Abstract Skewed slabs, deviating from conventional orthogonal alignment, pose distinctive structural hurdles. Despite their aesthetic allure and spatial efficiency, their incorporation entails intricate challenges in design, analysis, and construction. Within structural frameworks, slabs are pivotal elements susceptible to devastating impacts from contact explosions, like those triggered by suitcase or parcel bombs, in numerous engineering scenarios. The events like the Beirut explosion in 2022 and the Tianjin blast in 2023 serve as poignant reminders of the urgent need to grasp and address these dangers effectively. Slabs, whether arranged orthogonally or skewed, are fundamental in various engineering frameworks. Despite their key role in load support, slabs are highly vulnerable to damage from explosions, particularly contact blasts like suitcase bombs. Understanding slab behavior under such conditions is crucial for bolstering structural resilience and devising effective defense strategies against potential threats. This research endeavors to contribute to defense technology by examining the dynamic response of both orthogonal and skewed slabs to contact explosions, furnishing indispensable insights aimed at fortifying structural security in diverse environments. The blast is emulated through the utilization of the Eulerian-Lagrangian method, employing the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) technique with the aid of the Abaqus software. Slabs featuring various degrees of skew, including 15°, 30°, and 45°, are under scrutiny, and their comparative efficacy is evaluated against the benchmark of an orthogonal slab. The performance of the orthogonal slab is validated by comparing it to data from previous experiments published in academic literature. The findings revealed that with an escalating skew angle, there’s a reduction in perforation dimensions alongside a rise in peripheral damage. Furthermore, the hierarchical order of damage severity among configurations corresponds to the angles: 15° > 30° > 45°, highlighting critical considerations for structural resilience.
Read full abstract