Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Research Articles

Calcaneal Scoring as an Adjunct to Modified Oxford Hip Scores: Prediction of Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

In 2 recent studies, modified Oxford hip scores of 16 through 18 have been shown to predict an extremely high risk of contralateral slipping in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). However, the modified Oxford system is not widely used. This may be due, in part, to the complexity of the scoring system, difficulty in viewing all 5 radiographic features on a single x-ray and phenotypic variation in the features. Ossification of the calcaneal apophysis provides an osteologic marker of skeletal maturation in relation to peak height velocity and has been described previously. We examine the value of the calcaneal apophyseal ossification sequence for predicting modified Oxford hip scores. We examined 279 pelvis and matching foot x-rays that were taken at the same session from 94 healthy children aged 3 to 18 years. A fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedist determined the modified Oxford hip score for each hip radiograph. The calcaneal x-rays had been previously graded. Modified Oxford hip scores were compared with calcaneal scores for each set of matched hip and calcaneal x-rays. Stage 0 to 2 calcanei had 94% of corresponding hip radiographs rated as modified Oxford scores of 16 to 18. Stage 3 calcanei had 54% rated as 16 to 18 and 31% rated as scores 19 to 21. Stage 4 calcanei had 31% rated as scores 19 to 21, and 68% rated as scores 22 to 26. Stage 5 calcanei had 100% rated as 22 to 26. Using data from Popejoy and colleagues' study, the weighted risk of contralateral SCFE was 94% for calcaneal stage 0, 86.5% for calcaneal stage 1, 90.3% for calcaneal stage 2, 55.8% for calcaneal stage 3, 6.1% for calcaneal stage 4, and 0 for calcaneal stage 5. Calcaneal stages 0 to 3 correspond entirely to modified Oxford scores indicating elevated risk of contralateral SCFE. The calcaneal scoring system has potential for adjunctive use with the modified Oxford score for prediction of contralateral SCFE.

Subclinical bilateral involvement of the hip in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis—a multicentre study

This study was conducted to assess the posterior inclination of the contralateral femoral epiphysis in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The posterior sloping angle (PSA) was measured using lateral radiographs in 67 patients with a unilateral SCFE and in 41 age-matched normal controls. A symptomatic epiphyseal slip was defined as the development of SCFE. The contralateral PSA in SCFE patients was more widely distributed and significantly larger compared to controls (15.0° vs. 9.0°, p < 0.0001). Forty-seven hips (70.1%) had a PSA of greater than 12.8°, which was +2SD of the control hips. Of the 65 hips excluding the two cases with prophylactic pinning, 11 hips (16.9%) eventually developed a contralateral SCFE during adolescence and their PSA at the initial visit was significantly larger compared to patients without a contralateral SCFE (18.0° vs. 14.3°, p < 0.005) with a cutoff value of 19°. These findings suggested the possibility of bilateral hip involvement in SCFE patients. Hips with greater degrees of PSA (> 19°) are likely to become symptomatic.

A reduction in body mass index lowers risk for bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is occurring in greater numbers, at increasingly younger ages, and more frequently bilaterally (BL-SCFE). Obesity is one risk factor for SCFE. However, it is unclear whether postoperative decreases or increases in body mass index (BMI) alter the risk of subsequent contralateral SCFE. We therefore determined whether (1) BMI percentile was a risk factor for BL-SCFE; and (2) postoperative increases and/or decreases in BMI percentile influenced the risk for BL-SCFE. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 502 patients surgically treated for SCFE and identified 138 (27%) with BL-SCFE and 364 (73%) with unilateral SCFE (UL-SCFE); 173 patients, 60 (35%) with BL-SCFE and 113 (65%) with UL-SCFE met our inclusion criteria. Risk factors included sex, age, slip stability, slip chronicity, slip angle, and obesity. Percentile BMI was recorded at the time of first SCFE surgery, at the time of last followup for patients undergoing UL-SCFE, and at the time of second SCFE surgery for patients undergoing BL-SCFE. Sex, age, slip stability, and slip angle were not associated with BL-SCFE. Postoperative obesity (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-9.7) and acute slip chronicity (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.7) had higher risks for sequential BL-SCFE. Obese patients who became nonobese postoperatively had a decreased risk of sequential BL-SCFE compared with those who remained obese (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 1.2-116.5). Only postoperative obesity and an acute slip were risk factors for sequential BL-SCFE. BMI reduction to lower than the 95% percentile after SCFE surgery was associated with lower risk for BL-SCFE development. The data suggest early supervised therapeutic weight management programs for patients treated for UL-SCFE are important to reduce risk of subsequent SCFE. Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Increased acetabular depth may influence physeal stability in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Multiple mechanical factors affecting the hip have been associated with the development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Whether acetabular depth plays a role in the development of a SCFE has not been elucidated. (1) What is the prevalence of a deep acetabulum in SCFE? (2) Is the presence of a deep acetabulum associated with physeal instability? (3) Is the presence of a deep acetabulum associated with the occurrence of a contralateral SCFE? We retrospectively reviewed 232 patients (156 males) who presented with a unilateral SCFE. Fifty (22%) subsequently developed a contralateral SCFE. The involved and uninvolved sides were evaluated for the presence of a deep acetabulum (DA). Preoperative radiographic parameters, slip stability, development of a contralateral SCFE, and demographic factors were then compared between patients with and without DA. DA was present in 120 hips (52%) with a SCFE. DA was more common in females (55 of 76 [72%]) than males (65 of 156 [42%]). Patients with DA presented with a higher lateral center-edge angle (33° versus 31°), slip angle (52° versus 43°), and with a lower body mass index (28.1 versus 30.0 kg/m(2)). Increased acetabular depth was more common in patients with an unstable SCFE (29 of 41 [71%]) than those with a stable SCFE (91 of 191 [48%]). The presence of DA either on the affected side or the contralateral side did not predict a contralateral SCFE. Despite not predicting a contralateral SCFE, DA may influence physeal stability if a SCFE does develop. Therefore, the contralateral hip with DA should be closely monitored. Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What Are the Risks of Prophylactic Pinning to Prevent Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

Two decision analyses on managing the contralateral, unaffected hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) have failed to yield consistent recommendations. Missing from both, however, are sufficient data on the risks associated with prophylactic pinning using modern surgical techniques. We determined the incidence and nature of complications after contemporary prophylactic fixation of the contralateral, unaffected hip in patients with a unilateral SCFE. We retrospectively identified and reviewed 99 children (mean age, 11 years; range, 8-15 years) who underwent prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip after treatment of a unilateral SCFE at four tertiary-care children's hospitals from 2001 to 2010. Complications on the prophylactic side, such as avascular necrosis (AVN), chondrolysis, fractures, implant pain, and need for further surgery, were recorded. Minimum followup was 12 months (median, 26 months; range, 12-110 months). On the prophylactic side, we found two cases of focal AVN (2%) and no cases of chondrolysis (0%). Two patients sustained periimplant femur fractures (2%). Three patients had symptomatic hardware (3%), two of whom required surgery for implant removal. In three patients (3%), growth occurred off the end of the prophylactic screw before physeal closure, but they did not require revision fixation. No patients developed a subsequent slip on the side of the prophylactic pinning. While prophylactic pinning prevents SCFE, it is not an entirely benign procedure. The possibility of developing complications such as AVN and periimplant fracture should be considered when determining the best management for the contralateral hip in patients who present with unilateral SCFE. Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Epidemiologic Characteristics of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Maori Children

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has been shown to have considerable racial variation. Children of Polynesian, and especially Maori, ethnicity are thought to have the highest worldwide incidence. Despite this, very little published literature exists to corroborate this. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of SCFE in the largest series of Maori children ever published. Case notes and radiographs were used to analyze the demographic and slip characteristics of all SCFE admissions over a 10-year period. Comparisons of these characteristics were made between Maori and New Zealand European (NZE) children and census data were used to provide incidences and racial frequencies for the two groups. A total of 130 Maori children and 44 NZE children had a new diagnosis of SCFE during the study period. For the "at-risk" age group (5 to 14 y), incidence in Maori children (81/100,000) was significantly higher than NZEs (11.3/100,000) (P≤0.001). Maori had a more even distribution of SCFE between males and females (P=0.04), with a lower age at presentation (P=0.002) and a higher incidence of bilateral SCFE (P=0.05). Female children also had a younger age at presentation (P=0.001) and higher incidence of future contralateral SCFE (P=0.02). This is the first published study primarily looking at the epidemiologic characteristics of SCFE in Maori children. It would appear that Maori children have the highest reported worldwide frequency of SCFE and present at a younger age with a greater rate of bilateral SCFE than their counterparts. Prognostic Level III.

Prediction of Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Using the Modified Oxford Bone Age Score

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the modified Oxford bone score can be used as a predictor for the risk of developing contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in children who present with a unilateral slip. We identified 260 patients treated for unilateral SCFE between 1980 and 2002 and followed them up to skeletal maturity or until development of contralateral slip. Exclusion criteria included patients with endocrine or metabolic disorder, Down syndrome, and those with radiographs inadequate to determine the modified Oxford bone score. The initial radiographs were given a score ranging from 16 to 26. Statistical analysis was used to determine whether the modified Oxford bone score was predictive of future development of contralateral slip. A linear regression model was used to estimate the probability of future development of a contralateral slip as related to the modified Oxford bone score. Of the 260 patients, 64 (24%) developed a contralateral slip, at an average of 10 months after initial presentation. Race, sex, age, and weight at initial presentation were not predictive of the development of contralateral slip. The modified Oxford score and a triradiate score of 1 were found to be significant (P<0.0001) predictors, with the modified Oxford score a better overall predictor. The modified Oxford bone age score is the best predictor of the risk of development of a contralateral SCFE in patients presenting with a unilateral slip. Controversy exists regarding prophylactic pinning of a normal hip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE. The benefits of prophylactic pinning must outweigh risk. This study provides probability data for predicting a contralateral slip based on the modified Oxford bone maturity score that can be shared with families and allows physicians to decide their threshold for prophylactically pinning the contralateral hip in patients presenting with a unilateral slip. Therapeutic level IV, Case series.

The epidemiology and demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

The etiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is unknown with many insights coming from epidemiologic/demographic information. A systematic medical literature review regarding SCFE was performed. The incidence is 0.33/100,000 to 24.58/100,000 children 8 to 15 years of age. The relative racial frequency, relative to Caucasians at 1.0, is 5.6 for Polynesians, 3.9 for Blacks, and 2.5 for Hispanics. The average age is 12.0 years for boys and 11.2 years for girls. The physiologic age when SCFE occurs is less variable than the chronologic age. The average symptom duration is 4 to 5 months. Most children are obese: >50% are >95th percentile weight for age with average BMI is 25–30 kg/m2. The onset of SCFE is in the summer when north of 40°N. Bilaterality ranges from 18 to 50%. In children with bilateral involvement, 50–60% present with simultaneous SCFEs and those who present with a unilateral SCFE and subsequently develop a contralateral SCFE do so within 18 months. The age at presentation is younger for those who present with a unilateral SCFE and later develop a contralateral SCFE. The age-weight, age-height, and height test are useful to differentiate between an idiopathic and atypical SCFE.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in an Adult with Panhypopituitarism

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis usually occurs in children going through a pubertal growth spurt, possibly because the immature proximal femoral physis is unable to bear the shear stress. It commonly occurs in adolescents between 10 and 16 years. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in adults is uncommon, with only 10 cases reported in the literature. This article presents a case of a 29-year-old man with craniopharyngioma diagnosed when he was 19. He underwent surgery with subtotal tumor excision and postoperative radiotherapy, but received no further treatment for the panhypopituitarism concomitant with the tumor. He reported sudden onset of left hip pain after riding a bicycle and underwent surgical fixation 5 days later. He also underwent hormone replacement therapy, including prednisolone, thyroxin, desmopressin, and testosterone, and regular clinical follow-up. His hip function recovered with a painless gait. At 18-month follow-up, neither osteonecrosis nor contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis was noted. Furthermore, bilateral proximal femoral physes were also closed. For stable slippage as in this case, in situ pinning fixation is a commendable method. A high index of suspicion of endocrinal disorder and proper management are essential for successful treatment of adult slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

The Utility of Posterior Sloping Angle in Predicting Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Prophylactic pinning of the uninvolved side after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial. The posterior sloping angle (PSA) has previously been proposed to predict contralateral slip. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the PSA can predict subsequent slip after unilateral SCFE, and if so, whether a sex difference exists. A retrospective case-control study was performed comparing 51 patients who initially presented with unilateral SCFE and subsequently developed contralateral slip (Bilateral) with 51 patients who had unilateral SCFE only (Unilateral). Data collected included age, sex, ethnicity, and PSA. The patients in the Bilateral group had significantly higher PSA (14.5±6.1 vs. 10.6±5.3, P=0.001) and were younger (11.3±1.5 vs.12.3±1.2, P<0.001) than the patients in the Unilateral group. A receiver-operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the threshold for pinning a contralateral hip with PSA >12.66 yields an area under the curve of 67%. When the analysis was repeated with respect to sex, girls in the Bilateral group had significantly higher PSA (15.9±6.3 vs. 10.1±6.0, P=0.002) and were younger (10.7±1.1 vs.11.9±1.0, P<0.001) than the girls in the Unilateral group. Among boys, these associations were not significant. A receiver-operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the threshold for pinning a contralateral hip with PSA >13 in girls yields an area under the curve of 76%. PSA is predictive of contralateral slip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE. However, it is more predictive in girls, and we recommend considering prophylactic pinning in girls with PSA >13. Level III.

Chondrolysis, Osteonecrosis, and Slip Severity in Patients with Subsequent Contralateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Prophylactic pinning of the radiographically and clinically normal contralateral hip in a patient with a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of chondrolysis and osteonecrosis and the degree of slip severity in contralateral hips with a subsequent slipped capital femoral epiphysis to determine whether the outcome or complications on the contralateral side were greater than the risks of prophylactic pinning. The medical records of the patients operated on between 1993 and 2003 at a single hospital for treatment of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis were retrospectively evaluated. The severity and the chronicity of the slips were graded. Only children who initially had had a unilateral slip and had been followed for a minimum of twenty-four months or until skeletal maturity were included in the analysis for detection of a subsequent contralateral slip. Patients with more than twelve months of follow-up were included in the analysis for detection of osteonecrosis and chondrolysis. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients had a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis at the time of the primary admission. A subsequent slip developed in the contralateral hip of eighty-two children (36%) within a mean of 6.5 months. Eighteen of the contralateral slips were of moderate or severe severity, with a potential for a poor outcome due to a risk of osteoarthritis in the future. Osteonecrosis or chondrolysis, each an established complication with a poor long-term prognosis, developed in five of the patients with a subsequent contralateral slip. The high prevalence of a subsequent contralateral slip (36%) and the potential complication (high slip severity) and established complications (osteonecrosis and chondrolysis) related to the contralateral slip indicate that prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in a patient with a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis is safer than and preferable to observation and symptomatic treatment.

Posterior Sloping Angle of the Capital Femoral Physis

The management of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the posterior sloping angle (PSA) as described by Barrios et al (J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:445-449) and whether it can be used as a predictor of need for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip. The PSA was measured by 4 different surgeons on 2 separated occasions in 47 unaffected contralateral hips after unilateral SCFE. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.83 (excellent) for the first set of measurements and 0.74 (fair to good) for the second set of measurements. Measurement of the intraobserver ICC revealed an excellent agreement (ICC > 0.75) in 3 of the 4 surgeons and fair to good agreement in 1 of the surgeons (ICC between 0.4 and 0.74). Comparison of the PSA measurements of the first author (M.Z.) with a control group of 20 hips revealed that the PSA was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the group of patients that eventually had a contralateral slip when compared with the PSA of patients in the study group who did not slip and with normal hips in the control group. Patients with contralateral SCFE that did not slip had a significantly higher PSA (P < 0.05) when compared with normal individuals. A PSA of 14.5 degrees or more is recommended for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip. The number needed to treat (NNT) at this cut off to avoid 1 future slip was calculated to be 1.9.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis at Young Age Predicts Bilaterality

Source: Riad J, Bajelidze G, Gabos PG. Bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: predictive factors for contralateral slip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007.27;411–414.Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is characterized by instability of the proximal femoral growth plate. Investigators from the Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Delaware, sought to determine predictors of contralateral slip in children with unilateral SCFE. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 235 patients with SCFE seen between 1990 and 2002. Children were excluded from analysis if they had bilateral disease on initial presentation, had incomplete radiographic data, were treated previously or elsewhere, had known endocrinopathies, or experienced comorbidities necessitating prophylactic screw fixation.The authors identified 70 patients with unilateral disease at presentation. Of these, 16 (23%) went on to develop bilateral disease. The mean age of both boys and girls who later developed bilateral SCFE was less than the mean age of those who did not develop bilateral disease (11.0 vs 11.9 for girls and 12.1 vs 14.2 for boys): 25% of girls younger than 12 years and 37% of boys younger than 14 years developed a contralateral slip. All girls younger than 10 (n=2) and boys younger than 12 (n=5) developed bilateral disease. Bivariate and subsequent multivariate correlation demonstrated a significant association between the development of contralateral SCFE and age (P<.01). For every one year increase in age at initial presentation, the patients were less likely to develop a contralateral slip (OR=.344). The authors conclude that in girls younger than 10 and boys younger than 12 years of age who present with unilateral SCFE, contralateral prophylactic screw fixation should be strongly consideredDr. Raszka has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of a commercial product/device. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/ investigative use of a commercial product/device.SCFE is one of the most common adolescent hip disorders. Boys are more commonly affected than girls.1 Several studies have demonstrated that between 40% and 80% of those who present with unilateral SCFE go on to develop bilateral disease.2–3 Reported predictive factors for contralateral involvement include sex, chronologic age, bone age, race, and obesity, although only age and skeletal maturity were looked at specifically in this study.4–5 Predicting who will develop contralateral disease has important implications for follow-up or the use of prophylactic fixation at the time of surgery for the involved hip. However, data accurately predicting who will develop bilateral disease are lacking.Clinical decision analysis models have reached different conclusions about whether to perform prophylactic fixation because of different assumptions about the risks of developing contralateral disease.6–7 This study adds to the body of evidence that suggests young age at presentation is a risk factor for bilateral SCFE. Unfortunately, the authors could not evaluate the relative contribution of body mass index to the risk of SCFE development as height, and even weight, were often not recorded. Based on this and other studies, the younger the child at the time of presentation with SCFE, the more seriously prophylactic fixation of the uninvolved side should be entertained. Children with SCFE, particularly young adolescents, need to be monitored for contralateral involvement with serial examinations and radiographs.

Bilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

The primary goal in treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is to prevent further slip by stabilizing the physis. Debate exists concerning prophylactic fixation of the uninvolved hip at presentation. Our goal was to determine predictive factors for a contralateral slip after presentation with a unilateral SCFE. Ninety patients with SCFE and complete radiographs were followed up until the bilateral closure of the proximal femoral physis. Chronological age at presentation, sex, and race were recorded. Open or closed triradiate cartilage was recorded, and a modified Oxford bone age assessment was performed. Twenty patients (22%) had bilateral SCFE at presentation, and 70 patients (78%) were unilateral. Of these 70 patients, 16 (23%) later developed a contralateral SCFE. Analysis revealed that chronological age was the only significant (P = 0.010) predictor for developing a contralateral slip. All girls younger than 10 years and all boys younger than 12 years who presented with unilateral SCFE developed a contralateral slip. Twenty-five percent of girls younger than 12 years and 37% of boys younger than 14 years developed a contralateral slip. No girl older than 13 years and no boy older than 14 years developed a contralateral slip in our series. Surgical complications were infrequent and isolated to the side of the initial SCFE. Chronological age is a predictor for a contralateral slip in patients presenting with a unilateral SCFE. The authors recommend that all girls younger than 10 years and all boys younger than 12 years presenting with unilateral SCFE should undergo strong consideration for prophylactic screw fixation on the contralateral side. In older age groups, prophylactic treatment may be considered on a case-by-case basis.

SEQUENTIAL SLIPPED CAPITAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSES: WHO IS AT RISK FOR A SECOND SLIP?

The purpose of this study was to determine as to which of the children who present to our unit with a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) are most at risk of presenting with a subsequent contralateral SCFE. Between 1988 and 2000, 171 patients presented with unilateral SCFE to our unit, whereas 40 presented with bilateral SCFE. At a minimum of 3 years follow up, 56 of the 171 patients had re-presented with a contralateral SCFE (31%). Age less than 12 years at the time of the first SCFE (odds ratio (OR) = 3.809, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.631-8.891, P < 0.002) and New Zealand European ethnicity (OR = 3.989, 95%CI = 1.824 to 8.720, P < 0.001) were significantly predictive of a second SCFE. Sex (OR = 0.722, 95%CI = 0.326-1.601, P = 0.4) and stability of the first slip (OR = 1.558, 95%CI = 0.582-4.172, P = 0.38) were not significantly associated with an increased probability of a second SCFE.

PROPHYLACTIC PINNING OF THE CONTRALATERAL HIP AFTER UNILATERAL SLIPPED CAPITAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSIS

The management of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine, with use of expected-value decision analysis, the optimal management strategy-prophylactic in situ pinning versus observation-for the contralateral hip. Outcome probabilities were determined from a systematic review of the literature. Utility values were obtained from a questionnaire on patient preferences completed with use of a visual analog scale by twenty-five adolescent male patients without slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A decision tree was constructed, fold-back analysis was performed to determine the optimal treatment, and one and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect on decision-making of varying outcome probabilities and utilities. Observation was the optimal management strategy for the contralateral hip given the outcome probabilities and utilities that we studied (the expected value was 9.5 for observation and 9.2 for prophylactic in situ pinning, with a marginal value of 0.3). Increased rates of a late second slip favored prophylactic in situ pinning (the threshold probability was 27%). Risk-taking patients with a high utility for uncomplicated prophylactic in situ pinning favored prophylaxis (the threshold utility was 9.8). The iatrogenic risks of treating a healthy patient or an uninvolved body part rarely outweigh the potential benefits unless the probability of the adverse event is likely and the consequences of the adverse event are very severe. In this decision analysis, the optimal decision was observation. In cases where the probability of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis exceeds 27% or in cases where reliable follow-up is not feasible, pinning of the contralateral hip is favored. For a given individual patient, the optimal strategy depends not only on probabilities of the various outcomes but also on personal preference. Thus, we advocate a model of doctor-patient shared decision-making in which both the outcome probabilities and the patient preferences are considered in order to optimize the decision-making process. Economic and decision analysis, Level III-1 (limited alternatives and costs; poor estimates). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prophylactic dynamic screw fixation of the asymptomatic hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Prophylactic dynamic screw fixation (DSF) of clinically and radiographically unaffected hips of 34 patients with a contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis and no evidence of an endocrinopathy or systemic disorder was performed using a single cannulated screw. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 years (average, 5.4 years). There was no case of perioperative complication and no avascular necrosis or chondrolysis occurred. No preslip or slip became apparent. In all 34 hips, no tendency toward premature closure of the epiphysis could be observed, no growth disturbance including greater trochanteric overgrowth, coxa brevis, or coxa vara was noted. This study supports the prophylactic treatment of the asymptomatic hip, using a simple and safe fixation method.

Prophylactic Dynamic Screw Fixation of the Asymptomatic Hip in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Summary Prophylactic dynamic screw fixation (DSF) of clinically and radiographically unaffected hips of 34 patients with a contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis and no evidence of an endocrinopathy or systemic disorder was performed using a single cannulated screw. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 years (average, 5.4 years). There was no case of perioperative complication and no avascular necrosis or chondrolysis occurred. No preslip or slip became apparent. In all 34 hips, no tendency toward premature closure of the epiphysis could be observed, no growth disturbance including greater trochanteric overgrowth, coxa brevis, or coxa vara was noted. This study supports the prophylactic treatment of the asymptomatic hip, using a simple and safe fixation method.