Conventional Antiemetics Research Articles

The budgetary impact of 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists in the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis

The study examined the budgetary implications of using 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonists(5-HT 3RA), granisetron or ondansetron, in the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis (CIE). A treatment model was constructed to represent a baseline of efficacy and costs for treating a cohort of patients with conventional antiemetics. Groups of patients who would be expected to receive the most benefit from 5-HT 3RA were then identified and the effect upon costs of using these compounds in a consecutively larger proportion of selected patients was calculated. On the basis of illustrative costs from The Cookridge Hospital in the UK, it was concluded that the new antiemetics can be used in acute emesis with substantial clinical benefit for an increase of 3–10% to total treatment costs. However, for delayed emesis these compounds have not yet shown a clinical advantage, and the increase in total costs of 12–34% is not justified.

Current issues in the management of nausea and vomiting

This state-of-the-art review describes the development, over the past 12 years, of new agents for the control of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis. While the mechanism of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is still not fully understood, significant progress in prevention of the symptoms has been achieved. The discovery that high-dose metoclopramide was very effective in antiemetic control ultimately led to the development of a new class of antiemetics, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, of which tropisetron is the most recent to be introduced. The emphasis of the review is on acute chemotherapy-induced emesis and includes current thinking on the influence of patient characteristics on the emetic outcome. The new 5-HT3 receptor antagonists do not demonstrate any of the distressing extrapyramidal reactions so frequently encountered with conventional antiemetics acting at dopamine receptor sites. Mild headache is the most characteristic side effect of this class of agents. The major advantages of the newer 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, such as tropisetron, over the conventional antiemetic regimens are convenience, flexibility and, above all, single-dose usage.

A comparison of granisetron as a single agent with conventional combination antiemetic therapies in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis

The safety and efficacy of intravenous granisetron were compared with combinations of conventional antiemetics in two single-blind, parallel-group studies which have been reported previously [1, 2]. In this review updated data from both studies is presented. In both studies granisetron (40 μg/kg) was given as a single 5-min infusion before chemotherapy with two additional doses allowed to control subsequent nausea and vomiting. All patients were naive to chemotherapy. Patients due to receive cisplatin (> 49 mg/m 2) were randomly assigned to receive either granisetron alone or metoclopramide (3 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) given prophylactically followed by an 8-h infusion of metoclopramide (4 mg/kg). In the 24 h after the start of chemotherapy 70% of granisetron-treated patients and 67% of comparator group were complete responders. In patients due to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, granisetron was compared with chlorpromazine (up to 200 mg/24 h) plus dexamethasone (12 mg). Twenty-four hour efficacy was significantly higher in the granisetron group with complete response in 68% of patients compared to 47% in the comparator group ( P < 0.001). A subset of 40 patients in this study were crossed over to receive the alternative antiemetic on their next cycle of chemotherapy. A significant majority of patients ( 32 34 ; 94%) preferred granisetron ( P < 0.001). Around 80% of the granisetron-treated patients in both groups required only a single prophylactic dose of granisetron. Following the first additional dose of granisetron, around 87% of patients reported symptoms to be improved or resolved. Adverse experience reporting was higher in the comparator groups with somnolence and extrapyramidal reactions representing the most common events. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse experience in granisetron-treated patients. Granisetron has proved safe and effective in controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis and is more convenient to administer than conventional antiemetics.

Serotonin Antagonists: A New Class of Antiemetic Agents

Despite a number of significant advances over the past decade, prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis remain formidable problems, particularly with cisplatin-containing regimens. Nearly one third of patients receiving high-dose cisplatin still experience substantial emesis despite the best available conventional antiemetics, and the toxic effects of these agents remain quite troublesome. In recent years, a new class of agents, the serotonin antagonists, has been identified. These agents hold promise for clinical utility in a wide range of areas. Selective antagonists of the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) type 3 (5-HT3) receptor have proven in early clinical trials to be potent antiemetic agents in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, with efficacy comparable to or superior to that of conventional antiemetics. Toxic effects to date with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been modest. The current state of knowledge with respect to these agents as antiemetics for patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy is summarized.

The use of methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in control of emesis in patients receiving cis-platinum

cis-Platinum is a chemotherapeutic agent with benefits often limited by the severe gastrointestinal reactions it produces in nearly all patients. Persistent anorexia, nausea, and vomiting may continue for days after therapy and are poorly controlled by conventional antiemetics. Patients at times refuse continuation of cis-platinum chemotherapy because of these severe gastrointestinal side effects. Intravenous methylprednisolone (Solu-medrol) as well as intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan) have been shown effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This randomized, double-blind study is a comparison of the efficacy of Solu-medrol vs Reglan, as well as, the combination of Solu-medrol and Reglan in the prevention of cis-platinum-induced nausea and vomiting. In this study patients receiving Reglan had better protection from vomiting than patients receiving Solu-medrol ( P = 0.0564). Patients receiving the combination of Reglan and Solu-medrol had better protection from vomiting than patients receiving Reglan alone ( P = 0.0332), or patients receiving Solu-medrol alone ( P = 0.0010). Finally, older patients experienced less vomiting than younger patients, regardless of the anti-emetic drugs used ( P = 0.0730).