Controlled-release Oxycodone Research Articles

Imputing At-Work Productivity Loss Using Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Tapentadol Extended Release and Oxycodone Controlled Release for Osteoarthritis Pain

: To determine the impact of tapentadol extended release (ER) versus placebo or oxycodone controlled release (CR) on the work productivity of adults with chronic moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis pain. : Using clinical trial data on pain outcomes, a validated methodology imputed treatment group differences in at-work productivity and associated differences in productivity costs (assuming a $100,000 annual salary per participant). : Imputed improvements in at-work productivity were significantly greater for tapentadol ER compared with either placebo (mean, 1.96% vs 1.51%; P = 0.001) or oxycodone CR (mean, 1.96% vs 1.40%; P < 0.001). Mean net savings per participant were $450 (P < 0.01) for tapentadol ER versus placebo and $560 (P = 0.001) for tapentadol ER versus oxycodone CR. : Effective osteoarthritis pain treatment also may help employees to function better at work and reduce their employers' productivity costs.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of OROS® hydromorphone in breakthrough cancer pain treatment: A multicenter, prospective, open-label study in Korean patients

To evaluate the effectiveness of OROS® hydromorphone in reducing breakthrough pain (BTP) medication frequency in Korean patients with chronic cancer pain. Multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase IV study. Patients with chronic malignant pain using immediate-release oxycodone more than two times per day for BTP. Patients were stabilized on their ongoing drug for 3 days immediately before baseline measurements (day 0). Medication was changed to OROS® hydromorphone at a dose equianalgesic to oxycodone using a 2.5:1 controlled-release oxycodone to hydromorphone hydrochloride conversion ratio; the patients were observed for 7 days. Dose was titrated, if required, and the patients were observed for another 7 days. Effectiveness and safety parameters were measured at baseline, day 7, and day 14. BTP medication frequency on days 7 and 14, compared to baseline. Of the 141 patients screened, 114 received study drug and 98 completed the study. Compared to day 0, daily BTP medication frequency on day 14 decreased from 2.93 to 2.00 (p > 0.0001), daily BTP frequency decreased from 3.67 to 2.44 (p > 0.0001), and end-of-dose pain frequency decreased by 44 percent. Pain was controlled adequately during daytime and night-time. Pain intensity decreased by 11 percent as assessed using the Korean Brief Pain Inventory and by 17 percent as assessed using the numerical rating scale. About 61.2 percent patients and 60.2 percent physicians were satisfied with the treatment. Common adverse events, which occurred in 91.2 percent patients, were constipation, somnolence, and dizziness. Once-daily OROS® hydromorphone is efficient in the reduction of cancer pain-related BTP episodes, including end-of-dose pain.

Controlled-release oxycodone for the treatment of bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain in patients with multiple myeloma

Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor drug very effective against multiple myeloma, may induce the so-called bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN), hardly manageable with common analgesic drugs. This study assessed the effectiveness of controlled-release (CR) oral oxycodone in controlling pain and its interference on daily functions of patients with hematologic malignancies affected by BIPN. Forty-six patients (median age, 62 years) affected by myeloma and lymphoma, complaining of BIPN-related pain of moderate-to-severe intensity and unresponsive to previous analgesic treatments, were treated with CR oxycodone. The intensity of continuous and brief pain (BP) along with interference of pain with the common daily dimensions of feeling and function were evaluated by using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS); a global patient evaluation of efficacy was also performed. The daily average dose of CR oxycodone administered was 28.46 mg (range, 20-80 mg). The pain intensity decreased from a mean NRS value of 7.6 at baseline to 1.3 on day 14. The frequency of BP was reduced from 61 to 47% of patients and its intensity from 7.4 to 3.1 NRS score. A similar trend to decreasing values was observed for all the daily life functions. Slight- or mild-intensity side effects were observed in 23 patients (51%). At the end of the study, 75% of patients found the treatment effective or very effective. CR oxycodone for relief of BIPN-related pain was effective and well tolerated. The pain control significantly improved also the quality of the daily life functions, which are usually compromised in these suffering patients.

Premedication with controlled-release oxycodone in management of postoperative pain after ambulatory laparoscopic gynaecological surgery

Introduction Oxycodone controlled-release is a potent opioid analgesic. We aim to assess the efficacy of pre-medication of oral oxycodone controlled-release in the reduction of postoperative pain in ambulatory laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Materials and Methods A randomised, double blind, placebocontrolled trial was performed. This was conducted in 60 patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. They were randomised into two groups to receive either oral oxycodone controlled-release 10 mg (Group C, n = 30) or placebo (Group P, n = 30 ) 1 h preoperatively. Postoperative pain score and side effects of oxycodone controlled-release were assessed in the recovery room. Rescue analgesia of intravenous fentanyl (25 μg every 15 min) was given in the recovery room until the numerical rating pain score was ≤5. These patients were followed up 24 h postoperatively via telephone questionnaire. Results We found no difference in pain scores at rest or on exertion at 15 min, 1 h, 2 h or 24 h after the surgery between the two groups of patients. In addition, fentanyl usage, discharge time and satisfaction score were not significantly different. The side effect profiles were similar between the two groups except an increased incidence of headache at 24 h after surgery in the oxycodone controlledrelease group (p < 0.05). Conclusion There was no difference in postoperative pain scores in patients who were pre-medicated with oral oxycodone controlled-release as compared with placebo.

Sustained Safety and Efficacy of Once‐Daily Hydromorphone Extended‐Release (OROS® hydromorphone ER) Compared with Twice‐Daily Oxycodone Controlled‐Release Over 52 Weeks in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Noncancer Pain

Once-daily hydromorphone extended-release (OROS(®) hydromorphone ER) and oxycodone controlled-release (CR) are semisynthetic, ER opioid analgesics with established efficacy. An open-label, randomized, 24-week, parallel group, flexible-dose study demonstrated noninferiority of OROS hydromorphone ER vs. twice-daily oxycodone CR in patients with chronic noncancer pain. In total, 112 patients were enrolled in a 28-week, open-label extension study; 60 patients received OROS hydromorphone ER and 52 received oxycodone CR. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to Weeks 38 and 52 in Brief Pain Inventory item "pain right now." Global assessments of efficacy, dosing convenience, and tolerability were secondary endpoints. Mean change in "pain right now" from baseline to Week 38 was -3.0 (OROS hydromorphone ER) vs. -2.8 (oxycodone CR), and from baseline to Week 52 was -2.9 vs. -2.8; these changes were similar to the changes in the core phase (-2.1 vs. -2.1). Similar improvements were demonstrated for secondary assessments, including pain, pain interference, and quality of life. At Week 52, global assessment of efficacy was rated as "very good" or "good" by the majority of patients (OROS hydromorphone ER, 91.7%; oxycodone CR, 86.5%). More patients in the OROS hydromorphone ER group (35.0% vs. 21.2%) assessed mode of drug intake as "very convenient." The majority of patients receiving OROS hydromorphone ER (88.3%) and oxycodone CR (88.5%) rated tolerability as "good" or "very good" at Week 52; few patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event (1.6% vs. 0.4%, respectively). The effectiveness of OROS hydromorphone ER and oxycodone CR was maintained through 1 year.

Controlled release formulation of oxycodone in patients with moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis: a critical review of the literature

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a physically and emotionally debilitating disease that predominantly affects the aging adult population. Current pharmacologic treatment options primarily consist of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen, but associated side effects, analgesic limitations, especially in the elderly, and the need for around-the-clock analgesia have led physicians to search for alternative analgesics. Opioids have shown effectiveness at mitigating both chronic cancer and noncancer pain, and their ability to be placed into controlled release (CR) formulations suggests that they may prove efficacious for OA patients. One formulation, oxycodone CR, has shown effectiveness in cancer pain patients and in some trials of noncancer low back pain. In this review, the objective was to synthesize the reported findings by researchers in this field and present an up-to-date look at the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oxycodone CR in OA patients. Public literature databases were searched using specific keywords (eg, oxycodone CR) for studies assessing the efficacy and safety profile of oxycodone CR and its use in patients with OA. A total of eleven articles that matched the criteria were identified, which included three placebo-controlled trials, six comparative trials, one pharmacokinetic study in the elderly, and one long-term safety trial. Analysis of the studies revealed that oxycodone CR is reasonably efficacious, safe, and tolerable when used to manage moderate to severe chronic OA pain, with similar side effects to that of other opioids.

Validity testing of patient objections to acceptance of tamper-resistant opioid formulations

As tamper-resistant formulations (TRFs) are introduced in the hope of presenting obstacles to drug abuse, clinicians will need to judge whether a patient objecting to a TRF has legitimate complaints or is seeking a more easily-abused alternative. Experienced pain clinicians from the US Northeast, Midwest, and Northwest regions were asked to recount any objections raised by patients after switching from the old formulation of oxycodone controlled release (CR) to the tamper-resistant formulation of oxycodone CR.

Cost-effectiveness of tapentadol prolonged release compared with oxycodone controlled release in the UK in patients with severe non-malignant chronic pain who failed 1st line treatment with morphine

Objectives:The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of tapentadol PR (prolonged release) compared with oxycodone CR (controlled release) in severe non-malignant chronic pain patients in whom controlled release morphine was ineffective or not tolerated.Methods:A Markov model was developed to assess costs and benefits over a 1-year time horizon from the National Health Service perspective in the UK. Patients could either continue on 2nd line therapy or switch to 3rd line opioid due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. Patients failing also 3rd line therapy entered the final absorbing health state (4th line). Data on tolerability, efficacy, and utilities for tapentadol and oxycodone were obtained from the three comparative phase III clinical trials. Costs of resource consumption associated with opioid treatment were derived from a retrospective database analysis of anonymized patient records.Results:The model results predicted that initiating 2nd line therapy with tapentadol leads to higher effectiveness and lower costs vs oxycodone. For the overall population included in the clinical trials, mean annual costs per patient when treated with tapentadol and oxycodone were £3543 and £3656, respectively. Treatment with tapentadol, while cheaper than oxycodone, was more effective (0.6371 vs 0.6237 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for tapentadol and oxycodone, respectively), meaning that tapentadol dominated oxycodone. For the sub-group of opioid-experienced patients with severe pain at baseline the ranking in terms of costs and QALYs remained unchanged. Extensive sensitivity analyses showed that conclusions about the cost-effectiveness are consistent.Conclusions:The cost-effectiveness study suggested that initiating 2nd line treatment in patients with severe non-malignant chronic pain in the UK with tapentadol instead of oxycodone improves patients’ quality-of-life and is less costly. Key limitations when interpreting the results are the use of different sources to populate the model and restricted generalizability due to data extrapolation.

Liver Cancer: Effects, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness of Controlled-Release Oxycodone for Pain Control after TACE

To evaluate the analgesic effect, safety, and cost-effectiveness of controlled-release oxycodone (CRO) to control postoperative pain in patients with liver cancer who are undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective clinical study received institutional review board approval. After written informed consent was obtained, 210 patients with liver cancer were randomized into three groups of 70 patients. Group 1 received 20 mg of CRO, group 2 received 10 mg of CRO, and group 3 received a placebo at 1 hour before transarterial chemoembolization (T(0)) and 12 (T(12)) and 24 (T(24)) hours after T(0). Pain intensity on a numeric rating scale, percentage of patients with each degree of pain, quality of life, adverse reactions, analgesic costs, and hospital stays were evaluated and compared among the three groups. Numeric rating scale scores for pain intensity in group 1 and group 2 were significantly lower than those in group 3 at T(0-12) (P < .001); T(12-24) (P < .001); and T(24-48) (P < .001). When group 1 with group 2 were compared, numeric rating scale scores were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 during the period of T(0-12) (P < .001) but were not significantly different at T(12-24) (P = .68) and T(24-48) (P = .10). Analgesic cost and hospital stay were significantly lower in treated groups than in the placebo group. No significant difference was observed in quality of life and adverse events between the treated groups and the placebo group. CRO is effective, safe, and cost-effective in the control of postoperative pain after transarterial chemoembolization for patients with inoperable liver cancer.

Direct and indirect costs of patients treated with extended-release oxymorphone HCl or controlled-release oxycodone HCl

Objective:Compare direct and indirect costs of oxymorphone extended-release (‘oxymorphone’) and oxycodone controlled-release (‘oxycodone’) users.Methods:Patients, aged 18+, with ≥1 claim for oxymorphone/oxycodone, Q2:2006–Q4:2009, were selected from a de-identified private payer claims database and observed from the first such claim (‘index date’) until the earliest of: use of comparator drug; end of continuous eligibility; 12 months (‘study period’). Patients with claims for any formulation of the comparator drug during the first 30 days of the study period were excluded. Direct (medical and drug) costs paid by private insurers were reported for patients aged 18–64 (n = 8354) and 65+(n = 3515), as well as sub-sets without cancer (n = 7090 and n = 2444, respectively). Indirect costs (medically-related absenteeism and disability) were reported for all employees, aged 18–64 (n = 1313), and employees without cancer (n = 1146). Multivariate models were used to estimate risk-adjusted costs controlling for patient characteristics.Results:Oxymorphone users, aged 18–64, had lower drug costs ($693 vs $763, p = 0.0035) and similar medical costs ($1875 vs $1976, p = 0.3570) per patient-month compared with oxycodone users (mean follow-up 236 and 280 days, respectively). Indirect costs were not different ($662 vs $670, p = 0.9370). Oxymorphone users, aged 65+, had similar Medicare supplemental drug costs ($533 vs $588, p = 0.0840) and lower medical costs ($459 vs $747, p < 0.0001). Results were comparable for subsets without cancer.Limitations:Patients with concomitant use of oxymorphone and oxycodone were excluded.Conclusions:Oxymorphone users incur lower risk-adjusted costs in several cost categories, compared with oxycodone users, and no higher costs in any of the examined categories.

Controlled-release oxycodone tablets after transdermal-based opioid therapy in patients with cancer and non-cancer pain

Several publications and guidelines stress the efficacy and safety of opioid-based therapy for cancer and non-cancer pain management. The first point of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommends that, if possible, analgesics should be given by mouth. This advice fully matches the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, which advise that opioids should be titrated to take effect as rapidly as possible. The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) guidelines specify that transdermal fentanyl should be administered only in patients with stable analgesic requirements. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and influence on the quality of life of controlled- release (CR) oxycodone in patients who had obtained no or only partial pain relief after transdermal (TTD)-based opioid therapy. Forty-one consecutive patients experiencing persistent cancer and non-cancer related pain and in treatment with transdermal- based opioid therapy for at least 5 days were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter observational study. All patients were switched from transdermal to oral opioid therapy with oxycodone CR for 21 days. Pain intensity was rated on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0=no pain, 10=maximum severity). Patients were asked to rate their perceptions on efficacy and pain interference on the quality of life on an NRS from 0 to 10 (0=no interference, 10=maximum interference). After 3 days with oxycodone CR, pain intensity decreased by 38.83% (p<0.001) and maintained a significant decrease throughout the period (T0-T7: -59.71%, p<0.001; T0-T21: -65.75%, p<0.001). The average daily dose of oxycodone CR increased from 68.75 mg at baseline to 72.39 mg after 7 days and was maintained stable until the study ended. At T0, 56.10% of patients suffered from severe pain (NRS 7- 10); this percentage had decreased to 2.56% at the end of the study. About 7% of patients considered transdermal therapy effective at baseline; after 21 days, 72.22% and 19.44% of patients considered it effective and very effective, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly during the 21 days with the oral treatment (p<0.001). Switching from transdermal opioid to oxycodone CR treatment is effective and leads to patients' improved satisfaction and quality of life.

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: consensus recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and management

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is common, is associated with significant reduction in quality of life and poses major treatment challenges to the practising physician. Although poor glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors have been proven to contribute to the aetiology of DPN, risk factors specific for painful DPN remain unknown. A number of instruments have been tested to assess the character, intensity and impact of painful DPN on quality of life, activities of daily living and mood. Management of the patient with DPN must be tailored to individual requirements, taking into consideration the co-morbidities and other factors. Pharmacological agents with proven efficacy for painful DPN include tricyclic anti-depressants, the selective serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors, anti-convulsants, opiates, membrane stabilizers, the anti-oxidant alpha-lipoic acid and topical agents including capsaicin. Current first-line therapies for painful DPN include tricyclic anti-depressants, the serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor duloxetine and the anti-convulsants pregabalin and gabapentin. When prescribing any of these agents, other co-morbidities and costs must be taken into account. Second-line approaches include the use of opiates such as synthetic opioid tramadol, morphine and oxycodone-controlled release. There is a limited literature with regard to combination treatment. In extreme cases of painful DPN unresponsive to pharmacotherapy, occasional use of electrical spinal cord stimulation might be indicated. There are a number of unmet needs in the therapeutic management of painful DPN. These include the need for randomized controlled trials with active comparators and data on the long-term efficacy of agents used, as most trials have lasted for less than 6 months. Finally, there is a need for appropriately designed studies to investigate non-pharmacological approaches.

Oral controlled-release oxycodone for uterine cramping pain after cesarean section

To evaluate whether combined oral oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets plus paracetamol and tramadol hydrochloride tablets is better than epidural analgesia with respect to uterine cramping pain control and side effects after cesarean section. Sixty consecutive patients scheduled for cesarean section from April to May, 2010 were randomized to either patient-controlled epidural analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine, 0.1 µg/ml sufentanil (for postoperative 48 h) plus injected pethidine on demand (EDA group) or controlled-release oxycodone (2 × 15 mg for 1st postoperative 24 h; 2 × 10 mg for 2nd postoperative 24 h), paracetamol & tramadol hydrochloride tablets (8 × 1 tablet for postoperative 48 h) orally plus pethidine injection on demand (OXY group). Two groups were compared with respects to uterine cramping pain control when the oxytocin infusion (20 U plus 500 ml 5% glucose solution, iv. gtt within 2 h) once per day for postoperative 3 days as determined by the means of a visual analogue scale (VAS), pethidine consumption, side effects and costs. The EDA group experienced significant more pain than the OXY group when the oxytocin infusion was administered (mm) [50.0 (15.0, 72.5) vs 25.0 (0, 40.0), 60.0 (47.5, 72.5) vs 20.0 (0, 30.0), 35.0 (20.0, 50.0) vs 0 (0, 20.0)]. all P < 0.05). Pethidine was used for pain control in 2 patients (150 mg total) of EDA group during the oxytocin infusion whereas none of the OXY group received an injection of pethidine. There was a higher level of maternal satisfaction with a lower analgesic dose in the EDA group (80.9 ± 9.3 vs 90.0 ± 9.8, P < 0.01). The median duration of hospital stay was around 5 days in both groups. Postoperative pain control after cesarean section with the above combined regimen is superior to EDA in terms of a lower cost and a higher level of maternal satisfaction.

ChemInform Abstract: Solutions for the Clinical Problems of Analgesics for Cancer Pain Treatment in Japan

AbstractReview: 89 refs.

High doses of oxycodone–naloxone combination may provide poor analgesia

Several studies have shown that an oxycodone/naloxone combination (ratio 2:1) provides analgesia and less constipation in non-cancer patients receiving relatively low doses of this formulation. A case report of a cancer patient who was receiving increasing doses of oxycodone with an unexpected declining analgesia is presented. The substitution with the same doses (240mg/day) of regular controlled-release oxycodone was effective in regaining adequate analgesia.

Long-Term Controlled-Release Oxycodone and Pregabalin in the Treatment of Non-Cancer Pain: An Observational Study

Aims: This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of long-term controlled-release (CR) oxycodone + pregabalin in patients with non-cancer pain, in a real-life setting. Methods: Patients (n = 1,051) with chronic uncontrolled non-cancer pain received CR oxycodone + pregabalin for 1 year. Pain intensity was rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) at months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12. Results: Throughout the study period, the NRS score decreased significantly (baseline: 7.02 ± 1.26; 12 months: 1.45 ± 0.92; p = 0.00001). Following an initial increase in the mean daily doses of CR oxycodone (starting dose: 12.5 ± 8.4 mg) and pregabalin (starting dose: 121.7 ± 97.2 mg), dose reductions were seen for both drugs with the trend particularly evident for CR oxycodone. 23% of patients withdrew from the study, mainly due to adverse events (67.9% of withdrawn subjects). However, 19.7% of withdrawn patients were removed from the study due to complete relief from chronic pain. The combination was generally well tolerated and there were no reports of addiction. Conclusion: The combination of CR oxycodone + pregabalin could represent a valuable long-term therapeutic addition to existing pharmacological options for the treatment of non-cancer pain.

Positive and negative subjective effects of extended-release oxymorphone versus controlled-release oxycodone in recreational opioid users

To compare the subjective effects of oxymorphone extended release (OM-ER) versus oxycodone controlled release (OC-CR). Randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Inpatient unit. Healthy, nondependent recreational opioid users. Single intact oral tablets that were placebo or contained OM-ER (15 and 30 mg) or OC-CR (30 and 60 mg). Doses were representative of mid-range doses for chronic pain and were calculated using an established opioid conversion table. Visual Analog Scales, Subjective Drug Value (SDV), and Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) measured positive, negative, and balance effects and pupillometry. Equianalgesic comparisons were between OM-ER 15 mg versus OC-CR 30 mg (low doses) and OM-ER 30 mg versus OC-CR 60 mg (high doses). Thirty-five subjects received all five treatments. Positive subjective effects were lower for OM-ER 15 mg versus OC-CR 30 mg and for OM-ER 30 mg versus OC-CR 60 mg in ARCI Morphine Benzedrine Group (< or = 0.01 for both), Good Effects (p < 0.001 for both), Rush (p < 0.001 for both), and High VAS (p < 0.001 for both). Nausea was higher with OC-CR (p < or = 0.02), and Bad Effects were higher for OC-CR 60 mg versus OM-ER 30 mg (p < 0.001). Balance effects were lower for OM-ER versus OC-CR (Drug Liking, p < 0.001; Overall Drug Liking, p < or = 0.006; SDV, p < or = 0.008), except for Take Drug Again (p < 0.001 for OC-CR 30 mg versus OM-ER 15 mg; p = 0.18 for high-dose group). Euphoric mood, nausea, somnolence, vomiting, and dizziness were more common with OC-CR than OM-ER. Single-dose design; use of healthy, recreational opioid users. At equianalgesic doses, single oral intact OM-ER produced lower positive, negative, and balance subjective effects than OC-CR, indicating that analgesic potency may not necessarily be reflected in subjective/objective effects.

Evidence‐based guideline: Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy—report of the american association of neuromuscular and electrodiagnostic medicine, the american academy of neurology, and the american academy of physical medicine &amp; rehabilitation

The objective of this report was to develop a scientifically sound and clinically relevant evidence-based guideline for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). The basic question that was asked was: "What is the efficacy of a given treatment (pharmacological: anticonvulsants, antidepressants, opioids, others; non-pharmacological: electrical stimulation, magnetic field treatment, low-intensity laser treatment, Reiki massage, others) to reduce pain and improve physical function and quality of life (QOL) in patients with PDN?" A systematic review of literature from 1960 to August 2008 was performed, and studies were classified according to the American Academy of Neurology classification of evidence scheme for a therapeutic article. Recommendations were linked to the strength of the evidence. The results indicate that pregabalin is established as effective and should be offered for relief of PDN (Level A). Venlafaxine, duloxetine, amitriptyline, gabapentin, valproate, opioids (morphine sulfate, tramadol, and oxycodone controlled-release), and capsaicin are probably effective and should be considered for treatment of PDN (Level B). Other treatments have less robust evidence, or the evidence is negative. Effective treatments for PDN are available, but many have side effects that limit their usefulness. Few studies have sufficient information on their effects on function and QOL.

Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a and review of the literature

ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Leppert W. Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia. 2011;15(3):186-189. doi:10.5114/wo.2011.23012. APA Leppert, W. (2011). Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia, 15(3), 186-189. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2011.23012 Chicago Leppert, Wojciech. 2011. "Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature". Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia 15 (3): 186-189. doi:10.5114/wo.2011.23012. Harvard Leppert, W. (2011). Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia, 15(3), pp.186-189. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2011.23012 MLA Leppert, Wojciech. "Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature." Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia, vol. 15, no. 3, 2011, pp. 186-189. doi:10.5114/wo.2011.23012. Vancouver Leppert W. Successful switch from transdermal buprenorphine to oral controlled-release oxycodone in a patient with locally advanced prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia. 2011;15(3):186-189. doi:10.5114/wo.2011.23012.

Solutions for the Clinical Problems of Analgesics for Cancer Pain Treatment in Japan

The pain experienced by cancer patients can be managed in 70-90% of cases by the World Health Organisation protocol for cancer pain. However, cancer pain treatment in Japan is not sufficiently effective. To use medicine safely and effectively, various problems must be solved. Therefore, in this study, appropriate usage of cancer pain treatment was examined. We were able to use acetaminophen suppositories (800 mg each) in cancer pain patients. It was suggested that high serum concentrations of oxycodone and hydrocotarnine might be observed in geriatric patients or in the state of decreased hepatic blood flow, making dose adjustment is necessary for such patients. We also clarified that the conversion ratio from oral oxycodone to intravenous ocycodone/hydrocotarnine was 0.71±0.12. In addition, we clarified the pharmacokinetics of controlled-release oxycodone in patients with cancer pain. Moreover, the findings of our study indicate that in the steady state, the serum concentrations of fentanyl are not maintained at a constant level for 3 days following the use of transdermal fentanyl. We established a method of appropriately passing a nasal duct for sustained release of fine granules of morphine sulfate. Resolution of the clinical problems associated with cancer pain treatments is anticipated to allow the proper use of cancer pain treatments in Japan.