Helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders in many species of cooperatively breeding birds. Several mechanisms by which they do so involve the feeding of nestlings. The presence of additional feeders may result in increased amounts of food brought to nests, which can increase growth rates of nestlings (Dickinson et al. 1996) and reduce starvation (Rowley 1978, Reyer 1980, Emlen and Wrege 1991, Heinsohn 1992). Alternatively, helpers may not increase total feeding rates at nests but instead reduce the workload of one or both breeders. Lightening the load of breeders may translate into increased success in several ways. Relief of feeding responsibilities may allow breeders to devote more time to vigilance and antipredator behavior (Rabenold 1984, Austad and Rabenold 1985). For some species, subsequent survival is higher for members of assisted pairs than for unassisted ones (Stallcup and Woofenden 1978, Reyer 1984, Russell and Rowley 1988). Additionally, in some multiple-brooded species, helper assistance results in shortened interbrood intervals, allowing for the production of more clutches per season (Rowley 1965, Brown and Brown 1981, Rabenold 1984, Russell and Rowley 1988). Here, I describe the feeding contributions made by individuals at assisted and unassisted nests of Western American Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos hesperis) and examine the effects that the feeding contributions of helpers have on nestling feeding rates. I also examine other factors that could affect feeding rates, and the consequences of variation in feeding rates on breeding success. Methods.-I studied members of a resident population of crows on the Balboa and Encino golf courses in Encino, California, from March 1985 through August 1990. The habitat consisted of tracts of grass separated by rows of trees, with additional clumps of trees scattered throughout the site. The climate was southern Californian Mediterranean, with hot, dry summers and occasional winter rains between December and February. I captured 173 free-flying individuals (63 males, 54 females, 56 unsexed) using large walk-in traps and a cannon net. Trapped crows were weighed, measured, and marked with identical patagial tags bear-