been developed to improve clinicians’ knowledge of patient pulmonary condition prior to treatment. Ultimately, it may be possible to employ these functional imaging modalities to tailor radiation treatment plans to optimize patient outcome and mitigate pulmonary complications. Parametric response mapping (PRM) is a computed tomography (CT)–based functional lung imaging method that utilizes a voxel‐wise image analysis technique to classify lung abnormality phenotypes, and has previously been shown to be effective at assessing lung complication risk in diagnostic applications. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate the implementation of PRM guidance in radiotherapy treatment planning.Methods and materialsA retrospective study was performed with 18 lung cancer patients to test the incorporation of PRM into a radiotherapy planning workflow. Paired inspiration/expiration pretreatment CT scans were acquired and PRM analysis was utilized to classify each voxel as normal, parenchymal disease, small airway disease, and emphysema. Density maps were generated for each PRM classification to contour high density regions of pulmonary abnormalities. Conventional volumetric‐modulated arc therapy and PRM‐guided treatment plans were designed for each patient.ResultsPRM guidance was successfully implemented into the treatment planning process. The inclusion of PRM priorities resulted in statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements to the V20Gy within the PRM avoidance contours. On average, reductions of 5.4% in the V20Gy(%) were found. The PRM‐guided treatment plans did not significantly increase the dose to the organs at risk or result in insufficient planning target volume coverage, but did increase plan complexity.ConclusionsPRM guidance was successfully implemented into a treatment planning workflow and shown to be effective for dose redistribution within the lung. This work has provided a framework for the potential clinical implementation of PRM‐guided treatment planning.

Investigating the potential of proton therapy for hypoxia-targeted dose escalation in non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundHypoxia is known to be prevalent in solid tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and reportedly correlates with poor prognostic clinical outcome. PET imaging can provide in-vivo hypoxia measurements to support targeted radiotherapy treatment planning. We explore the potential of proton therapy in performing patient-specific dose escalation and compare it with photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).MethodsDose escalation has been calibrated to the patient specific tumor response of ten stage IIb-IIIb NSCLC patients by combining HX4-PET imaging and radiobiological modelling of oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) to target variable tumor hypoxia. In a dose-escalation-by-contour approach, escalated dose levels were simulated to the most hypoxic region of the primary target and its effectiveness in improving loco-regional tumor control was assessed. Furthermore, the impact on normal tissue of proton treatments including dose escalation was evaluated in comparison to the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of conventional VMAT plans.ResultsIgnoring regions of tumor hypoxia can cause overestimation of TCP values by up to 10%, which can effectively be recovered on average to within 0.9% of the nominal TCP, using patient-specific dose escalations of up to 22% of the prescribed dose to PET defined hypoxic regions. Despite such dose escalations, the use of protons could also simultaneously reduce mean doses to the heart (− 14.3 GyRBE), lung (− 8.3 GyRBE), esophagus (− 6.9 GyRBE) and spinal cord (− 3.8 Gy) compared to non-escalated VMAT plans. These reductions are predicted to lead to clinically relevant decreases in NTCP for radiation-induced pneumonitis (− 11.3%), high grade heart toxicity (− 7.4%) and esophagitis (− 7.5%).ConclusionsThis study suggests that the administration of proton therapy for dose escalation to patient specific regions of tumor hypoxia in the treatment of NSCLC can mitigate TCP reduction due to hypoxia-induced radio resistance, while simultaneously reducing NTCP levels even when compared to non-escalated treatments delivered with state-of-the-art photon techniques.

An Investigation of Non-Coplanar Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Using a Trajectory Optimization Method.

PurposeThis study was conducted in order to develop a trajectory optimization algorithm for non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and investigate the potential of organs at risk (OARs) sparing in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients using non-coplanar VMAT.Methods and MaterialsFirstly, a cost map that represents the ray–OAR voxel intersections at each source position was generated using a ray-tracing algorithm. A graph search algorithm was then used to determine the least-cost path from the cost map. Lastly, full arcs or partial arcs were selected based on the least-cost path to generate the non-coplanar VMAT (ncVMAT) trajectories. Clinical coplanar VMAT (coVMAT) plans for 11 patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) receiving 45 to 70 Gy in 25 fractions were replanned using non-coplanar VMAT trajectories. Both coplanar and non-coplanar plans were normalized to cover 95% of the PTV45 Gy volume with a prescription dose of 45 Gy. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), PTV coverage, and dose to the OARs were compared between coVMAT and ncVMAT plans.ResultsWith ncVMAT, the mean coverage of PTV50 Gy, PTV54 Gy, PTV60 Gy, and PTV70 Gy increased significantly. The mean conformity index of PTV45 Gy, PTV54 Gy, and PTV70 Gy was also improved in the ncVMAT plans. Compared with coVMAT plans, the ncVMAT plans resulted in significantly lower doses to the spinal cord, bilateral kidneys, stomach, and duodenum. The maximum dose to the spinal cord decreased by 6.11%. The mean dose to the left and right kidneys decreased by an average of 5.52% and 11.71%, respectively. The D max, D mean, and D 15% of the stomach were reduced by an average of 7.45%, 15.82%, and 16.79%, separately. The D 15% and D mean of the duodenum decreased 6.38% and 5.64%, respectively.ConclusionA trajectory optimization algorithm was developed for non-coplanar VMAT. Compared with conventional coplanar VMAT, non-coplanar VMAT resulted in improved coverage and conformity to the targets. The sparing of OARs was significantly improved in non-coplanar VMAT compared with coVMAT plans for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Comparison of Moderate Hypofractionated Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans With and Without Flattening Filter for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Background/AimThe aim of this study was to compare volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiation plans between conventional VMAT with flattening filter (cFF-VMAT) and flattening filter-free VMAT (FFF-VMAT) for localized prostate cancer.Materials and methodsTen patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent cFF-VMAT at Yokosuka General Hospital Uwamachi, Yokosuka, Japan, from July 2020 to October 2020 were enrolled. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the target volume, normal organs, monitor units (MU), and beam-on time (BOT) were compared between cFF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans.ResultsNo significant difference was observed for DVH parameters for the target volume. No significant difference was observed in all parameters for the bladder and rectum between the cFF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT groups. The mean values of MU were 686 ± 52 and 784 ± 80 in cFF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean BOT was 97.0 ± 6.6 s and 72.9 ± 1.4 s for cFF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT, respectively (p < 0.001).ConclusionDVH parameters of the target volume and normal organs were not significantly different between the cFF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans. In FFF-VMAT, MU was significantly higher, and the BOT was significantly shorter than those in cFF-VMAT.

Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, planned for low-field strength magnetic resonance (MR) guided linear accelerator (linac) delivery (labelled IMRT MRL plans), and clinical conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Both plans used the original planning target volume (PTV) margins. Additionally, the potential dosimetric benefits of MR-guidance were estimated, by creating IMRT MRL plans using smaller PTV margins.Materials and methods20 PCa patients previously treated with conventional VMAT were considered. For each patient, two different IMRT MRL plans using the low-field MR-linac treatment planning system were created: one with original (orig.) PTV margins and the other with reduced (red.) PTV margins. Dose indices related to target coverage, as well as dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for the target and organs at risk (OAR) were compared. Additionally, the estimated treatment delivery times and the number of monitor units (MU) of each plan were evaluated.ResultsThe dose distribution in the high dose region and the target volume DVH parameters (D98%, D50%, D2% and V95%) were similar for all three types of treatment plans, with deviations below 1% in most cases. Both IMRT MRL plans (orig. and red. PTV margins) showed similar homogeneity indices (HI), however worse values for the conformity index (CI) were also found when compared to VMAT. The IMRT MRL plans showed similar OAR sparing when the orig. PTV margins were used but a significantly better sparing was feasible when red. PTV margins were applied. Higher number of MU and longer predicted treatment delivery times were seen for both IMRT MRL plans.ConclusionsA comparable plan quality between VMAT and IMRT MRL plans was achieved, when applying the same PTV margin. However, online MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy allows for a reduction of PTV margins. With a red. PTV margin, better sparing of the surrounding tissues can be achieved, while maintaining adequate target coverage. Nonetheless, longer treatment delivery times, characteristic for the IMRT technique, have to be expected.

VMAT Planning With Xe-CT Functional Images Enables Radiotherapy Planning With Consideration of Lung Function.

The most severe adverse event of radiotherapy in lung cancer is radiation pneumonitis (RP). Some indices commonly used to prevent RP are evaluated based on the anatomical lung volume. The irradiation dose may be more accurately assessed by using functional lung volume. We evaluated the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) incorporating functional ventilation images acquired by the inhalation of xenon (Xe) gas (Xe-CT functional images). Two plans were created for twelve patients: volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning using conventional chest CT images (anatomical plans) and VMAT planning using Xe-CT functional images (functional plans), and the dosimetric parameters were compared. Compared to the anatomical plans, the functional plans had significantly reduced V 20Gy in the high-functional lungs (p=0.005), but significant differences were not seen in the moderate-functional and low-functional lungs. The incorporation of Xe-CT functional images into VMAT plans enables radiotherapy planning with consideration of lung function.