Abstract

Treatment efficacy, oto- and nephrotoxicity, and aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a prospective, comparative, randomized clinical study of aminoglycosides given once a day or three times a day for severe infections. Sixty patients were treated with netilmicin or gentamicin 4.5 mg/kg bodyweight/day, either once a day or divided into three doses a day. The patients were allocated randomly to the different groups. The clinical effect was difficult to compare in the different groups, because of the small numbers of patients. Therapeutic failures were seen in seven patients (three after one and four after three doses per day). Two patients, one with Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis and one with streptococcal endocarditis, on netilmicin once daily and conventional high-dose therapy with a penicillin had positive blood cultures after five and seven days of treatment, respectively. Vestibular function and hearing acuity were examined by serial audiograms and electronystagmograms. In spite of extensive diagnostic evaluation, only two cases of ototoxicity were detected. One patient treated with gentamicin three times a day developed vertigo and a severe abnormality of her electronystagmogram. One young patient treated with gentamicin once daily had a slight bilateral reduction of hearing. Nephrotoxicity was mild and did not differ in the four treatment groups. This was the first investigation of a once-daily dosing regimen conducted in seriously ill patients with systemic infections. We could not demonstrate any evidence that aminoglycoside treatment once daily has greater oto- or nephrotoxicity than the traditional three times daily regimen.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.