Control Rate Research Articles

β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis.ResultsTwenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0–6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2–12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response.Conclusionβ-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Iparomlimab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase 1c Study.

Iparomlimab (QL1604) is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 mAb against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Here, we report the preliminary efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of iparomlimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. In this open-label, phase 1c study, patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors, either failed or had no standard therapies available, were enrolled and received intravenous iparomlimab at 3mg/kg once every 3weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Between July 20, 2020, and September 6, 2021, 71 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of iparomlimab. The ORR was 9.9% (7/71) and disease control rate was 36.6% (26/71). Median duration of response of all responders was 10.7months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-not estimable]. Additionally, the median time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 1.4months (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), 1.4months (95% CI, 1.4-2.7), and 9.7months (95% CI, 7.2-15.3), respectively. A total of 52 (73.2%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (grade≥3, 19.7%). The most common TRAE (≥10%) was anemia (18.3%). A total of 20 (28.2%) experienced immune-related adverse events (grade≥3, 7.0%). TRAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug occurred in 4 (5.6%) patients, including immune-mediated myocarditis (2 patients), Guillain-Barré syndrome (1 patient), and diarrhea (1 patient). Iparomlimab showed preliminary clinical activity and had a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. These results support further investigation of iparomlimab as monotherapy or in combination therapy in advanced solid tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05801094. Retrospectively registered in 2023-03-24.

Clinical Effects and Safety of Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Lipiodol versus Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Alone for Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in 2 groups of patients: those who receive lipiodol (referred to as the lipiodol group) and those who do not receive lipiodol (referred to as the control group). Methods: From January 2016 through December 2023, 85 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. In total, 40 patients received HAIC with lipiodol, while 45 patients were given HAIC without lipiodol. The modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors were used to evaluate the tumor response, which was assessed through an imaging study. The two groups were compared regarding their overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: The outcomes between the lipiodol group and control group demonstrated no significant difference: the objective response rates (p = 0.066) were 32.5% and 15.6%; the disease control rates (p = 0.556) were 67.5% and 73.3%; the median OS times (p = 0.339) were 224 days and 398 days; the median PFS (p = 0.334) times were 191 days and 286 days in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. Adverse events also showed no significant difference between the two groups: elevation of total bilirubin (p = 0.834) rates were 40.0% and 37.8%; elevation of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.191) percentages were 35.0% and 22.2%; and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase values (p = 0.058) were 65.0% and 44.4% in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. Conclusions: HAIC without lipiodol was non-inferior to HAIC with lipiodol in the clinical outcome.

A Phase II Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effect and Safety of Nanvuranlat in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers Previously Treated by Systemic Chemotherapy.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanvuranlat [an L-type amino acid transporter 1 inhibitor] monotherapy as a later-line treatment in advanced, metastatic, and refractory biliary tract cancers. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study was conducted across fourteen leading Japanese cancer centers and hospitals. Nanvuranlat 25 mg/m2/day or placebo was given intravenously in cycles of 5 consecutive days, followed by 9 days off. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and disease control rate. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with high L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression and biliary tract cancer subtypes. A total of 211 patients were screened, of which 105 eligible patients were randomized. Among these, 70 received nanvuranlat and 35 received placebo. Nanvuranlat demonstrated an improvement in PFS when compared with placebo (HR, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.90; P = 0.02). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 30.0% and 22.9% of those in the nanvuranlat and placebo groups, respectively. The overall survival was not statistically different between nanvuranlat- and placebo-treated patients. An exploratory analysis indicated that nanvuranlat is warranted to evaluate its long-term clinical benefit in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. Compared with placebo, nanvuranlat improved PFS in patients with advanced and refractory biliary tract cancer with an acceptable safety profile. Further studies of this promising compound are warranted in the population of patients who are exhausted from treatment options.

Neo-adjuvant radiation and intratumoral immunotherapy followed by surgery-NARIS trial for extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

Extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) is a rare malignant nonepithelial disease, calling for combined modality treatments with surgery to further improve local control rates and long-term survival, especially in patients with multiple local recurrences with or without risk of amputation. In this double-arm, open-label, Phase II clinical trial, we will enroll 30 patients with pathologically confirmed ESTS without nodal involvement or distant metastases. Patients are randomly assigned to the combination treatment group or the radiation monotherapy group. Additionally, tumor and biological samples will be obtained directly before and after neoadjuvant therapy, allowing for studies of immune response and primary drug resistance mechanisms.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2200060659 (http://www.chictr.org.cn) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Levels of serum lipids predict responses to PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment in small cell lung cancer: an observational study.

Immunotherapy provides new hope to individuals with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Predicting biomarkers for clinical effects is crucial for SCLC patients receiving programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor treatment. The aim of this study was to clarify the value of serum lipids as predictors of immune related adverse events (irAEs) and the anti-tumour effects in SCLC patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment. This study included patients with SCLC who received at least one cycle of PD-L1inhibitors at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from August 2020 to December 2023. We collected the clinical data of the SCLC patients, including basic information and serum lipid levels, before immunotherapy. The irAEs rate was 16.1% of 124 enrolled patients. In multivariate analysis, the triglyceride (TG)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio was an independent predictor of irAEs (p = 0.045). Tumour response analysis indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) was 43.4% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.5%. Seventy-seven patients experienced any progression-free survival (PFS) event. The median PFS was longer in the HDL-C-high group (10.03months) than in the HDL-C-low group (6.67months) (p = 0.043). In Cox regression analysis, the serum HDL-C level was an independent predictor of PFS (p = 0.002). For patients of the high TG/HDL-C ratio, the ORR significantly differed between patients who suffered from any irAEs and those who did not (p = 0.0139). This study found that serum lipid levels might predict the responses to anti-PD-L1 as first-line treatment for SCLC.

Dose-Reduction of Bevacizumab in Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Therapy Extends Treatment duration with Disease Control in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: Atezolizumab (ATZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy is widely used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, combination therapy is typically interrupted or discontinued owing to BEV-related adverse events. In this study, we examined the effects of BEV dose-reduction on the treatment of unresectable HCC using propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Overall, 119 patients with HCC who were treated with ATZ + BEV between November 2020 and October 2022 were enrolled retrospectively at our institute. The therapeutic effects and safety of BEV dose-reduction and non-dose reduction after PSM were compared. Decision-tree analysis was used to investigate treatment duration in the patients. Results: Significant differences were not observed between the two groups after PSM. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) assessed by modified RECIST did not differ significantly between the two groups (BEV non-dose-reduction/dose-reduction: ORR; 46/34%, DCR; 80/91%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) also did not differ significantly between the two groups (BEV non-dose-reduction/dose-reduction: PFS; 5.6/8.6 months, OS; 18.6/15.5 months). The median duration of treatment in the BEV dose-reduction group was significantly longer than that in the non-dose-reduction group (BEV non-dose-reduction/dose-reduction: 4.8/9.1 months, p = 0.038). Decision-tree analysis revealed that dose-reduction of BEV was the first distinguish factor for the extension of treatment duration with ATZ + BEV. Conclusion: BEV dose-reduction can be effectively used in maintaining the treatment duration of ATZ + BEV while maintaining therapeutic effects and safety in real-world clinical practice.

Camrelizumab combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib or lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective study

Introduction and ObjectivesWe initiated this study to explore the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib or lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib or Lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and MethodsFrom June 2019 to November 2022, 127 advanced HCC patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. This consisted of 44 patients that received camrelizumab plus TACE plus sorafenib or lenvatinib (triple therapy group) and 83 patients that received TACE plus sorafenib or lenvatinib (double treatment group). The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were compared between the two patient groups. ResultsOur findings demonstrated that patients received the triple therapy exhibited superior median OS (15.8 vs. 10.3 months, P=0.0011) and median PFS (7.2 vs. 5.2 months, P=0.019) compared to the double treatment group. In addition, the triple therapy group exhibited better 6-month (93.5% vs. 66.3%), 12-month (67.2% vs. 36.3%), and 24-month (17.2% vs. 7.6%) survival rates than the double treatment group. However, the ORR (43.2% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.106) and DCR (93.2% vs. 81.9%, P = 0.084) of the two groups were similar. Subgroup analysis showed that compared with the double treatment group, the triple therapy group had a better mOS for HCC with HBV (15.8 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.0015) and tumor diameter ≥ 5cm (15.3 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.00055). ConclusionsCamrelizumab plus TACE and sorafenib or lenvatinib may be a promising treatment approach for the clinical management of unresectable HCC patients.

Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis F9 for Cucumber Growth Promotion and Suppression of Fusarium wilt Disease.

Cucumber wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum (FOC), is a soilborne disease that poses a significant threat to cucumber production, resulting in substantial yield losses. This study aimed to evaluate the biocontrol and growth-promoting effects of Bacillus velezensis, a highly active bacterial strain. In vitro assays revealed that B. velezensis F9 exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activity against eight plant pathogenic fungi, with inhibition ratio ranging from 62.66% to 88.18%. Additionally, the strain displayed the ability to produce IAA (5.97 ± 1.75 µg/mL), fix nitrogen, produce siderophores, and form biofilms. In vitro growth promotion assays demonstrated that different concentrations of B. velezensis F9 significantly promoted cucumber seedling growth. Furthermore, two pot experiments revealed that the strain exhibited biocontrol efficacy against cucumber wilt, with disease control rates ranging from 42.86% to 67.78%. Notably, the strain significantly increased the plant height, fresh weight, and dry weight, with increases ranging from 20.67% to 60.04%, 40.27% to 75.51%, and 22.07% to 52.54%, respectively. Two field trials confirmed the efficacy of B. velezensis F9 in controlling cucumber wilt, with disease control rates of 44.95% and 33.99%, respectively. The strain effectively alleviated the dwarfing and wilting symptoms caused by the pathogen. Compared with the FOC treatment, the F9 + FOC treatment significantly increased the plant height, fresh weight, and dry weight, with increases of 43.85% and 56.28%, 49.49% and 23.70%, and 36.25% and 73.63%, respectively. Enzyme activity assays indicated that inoculation significantly increased SOD activity in cucumber leaves and neutral phosphatase, sucrase, and urease activity in rhizosphere soil. Correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between the disease index and plant height, fresh weight, dry weight, and peroxidase activity, with correlation coefficients of -0.53, -0.60, -0.38, and -0.45, respectively. These findings suggest that plant height, fresh weight, and dry weight are significantly negatively correlated with the cucumber disease index, highlighting their importance as indicators for evaluating the biocontrol efficacy of B. velezensis F9. In conclusion, B. velezensis F9 is a highly effective plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with excellent biocontrol potential, showcasing promising applications in agricultural production.

Adrenal Insufficiency following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) of Adrenal Gland Metastases.

Adrenal metastases are often treated with stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR). We aimed to assess the incidence, timing, and factors associated with the development of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) following SAbR. A retrospective cohort study comprised 66 consecutive patients (73% men, median age 61 years) who underwent SAbR for adrenal metastasis. The series encompassed metastases from renal cell carcinoma (41%), lung tumors (38%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (9%), melanoma (5%), and others (7%). Median follow-up was 17 months from SAbR. Nine (14%) patients developed PAI at a median of 4.3 months (range, 0.7-20.2). The incidence of PAI was 44% in patients with prior adrenalectomy receiving unilateral SAbR, 44% with bilateral SAbR, 2% with unaffected contralateral gland, and 0% with bilateral metastases treated with unilateral SAbR. PAI was associated with prior adrenalectomy (odds ratio [OR] 32) and bilateral SAbR (OR 8.2), but not age, sex, metastasis size, or biological effective dose. Post-SAbR 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 82% and 75%, respectively. Patients undergoing SAbR for adrenal metastasis are at high risk of developing PAI. PAI is associated with bilateral SAbR and contralateral adrenalectomy. PAI is unlikely with a remaining unaffected adrenal gland or in the setting of bilateral adrenal metastases with unilateral SAbR.

Salvage chemotherapy regimens with arsenic trioxide for relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a promising approach

In patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma (NB), the limited efficacy of conventional chemotherapies necessitates the exploration of new treatment options. Previous studies have highlighted the anti-tumor properties of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in high-risk NB (HR-NB). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of ATO combined with salvage chemotherapy regimens, featuring cyclophosphamide and topotecan, as a foundational treatment for children with relapsed or refractory NB. Eleven patients (four relapsed, seven refractory NB) were retrospectively analyzed for efficacy and treatment relevance. Salvage treatments, incorporating ATO (0.18 mg/kg daily for 8 h intravenously on days 1 to 10), were administered upon disease progression or relapse, with assessments conducted every two cycles. Treatments had 63.6% efficacy, with six cases of partial response, one case of stable disease, and four cases of disease progression. The overall response rate was 54.5%, and the disease control rate was 63.6%. Importantly, the systemic toxicity experienced by patients following salvage chemotherapy with ATO was mild. Salvage chemotherapy regimens featuring ATO demonstrated potential for prolonging disease stabilization for relapsed or refractory HR-NB patients, exhibiting both favorable efficacy and safety profiles. This suggests further clinical exploration and promotion of this therapeutic approach in the treatment of NB.

Clinical Impact of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Nutritional Status in Patients with Recurrent or Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Nivolumab

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of skeletal muscle mass and nutritional status in gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy as late-line treatment. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 90 gastric cancer patients who previously received anti-PD-1 therapy (nivolumab). On computed tomography images captured before nivolumab induction, the skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) was defined as the erector muscle area (cm2) divided by the height (m) squared. Patients were divided into two groups: those with SMI-high (n = 45) and those with SMI-low (n = 45). Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was also calculated before nivolumab induction. The associations of SMI and PNI with response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were analyzed. Results: The cutoff values for SMI were determined as 13.45 for males and 10.41 for females. SMI-high was significantly associated with a higher RR (odds ratio = 12.36, p = 0.02) and DCR (odds ratio = 2.97, p = 0.02). Although not significant, PNI-high also tended to be associated with a higher RR. Multivariate analysis showed that SMI-high was independently associated with a higher RR and higher DCR in gastric cancer. Moreover, prognostic analyses revealed that SMI-high (log-rank test p = 0.008) and PNI-high (log-rank test p = 0.0008) were significantly associated with longer OS since nivolumab induction. SMI-high was also associated with longer PFS (log-rank test p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in immune-related adverse event between SMI-low and SMI-high. Conclusion: SMI and PNI were associated with nivolumab efficacy in gastric cancer patients. Management of skeletal muscle loss and nutritional status in gastric cancer patients who will receive nivolumab would be beneficial to enhance survival outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CAP 02 Re-challenge): A single-arm, phase II study

BackgroundWith the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs. MethodsThis study enrolled patients aged 18–75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). ResultsBetween September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4–22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6–81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8–6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5–13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred. ConclusionsThis study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile.

Meta-analysis of Targeted Therapies in EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy and Safety of Osimertinib, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib as First-line Treatment.

Some of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases enhance somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene within the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) domain. In such cases, first-line treatments are EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients, focusing on osimertinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib. A systematic electronic search was conducted on 3 electronic databases-Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science-from inception to May 2024 to locate relevant trials reporting the safety and efficacy of osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. No language or data restriction was applied to the search strategy. The assessed effects were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). RoB 2 tool was utilized to determine the risk of bias while R programming language performed all the statistical synthesis. Out of 15,275 search results, only 19 trials were eligible for this meta-analysis. All the 3 EGFR-TKIs depicted effectiveness and safety among NSCLC patients, but osimertinib improved the ORR by 72% (95% CI: 65%, 78%) as compared with erlotinib (69% [95% CI: 58%, 79%]) and gefitinib (64% [95% CI: 64%, 78%]). Overall, the 3 EGFR-TKIs were effective by improving ORR 68% (95% CI: 63%, 73%). Similarly, osimertinib demonstrated highly effective impacts in disease control among NSCLC patients by 94% (95% CI: 91%, 97%) compared with gefitinib (68% [95% CI: 41%, 89%]). Overall, the 2 EGFR-TKIs were effective in disease control among NSCLC patients (82% [95% CI: 67%, 93%]). The pooled analyses have shown that erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib are safe and effective first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. The meta-analysis outcomes have demonstrated that osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib positively impact overall response rate and disease control.

Clinical benefit and safety profile of cross-line therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a retrospective study of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and have transformed the therapeutic landscape. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy in which another CDK4/6i is continued after progression on a prior CDK4/6i may still offer advantageous therapeutic effects. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is an area of active investigation in the ongoing pursuit to improve outcomes for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- ABC. This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated with cross-line CDK4/6is (abemaciclib, palbociclib, ribociclib, and dalpiciclib) after progression with another CDK4/6i. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, objective response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, as promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Eighty-two HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received cross-line CDK4/6i therapy from January 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years. The median PFS of all patients was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.2). Cox regression analysis identified lung metastasis and a switch to endocrine therapy following prior CDK4/6i therapy as independent predictive factors for PFS. Notably, patients who previously received abemaciclib and switched to palbociclib upon disease progression had a median PFS of 10.7 months. The strategy of transitioning to chemotherapy after progression on a prior CDK4/6i, then to a subsequent CDK4/6i merits further investigation. Hematologic toxicity was the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs. No instances of fatal safety events were observed. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is associated with significant clinical benefits and manageable safety profiles in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, which underscores cross-line CDK4/6i therapy potential as an effective treatment strategy.

Isolated Limb Infusion for Limb-Threatening Sarcomas.

Isolated limb infusion (ILI) treats unresectable extremity malignancies with high-dose regional chemotherapy limited to the limb. This study assessed long-term outcomes after ILI for limb-threatening sarcomas. A retrospective review analyzed patients with an extremity sarcoma who underwent ILI with melphalan and dactinomycin from 2008 to 2023 at a single institution. The study identified 61 patients (52.5% female; median age, 73 years; range, 20-94 years). Of these patients, 68.9% had lower-extremity disease. The median follow-up period was 6.9 years. The overall response rate was 48.3% (complete response [CR], 21.7%; partial response [PR], 26.7%), and the disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+stable disease [SD]) was 65%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the patients with CR/PR/SD/progressive disease (PD) was respectively 16.8/9.6/4.8/2.4 months (P<0.0001). The responders (CR+PR) had significantly longer PFS than the non-responders (SD+PD) (hazard ratio [HR], 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-12.9; P<0.001). The median in-field PFS times for CR/PR/SD/PD were respectively 16.8/12/4.8/2.4 months (P<0.001). The responders had a significantly longer risk of in-field PFS than the non-responders (HR, 5.9; 95% CI 2.9-12.0; P<0.001). The median distant relapse PFS for CR/PR/SD/PD was not reached (NR)/NR/44.4/40.8 months (P=0.02). The responders had a significantly longer distant relapse PFS than the non-responders (HR, 2.7; range, 1.1-6.8; P=0.04). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.6 years for the responders and 4.1 years for the non-responders (P=0.02). The disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 87% at 1 year, 71% at 3 years, and 64% at 5 years. The median DSS was not reached for the responders and was 4.1 years for the non-responders (P=0.003). The limb salvage rates at 6 months were 85% at 1 year, 80% at 3 years, and 70% at 5 years. The patients with PD had a higher risk of requiring amputation than the patients with CR+PR+SD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI 1.0-8.7; P=0.04). The 5-year limb salvage rates after ILI are notably high, reaching 70%. After ILI, the responders had significantly better in-field and distant relapse PFS, OS, and DSS.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of first-line systemic treatments for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of various first-line initial treatment systemic regimens for patients with unresectable esophageal squamous carcinoma(ESCC), utilizing a network meta-analysis approach. A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials focusing on the primary treatment of esophageal cancer ESCC was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, up until November 17, 2023. The quality of the included studies was rigorously assessed using Review Manager software. Subsequently, data analysis was meticulously carried out employing R software. The first-line treatment regimens examined were: CD (Cisplatin + Docetaxel), CET-CF (Cetuximab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), CF (Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), N-CF (Nivolumab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), NI (Nivolumab + Ipilimumab), Nim-CF (Nimotuzumab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), P-CF (Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil), and Ser-CF (Serplulimab + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil). The Primary endpoints included the overall survival(OS),progression-free survival (PFS),objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).The secondary endpoint was adverse effects(AEs). The analysis encompassed eight studies, incorporating a total of 3,051 patients with untreated esophageal cancer. There are 45 people in the CD regimen,32 in the CET-CF regimen,1,212 in the CF regimen,447 in the N-CF regimen,456 in the NI regimen,53 in the Nim-CF regimen,447 in the P-CF regimen and 368 in the Ser-CF regimen. The network meta-analysis revealed that, in comparison to the CF regimen, the other regimens (CD, CET-CF, N-CF, NI, Nim-CF, P-CF, and Ser-CF) did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). However, Ser-CF potentially offers superior outcomes in terms of OS and PFS when juxtaposed with other regimens. Notably, N-CF was associated with a substantial increase in the objective response rate (ORR), and CET-CF markedly improved the disease control rate (DCR). In terms of adverse effects, N-CF was more likely to cause anorexia, whereas CET-CF was significantly associated with nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and skin disorders. The current evidence suggests that N-CF may provide the most favorable outcomes in terms of ORR, while CET-CF could be the optimal choice for enhancing DCR in patients with untreated esophageal cancer.

Chemotherapy combined with Shenmai injection alleviates inflammatory response and side effects in the patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis.

To assess the inflammatory response and side effects of chemotherapy combined with Shenmai injection (SMI) in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). This retrospective cohort study included the clinical data of 152 patients with advanced CRC admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University from April 2020 to April 2023. The patients were divided into control group (patients received chemotherapy treatment, n=75) and observation group (patients received chemotherapy combined with SMI, n=77) based on the treatment received. Tumor control rate, levels of immune function indicators before and after treatment, levels of inflammatory factor indicators, and incidence of toxic side effects in two groups were analyzed. Tumor control rate in the observation group (89.61%) was higher than that in the control group (77.33%) (P<0.05). After the treatment, the levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+in both groups were significantly higher than before the treatment, and significantly higher in the observation group compared to the control group (P<0.05). After the treatment, serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) in both groups decreased compared to pretreatment levels, and was significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy combined with SMI better alleviates inflammatory response in patients with advanced CRC, enhance immune function, and improve tumor control rate, with a lower incidence of toxic side effects.

Measurement of changes in serum-based inflammatory indicators to monitor response to nivolumab monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BackgroundNonresectable gastric cancer develops rapidly; thus, monitoring disease progression especially in patients receiving nivolumab as late-line therapy is important. Biomarkers may facilitate the evaluation of nivolumab treatment response. Herein, we assessed the utility of serum-based inflammatory indicators for evaluating tumor response to nivolumab.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study included 111 patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy for nonresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer from October 2017 to October 2021. We measured changes in the C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in serum from baseline to after the fourth administration of nivolumab. Furthermore, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ROCs) for CAR, PLR, and NLR to identify the optimal cutoff values for treatment response. We also investigated the relationship between clinicopathologic factors and disease control (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) using the chi-squared test.ResultsThe overall response rate (complete and partial response) was 11.7%, and the disease control rate was 44.1%. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.0 (95% CI 10.7‒19.2) months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 (95% CI 3.0‒5.9) months. The AUC ROCs for CAR, PLR, and NLR before nivolumab monotherapy for patients with progressive disease (PD) were 0.574 (95% CI, 0.461‒0.687), 0.528 (95% CI, 0.418‒0.637), and 0.511 (95% CI, 0.401‒0.620), respectively. The values for changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR were 0.766 (95% CI, 0.666‒0.865), 0.707 (95% CI, 0.607‒0.807), and 0.660 (95% CI 0.556‒0.765), respectively. The cutoff values for the treatment response were 3.0, 1.3, and 1.4 for CAR, PLR, and NLR, respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly longer when the treatment response values for changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR were below these cutoff values (CAR: OS, p < 0.0001 and PFS, p < 0.0001; PLR: OS, p = 0.0289 and PFS, p = 0.0302; and NLR: OS, p = 0.0077 and PFS, p = 0.0044).ConclusionsMeasurement of the changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR could provide a simple, prompt, noninvasive method to evaluate response to nivolumab monotherapy.Trial registrationThis study is registered with number K2023006.

Chromosomal instability is associated with prognosis and efficacy of bevacizumab after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Introduction Individualized treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) remains challenging due to differences in the severity of metastatic disease and tumour biology. Exploring specific prognostic risk subgroups is urgently needed. The current study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of chromosomal instability (CIN) in patients with initially resectable CRLM and the predictive value of CIN for the efficacy of bevacizumab. Methods Ninety-one consecutive patients with initially resectable CRLM who underwent curative liver resection from 2006 to 2018 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were selected for analysis. CIN was evaluated by automated digital imaging systems. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and CD31 expression in paraffin-embedded specimens. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models. Results Patients with high chromosomal instability (CIN-H) had a worse 3-year RFS rate (HR, 1.953; 95% CI, 1.001–3.810; p = 0.049) and a worse 3-year OS rate (HR, 2.449; 95% CI, 1.150–5.213; p = 0.016) than those with low chromosomal instability (CIN-L). CIN-H was identified as an independent prognostic factor for RFS (HR, 2.569; 95% CI, 1.078–6.121; p = 0.033) and OS (HR, 3.852; 95% CI, 1.173–12.645; p = 0.026) in the multivariate analysis. The protein levels of IL-6, VEGFA and CD31 were upregulated in patients in the CIN-H group compared to those in the CIN-L group in both primary tumour and liver metastases tissues. Among them, 22 patients with recurrent tumours were treated with first-line bevacizumab treatment and based on the clinical response assessment, disease control rates were adversely associated with chromosomal instability (p = 0.043). Conclusions Our study showed that high chromosomal instability is a negative prognostic factor for patients with initially resectable CRLM after liver resection. CIN may have positive correlations with angiogenesis through expression of IL-6–VEGFA axis and be used as a potential predictor of efficacy of bevacizumab.