Control Of Histone Gene Expression Research Articles

Higher order genomic organization and regulatory compartmentalization for cell cycle control at the G1/S-phase transition.

Fidelity of histone gene regulation, and ultimately of histone protein biosynthesis, is obligatory for packaging of newly replicated DNA into chromatin. Control of histone gene expression within the 3-dimensional context of nuclear organization is reflected by two well documented observations. DNA replication-dependent histone mRNAs are synthesized at specialized subnuclear domains designated histone locus bodies (HLBs), in response to activation of the growth factor dependent Cyclin E/CDK2/HINFP/NPAT pathway at the G1/S transition in mammalian cells. Complete loss of the histone gene regulatory factors HINFP or NPAT disrupts HLB integrity that is necessary for coordinate control of DNA replication and histone gene transcription. Here we review the molecular histone-related requirements for G1/S-phase progression during the cell cycle. Recently developed experimental strategies, now enable us to explore mechanisms involved in dynamic control of histone gene expression in the context of the temporal (cell cycle) and spatial (HLBs) remodeling of the histone gene loci.

Cell cycle-regulated oscillator coordinates core histone gene transcription through histone acetylation.

DNA replication occurs during the synthetic (S) phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle and features a dramatic induction of histone gene expression for concomitant chromatin assembly. Ectopic production of core histones outside of S phase is toxic, underscoring the critical importance of regulatory pathways that ensure proper expression of histone genes. Several regulators of histone gene expression in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are known, yet the key oscillator responsible for restricting gene expression to S phase has remained elusive. Here, we show that suppressor of Ty (Spt)10, a putative histone acetyltransferase, and its binding partner Spt21 are key determinants of S-phase-specific histone gene expression. We show that Spt21 abundance is restricted to S phase in part by anaphase promoting complex Cdc20-homologue 1 (APC(Cdh1)) and that it is recruited to histone gene promoters in S phase by Spt10. There, Spt21-Spt10 enables the recruitment of a cascade of regulators, including histone chaperones and the histone-acetyltransferase general control nonderepressible (Gcn) 5, which we hypothesize lead to histone acetylation and consequent transcription activation.

Replication stress-induced alternative mRNA splicing alters properties of the histone RNA-binding protein HBP/SLBP: a key factor in the control of histone gene expression

Animal replication-dependent histone genes produce histone proteins for the packaging of newly replicated genomic DNA. The expression of these histone genes occurs during S phase and is linked to DNA replication via S-phase checkpoints. The histone RNA-binding protein HBP/SLBP (hairpin-binding protein/stem-loop binding protein), an essential regulator of histone gene expression, binds to the conserved hairpin structure located in the 3′UTR (untranslated region) of histone mRNA and participates in histone pre-mRNA processing, translation and histone mRNA degradation. Here, we report the accumulation of alternatively spliced HBP/SLBP transcripts lacking exons 2 and/or 3 in HeLa cells exposed to replication stress. We also detected a shorter HBP/SLBP protein isoform under these conditions that can be accounted for by alternative splicing of HBP/SLBP mRNA. HBP/SLBP mRNA alternative splicing returned to low levels again upon removal of replication stress and was abrogated by caffeine, suggesting the involvement of checkpoint kinases. Analysis of HBP/SLBP cellular localization using GFP (green fluorescent protein) fusion proteins revealed that HBP/SLBP protein and isoforms lacking the domains encoded by exon 2 and exons 2 and 3 were found in the nucleus and cytoplasm, whereas HBP/SLBP lacking the domain encoded by exon 3 was predominantly localised to the nucleus. This isoform lacks the conserved region important for protein–protein interaction with the CTIF [CBP80/20 (cap-binding protein 80/20)]-dependent initiation translation factor and the eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E)-dependent translation factor SLIP1/MIF4GD (SLBP-interacting protein 1/MIF4G domain). Consistent with this, we have previously demonstrated that this region is required for the function of HBP/SLBP in cap-dependent translation. In conclusion, alternative splicing allows the synthesis of HBP/SLBP isoforms with different properties that may be important for regulating HBP/SLBP functions during replication stress.

Direct Interplay among Histones, Histone Chaperones, and a Chromatin Boundary Protein in the Control of Histone Gene Expression

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone chaperone Rtt106 binds newly synthesized histone proteins and mediates their delivery into chromatin during transcription, replication, and silencing. Rtt106 is also recruited to histone gene regulatory regions by the HIR histone chaperone complex to ensure S-phase-specific expression. Here we showed that this Rtt106:HIR complex included Asf1 and histone proteins. Mutations in Rtt106 that reduced histone binding reduced Rtt106 enrichment at histone genes, leading to their increased transcription. Deletion of the chromatin boundary element Yta7 led to increased Rtt106:H3 binding, increased Rtt106 enrichment at histone gene regulatory regions, and decreased histone gene transcription at the HTA1-HTB1 locus. These results suggested a unique regulatory mechanism in which Rtt106 sensed the level of histone proteins to maintain the proper level of histone gene transcription. The role of these histone chaperones and Yta7 differed markedly among the histone gene loci, including the two H3-H4 histone gene pairs. Defects in silencing in rtt106 mutants could be partially accounted for by Rtt106-mediated changes in histone gene repression. These studies suggested that feedback mediated by histone chaperone complexes plays a pivotal role in regulating histone gene transcription.

The control of histone gene expression

Histone proteins are essential for the packaging of DNA into chromosomes. Histone gene expression is cell-cycle-regulated and coupled to DNA replication. Control of histone gene expression occurs at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level and ensures that a fine balance between histone abundance and DNA replication is maintained for the correct packaging of newly replicated DNA into chromosomes. In the present paper, we review histone gene expression, highlighting the control mechanisms and key molecules involved in this process.

Spt10 and Spt21 are required for transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transcriptional silencing occurs at three classes of genomic regions: near the telomeres, at the silent mating type loci, and within the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats. In all three cases, silencing depends upon several factors, including specific types of histone modifications. In this work we have investigated the roles in silencing for Spt10 and Spt21, two proteins previously shown to control transcription of particular histone genes. Building on a recent study showing that Spt10 is required for telomeric silencing, our results show that in both spt10 and spt21 mutants, silencing is reduced near telomeres and at HMLα, while it is increased at the rDNA. Both spt10 and spt21 mutations cause modest effects on Sir protein recruitment and histone modifications at telomeric regions, and they cause significant changes in chromatin structure, as judged by its accessibility to dam methylase. These silencing and chromatin changes are not seen upon deletion of HTA2-HTB2, the primary histone locus regulated by Spt10 and Spt21. These results suggest that Spt10 and Spt21 control silencing in S. cerevisiae by altering chromatin structure through roles beyond the control of histone gene expression.

Post-transcriptional control of animal histone gene expression—not so different after all…

Histone proteins are essential components of eukaryotic chromosomes. The expression of histone genes is cell cycle controlled and coupled to DNA replication, to ensure the packaging of replicated DNA into chromatin. The post-transcriptional control of histone gene expression is a key element in this coupling to DNA replication. It involves mRNA 3' end formation by histone-specific nuclear RNA processing, which produces mRNAs lacking a poly(A) tail, translation and mRNA stability control. This requires several histone-specific trans-acting factors and was thought to be a special case. Here we review recent observations that now reveal that many of the factors involved are shared with processing, translation and degradation of poly(A) mRNA.

Histone gene expression and histone mRNA 3' end structure in Caenorhabditis elegans.

BackgroundHistone protein synthesis is essential for cell proliferation and required for the packaging of DNA into chromatin. In animals, histone proteins are provided by the expression of multicopy replication-dependent histone genes. Histone mRNAs that are processed by a histone-specific mechanism to end after a highly conserved RNA hairpin element, and lack a poly(A) tail. In vertebrates and Drosophila, their expression is dependent on HBP/SLBP that binds to the RNA hairpin element. We showed previously that these cis and trans acting regulators of histone gene expression are conserved in C. elegans. Here we report the results of an investigation of the histone mRNA 3' end structure and of histone gene expression during C. elegans development.ResultsSequence analysis of replication-dependent histone genes revealed the presence of several highly conserved sequence elements in the 3' untranslated region of histone pre-mRNAs, including an RNA hairpin element and a polyadenylation signal. To determine whether in C. elegans histone mRNA 3' end formation occurs at this polyadenylation signal and results in polyadenylated histone mRNA, we investigated the mRNA 3' end structure of histone mRNA. Using poly(A) selection, RNAse protection and sequencing of histone mRNA ends, we determined that a majority of C. elegans histone mRNAs lack a poly(A) tail and end three to six nucleotides after the hairpin structure, after an A or a U, and have a 3' OH group. RNAi knock down of CDL-1, the C. elegans HBP/SLBP, does not significantly affect histone mRNA levels but severely depletes histone protein levels. Histone gene expression varies during development and is reduced in L3 animals compared to L1 animals and adults. In adults, histone gene expression is restricted to the germ line, where cell division occurs.ConclusionOur findings indicate that the expression of C. elegans histone genes is subject to control mechanisms similar to the ones in other animals: the structure of C. elegans histone mRNA 3' ends is compatible with histone-specific mRNA 3' end processing; CDL-1 functions in post-transcriptional control of histone gene expression; and C. elegans histone mRNA levels are elevated at periods of active cell division, indicating that histone gene expression is linked to DNA replication.

The Histone Gene Transcription Factor HiNF-P Stabilizes Its Cell Cycle Regulatory Co-Activator p220NPAT

Orderly progression through the cell cycle requires the transcriptional activation of histone genes to support packaging of newly replicated DNA. Induction of human histone gene expression is mediated by a co-activation complex containing transcription factor HiNF-P and its cofactor p220NPAT. Here, using cells synchronized in S-phase and in mitosis, as well as serum-stimulated cells, we have investigated how HiNF-P is regulated during the cell cycle and examined its stability relative to p220NPAT. We find that while HiNF-P is maintained at steady-state levels throughout the cell cycle, both HiNF-P and p220NPAT are actively degraded by the proteasome pathway. Importantly, elevation of HiNF-P levels enhances the stability of its co-activator p220NPAT. The HiNF-P-dependent stabilization of p220NPAT may reinforce signaling through the cyclin E/CDK2/p220NPAT pathway and contribute to coordinate control of histone gene expression.

New nuclear functions of the glycolytic protein, glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase, in mammalian cells

Recent studies establish that the glycolytic protein, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), is not simply a classical metabolic protein involved in energy production. Instead, it is a multifunctional protein with defined functions in numerous subcellular processes. New investigations establish a primary role for GAPDH in a variety of critical nuclear pathways apart from its already recognized role in apoptosis. These new roles include its requirement for transcriptional control of histone gene expression, its essential function in nuclear membrane fusion, its necessity for the recognition of fraudulently incorporated nucleotides in DNA, and its mandatory participation in the maintenance of telomere structure. Each of these new functions requires GAPDH association into a series of multienzyme complexes. Although other proteins in those complexes are variable, GAPDH remains the single constant protein in each structure. To undertake these new functions, GAPDH is recruited to the nucleus in S phase or its intracellular distribution is regulated as a function of drug exposure. Other investigations relate a substantial role for nuclear GAPDH in hyperglycemic stress and the development of metabolic syndrome. Considerations of future directions as well as the role of GAPDH post-translational modification as a basis for its multifunctional activities is suggested.

The human histone gene expression regulator HBP/SLBP is required for histone and DNA synthesis, cell cycle progression and cell proliferation in mitotic cells

Histone proteins are essential for chromatin formation, and histone gene expression is coupled to DNA synthesis. In metazoans, the histone RNA binding protein HBP/SLBP is involved in post-transcriptional control of histone gene expression. In vitro assays have demonstrated that human HBP/SLBP is involved in histone mRNA 3' end formation and translation. We have inhibited human HBP/SLBP expression by RNA interference to determine its function during the mitotic cell cycle. Inhibition of HBP/SLBP expression resulted in the inhibition of histone gene expression and DNA synthesis, the inhibition of cell cycle progression in S phase and the inhibition of cell proliferation. These findings indicate that human HBP/SLBP is essential for the coordinate synthesis of DNA and histone proteins and is required for progression through the cell division cycle.

CAMP-dependent reorganization of the Cajal bodies and splicing machinery in cultured Schwann cells.

It is well established that forskolin-induced elevation of cAMP results in activation of DNA synthesis in Schwann cell cultures. This promitotic response is partially mediated by the Cdk2, which is required for the transition from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle. In the present study, we analyze the effects of cAMP elevation in cultured Schwann cells on the transcriptional activity and on the organization of two nuclear compartments involved in pre-mRNA processing: Cajal bodies (CBs) and splicing factor compartments. Our immunofluorescence and quantitative studies show that forskolin treatment induces a 5.6-fold increase in the proportion of S phase Schwann cells, detected by a short pulse (20 min) of BrdU incorporation. This increase in DNA synthesis correlates with an activation of global transcription, as is indicated by the higher nuclear incorporation of BrU in nascent RNA. Forskolin treatment significantly increases the percentage of Schwann cells containing typical CBs, which concentrate spliceosomal snRNPs and the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. This increase in the number of CBs closely correlates with the activation of transcription. Moreover, the occurrence of CBs is significantly higher in BrdU (+) cells than in BrdU (-) cells, indicating that entry in the S phase promotes the formation of CBs. During the S phase, Schwann cell nuclei display higher Cdk2 nuclear staining and concentrate this kinase in CBs. Forskolin also induces a redistribution of the pre-mRNA splicing factors in Schwann cells. Primary cultures of Schwann cells provide an excellent physiological model to demonstrate that the assembly of CBs is a transcription- and replication-dependent cellular event. Moreover, the S phase accumulation of Cdk2 observed in Schwann cells supports a functional link between CBs and DNA replication, which is mediated by the possible participation of CBs in the regulatory control of histone gene expression.

Repressor elements in the coding region of the human histone H4 gene interact with the transcription factor CDP/cut.

The coding region of the human histone H4 gene FO108 undergoes dynamic changes in chromatin structure that correlate with modifications in gene expression. Such structural alterations generally reflect transcription factor interactions with gene regulatory sequences. To test for regulatory elements within the coding region, we performed transient transfection experiments in HeLa cells using constructs with histone H4 sequences fused upstream of a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter and CAT reporter gene. H4 gene sequences from -10 to +210 repressed transcription 4.8-fold. Further deletion and mutational analysis delineated three repressor elements within this region. Using oligonucleotide competition analysis and specific antibody recognition in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, as well as methylation interference and DNase I footprinting analyses, we have identified the CCAAT displacement protein (CDP/cut) as the factor that interacts with these three repressor elements. CDP/cut binding to these repressor sites is proliferation-specific and cell-cycle-regulated, increasing in mid to late S phase. Our results indicate that the proximal 200 nucleotides of the histone H4-coding region contain transcriptional regulatory elements that may contribute to cell-cycle control of histone gene expression by interacting with repressor complexes containing CDP/cut homeodomain transcription factors.

Downregulation of histone H4 gene transcription during postnatal development in transgenic mice and at the onset of differentiation in transgenically derived calvarial osteoblast cultures.

In vivo regulation of cell cycle dependent human histone gene expression was examined in transgenic mice using a fusion construct containing 6.5 kB of a human H4 promoter linked to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. Transcriptional control of histone gene expression, as a function of proliferative activity, was determined. We established the relationship between DNA replication dependent H4 mRNA levels (Northern blot analysis) and H4 promoter activity (CAT assay) during postnatal development in a broad spectrum of tissues. In most tissues sampled in adult animals, the cellular representation of H4 gene transcripts declined in parallel with promoter activity. This result is consistent with transcriptional control of H4 gene expression at the cessation of proliferation. Interestingly, while H4 mRNA was detectable at very low levels post-proliferatively in brain, promoter activity persisted in adult brain, where most of the cells are terminally differentiated. This dissociation between histone gene promoter activity and histone mRNA accumulation points to the possibility of post-transcriptional regulation of histone gene expression in brain. Cultures of osteoblasts were prepared from calvaria of transgenic mice carrying the H4 promoter/CAT reporter construct. In contrast to the brain, in these bone-derived cells, we established by immunohistochemistry that the transition to the quiescent, differentiated state is associated with a transcriptionally mediated downregulation of histone gene expression at the single cell level.

SV40T-immortalized lung alveolar epithelial cells display posttranscriptional regulation of proliferation-related genes

To study the regulation of proliferation of lung alveolar epithelial type 2 cells, we have established a cell line derived from neonatal type 2 cells by transfection with the SV40 large T antigen gene. We find that this cell line, designated SV40-T2, displays the same post-transcriptional control of expression of proliferation-related genes, including c-myc, ornithine decarboxylase, thymidine kinase, and histone, that we have previously described in primary isolates of type 2 cells (Clement et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 318–322, 1990). Both proliferating and nonproliferating SV40-T2 cells express these genes at high levels, but their translation products are only detected in proliferating cells. Using the histone gene as an example, we have found that regulation of expression occurs at the level of transcription and of mRNA turnover, as previously described in other mammalian systems. However, in addition, regulation of expression also occurs at the level of translation of the histone mRNA, because its protein product is not detectable in nonproliferating SV40-T2 cells. We have analyzed the steps which are potentially involved in this translational regulation of histone gene expression in SV40-T2 cells. In both proliferating and nonproliferating cells, histone mRNA was found to be efficiently transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and to associate with the translationally active heavy polysomal fractions. These results indicate that control of histone gene expression (and perhaps that of other proliferation-related genes) in lung epithelial cells may involve either rapid and selective degradation of histone protein or binding factor(s) which modulate translational efficiency of histone mRNA.

Altered binding of human histone gene transcription factors during the shutdown of proliferation and onset of differentiation in HL-60 cells.

Two sites of protein-DNA interaction have been identified in vivo and in vitro in the proximal promoter regions of an H4 and an H3 human histone gene. In proliferating cells, these genes are transcribed throughout the cell cycle, and both the more distal site I and the proximal site II are occupied by promoter-binding factors. In this report we demonstrate that during the shutdown of proliferation and onset of differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60 into cells that exhibit phenotypic properties of monocytes, histone gene expression is down-regulated at the level of transcription. In vivo occupancy of site I by promoter factors persists in the differentiated HL-60 cells, but protein-DNA interactions at site II are selectively lost. Furthermore, in vitro binding activity of the site II promoter factor HiNF-D is lost in differentiated cells, and nuclear extracts from differentiated cells do not support in vitro transcription of these histone genes. Our results suggest that the interaction of HiNF-D with proximal promoter site II sequences plays a primary role in rendering cell growth-regulated histone genes transcribable in proliferating cells. It appears that while cell-cycle control of histone gene expression is mediated by both transcription and mRNA stability, with the shutdown of proliferation and onset mRNA stability, with the shutdown of proliferation and onset of differentiation, histone gene expression is regulated at the transcriptional level.

Selective expression of histone genes in mouse-human hybrid cells

Mouse-human hybrid cells preferentially segregating mouse chromosomes contain predominantly human histone mRNAs and synthesize human histone proteins. In contrast, hybrids segregating human chromosomes contain both human and murine histone mRNAs, yet synthesize only mouse histone proteins. These results suggest transcriptional control of histone gene expression in hybrids segregating mouse chromosomes and post-transcriptional regulation in hybrids segregating human chromosomes.

Sea urchin histone genes: the beginning and end of the message.

The purpose of studies on the regulation of histone gene expression is to explain, for instance, how histone proteins arise in defined stoichiometric relationships in the chromatin, how transcription of histone genes is regulated in the cell cycle and how during the development of some species, histone variant genes are activated sequentially. The control of histone gene expression has m any interesting facets. One is struck by the major differences in balance and importance of the various regulatory mechanisms as they become apparent from investigations in m any laboratories. For example, in yeast, histone gene transcription is tightly coupled to the cell cycle, and the amounts of histone synthesized are determined largely by regulation of histone m RN A turnover (Hereford & Osley 1981). At the other extreme, there is the example of the maturing frog oöcyte where histone m RN A synthesis is uncoupled from DNA synthesis and yields pools of histone 1000-fold in excess of nuclear DNA mass (reviewed by Woodland 1980). Recent reports suggest that even the details of histone gene transcription may vary during the development of the species. The tandem histone gene clusters of sea urchin (G. Spinelli, unpublished results) and frog oocytes are transcribed polycistronically at least at some stages of their development (J. Gall, personal communication), whereas histone gene clusters of the cleaving sea urchin embryos appear to be transcribed monocistronically (Mauron et al. 1981). Finally, in the early embryo the partitioning of the m RN A between nucleus and cytoplasm may be also a regulative process (DeLeon al. 1983).

Control of histone gene expression in Physarum polycephalum. I. Protein synthesis during the cell cycle.

Synchronous cultures of Physarum polycephalum were pulsed with [3H]lysine hydrochloride in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. Plasmodial extracts were separated into nuclear, ribosomal and acid-soluble post-ribosomal cytoplasmic fractions. Core histones could be detected by staining in the nuclear fractions of both S and G2 phases, but were not detected by staining in the cytoplasmic fractions. Newly synthesized histone was present in S-phase nuclei but not in S-phase cytoplasm. The specific activity of newly synthesized histone in G2-phase nuclei decreased by at least 95% compared to S phase and no newly synthesized histone was observed in G2-phase cytoplasmic fractions. Thus histone synthesis is restricted to S phase. There are no free pools of histone in the cytoplasm of Physarum in either S or G2 phases of the cell cycle.

Regulation of specific genes during the cell cycle. Utilization of homologous cDNAs and cloned sequences for studying histone gene expression in human cells.

Evidence for differential gene expression during the cell cycle and approaches for studying cell-cycle-stage specific gene expression are summarized. Attention is focused on regulation of histone gene expression during the cell cycle of continuously dividing cells and after stimulation of nondividing cells to proliferate. The level(s) at which control of histone gene expression occurs and the possible involvement of chromosomal proteins in the regulation of histone gene expression are discussed. The preparation of cloned human histone sequences and their use in studying the structural and functional properties of human histone genes are presented. Index Entries: Cell cycle, gene regulation during; gene regulation, during the cell cycle; regulation of specific genes, during the cell cycle; DNAs, homologous, and histone gene expression; cloned DNAs, and histone gene expression; histone gene expression; gene expression, histone; cloned human histone sequences.