Conventional High-dose Therapy Research Articles

High-dose radioimmunotherapy versus conventional high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a multivariable cohort analysis

AbstractWe performed a multivariable comparison of 125 consecutive patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) treated at our centers with either high-dose radioimmunotherapy (HD-RIT) using 131I-anti-CD20 (n = 27) or conventional high-dose therapy (C-HDT) (n = 98) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The groups were similar, although more patients treated with HD-RIT had an elevated pretransplantation level of lactate dehydrogenase (41% versus 20%, P = .03) and elevated international prognostic score (41% versus 19%, P = .02). Patients treated with HD-RIT received individualized therapeutic doses of 131I-tositumomab (median, 19.7 GBq [531 mCi]) to deliver 17 to 31 Gy (median, 27 Gy) to critical organs. Patients treated with C-HDT received total body irradiation plus chemotherapy (70%) or chemotherapy alone (30%). Patients treated with HD-RIT experienced improved overall survival (OS) (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for death = 0.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.2-0.9], P = .02; adjusted HR, 0.3, P = .004) and progression-free survival (PFS) (unadjusted HR = .6 [95% C.I., 0.3-1.0], P = .06; adjusted HR, 0.5, P = .03) versus patients treated with C-HDT. The estimated 5-year OS and PFS were 67% and 48%, respectively, for HD-RIT and 53% and 29%, respectively, for C-HDT. One hundred-day treatment-related mortality was 3.7% in the HD-RIT group and 11% in the C-HDT group. The probability of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) was estimated to be .076 at 8 years in the HD-RIT group and .086 at 7 years in the C-HDT group. HD-RIT may improve outcomes versus C-HDT in patients with relapsed FL. (Blood. 2003;102:2351-2357)

High-dose chemo-radioimmunotherapy with autologous stem cell support for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma

Relapsed mantle cell lymphoma is a radiation-sensitive malignancy that is unlikely to be cured by treatment with conventional high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. We tested the safety and efficacy of using a CD20-specific monoclonal antibody conjugated with (131)I to deliver high-dose radiation selectively to all lymphoma sites. Patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma received infusions of (131)I-labeled CD20-specific monoclonal antibody (Tositumomab). The antibody dose was 1.7 mg/kg body weight, and the amount of (131)I was calibrated to deliver 20 to 25 Gy to vital normal organs. This treatment was followed 10 days later by administration of high-dose etoposide (30-60 mg/kg), cyclophosphamide (60-100 mg/kg), and infusion of cryopreserved autologous stem cells. The 16 patients in this study had received a median of 3 prior treatments, and 7 had chemotherapy-resistant disease. The median dose of (131)I was 510 mCi (18.87 GBq). There were no therapy-related deaths. Among the 11 patients with conventionally measurable disease at the time of treatment, the respective complete and overall response rates were 91% and 100%. Fifteen patients remain alive, and 12 have had no progression of lymphoma at 6 to 57 months from transplantation and 16 to 97 months from diagnosis. Overall survival at 3 years from transplantation is estimated at 93%, and progression-free survival is estimated at 61%. High-dose treatment with (131)I-Tositumomab, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide results in a high remission rate and may provide long-term disease-free survival for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

High-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide without stem cell support in patients with high-risk and advanced breast carcinoma

Currently employed high-dose regimens for patients with breast carcinoma consist mainly of single-cycle combinations of alkylating agents. In a previous Phase I trial, the authors developed a tandem high-dose combination of two cycles of mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) and high-risk breast carcinoma (HRBC). Treatment was delivered with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) but without stem cell support to avoid potential tumor cell reinfusion. The objective was to validate the safety and obtain preliminary efficacy assessment of this combination in a Phase II trial.Fifty-three patients were included: 27 patients with MBC and 26 patients with HRBC. After standard induction treatment, patients received two cycles of mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2 separated by a 4-week interval. Patients received G-CSF and ciprofloxacin until hematologic recovery. Follow-up was performed in an outpatient setting.One hundred one of 106 projected cycles (95%) were delivered. The mean dose intensities achieved were mitoxantrone 5.8 mg/m2 per week and cyclophosphamide 933 mg/m2 per week. Infection developed in 46% of the cycles, and platelet transfusions were required in 42%. Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly Grade 3 emesis. There were no toxic deaths. In 17 evaluable patients with MBC, 13 patients (77%) had response improvements, including 7 complete responses (41%).Treatment with two cycles of mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2 with G-CSF but without stem cell support was well tolerated. The dose intensities achieved approach those obtained with conventional high-dose therapy. This combination warrants further investigation as an alternative to conventional high-dose regimens.

Does administration of an aminoglycoside in a single daily dose affect its efficacy and toxicity?

Treatment efficacy, oto- and nephrotoxicity, and aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a prospective, comparative, randomized clinical study of aminoglycosides given once a day or three times a day for severe infections. Sixty patients were treated with netilmicin or gentamicin 4.5 mg/kg bodyweight/day, either once a day or divided into three doses a day. The patients were allocated randomly to the different groups. The clinical effect was difficult to compare in the different groups, because of the small numbers of patients. Therapeutic failures were seen in seven patients (three after one and four after three doses per day). Two patients, one with Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis and one with streptococcal endocarditis, on netilmicin once daily and conventional high-dose therapy with a penicillin had positive blood cultures after five and seven days of treatment, respectively. Vestibular function and hearing acuity were examined by serial audiograms and electronystagmograms. In spite of extensive diagnostic evaluation, only two cases of ototoxicity were detected. One patient treated with gentamicin three times a day developed vertigo and a severe abnormality of her electronystagmogram. One young patient treated with gentamicin once daily had a slight bilateral reduction of hearing. Nephrotoxicity was mild and did not differ in the four treatment groups. This was the first investigation of a once-daily dosing regimen conducted in seriously ill patients with systemic infections. We could not demonstrate any evidence that aminoglycoside treatment once daily has greater oto- or nephrotoxicity than the traditional three times daily regimen.